HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ADVANCING E-GOVERNMENT
January 19, 2001 Hearing
Room E
3:30 PM Tapes
2 - 3
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jim Hill, Chair
Rep. Kathy Lowe
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Rob Patridge, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Mark Jolley, Committee
Administrator
Alice Morton, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Implementation Overview of SB 622
(1999)
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents, please
refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 2, A |
||
|
010 |
Chair Hill |
Calls committee to order
at 3:35 p.m. |
|
IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW OF SB 622 (1999) |
||
|
015 |
Joan Smith |
Commissioner, Public
Utilities Commission (PUC). Provides PUC implementation update report (EXHIBIT A) on SB 622, a
telecommunications act that requires carriers electing price regulation to
fund telecommunications infrastructure and technology. |
|
155 |
Smith |
Reports that service
quality levels have improved. |
|
195 |
Smith |
Declares the PUC is very
pleased with the outcomes of the bill. |
|
209 |
Smith |
Says PUC project staffing
generally comes from a pool of retired telecommunications workers, and that
position vacancies generally stay open longer than management prefers. |
|
224 |
Sherry Sheng |
Oregon Economic &
Community Development Department (OECDD). Presents OECDD implementation
report (EXHIBIT B) of SB 622.
Includes explanation on the focus of SB 622, on the allocation of funds, and
a summary of activities. |
|
301 |
Sheng |
Continues report on
funding structure. |
|
390 |
Sheng |
Outlines implementation
activities, progress, and describes community and business partner’s
contributions to the process. |
TAPE 3, A |
||
|
010 |
Sheng |
Describes use of
telecommunications infrastructure account funds, including seven projects approved
October 2000. Gives overview of
existing telecommunications infrastructure and the nine proposed projects as
of December 2000. |
|
055 |
Sheng |
Describes Portland
proposal and says staff has reviewed the proposals and that they seem a good
fit to the funding parameters. |
|
111 |
Sheng |
Continues presentation,
describing the main finding of the statewide need assessment conducted by
OECDD. |
|
140 |
Sheng |
Describes next steps for
the project, which includes: serving as a convener for future projects,
reviewing applications, monitoring progress of approved projects, and
increasing knowledge and use of technology. |
|
200 |
Pat McLarney |
Telecommunications Manger,
OECDD. Makes brief remarks regarding technology project implementation
calendar. Says that there are no specific dates identified, but that there is
an 18-month timeframe for the work. Adds that dates will be determined fairly
soon. |
|
213 |
Chair Hill |
Says he will invite OECDD,
the PUC, as well as Qwest back in February for a brief update. Asks Ms. Sheng
what amount of uncommitted dollars they anticipate being left in the fund
after the next go-round. |
|
228 |
Sheng |
Responds they are looking
at obligating most of the money. |
|
235 |
Chair Hill |
Adjourns committee at 4:20
p.m. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Alice Morton, Mark Jolley,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
–Implementation Overview of SB 622 (1999), written testimony, Joan Smith, 2pp.
B
–Implementation Overview of SB 622 (1999), written material, Sherry Sheng,
18pp.