HOUSE COMMITTEE ON ADVANCING E-GOVERNMENT
June 14, 2001 Hearing
Room E
10:00 AM Tape
63-64
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jim Hill, Chair
Rep. Rob Patridge, Vice-Chair
Rep. Kathy Lowe
MEMBER EXCUSED:
STAFF PRESENT: Mark Jolley, Committee
Administrator
Alice Morton, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 479A – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 63, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Hill |
Calls the meeting to order
at 10:05 am and opens a work session on SB 479A. |
SB 479A – Work Session |
||
|
007 |
Mark Jolley |
Committee
Administrator. Gives overview of the
bill |
|
024 |
Tom O’Connor |
Oregon Municipal
Utilities. Says they do not support
the –7 amendments. |
|
039 |
Olive Henry |
Olympia Water board
Details reasons she does not support the –7 amendments. Adds the definitions
do not correspond with the Federal definitions. |
|
064 |
Rep. Patridge |
Points out that a
three-year cost projection is the base line, that it can be longer. |
|
075 |
Chair Hill |
Invites others to come
speak. Notes that AT&T is not
present. |
|
077 |
Ginny Lang |
Lobbyist representing
QWEST. Explains the amendments she
has proposed and the two primary changes they would make to Sec. 105. |
|
103 |
Mike Dewey |
Oregon Cable
Telecommunications Association. Says he want to talk about HB 2680. Says it
almost no longer exists. |
|
210 |
Dewey |
Continues testimony. |
|
228 |
Dave Barenberg |
League of Oregon
Cities. Speaks to the QWEST
amendments. Indicates cities have
serious problems with it. Refers to
the 4% franchise fees. |
|
273 |
Chair Hill |
Clarifies rates and PUC
authority in determining basic rates. |
|
294 |
Barenberg |
Concurs and points out
other changes. |
|
329 |
Beth Vergis-Duncan |
Franchise Coordinator for
the City of Salem. Presents her position. |
|
354 |
Chair Hill |
Responds to her comments
on the franchise fees. |
|
425 |
Barenberg |
Makes additional comments
related to the franchise issue. |
|
435 |
Susan Schneider |
Lobbyist, City of
Portland. Says their pledge to come back next session is not a delaying
technique against change, instead the issues is just so complex they want to
give it appropriate attention. |
TAPE 64A |
||
|
032 |
Bill Penhollow |
Lobbyist, Association of
Oregon Counties. Says they did not receive the –8 amendments, but can comment
on the –5, which has elements of HB 2280.
|
|
059 |
Steve McClure |
Commissioner in an eastern
Oregon community. Says he will talk about delivering telecommunications and
the necessary infrastructure from the rural Oregon perspective. |
|
075 |
Rep. Patridge |
Asks why they are opposed
to the –5and –7. |
|
085 |
Penhollow |
Responds. |
|
100 |
Rep. Patridge |
Says that Mr. Penhollow
still has not answered the question he raised. Asks can you state for the
record, how this takes that tool away. |
|
115 |
Penhollow |
Responds he spoke from his
understanding of Mr. Dewey’s testimony, and, if he misunderstands, sorry. |
|
123 |
Rep. Patridge |
Pursues clarifying their
point. |
|
127 |
McClure |
Responds as an elected
official. |
|
140 |
Rep. Lowe |
Says she is trying to
envision an election of this type. |
|
219 |
Rep. Patridge |
Makes it clear that he is
reading this correctly and stresses that the AOC is objecting because it has
more public process, and they are objecting the public process part of it,
not because of what it would takes from them. |
|
250 |
Penhollow |
Responds that there would
be an additional expense to the public. |
|
270 |
Rep. Patridge |
Again stresses his view
that having public input and debate is important. For the record, he disagrees with them. |
|
300 |
Chair Hill |
Expresses his agreement
with Rep. Patridge comments. |
|
350 |
Penhollow |
Responds. |
|
449 |
Kathy Scapp |
Former Mayor of Ashland,
Oregon. Says she oversaw the Ashland
FiberNetwork. Says she has heard many misrepresentations in the past several
months. |
Tape 62, B |
||
|
100 |
Scapp |
Continues testimony. |
|
140 |
Chair Hill |
Says he does not agree
with her. |
|
145 |
Scapp |
Clarifies her point that
those with money win, and continues her testimony. |
|
187 |
Rep. Patridge |
Asks, given the
controversy around the Ashland FiberNetwork, why didn’t people come out to
meet and show their disagreement. |
|
200 |
Scapp |
Responds that this was an
issue supported by the Ashland Community. |
|
235 |
Rep. King |
Testifies regarding the –3
amendments, (EXHIBIT D) which
basically define telecommunications. |
|
290 |
Doris Penwell |
OECDD. Says they worked with Rep. King on the
amendment and support it. The OECDD currently believes it has the authority
to deal with this, and that the amendment are clarifying language. |
|
315 |
John Power |
Lobbyist representing
AT&T. Says he does not agree with
what Rep. King says would happen and therefore they oppose it. |
|
390 |
Rep. Patridge |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of conceptual amendments. |
|
400 |
Rep. Patridge |
MOTION: Moves to AMEND SB 479A, -5 amendments, on
page 2, in line 6, after "a local government must," insert
"initially". |
|
410 |
Rep. Patridge |
Gives his rationale for
the proposed change. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 2-1 AYE: 2 - Patridge, Hill NAY: 1 - Lowe |
|
440 |
Chair Hill |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
443 |
Rep. Patridge |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 479A, -5 amendments
dated 6/11/01, as conceptually amended on 6/14/01. |
|
024 |
Rep. Lowe |
Says she does not like
this fast approach and feels it could be preferable to give interested
parties more time to work it out. |
|
035 |
Rep. Patridge |
Says for the record he is
voting for the A5 amendments. Asks cities and counties, what are you afraid
of. |
|
045 |
Rep. Lowe |
Says she wants to respond,
says that it is the local flavor of how participation evolves which should be
viewed and respected. |
|
050 |
|
VOTE: 2-1 AYE: 2 - Patridge, Hill NAY: 1 - Lowe |
|
|
Chair Hill |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
065 |
Rep. Patridge |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 479A, -6 amendments dated 6/13/01. |
|
070 |
Rep. Lowe |
Asks for clarification of
the different amendments. |
|
075 |
Chair Hill |
Summarizes the different
amendments. |
|
086 |
Chair Hill |
VOTE: 2-1 AYE: 2 - Patridge, Hill NAY: 1 - Lowe |
|
|
Chair Hill |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
089 |
Rep. Patridge |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT SB 479A, -3 amendments
dated 5/25/01. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 3-0 |
|
106 |
Chair Hill |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
110 |
Rep. Patridge |
MOTION: Moves SB 479A as conceptually amended to
the floor with a DO PASS recommendation, AND to rescind referral to School
Funding and Tax Fairness/Revenue Committee. |
|
125 |
Rep. Lowe |
Says she does not like it. |
|
126 |
Chair Hill |
VOTE: 2-1 AYE: 2 - Patridge, Hill NAY: 1 - Lowe |
|
|
Chair Hill |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
134 |
Rep. Patridge |
Moves the committee
adjourn at 5 p.m. |
|
140 |
Rep. Patridge |
Moves the committee recess
at 11:40 a.m. until 1:00 p.m. today. |
|
145 |
|
The Committee does not reconvene from the recess and adjourns at 5
p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Alice Morton, Mark Jolley,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 479, -5 amendment, staff, 2pp.
B
– SB 479, -6 amendment, staff, 2pp.
C
- SB 479, -3 amendment, staff, 2pp.
D
– SB 479, written comments, Rep. Al King, 1p.