HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LAND USE AND REGULATORY FAIRNESS
May 22, 2001 Hearing
Room 357
3:30 p.m. Tapes
19 - 20
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Kurt Schrader, Vice-Chair
Rep. Chris Beck
Rep. Betsy Close
Rep. Kathy Lowe
Rep. Karen Minnis
Rep. Susan Morgan
STAFF PRESENT: Virginia Gustafson Lucker,
Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: LC 4258 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 19, A |
||
|
004 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Calls the meeting to order
at 4:00 p.m. and opens a hearing on LC 4258. |
LC 4258 PUBLIC HEARING
|
||
|
006 |
Sue Hanna |
Legislative CounselIntroduces LC 4258
relating to compensation for loss of property value resulting from land use
regulation (EXHIBIT A). Gives a sectional analysis of LC 4258. |
|
034 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks if it would be
appropriate to provide the state with a list of qualified appraisers. |
|
047 |
Hanna |
Says that it is a policy
call that the committee can make, but wonders if it might be inappropriate. |
|
056 |
Rep. Beck |
Contends that there are
standards that need to be met. |
|
063 |
Hanna |
Says the committee must be
careful not to take an unconstitutional route in selecting a list of
appraisers. Explains the criteria
would have to be clearly laid out. |
|
115 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Asks if there is any
constitutional problem with developing new appraiser standards for the
purposes of implementation of this act. |
|
125 |
Hanna |
Replies, no. |
|
147 |
Rep. Beck |
Wonders if an extra
certification could be added to an appraiser’s qualifications that would
acknowledge land use laws. |
|
172 |
Hanna |
Says it is doable, but
laborious. |
|
176 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks about out of state
appraisers. |
|
183 |
Hanna |
Replies that this needs
more research. Continues sectional
analysis of LC 4258. Talks about
valuation dates and case law on valuation. |
|
243 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks about fair market
value. |
|
247 |
Hanna |
Discusses competing appraisals
with regard to fair market value. Continues with the sectional analysis of LC
4258. |
|
292 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Asks for clarification of
“corporation” with regard to land ownership. |
|
301 |
Hanna |
Cites ORS 174.100, which
gives general definitions for all statutes. |
|
311 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Asks about the definition
of reinterpretation. |
|
313 |
Hanna |
Replies that a
reinterpretation can be just like adopting a new ordinance. |
|
337 |
Hanna |
Continues sectional
analysis of LC 4258. |
TAPE 20, A |
||
|
014 |
Rep. Lowe |
Discusses the intent of a
landowner with regard to development. |
|
101 |
Rep. Close |
States that she objects to
not having time to review the LC draft and not having the opportunity to
provide input. |
|
144 |
Hanna |
Continues the sectional
analysis. |
|
157 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks about the status of
transitional zones that are a combination of agricultural and forestry zone. |
|
162 |
Hanna |
States that that issue
needs more research. |
|
175 |
Rep. Morgan |
MOTION: Moves LC 4258 BE INTRODUCED as a committee
bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 4-1-2 AYE: 4 – Lowe, Schrader, Morgan, Beck NAY: 1 – Close EXCUSED: 2 – Williams, Minnis |
|
182 |
Vice Chair
Schrader |
The motion
Carries. |
|
189 |
Hanna |
Continues the sectional
analysis. |
|
203 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks why all references
are to cash compensation rather than variances or other tools discussed. |
|
210 |
Hanna |
Replies that this is a
policy decision that was made.
Continues sectional analysis. |
|
232 |
Rep. Morgan |
States that based on prior
testimony a variance is something to be considered. |
|
241 |
Hanna |
Comments that the variance
addressed is to standards, not a variance to use. |
|
276 |
Rep. Morgan |
Says that it would be
helpful to find a way to address a variance to use. |
|
279 |
Rep. Beck |
Agrees. |
|
316 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Calls a recess of the
committee at 4:30 p.m. for a call of the house. |
|
318 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Reconvenes the meeting at
4:45 p.m. |
|
320 |
Rep. Morgan |
Discusses the variance
terminology. |
|
332 |
Hanna |
Replies that it needs to
be very clear in the bill what the intent is. Contends that to deal with variances on a case by case basis
could jeopardize equal protection. |
|
365 |
Rep. Lowe |
Says that the committee
must preserve the ability to fashion a remedy to the particular needs of a
citizen. |
|
395 |
Hanna |
Continues with sectional
analysis. |
|
471 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks about the date she
chose on page 8, line 3. |
|
479 |
Hanna |
Explains how she
determined the date. |
|
TAPE 19, B |
||
|
043 |
Chair Williams |
Responds that the date is
very flexible. |
|
073 |
Hanna |
Continues analysis of
Section 7, 8, and 9. |
|
104 |
Rep. Lowe |
Asks about collections
made by the county that are not received by the state. |
|
111 |
Chair Williams |
Explains county revenue
sharing. |
|
140 |
Hanna |
Continues sectional
analysis. |
|
181 |
Chair Williams |
Recesses the meeting for
another call of the house at 5:15 p.m. |
|
185 |
Chair Williams |
Reconvenes the meeting at
5:30 p.m. |
|
191 |
Hanna |
Continues her analysis of
LC 4258. |
|
211 |
Chair Williams |
Talks about section 12
with regard to the threshold and says that it will need to be rewritten. |
|
243 |
Hanna |
Continues the analysis and
talks about reinterpretation with regard to land use regulations. |
|
293 |
Rep. Morgan |
States her opposition to
the Section 12C reference to the Endangered Species Act. |
|
308 |
Hanna |
Continues the sectional
analysis. |
|
444 |
Chair Williams |
Adjourns the meeting at
6:15 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Jane Bodenweiser, Virginia Gustafson Lucker,
Committee Assistant Counsel
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
- LC 4258 submitted by staff, dated
5/22/01, 12 pp