HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LAND USE AND REGULATORY FAIRNESS
May 24, 2001 Hearing
Room 357
3:30 p.m. Tapes
21 - 22
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Kurt Schrader, Vice-Chair
Rep. Chris Beck
Rep. Betsy Close
Rep. Kathy Lowe
Rep. Karen Minnis
Rep. Susan Morgan
STAFF PRESENT: Virginia Gustafson Lucker,
Counsel
Jane Bodenweiser, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3998 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 21, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Williams |
Opens the meeting at 4:00
p.m. and introduces Paul Warner from Legislative Revenue who will review
revenue options for Measure 7. |
HB 3998 PUBLIC HEARING
|
||
|
020 |
Paul Warner |
Legislative RevenueSubmits testimony and
testifies on revenue options for Measure 7 compensation fund (EXHIBIT A). Introduces three options and says there
are other possibilities. |
|
207 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Asks about the ability to
bond. |
|
209 |
Warner |
Replies that the adequacy
issue in Option B would be a concern. |
|
217 |
Chair Williams |
Asks what his confidence
level is on the two options. |
|
222 |
Warner |
Discusses the differences
in Options A and B. |
|
240 |
Chair Williams |
States that the $200
million amount discussed is a minimal amount needed for bonding. Says that the bonding piece of this
legislation is not mandatory. |
|
271 |
Warner |
Discusses the potential of
a bonding issue. Continues his
discussion of Revenue options. |
|
322 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks how the third option
would be implemented. |
|
326 |
Warner |
Replies that it not yet
clear how it would be implemented. |
|
363 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Asks about the
constitutional issues connected with these options. |
|
365 |
Warner |
Says Options A and B would
require some constitutional resolution and that Option C would not. |
|
405 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks for clarification of
the “exception value.” |
|
422 |
Warner |
Says the net exception
value is the actual increase in value of the improvements and the gross exception
value would be a whole new assessed value on the total property. |
|
460 |
Chair Williams |
Asks if the figures
offered in "Exhibit A" are net or gross. |
|
464 |
Warner |
Replies that they are net
figures. |
|
492 |
Chair Williams |
Asks about Option B and
wonders if there would be some sensitivity to the tax imposed on exception
value. |
TAPE 22, A |
||
|
041 |
Warner |
Says there would be some
sensitivity, but doubts there would be dramatic changes. |
|
069 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks if the revenue
response would be proportionate to the tax response. |
|
074 |
Warner |
Replies, yes. |
|
095 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks about the real estate
transfer tax and wonders why this option has not been considered. |
|
107 |
Warner |
Says that would be another
option, but was not included because it is not triggered by a land development
transaction. |
|
136 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks about the issuance of
bonds. |
|
149 |
Warner |
Advises that the longer
the revenue stream, the better. |
|
193 |
Sue Hanna |
Legislative CounselContinues a sectional
analysis of SB 3998 starting with Section 13. |
|
196 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Asks for a review of
Section 12 on page 6, subsection 2, line 31 relating to property restrictions
that would not be entitled to compensation. |
|
218 |
Counsel Lucker |
Explains that if the
existing regulations were clear and objective, they would not be subject to a
claim. |
|
230 |
Hanna |
Suggests a possible
clearer language. Continues the
sectional analysis. |
|
253 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Asks who gets to make the
determination as to the kind of compensation. |
|
361 |
Chair Williams |
Recesses the meeting for a
call of the House at 4:50 p.m. |
|
367 |
Rep. Minnis |
Reconvenes the meeting at
5:00 p.m. |
|
369 |
Hanna |
Continues sectional
analysis of HB 3998. |
TAPE 21, B |
||
|
068 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Asks about the appointment
of a Compensation and Conservation Ombudsman in Section 29. |
|
070 |
Hanna |
Replies that they are
mediators/negotiators. Continues
sectional analysis. |
|
098 |
Rep. Beck |
Asks about the $5 million
allocated in Section 32, line 39. |
|
103 |
Hanna |
Replies that it would be
to implement the provisions of the whole act. |
|
150 |
Vice Chair Schrader |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 398 and adjourns the meeting at 5:15 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Jane Bodenweiser, Virginia Gustafson Lucker,
Committee Assistant Counsel
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3998, written testimony submitted by Paul Warner, 6 pp