HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION & SPECIES
RECOVERY
January 10, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 PM Tapes 1 - 2
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Tim Knopp
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
ISSUES HEARD: Organizational Meeting
Adoption of Committee Rules
Introduction of Committee Members and
Staff
Informational Meeting
Invited
Testimony - Oregon Plan Overview
Governor’s Natural Resources Office
Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 1, A |
|
|
|
004 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls meeting to order at 1:05 p.m. |
|
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING – ADOPTION OF COMMITTEE
RULES |
||
|
009 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT the proposed Committee Rules dated 01/10/01
(EXHIBIT A). |
|
022 |
Ramona Kenady |
Chief Clerk, Oregon House
of Representatives. States the House
of Representative has adopted the consent calendar into rule. Explains the procedure. |
|
073 |
Rep. King |
Clarifies that it takes
four members to remove something from the consent calendar. |
|
|
Rep. Kruse |
Asks if the four members
who are objecting can write one note. |
|
|
Kenady |
Answers that separate
notes or one note with four signatures are acceptable. |
|
|
Rep. King |
Clarifies that a minority
report has to be filed by 5:00 p.m. the same day as the committee meeting. |
|
088 |
Chair Jenson |
Responds that is correct. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 8- 0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote AYE EXCUSED: 1 – Knopp |
|
100 |
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
INTRODUCTIONS |
||
|
115 |
Rep. Patti Smith |
District 56. States her background is in agriculture
and timber. |
|
120 |
Rep. Al King |
District 44. |
|
125 |
Rep. Jeff Kruse |
District 45. States he has
been involved with the salmon issue since 1995. |
|
130 |
Rep. Randy Leonard |
District 21. States he is interested in the hazardous
waste deposits and sewer overflow issues. |
|
142 |
Rep. Jan Lee |
District 10. States her background is in water, fish,
and agriculture issues. |
|
150 |
Rep. Carolyn Tomei |
District 25. States her interest is in protecting the
Willamette River and other waterways. |
|
157 |
Rep. Kelley Wirth |
District 35. States her
background is in planning and her interest is in the Willamette River and
species recovery. |
|
164 |
Chair Jenson |
District 57. States the
importance of water in eastern Oregon.
Proclaims the goal of institutionalizing the Oregon Plan. Closes the organization meeting and opens
informational meeting. |
INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
OREGON PLAN OVERVIEW |
||
|
276 |
Louise Solliday |
Governor’s Assistant,
Governor’s Natural Resources Office (GNRO).
Submits (EXHIBT B). Provides an overview on the oversight
groups, state agencies, local groups, outreach teams, and monitoring teams
that are involved in the Oregon Plan. |
TAPE 2, A |
|
|
|
023 |
Roy Hemmingway |
Governor’s Policy Advisor
for Salmon and Energy, GNRO. Overhead
presentation outlining the Oregon Plan, (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
|
|
·
SB 924 (1997) ·
HB 3225 (1999) ·
Measure 66 (1998) ·
4(d) rules, effective January 9, 2001 ·
Agency actions and local actions ·
Watershed Councils and Soil and Water Conservation Districts ·
Forest industry ·
Independent Multidisciplinary Science Team (IMST) ·
Outreach teams |
|
399 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that Soil and
Water Districts are locally elected bodies that have statutory oversight over
some state natural resource agencies and have Memorandums of Agreement, (MOA)
that give them access to most federal resource agencies. Questions does National Marine Fisheries
Service, (NMFS) differentiate between hatchery salmon and wild salmon. |
|
TAPE 1, B |
||
|
022 |
Hemmingway |
Affirmative. Points out that NMFS does not regard a
hatchery raised fish as a listed fish. |
|
025 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks if NMFS has a wild
fish policy. |
|
026 |
Hemmingway |
Answers not that he is
aware of. |
|
039 |
Rep. Leonard |
Comments on the definition
of a hatchery fish and a wild fish. |
|
088 |
Solliday |
Notes there are three
classifications of these fish and suggests that IMST discuss the issue with them. |
|
098 |
Rep. Leonard |
Asks if a large run of
hatchery fish is considered recovery. |
|
103 |
Hemmingway |
Answers the conditions
vary in each watershed so the fish evolve to meet those conditions. |
|
120 |
Rep. Leonard |
Asks why are those stocks
distinct from the native fish. |
|
130 |
Hemmingway |
Answers the fish evolve to
succeed in the hatchery. |
|
180 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the informational
meeting and re-opens the organizational meeting to introduce committee
staff. Reopens informational meeting. |
OREGON WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT BOARD (OWEB) |
||
|
200 |
Geoff Huntington |
Executive Director,
OWEB. Submits (EXHIBIT D). |
|
220 |
Ken Bierly |
Deputy Director, OWEB.
Presents an overview of (EXHIBIT D). ·
History of how the Governor’s Watershed Enhancement Board, (GWEB)
evolved into the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board, (OWEB). |
|
372 |
Bierly |
·
Background on how the watershed councils were formulated. |
|
395 |
Chair Jenson |
Requests description of
how the OWEB funds are used. |
TAPE 2, B |
|
|
|
|
Bierly |
Answers the funds are used
toward the salary and benefits of the coordinator, assessment work,
monitoring, and on the ground projects. |
|
006 |
Bierly |
Notes the map of watershed
councils, page six (EXHIBIT C). |
|
040 |
Huntington |
States he views the Soil
and Water Districts, and Watershed Councils as partners. Discusses funding sources. |
|
068 |
Rep. King |
Comments that the Soil and
Water Conservation Districts fund some of the Watershed Councils. |
|
077 |
Huntington |
Concurs. Continues testimony on the grant cycles. |
|
118 |
Huntington |
Discusses the membership
of OWEB and current activities. |
|
143 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks what is the link
between IMST and OWEB. |
|
156 |
Huntington |
Explains that per HB 3225,
OWEB is responsible for managing an investment fund that is primary for
research activity. The IMST will be
releasing a report on the research activities that would be the most
useful. The role of OWEB is to
prioritize these activities. |
|
186 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks if IMST evaluates the
grant applications. |
|
194 |
Huntington |
Answers that there is a
process where IMST assists in drafting the proposals. |
|
203 |
Rep. Jenson |
Notes that the IMST is
probably devoting more than 30 percent of their time. Expresses a concern
about overloading the team. |
|
233 |
Huntington |
Answers the goal is to
compliment the IMST and not increase their workload. |
|
240 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments that the IMST is
a critical component of the Oregon Plan. |
|
250 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks how many people from
other agencies are involved in the Oregon Plan. |
|
|
Huntington |
Answers he does not have
that information. |
|
293 |
Rep. Kruse |
Notes that he would like
to see the true investment in salmon recovery. |
|
330 |
Chair Jenson |
Concurs there may be
hidden costs. Adjourns the meeting at
2:45 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A. Committee rules, 01/10/01, staff, 2 pp.
B. The Oregon Plan overview, printed materials,
Louise Solliday, 100 pp.
C. The Oregon Plan overview, written
materials, Roy Hemmingway, 13 pp.
D. The Oregon Plan overview, written
testimony, Geoffrey Huntington, 11 pp.