HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION & SPECIES
RECOVERY
January 17, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 P.M. Tapes
8 - 9
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Al King
MEMBER VISITING: Rep. Wayne Krieger
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Shannon Relaford, Committee Assistant
ISSUES HEARD: Introduction of Committee
Bills
Oregon
Plan Overview:
League of Oregon Cities
Willamette Restoration Initiative (WRI)
Greater Salem Area Watershed Council
Association of Oregon Counties (AOC)
Soil & Water Conservation Districts
These minutes are in compliance
with Senate and House Rules. Only
text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the
tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 8, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls meeting to order at
1:06 p.m. Opens work session. |
INTRODUCTION OF COMMITTEE BILLS
|
||
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Explains how the proposed
bill provides an avenue for appeal. (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
042 |
Rep Lee |
MOTION: Moves to AMEND LC 64
on page 1, line 8, delete “person” and insert “applicant.” |
|
048 |
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no
objection declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
053 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves LC 64 as amended BE INTRODUCED as a committee bill. |
|
064 |
|
VOTE: 8-0 AYE: 8 - Knopp,
Kruse, Lee, Leonard, Smith P, Tomei, Wirth, Jenson EXCUSED: 1 – King |
|
074 |
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
077 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes work session and
opens informational meeting. |
|
OREGON PLAN OVERVIEW |
||
|
080 |
Willie Tiffany |
League of Oregon Cities
(LOC). Refers to (EXHIBIT B),
provides overview. |
|
125 |
Tiffany |
Refers to page four of (EXHIBIT B). |
|
219 |
Tiffany |
Clarifies the term “take”. |
|
224 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions what is meant by
Municipal, Residential, Commercial and Industrial (MRCI) limits. |
|
226 |
Tiffany |
Explains that under the
4(d) ruling, if an entity follows a certain procedure or submits a plan that
meets specific standards NMFS applies an exception status. States the limits
address municipal and industrial development in urban areas. |
|
284 |
Chair Jenson |
States a limit equals
exemption. |
|
286 |
Rep. Lee |
States Clackamas County
has filed for such an exemption. |
|
287 |
Rep. Kruse |
States the Oregon Plan is
suppose to be inclusive. Expresses concern about NMFS and Metro creating
separate deals outside the plan. |
|
292 |
Tiffany |
Explains that all
communities have liability under the Endangered Species Act. |
|
321 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that the State of
Oregon did not clarify that anybody operating in good faith under the Oregon
Plan will be under the protection of the state against any federal action. |
|
338 |
Chair Jenson |
States for the record that
it will be part of this committee’s agenda to work toward that end. |
|
340 |
Rep. Tomei |
Refers to page five, (EXHIBIT B) and questions how are
urban areas without sewers addressed.
|
|
343 |
Tiffany |
Responds that
municipalities are required to file comprehensive plans to entail these
issues. |
|
378 |
Rep. Tomei |
Clarifies the reference is
to urban areas not located in cities. |
|
381 |
Tiffany |
Explains that county
government serves unincorporated areas. |
|
412 |
Tiffany |
Continues with
presentation. |
|
434 |
Rep. Kruse |
Questions how cities
comply with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) or the Clean Water Act. |
|
435 |
Tiffany |
Explains for cities that
discharge into streams, the regulatory impact of the Clean Water Act is
immediate but there is a process to follow. In regard to the ESA, the fear
for municipalities is there are many uncertainties. |
|
462 |
Chair Jenson |
Inquires how would LOC
assess the Oregon Plan. |
|
465 |
Tiffany |
Responds the Oregon Plan
has been successful, through OWEB and other grant sources, with involving
private landowners in watershed enhancement issues. |
|
TAPE 9, A |
||
|
049 |
Chair Jenson |
Inquires, in relation to
regulations, if LOC believes the Oregon Plan has been beneficial. |
|
058 |
Tiffany |
Responds affirmatively but
notes that the Oregon Plan does not relieve liabilities under federal law and
compliance is foremost. Notes the Oregon Plan would be more effective if
coordinated with the regulatory structure. |
|
068 |
Rep. Krieger |
Questions at what point
will there be recovery. |
|
076 |
Tiffany |
Responds that in general,
municipalities are struggling with these issues one on one with NMFS. |
|
086 |
Rick Bastasch |
Executive Director,
Willamette Restoration Initiative (WRI).
Submits (EXHIBIT C) and
reviews. |
|
164 |
Bastasch |
Refers to the recommended
actions on page two, (EXHIBIT C). |
|
273 |
Rep. Leonard |
Notes that Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the City of Portland are represented on the
WRI board of directors and questions if sewage issues are being discussed. |
|
306 |
Bastasch |
Responds the board has
been informed of the Combined Sewage Overflow (CSO) requirement and requested
to review this issue at the February 21st meeting. |
|
336 |
Rep. Leonard |
Notes that smaller cities
have been ordered by DEQ to reduce their sewage output by as much as 99.6%,
however, the City of Portland has to reduce by only 85%. |
|
364 |
Rep. Kruse |
Questions if there are
further details on the strategies. |
|
367 |
Bastasch |
Responds yes there will
be. |
|
383 |
Rep. Kreger |
Questions what in ODFW’s
wild fish policy would allow achievement of item III on page two, (EXHIBIT C). |
|
407 |
Bastasch |
Responds the proposal is
that the policies be peer reviewed and founded on the best available science. |
|
|
||
|
426 |
Lisa Hemaseth |
Watershed Council
Coordinator, Greater Salem Area Watershed Council. Reviews the four essential
elements of the Oregon Plan and states that watershed councils play a major
role in community based actions. |
|
071 |
Council Members |
Wendy Krueger, Pringle
Creek Watershed Council; Liz Frances, professional landscape designer; Mark
Whiprect, Friends of Mill Creek; Jim Castle, Glen Gibson Creek Watershed
Council; provide insight on the reasons why they are personally involved in
watershed councils. |
|
170 |
Rep. Krieger |
Comments in support of
watershed council members. |
|
177 |
Rep. Smith |
Comments in support of
watershed council members. |
|
|
||
|
182 |
Patricia Gainsforth |
Past President, Oregon
Association of Conservation Districts, (OACD). Provides historical background
of Soil and Water Conservation Districts. |
|
281 |
Mike Barlow |
Past President, OACD.
Relates concerns relating to the Oregon Plan. |
|
348 |
Johnny Sundstrom |
Siuslaw Soil and Water
Conservation District, 2nd Vice President. Submits (EXHIBIT D). Offers suggestions for
the Oregon Plan: ·
Technical assistance ·
Financial management ·
Outreach and education ·
Allocation of resources |
TAPE 9, B |
||
|
054 |
Rep. Lee |
Refers to SB 443, the
institutionalization of the Oregon Plan. |
|
072 |
Barlow |
Relates personal
observations. |
|
|
||
|
158 |
Tim Josi |
Tillamook County
Commissioner, Association of Oregon Counties (AOC) leadership team member.
States that the Soil and Water Conservation Districts play an important role
because they have the landowners trust. Submits (EXHIBIT E) and reviews. |
|
250 |
Josi |
Discusses the AOC
contributions to the Oregon Plan. |
|
287 |
Josi |
Concludes testimony with
requests from the 36 counties: ·
Enhance county participation; ·
Move decision making to the local level; ·
Encourage sound scientific site-specific outcome based management;
and ·
Prevent unfunded mandates on the counties. |
|
322 |
Josi |
Continues requests, ·
Support efforts to gain state and private funding for projects; and ·
Assist the state in gaining federal grant funds. |
|
350 |
Josi |
States support of the
outcome based collaborative approach of the Oregon Plan. Suggests that
watershed council coordinators be provided with training. |
|
400 |
Chair Jenson |
Adjourns meeting at 4:30 p.m. |
Transcribed By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– LC Draft 64 3/21/00, staff, 3 pp.
B
– Oregon Plan Overview, written testimony, Willie Tiffany, 11 pp.
C
– Oregon Plan Overview, written testimony, Rick Bastasch, 4 pp.
D
– Oregon Plan Overview, written material, Johnny Sundstrom, 15 pp.
E
– Oregon Plan Overview, written testimony, Tim Josi, 2 pp.