HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION
& SPECIES RECOVERY
February 07, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 P.M. Tapes 26 - 27
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD:
Informational Meeting
Coastal Salmon Restoration & Production
Task Force
Public Hearing – HB
2536
Informational Meeting
Wild & Hatchery Fish Discussion
Oregon State University Extension
Service
Fishhawk Fisheries, Astoria
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish
Commission
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 26, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls meeting to order at
1:05 p.m and opens informational meeting. |
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
COASTAL SALMON RESTORATION & PRODUCTION TASK FORCE
|
||
|
035 |
Paul Heikkila |
Chairman, Coastal
Production and Restoration Task Force. Introduces panel. |
|
046 |
Sen. Joan Dukes |
Senate District 1. Reviews
the task force membership. Explains the task force’s goals and future plans.
Discusses differences between hatchery and wild fish. |
|
150 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if Sen. Dukes’s
group would be opposed to House amendments expanding the program. |
|
165 |
Sen. Dukes |
Answers no, supports the
need for continued funding. |
|
172 |
Rep. King |
Comments on wild fish
supplementation. Requests a definition for wild fish and clarification
regarding hatchery facilities. |
|
202 |
Sen. Dukes |
Defines wild fish.
Describes the projects and their goals. |
|
234 |
Heikkila |
Provides further
clarification about hatcheries. |
|
273 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions the genetic
composition relating to the mating of wild and hatchery fish. |
|
279 |
Heikkila |
Answers that if the stocks
are geographically close to the wild population, the impacts are minimal.
Notes that there is weakening if stocks are different from the wild
population. Further explains how hatchery fish relate to wild fish. |
|
318 |
Onno Husing |
Director, Oregon Coastal
Zone Management Association. Submits and summarizes testimony (EXHIBIT A). Comments that conducting
DNA tests on the fish scales will provide answers. Discusses merits of the
DNA tests. Explains the dynamics of fish populations. |
|
416 |
Sen. Dukes |
Comments on the selection
process. |
TAPE 27, A |
||
|
031 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks about the white paper
draft and when it will be finalized. States that Oregon Department of Fish
& Wildlife (ODFW) has a companion piece to it. |
|
037 |
Sen. Dukes |
Notes that the task force
adopted it pending some changes. |
|
045 |
Husing |
Further clarifies that the
report is essentially complete and is being re-sent to the task force members
for a final input. Explains how the projects came to be. |
|
063 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes informational
meeting and opens public hearing on HB 2536. |
HB 2536 – PUBLIC HEARING
|
||
|
061 |
Sandy Thiele-Cirka |
Committee Administrator.
Summarizes HB 2536. |
|
095 |
Geoff Huntington |
Executive Director, Oregon
Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). Submits and summarizes testimony (EXHIBIT B). |
|
164 |
Huntington |
Comments that what the
bill is requesting is currently being done. |
|
170 |
Rep. Lee |
Questions how the cost
sharing occurs with on the ground practices. |
|
176 |
Huntington |
Responds there is a match
requirement for projects that are not on the ground. Provides explanation. |
|
190 |
Rep. Lee |
Questions if OWEB and the
Soil and Water Conservation Commission engage in cost-sharing programs and
how it differs from the program being requested in HB 2536. |
|
193 |
Huntington |
Responds that OWEB is
developing a rules advisory committee to address and focus on small identifiable projects. |
|
231 |
Rep. Kruse |
Discusses the concern with
state funds being allocated to state agencies. Addresses the removal of
legislative overview from the grant-funding process. |
|
300 |
Rep. King |
Comments that outside
insight provides good direction for dealing with this process. |
|
311 |
Rep. Kruse |
Notes that micro managing
is a potential problem the legislature faces. |
|
325 |
Rep. Lee |
Comments in support of the
oversight from the point of view that the need is being met. |
|
337 |
Huntington |
Comments in agreement and
offers support in the process. |
|
371 |
Glen Stonebrink |
Representing the Oregon
Cattlemen’s Association. States that his comments are on a personal level.
Testifies in support and explains benefits of the program. |
TAPE 26, B |
||
|
024 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 2536 and re-opens informational meeting. |
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
|
||
|
034 |
Jim Bergeron |
Marine/Sea Grant Extension
Faculty. Introduces Steve Fick. |
|
041 |
Steve Fick |
Owner, Fishhawk Fisheries.
Explains that evidence indicates that there are conflicts between wild and
hatchery fish. Argues for a strong strategic plan that does not encumber the
hatchery system. |
|
080 |
Fick |
Continues discussing
Oregon’s environmental issues which have resulted in diminished wild fish
runs. |
|
101 |
Fick |
Reviews hatchery
production in Alaska. Notes that the hatchery fish are separated from the
wild fish. |
|
120 |
Rep. Tomei |
Requests clarification
relating to harvesting and wild fish. |
|
128 |
Fick |
Explains that he was
proposing that streams that currently sustain fish should be addressed before
those streams that are suitable for fish populations to survive. |
|
132 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks how it would impede
hatchery fish. |
|
134 |
Bergeron |
Answers that in streams
where there are no wild Coho, the watershed council is interested in the
re-establishment and the salmon project. |
|
157 |
Fick |
Comments that technology
has been developed to be more selective of hatchery fish. Cites example of
the development of a new fishing net which lowers fish mortality rates. |
|
175 |
John Platt |
Special Assistant to
Executive Director, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. Discusses
treaties between Native Americans and the United States regarding salmon. |
|
201 |
Chris Beasley |
Conservation Geneticist,
Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. Presents power-point
presentation relating to tribal fish policies (EXHIBIT C). |
|
245 |
Rep. King |
Asks for explanation of
outplanting. |
|
247 |
Beasley |
Provides explanation of
outplanting. Continues presentation. |
|
270 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if evolutionary
significant unit (ESU) is used on the East Coast. |
|
272 |
Beasley |
Responds not to his
knowledge. Continues presentation. |
|
309 |
Beasley |
Discusses common
assumptions that relate to fish populations and role of the environment. |
|
369 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments that often salmon
mortality is thought to be related to the fish themselves when there are
often environmental factors that play a significant role. |
|
380 |
Beasley |
Concurs. Explains further.
Continues presentation. Comments that natural mortality is random. |
TAPE 27, B |
||
|
003 |
Rep. Kruse |
Asks if Mr. Beasley would
assume that predation on juvenile salmon is random. |
|
006 |
Beasley |
Responds affirmatively.
Continues presentation. Reviews the probability of differentiating between
wild and hatchery fish. Comments on the need for hatchery fish. |
|
125 |
Beasley |
Discusses how salmon
contribute to the ecosystem. |
|
157 |
Beasley |
Concludes with the Tribal
proposal. |
|
191 |
Cathryn Brigham |
Member of the Umatilla
Board of Trustees. Discusses economic and political aspects of salmon
restoration. Comments on existing treaties |
|
224 |
Platt |
Comments on the power
crisis and the economic impact. |
|
257 |
Brigham |
Discusses the success of
salmon restoration on the Umatilla River. |
|
287 |
Chair Jenson |
Further elaborates on the
success of the Umatilla. |
|
306 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks Mr. Beasley why
hatchery fish are successful in the Umatilla. |
|
318 |
Beasley |
Responds that it is a
result of the current hatchery practices. |
|
331 |
Brigham |
Offers further explanation
of fish practices. |
|
363 |
Chair Jenson |
Notes that efforts of the
Umatilla Tribe on the Umatilla River have extended into the Walla Walla
River. |
|
388 |
Beasley |
Concurs. Provides closing
comments. |
|
394 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes informational
meeting and adjourns the meeting at 3:04 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
Transcribed by,
Michael Reiley
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Coastal Salmon Restoration & Production Task Force, white paper, Onno
Husing,
33 pp
B
–HB 2536, written testimony Geoff Huntington, 10 pp
C
– Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, written testimony/power-point,
Chris Beasley, 57 pp