HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION
& SPECIES RECOVERY
March 05, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 P.M. Tapes
50 - 51
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
Informational Meeting
The Impact of the 4(d) Rules on Oregon Land
Use
Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 2224
HB 2862
Work Session
HB 2163
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 50, A |
||
|
004 |
Vice-Chair Lee |
Calls the meeting to order
at 1:01 p.m. as a subcommittee and opens the informational meeting. |
INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
008 |
Harland Levy |
Government Affairs, Oregon
Association of Realtors. Submits (EXHIBIT
A) and reviews the outline. |
|
100 |
Levy |
Continues testimony,
refers to page five, article regarding the Clackamas County bridge project. |
|
110 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions the bridge
construction time line. |
|
115 |
Levy |
States it was
approximately eight to ten months. |
|
125 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments that there is
confusion about the authorizations that were issued and the outcomes. |
|
132 |
Levy |
Clarifies that National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) gave approval for one type of construction
and the county engaged in another. |
|
167 |
Levy |
Continues testimony,
explains section seven and nine. |
|
201 |
Levy |
Continues explanation of
section 11. |
|
286 |
Levy |
Notes the territory
included in the 4(d) rule. |
|
331 |
Levy |
Provides clarification and
explanation regarding Evolutionary Significant Units (ESU). |
|
403 |
Levy |
Discusses take and refers
to page eight of the citizen’s guide. |
TAPE 51, A
|
||
|
008 |
Levy |
Continues presentation,
refers to page 14 of the citizen’s guide. |
|
072 |
Levy |
Continues overview of the
citizen’s guide. |
|
121 |
Levy |
Addresses local government
liabilities. |
|
154 |
Rep. Leonard |
Comments that unregulated
activities have resulted in superfund sites. |
|
211 |
Rep. Smith |
Questions if under the
4(d) rules a county is liable for developing bicycle paths next to riparian
zones. |
|
217 |
Levy |
Answers affirmatively. |
|
223 |
Rep. Smith |
Notes an example of a
bicycle path that was built within the designated stream buffer zone. |
|
231 |
Rep. Lee |
Notes that if a stream
contains endangered species, constructing a bicycle path is illegal. |
|
240 |
Levy |
Explains the permit
process and the impact on developers. |
|
257 |
Rep. Lee |
Questions if counties and
other local governments provide notice when issuing permits to limit
liabilities. |
|
262 |
Levy |
Responds that he does not
have that information. |
|
291 |
Chair Jenson |
Convenes as a full
committee and opens the public hearing on HB 2224. |
HB 2224 – PUBLIC HEARING
|
||
|
302 |
Sandy Thiele-Cirka |
Administrator. Summarizes
HB 2224. |
|
310 |
Roy Elicker |
Legislative Coordinator,
Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW). Reads prepared testimony in
support of HB 2224, (EXHIBIT B). |
|
324 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions when the law was
enacted. |
|
329 |
Elicker |
Responds 1973. |
|
351 |
Rep. Lee |
Questions how many
preserves would be developed. |
|
358 |
Elicker |
Responds that currently
there are 59 shooting preserves registered in western Oregon but he does not
know how many could be added. |
|
378 |
Chair Jenson |
Expresses concern that
land may be purchased in eastern Oregon for a game preserve which would take
that land out of production. |
|
396 |
Elicker |
Notes that hunting issues
have been a concern but he is not aware of agricultural conflicts. |
|
412 |
Chair Jenson |
Notes there seems to be an
increase in acreage owned by individuals for private hunting preserves. |
|
465 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 2224 and opens the work session on HB 2224. |
TAPE 50, B |
||
HB 2224 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
037 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves HB 2224 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-2 |
|
|
|
AYE: In a roll call vote, all members
present vote Aye. |
|
|
|
EXCUSED: 2 - Knopp, Tomei |
|
048 |
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. REP. MORGAN
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
074 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 2224 and opens the public hearing on HB 2862. |
HB 2862 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
077 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 2862. |
|
085 |
Terry Thompson |
Representing the
Fisherman’s Market Association and testifies in support of HB 2862. |
|
106 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions how long the buy
back program has been discussed. |
|
108 |
Thompson |
Answers that the concept
began four years ago as caps on the ground fish started to reduce. Explains
the funding. |
|
121 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if there are
other bills that prevent new permits being issued to license new boats. |
|
124 |
Thompson |
Answers affirmatively.
Explains that the bill would reduce the number of boats and the permit
lottery would not rebuild the fleet numbers. |
|
140 |
Chair Jenson |
Notes that the sponsors of
the bill represent the Oregon coast. |
|
147 |
Thompson |
States this bill will
affect all commercial fisheries on the coast and notes that that similar
bills are proposed in Washington and California. |
|
154 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions the status of
those bills. |
|
155 |
Thompson |
Responds that the bills
have not moved as far as HB 2862 in Oregon. Comments that Washington’s bill
is still in draft form and he is unsure of what progress California has made. |
|
157 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions the consequences
if Oregon passes HB 2862 and the other states do not pass similar bills. |
|
158 |
Thompson |
Responds that ideally all
the money would flow into Oregon. |
|
162 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if Oregon would
be negatively impacted if the other states did not pass similar legislation. |
|
156 |
Thompson |
Notes that the bulk of the
ground fish fishery is in Oregon. |
|
165 |
Elicker |
Legislative Coordinator,
ODFW. Testifies in support of HB 2862. |
|
192 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 2862 and opens the work session on HB 2862. |
HB 2862 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
194 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves HB 2862 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-2 |
|
|
|
AYE: In a roll call vote, all members
present vote Aye. |
|
|
|
EXCUSED: 2 - Knopp, Tomei |
|
206 |
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
209 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 2862 and opens the work session on HB 2163. |
HB 2163 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
211 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 2163 and the
–1 amendments dated 2/16/01 (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
245 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2163-1 amendments dated
2/16/01. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-2 |
|
|
|
AYE: In a roll call vote, all members
present vote Aye. |
|
|
|
EXCUSED: 2 - Knopp, Leonard |
|
263 |
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
265 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves HB 2163 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
270 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks if an analysis has
been completed. Refers to (EXHIBIT D) submitted
by Mary Scurlock. |
|
285 |
Ray Wilkeson |
Oregon Forest Industries
Council. States that HB 2163 is a recommendation from the Forest Practices
Advisory Committee. Clarifies and explains the purpose of the advisory
committee. |
|
308 |
Rep. Lee |
Questions if the governor’s
office was aware of the outcome of the committee. |
|
307 |
Wilkeson |
Responds affirmatively.
Notes that the governor participated in the committee process. |
|
320 |
Chair Jenson |
References Mr. Wilkeson’s
previous testimony that HB 2163 was an illustration of the Oregon Plan at
work. Asks for elaboration. |
|
325 |
Wilkeson |
Describes the relationship
between HB 2163 and the Oregon Plan. |
|
340 |
Chair Jenson |
Explains that Rep. Morgan
had concerns about HB 2163 and small woodland owners. States that she
contacted the landowners and they found the legislation acceptable. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 7-0-2 |
|
|
|
AYE: In a roll call vote, all members
present vote Aye. |
|
|
|
EXCUSED: 2 - Knopp, Leonard |
|
364 |
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. REP. KING
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
376 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes work session on HB
2163 and adjourns the meeting at 2:45 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
Transcribed By,
Michael Reiley,
Committee Assistant
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Overview of the Endangered Species Act and Citizen’s Guide, Harlan E. Levy,
38 pp.
B
– HB 2224, written testimony, Roy Elicker, 1 p.
C
– HB 2163, -1 amendments, staff, 3 pp.
D
– HB 2163, written information, Mary Scurlock, 2 pp.