HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION
& SPECIES RECOVERY
May 14, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 P.M. Tapes 121 - 122
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Rep. Bob Jenson,
Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard, Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
VISTING MEMBER: Rep. Dingfelder
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD:
HB 3981 – Public
Hearing
HB 3564 – Work Session
HB 3637 – Work
Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
|
|
Tape 121, A |
|
|||
|
006 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls the meeting to order
at 1:45 p.m. as a subcommittee and opens the public hearing on HB 3981. |
|
|
HB 3981 – PUBLIC HEARING
|
|
|||
|
010 |
Ray Craig |
Assistant State Forester,
Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF). States that the ODF is the largest
landowner affected by the state Endangered Species Act (ESA). Expresses
concerns with HB 3981 –1 amendments, (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
|
|
047 |
Chair Jenson |
Opens as a full committee. |
|
|
|
052 |
Rep. Jeff Kropf |
House District 37. States
that HB 3981 balances the needs of the ESA and the needs of the people. Discusses the Klamath Falls situation. |
|
|
|
103 |
Rep. Kropf |
Explains the Economic and
Social Impact Analysis Team and the Emergency Listing Committee. |
|
|
|
145 |
Chair Jenson |
Notes that the Oregon ESA
does not have provisions for exceptions or incidental take. |
|
|
|
152 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds that listed
species that are endangered need to be considered in their entire range. |
|
|
|
188 |
Rep. Smith |
Questions is there one
commissioner being appointed by the Speaker or the Governor. |
|
|
|
208 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds that in the
emergency listing committee, the Governor would appoint one county
commissioner. |
|
|
|
208 |
Rep. King |
Questions if the bill
provides staffing. |
|
|
|
209 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds not in the
current form. |
|
|
|
210 |
Rep. Lee |
Requests clarification and
an example of infrastructure. |
|
|
|
212 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds infrastructure is
actual structures that may need to be addressed. |
|
|
|
233 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions if the
determination of a species as threatened impact the language. |
|
|
|
245 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds that the intent
is to have verifiable peer reviewed science. |
|
|
|
275 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions what takes
precedence when the science supports listing a species but the economic and
social impact analysis does not support the listing of the species. |
|
|
|
280 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds decision-making
criteria would need to be developed. |
|
|
|
288 |
Rep. Leonard |
Comments on the opinion of
people being superior to animals. |
|
|
|
316 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds the objective is
create a balance. |
|
|
|
350 |
Rep. Kruse |
Interprets that this
opinion relates to real impacts on people compared to speculative impacts on
the environment that can not be proven. |
|
|
|
400 |
Rep. Kropf |
Concurs and elaborates on
the intention. |
|
|
Tape 122, A |
|
|||
|
004 |
Chair Jenson |
States that the Governor
made the comment that the ESA needs to consider people and this is the
original intention, to include people into the equation. |
|
|
|
043 |
Roy Hemmingway |
Governor’s Natural
Resource Office. Explains concern about mixing legislative and executive
functions in the appointment process.
|
|
|
|
109 |
Hemmingway |
Clarifies that Oregon’s
ESA applies only to state lands whereas the federal ESA applies to private
lands. |
|
|
|
168 |
Rep. Lee |
Questions if the
Governor’s office has a position relating to the safe harbor program. |
|
|
|
164 |
Hemmingway |
Responds a basic
philosophy is to find ways for landowners to find accommodations rather than
enforcement. |
|
|
|
177 |
Glen Stonebrink |
Representing Oregon
Cattlemen’s Association. Testifies in support of HB 3981-1 amendments.
Discusses balancing science, National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA),
and the economic impact. |
|
|
|
208 |
Roy Elicker |
Legislative Coordinator,
Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW). Discusses the workload, emergency timeframe, and safe harbor.
Notes that the Lost River sucker and Short Nose sucker have been on the
state’s ESA since 1987. |
|
|
|
247 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments on the impact to
state owned lands. |
|
|
|
265 |
Rep. Kruse |
Questions if upland
activities impact waters of the state, does the state have the ability to go
on private lands to mitigate impact. |
|
|
|
292 |
Elicker |
Responds he does not
believe there has been an analysis done in that regard. |
|
|
|
289 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions if other states
rely on information other than verifiable and documented science. |
|
|
|
320 |
Martin Nugent |
ODFW. Responds the
scientific data drives the process. |
|
|
|
330 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Questions how is beyond
recovery determined. |
|
|
|
368 |
Chair Jenson |
Responds by a biological
assessment of the species. |
|
|
|
354 |
Elicker |
Responds the commission
would probably further define this. |
|
|
|
390 |
Chair Jenson |
Notes the fiscal impact in
the Klamath issue. |
|
|
Tape 121, B |
|
|||
|
023 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 3981 and opens the work session on HB 3564. |
|
|
HB 3564 – WORK SESSION |
|
|||
|
039 |
Ray Craig |
ODF. Submits and reviews (EXHIBIT C). |
|
|
|
090 |
Tom Imeson |
Defenders of Wildlife.
Submits (EXHIBIT D). |
|
|
|
107 |
Rep. Smith |
Requests an example of
highest and best use forestland. |
|
|
|
118 |
Imeson |
Explains that designated
forestland is Department of Revenue language. |
|
|
|
142 |
Rep. Smith |
Questions why the county
could not change a new classification of zoning to open space. |
|
|
|
143 |
Mike Barsotti |
ODF. Explains that
eligible land has to be in counties that are willing and the land has to be
farm and forest. |
|
|
|
183 |
Rep. Smith |
Expresses concern that
this could hurt rural counties. |
|
|
|
217 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Questions if the objective
is to try to maintain flexibility in the use of existing incentives. |
|
|
|
222 |
Craig |
Responds that the flexible
incentives account is to create funds and how they can be used for the
state’s conservation efforts. |
|
|
|
242 |
Rep. Lee |
Asks if this bill solves
the restrictions on forestlands. |
|
|
|
246 |
Craig |
Responds that the bill
allows the special assessment to remain once the conservation easement is
achieved. |
|
|
|
288 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3564-4 amendments dated
5/14/01. |
|
|
|
292 |
|
VOTE: 9-0 |
|
|
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
292 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves HB 3564 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
319 |
Chair Jenson |
VOTE: 5-3 AYE: 5 - King, Lee, Leonard, Tomei, Wirth NAY: 3 - Kruse, Smith P, Jenson EXCUSED: 1 – Knopp |
|
|
|
|
|
The motion CARRIES. REP. TOMEI will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
|
|
313 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 3564 and opens the work session on HB 3637. |
|
|
HB 3637 – WORK SESSION |
|
|||
|
345 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Reviews the –13 through
–17 amendments (EXHIBIT E). |
|
|
|
405 |
Chair Jenson |
Relates that the –19
amendments (EXHIBIT F) are similar
to the –17 amendments and explains the exceptions. |
|
|
Tape 122, B |
|
|||
|
026 |
Phil Donavan |
Representing Oregon Guides
and Packers. Clarifies that the members of the commission have a background
in the specified areas, not representatives. |
|
|
|
041 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions the monthly
meeting requirement. |
|
|
|
058 |
Chair Jenson |
Responds that the
commission currently meets once a month. Notes the commission’s workload. |
|
|
|
083 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3637-19 amendments dated 5/14/01. |
|
|
|
086 |
Rep. Tomei |
Notes concern that the conservation groups are not represented and
will be a no vote. |
|
|
|
106 |
Rep. Kruse |
States there is nothing in
the bill that prohibits their inclusion. |
|
|
|
122 |
|
VOTE: 7-2 AYE: 7 - King, Knopp, Kruse, Lee, Leonard,
Smith P, Jenson NAY: 2 - Tomei, Wirth |
|
|
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
|
|
129 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves HB 3637 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
|
|
|
Rep. Wirth |
Explains she
will be a no vote and explains that the specified membership emphasizes the
consumption aspect of ODFW’s mission over the non-consumptive aspect. Notes
e-mails relating to the politicizing of the process of appointing the chair
by giving the governor that authority.
|
|
|
|
130 |
Rep. Wirth |
VOTE: 7-2 AYE: 7 -
King, Knopp, Kruse, Lee, Leonard, Smith P, Jenson NAY: 2 -
Tomei, Wirth |
|
|
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. REP. KRIEGER
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
|
|
196 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 3637 and adjourns the meeting at 3:23 p.m. |
|
|
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A. HB 3981, -1 amendments dated 5/10/01,
Staff, 9 pp.
B. HB 3564, prepared testimony, Ray Craig, 2
pp.
C. HB 3564, prepared testimony, Tom Imeson, 2
pp.
D. HB 3564, -4 amendments dated 5/14/01,
Staff, 13 pp.
E. HB 3637, -13 amendments dated 5/2/01, -14
amendments dated 5/4/01, -15 amendments dated 5/4/01, -16 amendments dated
5/4/01, -17 amendments dated 5/4/01, Staff, 20 pp.
F.
HB 3637, -19
amendments, dated 5/14/01, Staff, 4 pp.