HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION
& SPECIES RECOVERY
May 17, 2001 Hearing
Room B
5:00 P.M. Tapes 125 - 129
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Rep. Bob Jenson,
Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD:
SB 51 A – Public
Hearing and Work Session
SB 208 A – Public Hearing and Work Session
HB 3989 – Work Session
HB 3547 – Public
Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 125, A |
||
|
006 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls the meeting to order
as a subcommittee at 6:27 p.m. and opens the public hearing on SB 51A. |
SB 51 A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
025 |
Terry Witt |
Executive Director,
Oregonians for Food and Shelter, Submits prepared testimony in support of SB
51A, (EXHIBIT A). Discusses
the SB 1010 work group. |
|
042 |
Chair Jenson |
Opens full committee. |
|
069 |
Chuck Craig |
Deputy Director, Oregon
Department of Agriculture (ODA). Submits correspondence and explains the
issues (EXHIBIT B). |
|
110 |
Chair Jenson |
Refers to and interprets
page 2 SB 51A, after line 3, and notes the governor’s correspondence (EXHIBIT C). Questions why ODA is
objecting to having to conform |
|
149 |
Craig |
Responds ODA is
questioning why the agency was singled out over Department of Environmental
Quality, (DEQ) or Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA). |
|
168 |
Chair Jenson |
Notes that EPA is a
federal agency. |
|
186 |
Craig |
Responds that there are no
objections to the way business is conducted now. Explains that SB 51A would
not be able to respond in an emergency. |
|
224 |
Chair Jenson |
Summarizes the status of
the bill and amendments and states the intent is to have further legislatures
to look into it. |
|
310 |
Craig |
Discusses SB 51A-3
amendments, (EXHIBIT D). |
|
330 |
Rep. Leonard |
Questions if the –A3
amendments are consistent with the consensus bill. |
|
346 |
Craig |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
368 |
Pete Test |
Associate Director of
Government Affairs, Oregon Farm Bureau. Submits prepared testimony in support
of SB 51A-3 amendments, (EXHIBIT E). |
|
410 |
Chair Jenson |
Reads correspondence from
Brendan McCarthy, (EXHIBIT F). |
|
405 |
Rep. Leonard |
Refers to (EXHIBIT C) questions why jeopardize
the bill if the language is not needed. |
|
455 |
Witt |
Responds the general
consensus was there would be no amendments to SB 51A. Notes the amendments
may address perception problems regarding fees. |
Tape 126, A |
||
|
016 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments on the perception
issue. |
|
046 |
Brendan McCarthy |
Deputy Legislative
Counsel. Explains (EXHIBIT F). |
|
070 |
Jim Myron |
Oregon Trout. Submits prepared
testimony in support of SB 51A, (EXHIBIT G). |
|
082 |
Glen Stonebrink |
Oregon Cattlemen’s
Association. Refers to (EXHIBIT B).
States opposition to SB 51A-3 amendments if it will result in the bill being
vetoed. |
|
116 |
David Alsup |
Representing Oregon Family
Farm Association. Testifies in
support of SB 51A-3 amendments. Notes opposition if the amendment will veto
the bill. Discusses the trespass issue. |
|
143 |
Rep. Smith |
Questions if there has
been a problem with trespass on his property. |
|
155 |
Alsup |
Responds affirmatively and
identifies ODFW. |
|
180 |
James Mast |
Oregon Family Farms,
Douglas County Chapter. Comments on the trespass issue. |
|
214 |
Mast |
Continues testimony.
Comments on the impact a $200 fee has on a small farmer. States that Phil
Ward is quoted as saying that SB 1010 is a non-point source plan. |
|
267 |
Rep. Smith |
Refers to (EXHIBIT B) and questions if
complaints are made when trespass happens. |
|
294 |
Mast |
Responds no. |
|
307 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on SB 51A and opens the work session on
SB 51A. |
|
309 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves SB 51A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
312 |
Witt |
States it is his belief
the Governor would find this amendment agreeable. Proposes that if there is
not agreement when the bill goes for concurrence, it could be removed at that
time. |
|
355 |
Craig |
Concurs. |
|
381 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves to withdraw the previous motion and Moves to ADOPT SB
51A-3 amendments dated 5/17/01. |
|
407 |
Rep. Wirth |
Declares she will be a no vote. |
|
455 |
|
VOTE: 7-1 AYE: 7 – Knopp, Kruse, Lee, Leonard, Smith P,
Tomei, Jenson NAY: 1 – Wirth EXCUSED: 1 –
King |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
466 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves SB 51A to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation. |
|
470 |
|
VOTE: 7-1 AYE: 7 - Knopp, Kruse, Lee, Leonard, Smith P,
Tomei, Jenson NAY: 1 – Wirth EXCUSED: 1 –
King |
|
|
Chair |
The motion
CARRIES. REP. JENSON
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
Tape 125, B |
||
|
022 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
SB 51A and opens a public hearing on
SB 208A. |
|
SB 208 A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
028 |
Witt |
Testifies in support of SB
208A. |
|
033 |
Test |
Submits prepared testimony
in support of SB 208A, (EXHIBIT H). |
|
086 |
Craig |
ODA. Testifies in support
of SB 208A. |
|
107 |
Chair Jenson |
Notes that the rules are
basin by basin, not state by state. |
|
121 |
Stonebrink |
States support for SB
208A. |
|
124 |
Myron |
States support for SB
208A. |
|
121 |
Mast |
Proposes that SB 208A
should require that the rules reflect the plan. |
|
138 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on SB 208A and opens the work session on SB 208A. |
SB 208A – WORK SESSION |
||
|
151 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves SB 208A to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
157 |
|
VOTE: 7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present
vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Kruse, King |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
163 |
Chair Jenson |
REP. JENSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
165 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
SB 208A and opens the public hearing on HB 3547. |
|
HB3547 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
178 |
Welsh |
Submits prepared testimony
(EXHIBIT I) and discusses the –1
amendments (EXHIBIT J). |
|
269 |
Welsh |
Continues with testimony. |
|
347 |
Rep. Leonard |
Notes that these sections
are in direct conflict with SB 208A. |
|
375 |
Welsh |
Responds this represents
what people in the farming and ranching communities would like to see. |
Tape 126, B (Committee breaks for dinner) |
||
|
064 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 3547 and opens the work session on HB 3989. |
HB 3989 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
071 |
Harrison Conley |
Deputy Legislative
Counsel. States that HB 3989 allows tribal members to participate as zone
directors for soil and water conservation district based on reservation lands
being within the soil and water districts. |
|
076 |
Rep. Leonard |
Questions if the soil and
water district has authority over tribal lands in the district. |
|
081 |
Conley |
Responds no. |
|
084 |
Rep. Leonard |
Questions why have tribal
members on the board. |
|
102 |
Rep. Lee |
Responds that there are
irrigated lands in tribal reservations. Clarifies that it is working with
groups that have not authority. |
|
106 |
Rep. Kruse |
States that soil districts
have regional and at-large representatives on the board. Explains that having
a tribal member on the board helps to have groups work together on issues
effecting the basin. |
|
132 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves HB 3989 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
135 |
|
VOTE: 7-0 AYE: In a
roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 – Wirth, King |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
143 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves HB 3989 be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 7-0 EXCUSED: 2 – Wirth, King |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
160 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 3989 and reopens the public hearing on HB 3547. |
HB 3547 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
156 |
Stonebrink |
Refers to page two, line
21 (EXHIBIT J), explains what this
change would do. |
|
223 |
Stonebrink |
Refers to the SB 1010
public hearing records. Comments that 1010 plans target non-point source
pollution (EXHIBIT K). Notes a
federal court case and the interpretation under the Clean Water Act. |
|
293 |
David Alsup |
Oregon Family Farms.
Testifies that the work group did not get anything that they wanted in SB
208. Testifies in support of HB 3547. |
|
361 |
Mast |
States that SB 51 through
SB 57 are products of a grass roots organization. Refers to (EXHIBIT K) noting the references to
non-point source pollution. |
|
Tape 127, A |
||
|
029 |
Rep. Leonard |
Questions that the
objection is to pollution that goes directly into a waterway. |
|
038 |
Mast |
Responds that 468B is
being dragged into SB 1010. |
|
050 |
Craig |
States that SB 1010 was
passed in 1993, then in 1995 SB 502 passed which gave ODA exclusive authority
to regulate agricultural water pollution. |
|
090 |
Craig |
Reviews prepared
testimony, (EXHIBIT L). Comments on the conflicts with the
new rules. |
|
166 |
Craig |
Continues testimony. Notes
the bill places limitations on inspection authority. |
|
201 |
Stonebrink |
Responds to Craig’s
testimony noting that the direct focus of SB 1010 is not non-point source
pollution. |
|
216 |
Rep. Leonard |
States that it sounds like
there is opposition to be regulated for point source pollution going directly
into streams. |
|
222 |
Stonebrink |
Clarifies that they are
not objecting to point source laws, but to being regulated for non-point
source pollution. |
|
288 |
Stonebrink |
Continues discussion on
point source pollution as part of an agricultural practice and that they do
not want it to go to DEQ or EPA for regulation. |
|
330 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks if ODA can regulate
this. |
|
331 |
Craig |
Responds unless it is
absorbed into the rules for the basin plan, they can not regulate it. |
|
323 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions why the objection
to ODA being responsible for regulating. |
|
353 |
Stonebrink |
Responds they do not
object to point source, but they want the non-point source to be separate and
to be handled voluntary and incentive based. |
|
385 |
Rep. King |
Questions do they want to
work with ODA and DEQ. |
|
447 |
Craig |
Explains that DEQ could
say that discharging pollution into a river is not an agricultural practice
thus regulating it. |
Tape 128, A |
||
|
024 |
Rep. King |
Rephrases that SB 502
gives the authority to deal with the pollution but the EPA regulations have
the ultimate authority. Comments that currently it would take two agencies to
deal with a point source situation and this amendment would allow one agency
to deal with it. |
|
032 |
Rep. Lee |
Refers to lines 15 though
18. |
|
043 |
Craig |
Provides additional
examples and explanation. |
|
057 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 3547 and adjourns the meeting at 9:00 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A. SB 51A, prepared testimony, Terry Witt, 3
pp.
B. SB 51A, correspondence between Phil Ward
and Rep. Greg Smith, Chuck Craig, 3 pp.
C. SB 51A, correspondence from the governor’s
office, staff, 3 pp.
D. SB 51A, -3 amendments dated 5/17/01, staff,
1 p
E. SB 51A, prepared testimony, Pete Test, 1 p
F.
SB 51A,
correspondence from Legislative Counsel, staff, 1 p
G. SB 51A, prepared testimony, Jim Myron, 1 p
H. SB 208A, prepared testimony, Pete Test, 1 p
I.
HB 3547, prepared
testimony, Jim Welsh, 3 pp.
J.
HB 3547, -1
amendments dated 5/17/01, Jim Welsh, 10 pp.
K. HB 3547, public hearing records from May
20, 1993, Jim Mast, 21 pp.
L. HB 3547, prepared testimony, Chuck Craig, 2
pp.