HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION
&
SPECIES RECOVERY
January 31, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 P.M. Tapes
21 - 22
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
MEMBER VISTING: Rep. Wayne Krieger
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD:
Public Hearing
HJM 4
Oregon Department of
Fish & Wildlife (ODFW)
Hatchery Fish, Wild Fish, Native Fish
Conservation Policy
Public Hearing and
Work Session
HB 2457
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
|
TAPE 21, A |
|||
|
003 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls the meeting to order
at 1:10 p.m. and opens public hearing on HJM 4. |
|
PUBLIC HEARING - HJM 4
|
|||
|
010 |
Sandy Thiele-Cirka |
Administrator. Summarizes
HJM 4. |
|
|
016 |
Terry Thompson |
Former Representative.
States the Marine Mammal Act (MMA) is about to be re-authored and the goal is
to resolve the conflict between protecting pinnipeds and salmon recovery
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). |
|
|
043 |
Thompson |
Relates a sea lion story. |
|
|
059 |
Robin Brown |
Marine Mammal Program
Leader, Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife (ODFW). Submits (EXHIBIT A) and reviews. |
|
|
129 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if the language
is specific enough. |
|
|
138 |
Brown |
Responds the language
resulted from discussions with NMFS and the State of Washington. |
|
|
152 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if the State of
Washington is proceeding with a similar action. |
|
|
158 |
Brown |
Responds that the states
of Washington and California have addressed this issue in previous sessions. |
|
|
160 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions what does the
removal of pinnipeds entail. |
|
|
167 |
Brown |
Provides a brief
background on the development of this proposal. Clarifies the non-lethal
removal of sea lions that prey in particular locations. |
|
|
218 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions the definition
of adequate to ensure. |
|
|
225 |
Brown |
Responds that NMFS has
made stock determinations on marine mammals. |
|
|
259 |
Rep. Thompson |
Comments on the need for
more information to make good management decisions. |
|
|
286 |
Rep. Krieger |
Notes that in the budget
presented to the Legislative Task Force on Pacific Fisheries Management
presented by the states of Oregon, Washington, California, and the federal
government amounted to $38 million to study pinnipeds. |
|
|
293 |
Rep. Thompson |
Responds the money goes to
Alaskan fisheries to study Stellar sea lions and that very little money is
allocated to Oregon. |
|
|
315 |
Rep. Kruse |
Questions when the
authority was transferred to NMFS. |
|
|
327 |
Brown |
Answers that the MMA does
provide an option for the state to regulate, but it is difficult to
implement. |
|
|
400 |
Glen Stonebrink |
Executive Director, Oregon
Cattlemen’s Association. Submits (EXHIBIT
B), testifies in support of the bill and discusses SB 31. |
|
TAPE 22, A |
|||
|
029 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HJM 4, opens informational meeting on hatchery and wild fish. |
|
|
037 |
Ed. Bowles |
Fish Division Director,
ODFW. Provides an overview of (EXHIBIT C). |
|
|
083 |
Bowles |
Continues with overview,
part III. |
|
|
150 |
Rep. Tomei |
Request clarification on
what is meant by altered spawn timing and altered age of adults. |
|
|
156 |
Bowles |
Responds this relates to
wild fish risk survival. |
|
|
170 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions risk factors for
wild fish. |
|
|
173 |
Bowles |
Answers the wild fish
characteristics displayed are the best in a specific watershed. Provides an
example of disease transmission. |
|
|
204 |
Chair Jenson |
Clarifies that a condition
could be amplified in the wild. |
|
|
223 |
Rep. Leonard |
Questions to what extent a
hatchery fish is less adaptable to the wild due to hatchery practices. |
|
|
233 |
Bowles |
Responds there are
behavior shifts. |
|
|
266 |
Rep. Leonard |
Questions the differences
between a fish raised in a natural setting and a first generation native
fish. |
|
|
283 |
Bowles |
Responds the focus has
been to provide a survival advantage.
|
|
|
307 |
Rep. Leonard |
Clarifies to the extent
there are differences, to what extent can those differences be attributed to
hatchery practices. |
|
|
310 |
Bowles |
Responds the differences
can be attributed to hatchery practices. Notes that which practices effect
behavior or genetics are unknown. |
|
|
342 |
Rep. Leonard |
Expresses that an
explanation as to why a fish genetically identical to a native fish cannot be
raised in a hatchery setting is important. |
|
|
352 |
Bowles |
Responds the goal is to
minimize a hatchery fishes ability to adapt to a new environment. |
|
|
392 |
Rep. Leonard |
Clarifies the concern is
if can natural conditions be replicated and produce genetically equal fish. |
|
TAPE 21, B |
|||
|
048 |
Bowles |
Resumes presentation on
conservation hatcheries. |
|
|
076 |
Rep. Krieger |
Asks how many generations
does it take for a fish to become naturally sustainable. |
|
|
081 |
Bowles |
Answers the longer the
fish lives in a changeable environment the better. |
|
|
123 |
Rob Jones |
Branch Chief Hatcheries
and Inland Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). States that
one measure of success is determined by how well the fish are able to sustain
in the wild. |
|
|
180 |
Jones |
Notes the issue is how to
accomplish a sustainable population in the wild while using hatcheries. |
|
|
211 |
Rep. King |
Comments that an
acceptable term that defines an understanding would be helpful. |
|
|
242 |
Jones |
Responds that NMFS’s
perspective is a fish that survives in the wild and produces offspring that
survive in the wild is wild. |
|
|
274 |
Rep. King |
Reiterates a term that
defines fish that share characteristics that indicate at what phase toward
being wild they are in is being requested. |
|
|
294 |
Jones |
Responds that NMFS does
not title fish as hatchery or wild, but rather characterize fish based on
biological and behavioral characteristics. |
|
|
315 |
Bowles |
Concurs that using the
term hatchery or wild does not accommodate a descriptive term for what level
of wildness a fish is. |
|
|
339 |
Rep. King |
Questions whether DNA
studies have been done to identify the genetic diversity of different runs. |
|
|
353 |
Jones |
Responds there is a
pioneer effort being done in the Salmon River basin on sockeye salmon. Discusses establishing a level for
recovery. |
|
TAPE 22, B |
|||
|
003 |
Rep. Tomei |
Requests clarification
relating to hatchery fish endangering wild fish. |
|
|
010 |
Bowles |
Responds that this issue
is critical. Explains the wild fish that has survived in the wild for
generations are better equipped for continued survival and hatchery fish may
not have developed this ability. Continues clarification noting that hatchery
fish can amplify the total fish within the wild fish causing the reduction of
their ability to survive in the wild. |
|
|
076 |
Rep. Wirth |
Comments on natural
selection and questions if the focus should be on habitat rather than fish. |
|
|
088 |
Jones |
Explains that a
comprehensive approach considers harvest, hatchery reform, habitat, ocean
conditions, and predators. |
|
|
096 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions what happens if
the best habitat is established but does not meet NMFS requirements. |
|
|
110 |
Jones |
Responds that experience
has indicated that fish can be restored and recover to satisfy the ESA
requirements. |
|
|
130 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes information meeting
and opens a public hearing on HB 2457. |
|
PUBLIC HEARING – HB 2457 |
|||
|
152 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 2457. |
|
|
191 |
Terry Thompson |
Former Oregon
Representative. Explains the need for regular reporting. |
|
|
206 |
Jim Neifert |
Legislative Coordinator
for Oregon Parks and Recreation (OPRD). Submits (EXHIBIT D). Currently, ORS 805.256 provides OPRD with half the
funds from the plate sales. Provides
background information on HB 2457. |
|
|
262 |
Neifert |
Reviews successful park
projects. |
|
|
300 |
Rep. Lee |
Questions how the other
half of the funds are used. |
|
|
306 |
Thompson |
Responds that ODOT
receives the other half and those projects are approved through OWEB. |
|
|
346 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 2457 and opens a work session. |
|
|
350 |
Rep. Knopp |
MOTION: Moves HB 2457 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
351 |
|
VOTE: 8 – 0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members
present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 – Leonard |
|
|
352 |
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. Rep. SMITH
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
|
355 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session
and adjourns the meeting at 3:00 p.m. |
|
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A. HJM 5, ODFW Statement and Report to Congress
from NOAA, Robin Brown, 23 pp.
B. HJM 5, US Code: Title 16, Section 1379 and
1389, Glen Stonebrink, 4 pp.
C. Hatchery, Wild and Native Fish, written
testimony, Ed Bowles, 5 pp.
D. HB 2457, written testimony and published
material, Jim Neifert, 9 pp.