HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION
& SPECIES RECOVERY
March 28, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 P.M. Tapes
69 – 71
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bob Jenson, Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Stephen Kosiewicz, Committee Assistant
MEASURE HEARD:
HB 3638 Public
Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 69, A |
||
|
003 |
Vice Chair Lee |
Calls the committee to
order at 1:06 p.m. as a subcommittee for the purpose of hearing public
testimony. Opens a public hearing on
HB 3638. |
HB 3638 PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
026 |
Ron Graves |
Representing Wasco County
Soil and Water Conservation District. Submits written material (EXHIBIT A) and presents a PowerPoint
presentation providing background information on conservation districts. |
|
111 |
Graves |
Continues presentation. |
|
170 |
Rep. King |
References the flowchart
and questions if there is output coming from the soil and water conservation
districts. |
|
183 |
Graves |
Explains that the box in
the upper left-hand corner represents the NRCS and conservation district
planning process. Notes that the output from the water districts would be
down to the diamond-shape decision box in the lower part of the graphic. |
|
191 |
Rep. King |
Asks if there is any
output to area wide conservation plans or agricultural land use plans. |
|
195 |
Graves |
Responds that they are not
trying to show all of the input. |
|
208 |
Rep. King |
Comments that input into
the conservation plans is important and that the districts should be involved
with the final conservation plans. |
|
218 |
Graves |
Indicates that Rep. King
is correct. Continues presentation. |
|
322 |
Graves |
Continues presentation. |
|
353 |
Jim Carpenter |
Carpenter Design Inc.
Submits and reads written testimony in support of HB 3638 (EXHIBIT B). |
TAPE 70, A |
|
|
|
005 |
Rep. Lee |
Comments in support of
district accomplishments. |
|
016 |
Rep. Tomei |
Asks Mr. Carpenter if he
has seen the amendments to HB 3638. |
|
018 |
Carpenter |
Responds that he has
received them but has not reviewed them. |
|
026 |
Jeff Rolá |
Representing Wy’East RC
& D Council. Testifies in support of HB 3638 and reviews the work being done by the Wy’East
RC & D Council in the basin. |
|
075 |
Rep. Lee |
Asks how long it took to
obtain the $9 million. |
|
077 |
Rolá |
Responds that it was
within the last year. |
|
086 |
Louise Solliday |
Governor’s Assistant for
Natural Resources. Testifies on the concept and why there may be value to the
structure outlined in HB 3638. |
|
168 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if the local
areas would be further ahead if they designed their own plans rather than
giving them a standard model. |
|
175 |
Solliday |
Responds that a balance of
both would be the most effective. |
|
191 |
Chair Jenson |
Notes that there would be
some flexibility on the part of the Governor’s Office if they came up with a
bill in relation to this. |
|
195 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks how HB 3638 relates
to SB 433. |
|
197 |
Solliday |
Responds that SB 433 has a
section that deals with regional bodies. Notes that it focuses on the
Willamette. |
|
218 |
Monte Graham |
Representing Marion Soil
and Water Conservation District. Submits written material (EXHIBIT C) and presents the annual
report of the Marion SWCD. |
|
338 |
Graham |
Continues discussing
successes of the Marion SWCD. |
|
390 |
Rep. Lee |
Asks how many water
quality management plans will be implemented in the Willamette Basin. |
|
396 |
Graham |
Responds that he believes
there will be nine. |
TAPE 69, B |
|
|
|
015 |
Rick Bastasch |
Executive Director,
Willamette Restoration Initiative (WRI). Submits and reads written testimony
in support of HB 3638 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
055 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks when WRI’s
recommendations will be presented to the Governor and the legislature. |
|
058 |
Bastasch |
Responds that their
recommendations will be sent out next week. |
|
065 |
Helen Berg |
Mayor, City of Corvallis,
and member WRI Board of Directors. Testifies in support of HB 3638. |
|
109 |
Sara Vickerman |
West Coast Office
Director, Defenders of Wildlife, and member WRI Board of Directors. Testifies
in support of HB 3638 and the proposed amendments. |
|
150 |
John McDonald |
Member, WRI Board of
Directors. Testifies in support of HB 3638 and notes some concerns. |
|
258 |
Rep. Lee |
Comments on a meeting that
was held with watershed councils and districts. Asks for Mr. McDonald’s
opinion on the concept of a regional body resources and accomplishments. |
|
276 |
McDonald |
Responds that this is a
concept that deserves development. |
|
299 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks Mr. McDonald if the
WRI is a bottom-up approach. |
|
306 |
McDonald |
Responds that it involves
local stakeholder groups that are assembled to be representation on the WRI. |
|
324 |
Berg |
Notes other entities that
were involved in the WRI process. |
|
352 |
Chair Jenson |
States that he sees the
WRI as a top-down approach. |
|
365 |
McDonald |
Comments that when he was
appointed to the WRI Board of Directors, he felt the same way initially. |
TAPE 70, B |
|
|
|
001 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that HB 3638 is
not the right approach to the issue. |
|
015 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks Mr. McDonald if he
has seen the amendment and is he supportive. |
|
017 |
McDonald |
Responds affirmatively and
notes that it is an improvement to the bill. Comments that there is not
universal excitement about having a regional body throughout the state. |
|
056 |
Berg |
Comments on the urgency of
what the citizens of Oregon need to do. |
|
078 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that there has
been tremendous success in restoring the environment in Oregon over the last
30 years. |
|
099 |
Debrah Marriott |
Director, Lower Columbia
River Estuary Program. Submits and reads written testimony on the estuary
program (EXHIBIT E). |
|
196 |
Marriott |
Continues reading
testimony. |
|
286 |
Marriott |
Continues reading
testimony. |
|
329 |
Geoff Huntington |
Executive Director, Oregon
Watershed Enhancement Board. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT F) and testifies on the role regional watershed entities
play in helping Oregon achieve healthier watersheds and recover at-risk fish
stocks. |
|
400 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks Mr. Huntington to
explain what top-down versus bottom-up. |
TAPE 71, A |
|
|
|
002 |
Huntington |
Responds that top-down is
when an agency, the legislature, or the Governor’s Office looks at a
watershed and tells them what they need to do and how to do it. |
|
005 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks if the bill as
originally written is a top-down approach. |
|
010 |
Huntington |
Indicates that this was
one of his initial thoughts, but that the proposed amendment addresses
bottom-up approach. |
|
030 |
Chair Jenson |
Comments on the need to
come up with some language to change the top-down approach that seems to be
inherent in the bill as written. |
|
059 |
Huntington |
Notes that it is important
to have a clear understanding as a group about what needs to be accomplished
and how it fits with other entities that are working in the same area. |
|
074 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 3638 and adjourns the committee at 3:00 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Stephen Kosiewicz, Sandy Thiele-Cirka,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3638, written material, Ron Graves, 17 pp.
B
– HB 3638, written testimony, Jim Carpenter, 1 p
C
– HB 3638, written material, Monte Graham, 90 pp.
D
– HB 3638, written testimony, Rick Bastasch, 1 p
E
– HB 3638, written testimony, Debrah Marriott, 5 pp.
F
– HB 3638, written testimony, Geoff Huntington, 1 p