HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION
& SPECIES RECOVERY
April 23, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 P.M. Tapes 102 - 103
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Rep. Bob Jenson,
Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Linda K. Gatto, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD:
HB 3958 - Public
Hearing
HB 3728 - Public
Hearing
HB 3341 - Work Session
HB 3637 - Work
Session
HB 2788 - Work
Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 102, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Jenson |
Calls the meeting to order
at 1:10 p.m. and opens the public hearing on HB 3958. |
|
HB 3958 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
015 |
Kristina McNitt |
Oregon Water Resources
Congress. Reads prepared testimony in support of HB 3958 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
069 |
Rep. Kruse |
Ask if this sets up a
separate standard for water-right holders located within a water district. |
|
070 |
McNitt |
Responds it would provide
standards if the temporary transfer provisions parallel the transfer permit
provisions. |
|
100 |
Tom Byler |
Water Resources
Department, (WRD). Submits (EXHIBIT B)
in support of HB 3958. |
|
140 |
Byler |
Explains the difference
between district and non-district transfers. |
|
156 |
Rep. Lee |
Notes the significant
difference is the point of diversion. Questions if any injuries reported. |
|
179 |
Byler |
Responds no. Notes the
transfers take place in the district. |
|
Written testimony
submitted by Doug Myers (EXHIBIT C). |
||
|
212 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 3958 and opens the public hearing on HB 3728. |
|
HB 3728 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
221 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 3728 and opens the work session on HB 3341. |
HB 3341 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
228 |
Sandy Thiele-Cirka |
Administrator. Summarizes
HB 3341. Notes SB 31A is a companion bill. |
|
249 |
Robin Brown |
Wildlife Division, Oregon
Department of Fish & Wildlife, (ODFW) agency specialist on marine mammal
biology. Reviews comments from the March 21st meeting. |
|
290 |
Rep. Kruse |
Requests clarification of
SB 31A. |
|
295 |
Brown |
Responds the bill directs
the department to develop a broad-based management plan for marine mammals. |
|
314 |
Rep. Kruse |
Questions if there is
specific reference to salmon predation. |
|
331 |
Brown |
Responds one
recommendation is to address California sea lions and Harbor seals preying on
depressed and recovering salmon stock. |
|
345 |
Rep. Kruse |
States that with the
assurance that predation is covered in SB 31A the intent of this legislation
is represented. |
|
359 |
Vice-Chair Leonard |
Closes the work session on
HB 3341 and opens the work session on HB 3637. |
HB 3637 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
387 |
Rep. Wayne Krieger |
House District 48.
Discusses the work group and states that the –11 amendments replaces the
original bill (EXHIBIT D). |
|
433 |
Rep. Wirth |
Express concern that the
conservation community is not represented in the amendment. |
Tape 103, A |
||
|
016 |
Rep. Krieger |
Refers to page two, line
25 and states the language was changed from representing to having a
background in. |
|
058 |
Rep. Wirth |
Notes concern about the
language in subsection c appointing representation in interest areas. |
|
067 |
Rep. Krieger |
Responds that HB 3637 is
intended to provide broad representation. |
|
084 |
Rep. Leonard |
Notes that the commission
is limited to seven members designated by regions. Refers to the three at
large members at large and asks are there seven or ten members on the
commission. |
|
095 |
Rep. Krieger |
Responds there are four
specific disciplines and three at large members. |
|
107 |
Chair Jenson |
Clarifies proposed
commission membership. |
|
161 |
Chair Jenson |
Clarifies that the
position of the director is not addressed in the –11 amendments. This bill allows the Governor to designate the
chairperson. |
|
196 |
Rep. Leonard |
Clarifies that the
commissioners serve without compensation and asks if the monthly meeting
schedule is an issue. |
|
220 |
Rep. Krieger |
Responds the commission
has been meeting monthly. |
|
223 |
Rep. Smith |
Comments that many
environmentalists have backgrounds in these industries. |
|
260 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions the disparity in
the district populations. |
|
344 |
Rep. Lee |
Questions the timing of
the meetings. |
|
380 |
Chair Jenson |
Proposes that the
commission be allowed to go back to the three-month guideline to allow for
some flexibility. |
|
450 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 3637 and opens the work session on HB 2788. |
HB 2788 – WORK SESSION |
||
Tape 102, B |
||
|
014 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Reviews the HB 2788 -4,
-1, -2 and submits the -5 amendments (EXHIBIT
E). |
|
038 |
Kristina McNitt |
Explains that the latest
language states the amendments do not affect a contract entered into before
the effective date of the 2001 act. |
|
088 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if including
piping as maintenance expands the definition. |
|
090 |
McNitt |
Responds this is a matter
of interpretation. |
|
099 |
Rep. Leonard |
Comments it was explained
as a conservation technique. |
|
120 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if the Cyrus’s
will incur additional maintenance expense. |
|
105 |
Harrison Conley |
Deputy Legislative
Counsel. Responds no. Explains this is relating to irrigation property. Refers to page 2, Section 11. |
|
139 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks what is the
fundamental purpose of piping. |
|
155 |
McNitt |
Explains piping is one way
to make improvements in the water delivery system. |
|
172 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if piping
changes the environment. |
|
177 |
McNitt |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
174 |
Rep. Lee |
Explains that districts
are required by federal law to conserve water. |
|
230 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions if the
department defines piping as maintenance. |
|
246 |
Tom Byler |
Water Resources Department
(WRD). Responds it could be
maintenance on an existing distribution system or it could be new when
increasing water distribution. |
|
281 |
Chair Jenson |
Questions the advantage of
piping. |
|
262 |
Tom Paul |
WRD. Responds open canal
distribution systems have high losses. |
|
276 |
Chair Jenson |
Asks what happens when
piping leads to the drying up of wetlands. |
|
284 |
Paul |
Responds when a system is
upgraded there is an optional review process available. |
|
345 |
Rep. Lee |
Provides an example from
Walla Walla. |
|
365 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves HB 2788 –5 amendments dated 4/23/01. |
|
361 |
Rep. Kruse |
Explains he will not
support HB 2788 without a further definition of lining and piping regarding
maintenance. |
|
385 |
Rep. Lee |
Requests clarification of
the question. |
|
394 |
Rep. Kruse |
Responds it allows the
district to lay piping where there is currently a ditch and then access the
landowner for the project. |
|
370 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions the location of
that language. |
|
400 |
Rep. Kruse |
Responds with language
location. |
|
426 |
Rep. King |
Clarifies everyone in
district would be paying for it. |
|
435 |
Rep. Lee |
Clarifies that the Cyrus
case relates to a private ditch. Explains details. |
Tape 103, B |
||
|
035 |
Conley |
Comments his opinion is
that where pipeline is added there is currently for pipeline under
waterworks. |
|
045 |
Rep. Wirth |
Clarifies that the
irrigation district is liable and responsible for the maintenance of the
ditches and will support the bill on that basis. |
|
060 |
|
VOTE: 7-2 AYE: 7 -
King, Knopp, Lee, Leonard, Tomei, Wirth, Jenson NAY: 2 - Kruse, Smith P |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
071 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves HB 2788 to the floor DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
070 |
Rep. Kruse |
Provides vote explanation. |
|
078 |
Rep. Knopp |
Questions if the Cyrus's
support the amendments. |
|
086 |
Chair Jenson |
Responds they have some
concerns. |
|
101 |
Rep. Knopp |
States he will support the
bill but reserves the right to change his vote on the floor. |
|
103 |
|
VOTE: 7-2 AYE: 7 -
King, Knopp, Lee, Leonard, Tomei, Wirth, Jenson NAY: 2 -
Kruse, Smith P |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. REP. LEE
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
117 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 2788 and adjourns the meeting at
2:40 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A. HB 3958, prepared testimony, Kristina
McNitt, 2 pp.
B. HB 3958, prepared testimony, Tom Byler, 3
pp.
C. HB 3958, prepared testimony, Doug Myers, 2
PP.
D. HB 3637, -11 amendments dated 4/23/01, Rep.
Wayne Krieger, 4 pp.
E. HB 2788, -1 amendments dated 2/28/01, -2
amendments dated 3/13/01, -4 amendments dated 4/11/01, -5 amendments dated
4/23/01, staff, 7 pp.