HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STREAM RESTORATION
& SPECIES RECOVERY
April 25, 2001 Hearing
Room E
1:00 P.M. Tapes 104 - 106
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Rep. Bob Jenson,
Chair
Rep. Jan Lee, Vice-Chair
Rep. Randy Leonard Vice-Chair
Rep. Tim Knopp
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Patti Smith
Rep. Al King
Rep. Carolyn Tomei
Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy Thiele-Cirka, Committee
Administrator
Kate Campeau, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD:
HB 3490 – Public Hearing & Work Session
HB 3091 – Work
Session
HB 2540 – Work
Session
HB 3637 – Work
Session
HB 3522 - Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 104, A |
||
|
007 |
Vice-Chair Lee |
Calls the meeting to order
at 1:23 p.m. and opens the public hearing on
HB 3490. |
HB 3490 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Sandy Thiele-Cirka |
Administrator. Summarizes HB 3490. |
|
020 |
Dick Pedersen |
Manager, Water Quality,
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Summarizes prepared testimony, (EXHIBIT A). |
|
030 |
Pete Test |
Associate Director of
Governmental Affairs, Oregon Farm Bureau.
Testifies on HB 3490 and submits written testimony (EXHIBIT B). Requests that the bill be referred to the
committee on Ways and Means to explore funding. |
|
100 |
Chair Jensen |
Questions if the Oregon
Watershed Enhancement Board, (OWEB) is a possible funding source. |
|
120 |
Test |
Responds that there have
been discussions with the Chair of the committee on House Ways and Means
regarding funding, and the possibility of OWEB providing supplemental
funding. |
|
150 |
Kathryn Van Natta |
Northwest Pulp and Paper
Association. Testifies in support
of HB 3490. |
|
180 |
Chair Jensen |
Questions why funding was
not included in the Governor’s Budget. |
|
200 |
Pedersen |
Responds that after
reviewing department priorities it was not advanced in the Governor’s budget. |
|
210 |
Chair Jensen |
Comments that the results
of the study are revealing and wonders why that information is not considered
in the evaluation of other species. |
|
220 |
Chair Jensen |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 3490 and opens the work session on HB 3490. |
HB 3490 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
230 |
Rep. Kruse |
MOTION: Moves HB 3490 to the to the floor with at DO PASS recommendation
and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means. |
|
240 |
Rep. Tomei |
Notes conflict with
funding. |
|
244 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions the fiscal
impact. |
|
250 |
Chair Jensen |
Responds approximately
$400,000. |
|
261 |
Rep. Kruse |
Responds to Rep. Tomei’s
statement and notes that this is not necessary to trade fish for kids. |
|
268 |
Rep. King |
Comments in support of the
study. |
|
270 |
Rep. Jensen |
Concurs with Rep. King
that this study is very necessary and should be in Governor’s budget. |
|
300 |
|
VOTE: 8-1 AYE: 8 -
King, Knopp, Kruse, Lee, Leonard, Smith P, Wirth, Jenson NAY: 1 –
Tomei |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
320 |
Chair Jensen |
Closes the work session on
HB 3490 and opens work session on
HB 3091. |
HB 3091 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
330 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 3091. Explains
the –3 amendments dated 4/20/01 (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
340 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB
3091 –3 amendments dated 4/20/01. |
|
347 |
Rep. Kruse |
Requests clarification
that the language “the environmental quality commission may adopt
administrative rules that specify the criteria used for approval of any
disposed” is direct reference to Ross Island and not a general reference. |
|
349 |
Chair Jensen |
States this is the
legislative intent. |
|
355 |
|
VOTE: 8-0-1 EXCUSED: Lee
AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present
vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. |
|
359 |
Rep. Leonard |
MOTION: Moves HB 3091 to the
floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
360 |
Len Bergstein |
Representing Northwest
Strategies, Inc. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT D). States that the –3 amendments conflict with the
Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) current permit language. States the
standards are so restrictive that they can not attain their reclamation
requirements. |
|
400 |
Jim Rue |
Director, Environmental
Affairs, Ross Island. Notes the process they are asking for is protective of
human health and environment but also allows completion of reclamation
requirements. |
|
Tape 105, A |
||
|
045 |
Chair Jensen |
States that after the deletion of section one, the –3 amendments, and
the consultation with DEQ, DSL, and Legislative Counsel, we don’t feel we are
imposing that strict a condition on Ross Island. States for the record that
“the legislative intent is that Ross Island has the right to make their case
to the Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) regarding the standards that do
not exceed the protection of human health and the environment. The fact that
the standards they are operating under at the present time, may if they can
make their case to DEQ, and it is my understanding that they will probably be
in a good position to do that, it will in fact allow them some leeway as to
what the standards might be.” |
|
055 |
Rep. Kruse |
Questions what is the
advantage of a requirement of the EQC. |
|
060 |
Bergstein |
Responds that with the
permissive language they are susceptible to somebody’s list of priorities.
Discusses removal of the materials. |
|
080 |
Chair Jensen |
States the DEQ has the
expertise and the committee does not feel it has the expertise. “We leave it to the department with the, I
hope, clear understanding that our intention is that you be able to negotiate
with them as far as what those standards are at any time you wish to
negotiate with them.” |
|
100 |
Rep. Leonard |
Concurs with Chair
Jensen’s statement and comments that he believes the bill allows that
latitude. |
|
130 |
Bergstein |
States for the record
“there is no active fault line running through Ross Island.” |
|
150 |
Rep. Leonard |
Clarifies his use of the
term active. |
|
155 |
Chair Jensen |
Compliments Mr. Bergstein
on the hard work he has done on this bill. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 8-0 AYE:
In a roll call vote, all members present vote AYE. |
|
225 |
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. REP. LEONARD
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 3091 and opens a work session on
HB 2540. |
|
HB 2540 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
250 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 2540 and the
–3 amendments, (EXHIBIT E). |
|
269 |
Steve Sanders |
Assistant Attorney
General, Department of Justice (DOJ). States consensus agreement regarding
the deletion of section 11 (b) of section 2 of the –2 amendments. Reads statement of the party’s intent to
explain the deletion. (EXHIBIT F) |
|
303 |
Roy Elicker |
Legislative Coordinator,
Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife. States ODFW and the Fish Passage
Task Force support the –3 amendments and the statement read into the record. (EXHIBIT F) |
|
313 |
Rep. Lee |
MOTION: Moves HB 2540-3 amendments dated 4/24/01. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Knopp |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
323 |
Rep. Lee |
MOTION: Moves HB 2540 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation. |
|
345 |
|
VOTE: 8-0AYE: In a
roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 – Knopp |
|
|
Chair Jenson |
The motion
CARRIES. REP. LEE
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
350 |
Rep. Kruse |
States the legislative intent is for reasonableness. |
|
364 |
Chair Jenson |
Closes the work session on
HB 2540 and re-opens the work session on HB 3637. |
HB 3637 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
373 |
Chair Jenson |
States there is additional
work to be done. Closes the work session on HB 3637 and opens the public
hearing on HB 3522. |
HB 3522 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
388 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 3522 and the
–1 and –2 amendments. (EXHIBIT G) |
|
425 |
Pete Test |
Associate Director for
Government Affairs, Oregon Farm Bureau. Submits (EXHIBIT H). Testifies in support of HB 3522. |
Tape 104, B |
||
|
028 |
Steve Hammond |
Ranch Owner in southeast
Oregon. Reads prepared testimony (EXHIBIT
I). |
|
146 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions if he
participated in drafting the bill. |
|
150 |
Test |
Responds affirmatively but
notes this is Steve’s bill. Provides examples of how the wildlife impacts the
ranches. |
|
217 |
Test |
Reviews the
recommendations on page ten of (EXHIBIT
I). |
|
300 |
Rep. Wayne Krieger |
House District 48. Submits
(EXHIBIT J). Discusses the damage
done by bears to tree farms, relates personal experience. |
|
404 |
Rep. Smith |
Relates personal experience. |
|
485 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions if there are
benefits to private landowners having wildlife on their property for hunting
purposes. |
|
490 |
Rep. Krieger |
Responds with reasons why
people own forest lands. |
|
Tape 105, B |
||
|
068 |
Tom Ursry |
Oregon Family Farm Association.
Representing six ranchers having problems with predators. Details the damage,
states the animals live on state lands and are coming onto the ranches land. |
|
099 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions if the state
currently provides any compensation for loss of livestock or crop for any
reason. |
|
101 |
Ursry |
Answers no. |
|
127 |
Rep. Smith |
Questions if there has
been an increase since Measure 18. |
|
128 |
Ursry |
Responds affirmatively. |
|
135 |
Bill McCormick |
Rancher, Crook County.
Submits (EXHIBIT K). Testifies in
support of HB 3522. |
|
195 |
Rep. Smith |
Questions if ODFW still
provides fencing for haystacks. |
|
297 |
McCormick |
Responds and explains the
process to attain funding. |
|
247 |
Elicker |
Submits (EXHIBIT L). States that a large
portion of the department’s time is involved in wildlife damage prevention
programs. Explains how passage of HB 3522 would affect ODFW. Refers to the
1997 damage survey. |
|
300 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions the fiscal
impact if HB 3522 were implemented. |
|
307 |
Elicker |
Responds the department’s
budget would increase substantially. |
|
318 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions if there is a
long-term solution. |
|
332 |
Elicker |
Responds that the
compensation issue for incurred losses would be difficult. States the goal of
ODFW is in prevention. |
|
360 |
Rep. Smith |
Questions the delays
associated with the haystack-fencing program. |
|
363 |
Elicker |
Responds that the program
is implemented through the Access and Habitat Board, which makes
recommendations to the commission. |
|
405 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions if ODFW is
working on ways to eliminate the problem. |
|
407 |
Elicker |
Responds that HB 2049
would establish a joint task force. |
Tape 106, A |
||
|
045 |
Katie Cate |
Oregon Cattlemen’s
Association. Reads prepared testimony in support of HB 3522 with the –1 and
–2 amendments (EXHIBIT M). |
|
071 |
Jim Welsh |
Oregon Family Farm
Association. Submits prepared testimony in support of HB 3522 and the
amendments (EXHIBIT N). |
|
096 |
James Monroe |
Ranch owner near Lebanon.
Testifies that ODFW released wild turkeys without consulting the landowners
causing property damage. |
|
144 |
Rep. Wirth |
Concurs this is a
management problem. |
|
168 |
Rep. Kruse |
Closes the public hearing
on HB 3522 and adjourns meeting at
3:30 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Linda K. Gatto, Sandy Thiele-Cirka,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A. HB 3490, prepared testimony, DEQ, D.
Pederson, 2 pp.
B. HB 3490, printed materials, Oregon Farm
Bureau, P. Test, 22 pp.
C. HB 3091, -3 amendments dated 4/20/01,
staff, 1 p
D. HB 3091, prepared testimony, Len Bergstein,
4 pp.
E. HB 2540, statement, Department of Justice,
Steve Sanders, 1 p
F.
HB 2540, -3
statements dated 4/24/01, staff, 20 pp.
G. HB 3522, -1 amendments dated 3/14/01 and –2
amendments dated 4/9/01, staff, 3 p
H. HB 3522, prepared testimony& printed
material, Oregon Farm Bureau, P. Test, 44 pp.
I.
HB 3522, prepared
testimony, Steven Hammond, 2 pp.
J.
HB 3522, pictures,
Rep. Wayne Krieger, 2 pp.
K. HB 3522, prepared testimony, William
McCormack, 2 pp.
L. HB 3522, prepared testimony, ODFW, R.
Elicker, 1 p
M. HB 3522, prepared testimony, Katie Cate, 2
pp.
N. HB 3522, prepared testimony, Jim Welsh, 1 p