CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON HB 2137
June 22, 2001 Hearing
Room B
11:00 AM Tapes
1 – 2
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bruce Starr, Chair
Rep. Joanne Verger
Rep. Cliff Zauner
Sen. Verne Duncan
Sen. Ken Messerle
Sen. Rick Metsger
STAFF PRESENT: John Leon, Committee
Administrator
Jennifer Simmons, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2137B Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 1, A |
||
|
002 |
Chair Starr |
Calls the committee to
order at 11:15 a.m. and opens a work session on HB 2137B. |
HB 2137B WORK SESSION |
||
|
004 |
John Leon |
Administrator. Explains the bill and the proposed
amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
060 |
Sen. Duncan |
Asks if the proposed
suspension is permanent. |
|
064 |
Chair Starr |
Answers yes. |
|
065 |
Sen. Duncan |
Expresses concern that a
permanent suspension is too harsh. |
|
073 |
Sen. Metsger |
Says that he believes a
permanent suspension is justifiable in the case of bus drivers who transport
children. |
|
090 |
Sen. Messerle |
Expresses concern with the
-10 amendment. Compares this
amendment with SB 85. |
|
112 |
Chair Starr |
Says that this bill is
narrower than SB 85. |
|
130 |
Chuck Bennett |
Confederation of Oregon
School Administrators. States their
support of the amendments. |
|
158 |
Jim Green |
Oregon School Board
Association. Speaks to Section 14 of
the amendments; regarding the fee.
Explains why the fee is necessary.
Speaks about the permanent suspension. |
|
203 |
Chair Starr |
Says that this shows zero
tolerance for substance abuse among school bus drivers. |
|
211 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks for a definition of
“motorcoach”. |
|
212 |
Green |
Answers that there is not
a definition in statute. Says that
they typically carry more than 20 passengers that is not designed like a
schoolbus. Compares them to
“Greyhound” buses. |
|
223 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks if this would lead to
the elimination of vans. |
|
226 |
Bennett |
Answers no. |
|
228 |
Sen. Messerle |
Asks definition of
schoolbus |
|
230 |
Green |
Answers that it is a
vehicle designed to carry more than twenty people and has certain safety
specifications. |
|
237 |
Sen. Messerle |
Asks if that definition
includes motorcoaches and vans. |
|
240 |
Green |
Answers no. |
|
241 |
Sen. Messerle |
Says that he feels blindsided
by these amendments. |
|
256 |
Rep. Verger |
Says that this is a
sensitive in some districts. |
|
265 |
BethAnne Darby |
Oregon Education
Association. Explains their concerns
with the amendments. |
|
333 |
Tricia Smith |
Oregon School Employees
Association. Says that Administrative
Rules already outline the discipline of a school bus driver |
|
405 |
Alan Tresidder |
Alcohol and Drug Abuse
Program Directors Association. Says
that he is primarily concerned with lines 24-25 on page two of the
amendments. Says that it is more
effective to get someone into treatment rather than train new employees. Speaks about what is currently done in
these situations. |
TAPE 2, A |
||
|
018 |
Sen. Duncan |
Says that he believes that
drivers deserve to have a chance to have their license back at some
time. Points out that there are
already limits set within Administrative Rules. |
|
055 |
Chair Starr |
Suggests changing “shall”
to “may” in line 24. |
|
078 |
Sen. Metsger |
Suggests other conceptual
amendments. |
|
113 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks if something could be
added providing full disclosure to potential employers of the driver. |
|
126 |
Darby |
Speaks about the current
Administrative Rules regarding disclosure. |
|
163 |
Sen. Metsger |
Says that current rule
only provides for disclosure in the event of a “conviction”. |
|
178 |
Darby |
Responds that a revocation
is counted as a conviction. |
|
220 |
Green |
Says that they would
support eliminating the permanent suspension. |
|
240 |
Rep. Verger |
Asks how many incidents
where a driver was found to be under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol
have occurred in the last five years |
|
243 |
Green |
Answers none to his
knowledge. Points out that there have
been 17 incidents of failing a urinalysis in the last year. |
|
280 |
Chair Starr |
Withdraws the –10
amendments. |
|
299 |
Rep. Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 2137B to the floor with the
recommendation that the House CONCUR in Senate amendments dated 05/15/01 and
that the bill be FURTHER AMENDED with the –B8, -B12, and –B13 amendments and
the measure be REPASSED. |
|
305 |
Sen. Duncan |
Says that he appreciates the goal of the –10
amendments, but hopes to find another way to accomplish it. |
|
327 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 |
|
|
Chair Starr |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED.
Adjourns
the meeting at 12:10 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Jennifer Simmons, John Leon,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– LC Amendments, HB 2137 -B8, -B12, -B13, staff