CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON SB 160
May 21, 2001 Hearing
Room B
4:00 PM Tapes
1 – 2
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Charles Starr, Chair
Sen. Peter Courtney
Sen. Ted Ferrioli
Rep. Vic Backlund
Rep. Bill Morrisette
Rep. Tootie Smith
STAFF PRESENT: Jan McComb, Committee
Administrator
Patrick Brennan, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 160B Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 1, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Starr |
Calls the committee to
order at 4: p.m. and opens a work session on
SB 160B. |
|
SB 160B WORK SESSION |
||
|
009 |
Jan McComb |
Committee
Administrator. Provides a brief
explanation of SB 160. Describes the
differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill, specifically
whether chiropractors should be allowed to perform examinations required for
participation in interscholastic athletic activities. Indicates that the –B9 amendments (EXHIBIT A), and –B10 amendments (EXHIBIT B) have been submitted for the committee’s
consideration. |
|
022 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Indicates that the
language related to chiropractic physicians was inserted at his request. Expresses support to the –B10 amendments,
adding that he believes an additional conceptual amendment is necessary. Suggests that chiropractors may not be
qualified to perform diagnosis related to cardiopulmonary health. Says he would prefer that chiropractors be
allowed to perform examinations in areas in which they have training and
experience. |
|
044 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Asks whether chiropractors
receive training that qualifies them to perform diagnostics. |
|
050 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Describes the types of
diagnostics used to determine whether a youth is ready to participate in a
sport or athletic activity. Says the examinations are not invasive, but are
related to general health, skeletal alignment and musculature. |
|
063 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Requests an explanation of
why some chiropractors might be qualified to perform diagnostics while others
may not be. |
|
071 |
John Sanscom |
Offers as an example a
description of the diagnostic process for Marfan Syndrome, a genetic defect
associated to laxity in the skin and connective tissues that is often found
within individuals who have unusually long legs and arms. Says Marfan
Syndrome is sometimes associated with cardiopulmonary difficulties such as
heart valve problems. Indicates that
the diagnostic process for Marfan Syndrom is problematic. |
|
090 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Asks whether chiropractors
are trained to diagnose Marfan Syndrome. |
|
092 |
Sanscom |
Replies he does not know,
adding that most physicians are trained to do so. |
|
095 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Asks whether nurses and
physician assistants are qualified to make this type of diagnosis. |
|
098 |
Sanscom |
Replies affirmatively. |
|
100 |
Larry Harvey |
Oregon Chiropractors
Association. Refers to testimony at a
previous hearing that indicated that the academic preparedness for doctors
and chiropractors is nearly identical, with the primary differences being
related to physicians. Says that the
solution is to ensure that the Oregon Board of Chiropractic Examiners (OBCE)
shall make rules determining how training will be provided for these types of
examinations. |
|
133 |
Jim Anderson |
Oregon Medical Association
(OMA). States that an examination of
the curriculum for chiropractic preparation indicates there is no training
related to the diagnostic skills necessary to detect, treat, or diagnose cardiopulmonary
problems. |
|
145 |
Sanscom |
Emphasizes that detection
of cardiopulmonary problems is the most difficult part of the diagnostic
process because they often present themselves in a subtle manner. Remarks that physicians listen to
patient’s hearts daily as part of their diagnostic procedure, and that the
experience thus gained provides the critical tools to pick up subtle
findings. Asserts that chiropractors
are unlikely to gain the experiential skills in detecting cardiopulmonary
problems even if they receive the requisite education. Reiterates that the
goal is to protect student athletes from catastrophic injuries or health
problems. Concedes that not all such
occurrences may be preventable but that students should be given the best
chance possible. |
|
183 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Asks whether physician
assistants and nurses have the experiential skills to detect cardiopulmonary
irregularities. |
|
187 |
Sanscom |
Answers affirmatively, as
they perform heart examinations daily. |
|
197 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Says the discussion
illustrates his point, which is that whether an abnormality is detected by a
physician assistant, nurse, or chiropractor, the end result will be a
referral to a physician for diagnosis.
Remarks that the person discovering the problem during the screening
process need not treat the abnormality, as the goal is simply to detect the
problem before it can result in a catastrophic injury. |
|
229 |
Harvey |
Concurs with Sen.
Ferrioli. Mentions that even his
personal doctor may not qualify to give a sports examination should the bill
be passed in its current form.
Asserts that those performing the examinations need not be trained to
provide treatment. Suggests the issue
is becoming a “turf battle” between physicians and chiropractors. Recalls that one student who had been
found to have a defect was allowed to play anyway by his parents and
died. |
|
266 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Asks again what qualifies
chiropractors to make diagnoses of heart ailments. |
|
275 |
Chair Starr |
Recalls compelling
testimony during previous hearings that chiropractors are qualified to make
such diagnoses. |
|
280 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Opines that the verbiage
used in the –B10 amendments suggest that nurses and physician assistants are
capable of making a diagnosis, which is not the case. Asserts that a more
accurate word would be “detection” rather than diagnosis. Asserts that the
purpose of the bill is to detect ailments and report them to parents. |
|
308 |
Rep. Smith |
Suggests that the –B10
amendments create questions about whether some small towns in her district
will have anyone qualified to make a diagnosis of a cardiopulmonary
ailment. Posits that if the language
is too tight then whoever performs the exams could be open to liability. Agrees with Sen. Ferrioli that detection
and diagnosis are different. Remarks
that there are not many cardiologists in Molalla. |
|
341 |
Rep. Backlund |
Solicits opinions
regarding replacing the word “detection” with the word “diagnosis.” |
|
351 |
Sanscom |
Submits that there is
little difference, as anyone not qualified to treat an ailment will doubtless
refer the problem to someone who can.
Emphasizes the need to ensure that children receiving the exams are in
the hands of someone who will be able to find any problems that may
exist. Reiterates that chiropractic
training does not prepare one to detect cardiopulmonary abnormalities and
that coursework cannot replace experience.
|
|
402 |
Harvey |
Requests clarification as
to the suggested language proposed by Rep. Backlund. Says chiropractors would not have a
problem performing the physical examination.
Asserts that the bill was not specifically designed to address heart
disease, but rather to seek a solution to a string unfortunate occurrences
that have occurred on the field of play. |
TAPE 2, A |
||
|
016 |
Anderson |
Indicates he does not
object to changing “diagnose” to “detect.”
Wonders whether the committee is confident that chiropractors are
qualified to detect potentially dangerous heart ailments. |
|
033 |
Sen. Courtney |
Notes that there is
already a form and protocol developed for the examinations, such as type and
frequency, and stresses the need to make that form and protocol consistent
across the state. Asks whether form and protocol dictate the answer the
question at hand. |
|
048 |
Anderson |
Responds that form and
protocol are two different things.
Describes the difference between form and protocol. |
|
067 |
Sen. Courtney |
Says that form and
protocol are germane to the discussion insofar as they relate to the
examinations performed on student athletes.
|
|
078 |
Anderson |
Mentions that there is a
doctor on the Oregon State Activities Association (OSAA) Committee who helped
to develop the form and protocol for the exams. |
|
085 |
Sanscom |
Agrees that form and
protocol are important, but so are the quality and experience of the person
performing the examination. |
|
098 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks who should be making
the final decision whether or not a student participates in athletic
activity. |
|
107 |
Sanscom |
Disagrees with the
assertion that few people are qualified to perform the diagnosis as it is
written in the bill, as general practitioners perform such examinations
daily. Says that pre-participation
examinations can do little to prevent catastrophic on-field injury, but can
be very effective at preventing cardiopulmonary failure. |
|
147 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Requests an explanation of
the current rule and why it is necessary to change it |
|
151 |
Harvey |
Explains that parents make
the initial determination as to whether a student may participate by signing
a consent form, with a coach making subsequent determinations based upon the
talent of the student. Indicates that chiropractors are already signing off
on consent forms because there are an insufficient number of doctors in many
small communities throughout the state. Says the –B10 amendments are
consistent with current practice. |
|
180 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Wonders whether
chiropractors would be placed at the bottom of the list of health care
providers to consult for athletic examinations. |
|
185 |
Harvey |
Replies that the bill does
not prioritize providers in that way. |
|
190 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Asks whether the bill
merely legitimizes current practice and whether the removal of chiropractors
could create a hardship for some small communities. |
|
196 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Draws an analogy between
how chiropractors can detect anomalies and how dentists and optometrists
often discover ailments unrelated to their examinations and for which they
are not trained to diagnose. Says the
distinction is primarily one of education, practice, and scope of
examination. Submits that
chiropractors spend their days examining and treating patients for physical
ailments, albeit in different manner than traditional doctors. Reiterates that if chiropractors cannot
demonstrate competence in detecting cardiopulmonary defects they will not be
allowed to perform the examinations.
Says the burden of proof of competence will be on the physician. |
|
265 |
Chair Starr |
Mentions that the
conference committee was required in order to consider the training of
chiropractic physicians. Opines that
it is appropriate for the training requirement be part of the bill. |
|
304 |
Rep. Backlund |
MOTION: Moves to AMEND SB 160B on page 1, in line
17, after "physician", insert "who has clinical training and
experience in detecting cardiopulmonary diseases and defects". |
|
324 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Restates the motion. |
|
333 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Concurs with the
conceptual amendments. Acknowledges
the validity of the points raised related to detection. Says he is concerned that prohibition
against chiropractors performing examinations could hinder some smaller
communities. Agrees that most chiropractors
are less able to detect heart ailments and expresses hope that general
practitioners will be the first choice for exams. |
|
364 |
|
VOTE: 5-1 AYE: 5 - Backlund, Ferrioli,
Morrisette, T. Smith, Starr NAY: 1 - Courtney |
|
|
Chair Starr |
The motion
Carries. |
|
370 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
MOTION: Moves SB 160B to the floor with the
recommendation that the Senate CONCUR in House amendments and that the bill
be FURTHER AMENDED by the –B10 amendments as conceptually amended and be
repassed. |
|
286 |
Sen. Courtney |
Notes that the amended
bill applies only to public schools, despite the fact that private schools
compete and practice against public schools within the OSAA. Suggests that conceptually amending the
bill to strike the word “district” would allow the bill to apply to private
schools as well. Emphasizes the need
to protect students in both private and public schools. |
TAPE 1, B |
||
|
019 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Restates and clarifies the
motion. |
|
023 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 AYE: 6 - Backlund, Courtney,
Ferrioli, Morrisette, T. Smith, Starr |
|
|
Chair Starr |
The motion
Carries. |
|
026 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asserts that the burden of
proof of competence rests on the shoulders of the physician, nurse, physician
assistant, or chiropractor who is to perform the examination. |
|
037 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Questions whether there is
sufficient legislative intent. |
|
039 |
Sen. Ferrioli |
Asserts that the bill
provides sufficient legislative intent. |
|
040 |
Chair Starr |
Adjourns the conference
committee at 5:05 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patrick Brennan, Jan McComb,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 160B, -B9 amendments, Rep. Phil Barnhart, 1 p.
B
– SB 160B, -B10 amendments, staff, 1 p.