SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE, SALMON AND WATER
January 12, 2001 Hearing Room B
8:00 AM Tapes
3 – 4
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ken Messerle, Chair
Sen. Frank Shields, Vice-Chair
Sen. Bill Fisher
Sen. Ginny Burdick
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Ryan Deckert
STAFF PRESENT: Judith Callens, Committee
Administrator
Patricia Nielsen, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Informational
Meeting / Regional electric power update, Northwest Power Planning Council
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 3, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Messerle |
Opens meeting at 8:04 a.m.
as subcommittee. Opens informational
meeting for briefing on regional electric power update. |
REGIONAL ELECTRIC POWER UPDATE |
||
|
010 |
Eric Bloch |
Council Member, Northwest
Power Planning Council (NWPPC).
Introduces his presentation as a description of the energy situation,
and the potential impacts on fish recovery and other river uses. Continues his presentation, with questions
from the members. |
|
041 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks for clarification of
damage on listed stocks of salmon from river uses, such as hydroelectric
generation, irrigation and navigation traffic. |
|
044 |
Bloch |
Responds. |
|
058 |
Sen. R. Beyer |
Asks where the figure came
from. |
|
060 |
Bloch |
Responds. |
|
070 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks how any make it to
ocean if predation is considered. |
|
073 |
Bloch |
Responds. |
|
078 |
Sen. R. Beyer |
Asks why there are strong
runs of some salmon upriver from the dams. |
|
087 |
Bloch |
Explains the process of
all cumulative impacts on fish runs. |
|
112 |
Chair Messerle |
A quorum being present,
opens full committee meeting at 8:12 a.m. |
|
115 |
Bloch |
Continues presentation,
describing benefits from a developed Columbia River. |
|
143 |
Bloch |
Continues presentation,
explaining fish-friendly operations. |
|
175 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks whether the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) authority is as consultant, or advisor. |
|
180 |
Bloch |
Summarizes NMFS role and
authority. |
|
224 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks who in NMFS makes
decisions about biological impacts of actions on listed species, and whether
there is any recourse from the decisions. |
|
230 |
Bloch |
Describes the
collaboration between the listing agency and action agency. |
|
250 |
Chair Messerle |
Expresses concern that
state decision-makers become less effective because of federal decisions. |
|
263 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks for a specific
example of listing process. |
|
273 |
Bloch |
Summarizes the operation
of the Columbia River hydroelectric system. |
|
363 |
Sen. Shields |
Requests additional
clarification about the process of listing of fish species. |
|
380 |
Bloch |
Responds and explains. |
|
407 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks whether the process
stops if there is an emergency power situation. |
|
440 |
Bloch |
Responds and continues
explanation. |
TAPE 4, A |
||
|
050 |
Bloch |
Continues
explanation. Refers to (EXHIBIT A). |
|
075 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks for examples of list
items. |
|
070 |
Bloch |
Responds and refers to
submitted written material. |
|
136 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks for clarification of
acronyms used in written material. |
|
140 |
Bloch |
Responds. |
|
145 |
Chair Messerle |
Inquires if dollar value
of lost power generation during spills done for benefit of fisheries has been
calculated. |
|
150 |
Bloch |
Responds. |
|
200 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks whether the
Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is actually running more because it is
required to send power to California. |
|
217 |
Bloch |
Replies. |
|
252 |
Chair Messerle |
Requests clarification
whether, when the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) required BPA to
send power to California, BPA was required to draw down reservoirs in order
to generate enough power. |
|
260 |
Bloch |
Responds. We sell them power. NW peak is in winter. |
|
310 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks whether this year is
different for power trading with California, because California this year
can’t generate enough power for itself, partly due to deregulation. |
|
325 |
Chair Messerle |
Requests the economist’s
view on the situation with public utility districts (PUDs), because of the
price of electrical power. |
|
335 |
Bloch |
Answers. |
|
420 |
Sen. Burdick |
Inquires whether PUDs,
which are now victims of high spot market wholesale prices, can come to BPA
and claim preference rates? |
|
Tape 3, B |
||
|
020 |
Bloch |
Responds that BP is fully
subscribed. |
|
026 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks whether when other
contracts expire, utility company customers can then exercise preference
rights? |
|
032 |
Bloch |
Confirms. |
|
034 |
Sen. Burdick |
Inquires whether these
expirations are staggered, or come all at once. |
|
037 |
Bloch |
Responds. |
|
050 |
Chair Messerle |
Clarifies that the purpose
of the Columbia River Governance is to develop a coalition, to achieve more
political power, to maintain that preference for the northwest. The fear is that power will be sent
elsewhere, such as the midwest, or that we will be required to match rates of
other regions, such as California or the eastern U.S. |
|
060 |
Deckert |
Asks whether governors who
are meeting in California are talking about rate gaps, and what Council’s
plan is. |
|
065 |
Bloch |
Clarifies. |
|
134 |
Chair Messerle |
Elaborates that
deregulation works fine if there is surplus supply, which is not the case
now. Notes that we are not building
up water so we can deal with potential market problems. Asks how we can get out of the situation,
and what it will do to our utilities in the short term. Asks whether some customers will not have
service, or have such expensive service that they will not operate, and how
severe the situation is. |
|
168 |
Bloch |
Acknowledges the question,
but has insufficient information to answer. |
|
183 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks who is making
windfall profits, and who is paying for that. Expresses concern that customers will have to pay. |
|
215 |
Chair Messerle |
Acknowledges issues, and
urges committee to plan to consider carefully what action it will take. Raises concern that the northwest is
growing, but not generating more power to keep pace with that growth. |
|
220 |
Deckert |
Points out that there is
information available about what entities are benefiting in the current
surplus and non-surplus environment. |
|
234 |
Tom O’Connor |
Executive Director, Oregon
Municipal Electric Utilities.
Represents small and mid-size municipal utilities in Oregon. Responds by encouraging the committee to
continue asking questions. |
|
286 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks for examples of
utilities that are being harmed by the market conditions. |
|
289 |
O’Connor |
Responds. |
|
319 |
Chair Messerle |
Notes that the information
doesn’t even consider private companies. |
|
323 |
Sen. Fisher |
Observes that in 1993,
Idaho Power said 15 percent of their bill to customers was the fish-related
cost of generating the power. Asks
what the percentage is now attributable to the fish recovery process. |
|
340 |
Bloch |
Offers to obtain
information for the committee. |
|
358 |
Sen. Fisher |
Expresses additional
concern about costs of fish recovery. |
|
359 |
Bloch |
Responds. |
|
412 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks about options these
small utility companies, and how to resolve some of the situations. |
|
422 |
O’Connor |
Elaborates. |
Tape 4, B |
||
|
050 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks what conservation
efforts municipal utilities are using, and what benefits they have if
programs are effective. |
|
060 |
O’Connor |
Illustrates. |
|
070 |
Chair Messerle |
Inquires about capacity
for transmission of power, whether a problem is developing, and what is the
capacity with natural gas. Asks
whether more coal generating plants are needed. |
|
080 |
Bloch |
Clarifies. |
|
090 |
Sen. Fisher |
Comments that gas prices
are high. |
|
091 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks whether the electric
infrastructure could be used to put peak-hour pricing in place. |
|
118 |
O’Connor |
Describes current pricing
structure. |
|
144 |
Sen. Fisher |
Again asks about who is
making windfall profits in the energy crisis. Asks for information about hedging buying or stranded costs. |
|
160 |
O’Connor |
Explains. |
|
210 |
Bloch |
Explains further. |
|
247 |
Chair Messerle |
Observes that at this
time, BPA has $800 million surplus fund, but if there is a cold dry spring
the reserve could be gone. If there
is a warm wet spring it could increase.
The market is fluctuating.
Expresses interest in learning who is gaining and losing in the
process. |
|
262 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks how much it would
cost to meter and charge a toll for heavy use time. |
|
269 |
O’Connor |
Offers to bring
information to the committee. |
|
278 |
Deckert |
Asserts concern that if
FERC abdicates its responsibility, in our dispersed political climate, we
lose. Asks how Oregon’s interests
will be represented in that process. |
|
190 |
Bloch |
Answers. |
|
339 |
Chair Messerle |
Points out to the
committee that it doesn’t have direction to deal with the energy problem at
this time. Encourages the committee
to also get involved in regulatory issues, such as siting or putting in gas
lines. |
|
354 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks whether anything
should be done to prevent some direct-service industries, such as Keyser
Aluminum, from shutting down and selling their power instead. |
|
365 |
Bloch |
Describes the re-marketing
process. |
|
430 |
Chair Messerle |
Agrees that excess supply
should go back into system, and observes that new contracts should tie
surplus into requirement to build more generation. |
|
440 |
Chair Messerle |
Adjourns meeting at 9:55
a.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patricia Nielsen, Judith Callens,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
A – List of FCRPS Operations, Eric Bloch, 1
p