SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE,
SALMON AND WATER
January 17, 2001 Hearing Room B
8:00 AM Tapes
7 - 8
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ken Messerle, Chair
Sen. Frank Shields, Vice-Chair
Sen. Bill Sen. Fisher
Sen. Ginny Burdick
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Ryan Sen. Deckert
VISITING MEMBER PRESENT:
Sen. Joan Dukes
STAFF PRESENT: Judith
Callens, Committee Administrator
Patricia Nielsen, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 49 Public Hearing
SB 50 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 7, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Messerle |
Convenes the meeting at
8:05 a.m. Opens public hearing on SB
49. |
SB 49 - PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
008 |
Judith Callens |
Describes bill and
impacts. |
|
020 |
Roy Elicker |
Assistant Director, Fish
Division, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW). Presents written statement (EXHIBIT A). Testifies in opposition. |
|
040 |
Al Elkins |
Porter Public
Relations. Representing the Oregon
Hunters Association. Testifies in
opposition. |
|
048 |
Sen. Fisher |
Comments that the
appointment of the director is a political process. |
|
055 |
Elkins |
Responds. |
|
060 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks how many members
Elkins represents. |
|
062 |
Elkins |
Responds there are 9000
members. |
|
065 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks for alternative
suggestions. |
|
068 |
Elkins |
Answers none at this time;
he will be polling association members. |
|
073 |
Phil Donovan |
Representing the Oregon
Sportfishing Industry Association, the Oregon Guides and Packers Association,
and the Association of Northwest Steelheaders. Testifies in opposition.
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
B). |
|
099 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks about the difference
between this agency and others where the governor directly appoints the
executive director. |
|
101 |
Donovan |
Describes different types
of agency director appointments. |
|
121 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks how many clients
Donovan represents, and whether he has any suggested alternatives. |
|
124 |
Donovan |
Describes membership of
his clients. Responds with suggested
alternatives to the bill. |
|
140 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks whether anything
prevents the Commission from hiring a consultant. |
|
145 |
Donovan |
Responds in the negative. |
|
150 |
Chair Messerle |
Observes that the
commissioners do not serve at the pleasure of the governor, but they can be
removed by just cause, which is a stricter standard. |
|
160 |
Rod Harder |
Representing Oregon
Sportsmen’s Defense Fund. Testifies
in opposition. |
|
201 |
Chair Messerle |
Closes public hearing on
SB 49. Opens public hearing on SB 50. |
SB 50 - PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
215 |
Callens |
Describes the bill and
impacts. |
|
220 |
Chair Messerle |
Observes that the issue
was raised with the interim committee.
The estimated cost was questioned by that committee, which brought the
bill before the current committee.
Describes the current building. |
|
240 |
Harder |
Representing Oregon
Sportsmen’s Defense Fund. Testifies
in favor, depending on cost. |
|
255 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks about difficulty of
access to department, and advantage of proximity to Portland airport. |
|
260 |
Harder |
Responds. |
|
265 |
Elkins |
Representing the Oregon
Hunters Association. Testifies in
support of the concept of the bill, but expresses concerns about the cost of
the study. |
|
282 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks witness whether his
client would be in favor of spending the amount dedicated to the study on
moving the agency instead. |
|
285 |
Elkins |
Responds with concern
about cost to the agency. |
|
290 |
Sen. Fisher |
Wonders about the cost of
travel from Portland to Salem during the session, and whether time and cost
would be saved if the agency were moved. |
|
300 |
Elkins |
Discusses travel of agency
staff and access to Portland airport. |
|
315 |
Sen. Deckert |
Comments about concerns of
his constituents who want to retain state resources within the Portland
metropolitan area. |
|
330 |
Elkins |
Discusses the cost of
renovating the current building, compared to cost of moving the agency. |
|
354 |
Vice-chair Shields |
Explains the concern he
had, as a member of the interim committee, about the value of the
building. Suggests that members of
the committee go and look at the building. |
|
370 |
Chair Messerle |
Agrees the committee would
welcome more information about the building. |
|
375 |
Sen. Fisher |
Suggests the building be
sold as is, and allow a buyer to renovate. |
|
390 |
Chair Messerle |
Urges the committee to
focus on how the agency functions and whether it would be more effective
located in Salem, in addition to the costs of the move. Asks witness whether there is an advantage
to having the department closer to other agencies, the legislature and the
governor’s office. |
|
410 |
Elkins |
Describes prior
experiences. |
TAPE 8, A |
||
|
020 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks about the agency’s
perception of how it functions in its present location. |
|
025 |
Elkins |
Explains the perception of
a gap because of the distance. |
|
040 |
Sen. R. Beyer |
Expresses general
preference for moving state workers away from Salem. Asks why the field staff are in downtown
Portland, where there is little wildlife. |
|
050 |
Elkins |
Agrees that the emphasis
needs to be in the field. |
|
070 |
Sen. R. Beyer |
Comments that Salem has an
airport, and asks whether using that airport would be just as easy. |
|
073 |
Elkins |
Expresses support. |
|
076 |
Sen. Dukes |
Asks how many field staff
are in Portland, when many staff are located around the state. |
|
080 |
Sen. Fisher |
Observes he has had
trouble using airline system in Oregon to serve a business purpose, either to
save time or money. |
|
090 |
Chair Messerle |
Points out that all state
agencies have access to the state airport, using state-owned planes stationed
in Salem. |
|
100 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks why there must be a
study. Recommends evaluating worth of
building if sold as is, and cost of moving the agency to Salem. |
|
110 |
Chair Messerle |
Describes other costs
involved. Explains the interim
committee felt all costs should be evaluated before deciding whether to move
the agency, and how to fund a move.
Agrees the amount of detail in the study must be addressed. |
|
120 |
Sen. R. Beyer |
Asks whether the bill
would go to the Ways and Means Committee to decide how much would be spent on
the study. Recommends against an
open-ended study. |
|
130 |
Chair Messerle |
Agrees it probably should
go to Ways and Means. |
|
135 |
Callens |
Points out the committee
received the bill without a subsequent referral to Ways and Means, probably
because the cost of the study would be under the threshold. Explains that the committee may request a
referral. |
|
140 |
Sen. Burdick |
Asks for fiscal impact
information. |
|
145 |
Callens |
Advises that committee
staff is awaiting fiscal information. |
|
160 |
Chair Messerle |
Closes the public hearing
on SB 50. |
|
165 |
Chair Messerle |
Adjourns the meeting at
8:45 a.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patricia Nielsen, Judith Callens,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Statement on SB 49, ODFW, Roy Elicker, 1 p
B
– Statement on SB 49, Phil Donovan, 2 pp