SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES, AGRICULTURE,
SALMON AND WATER
March 19, 2001 Hearing Room B
8:00 am Tapes
63 - 64
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Ken Messerle, Chair
Sen. Frank Shields, Vice-Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Ginny Burdick
Sen. Ryan Deckert
Sen. Bill Fisher
MEMBER EXCUSED:
STAFF PRESENT: Jennifer
Solomon, Committee Administrator
Cheryl Young, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Information Meeting on Lien Bill
Package
HB 2051-A, Public Hearing and
Possible Work Session
HB 2037-A, Public Hearing and
Possible Work Session
HB 2036-A, Public Hearing and
Possible Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 63, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Messerle |
Calls meeting to order at
8:08. Opens Informational Meeting on
Agriculture Lien Bill Package. |
|
012 |
Rep. Kropf |
Representing District 37.
Discusses related laws regarding the reworking of Oregon’s Agricultural Lien
Laws Statutes. Asks that the committee consider the three bills, HB 2051, HB
2037 and HB 2036. |
|
102 |
Chair Messerle |
States his appreciation
for all the work involved. States that they have been informed that HB 2051
is the Mother Bill. |
|
105 |
Rep. Kropf |
Agrees with the statement. |
|
109 |
John Albert |
Attorney. Describes the
bankruptcy of the AgriBioTech, Inc. and the effects on the farmers within
Oregon and in other states. Notes that their position would have been
significantly stronger if HB 2051 had been in place. Continues testimony. |
|
300 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks about the problems
with the processes and if he feels that the commodities are becoming more of
a world market and wonders if that might be causing the failures. |
|
312 |
Albert |
Responds that he thinks
that perhaps the Chair is correct in his perspective. |
|
322 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks about the federal law
that just passed, and will it be helpful in circumstances like this. |
|
329 |
Albert |
States that this would
have very little effect on the ABT bankruptcy, because it deals primarily
with individual Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcies. |
|
338 |
Sen. Kropf |
Makes further comments
regarding similar circumstances and future legislation. |
|
409 |
Jean Wilkinson |
Associate Director for
Governmental Affairs for the Oregon Farm Bureau. Speaks of the devastation caused by the ABT bankruptcy and the support of these bills. Submits
written testimony. (EXHIBIT A). |
Tape 64, A |
||
|
040 |
Brian Glaser |
Grass Seed Farmer. Speaks
in support of these bills. Submits
written testimony. (EXHIBIT B). |
|
063 |
Chair Messerle |
Declares a sub-committee. |
|
064 |
Glaser |
Continues testimony. |
|
097 |
Chair Messerle |
Declares Full Committee |
|
101 |
Walt Gowell |
Attorney practicing in
McMinnville. Speaks in favor of these bills. Expands on description of these
bills. Submits written testimony. (EXHIBIT
C). |
|
131 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks if the liens include
cranberries and meat products. |
|
134 |
Gowell |
Those are not being added
to the agricultural produce lien, by this amendment but are currently covered
under existing statute regarding meat products. Continues testimony. |
|
201 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if he is speaking of
the original bill and not the A-engrossed bill. |
|
207 |
Gowell |
Agrees that it is the
original bill. Continues with testimony. |
|
265 |
Tim Martinez |
Vice President, Government
Relations for the Oregon Bankers Association. Notes that this is a change in
the philosophy for the association noting that they have worked productively
with the Farm Bureau and others and the positive results from the experience.
Submits written testimony. (EXHIBIT D). |
|
292 |
Donn Wiley |
Representing the Oregon
Bankers Association Agriculture Committee. Describes the changes these will
make, and asks for the committee’s support of these bills. |
|
345 |
Martinez |
Continues testimony and
clarifies some areas of the bills. Feels they’ve resolved many issues
regarding the ABT bankruptcy. |
|
392 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if it wouldn’t be
wiser to blend all three bills together, instead of having them be individualized.
|
|
411 |
Wiley |
Defers to sponsors of the
bill on that issue. Discusses inconsistencies with some sections of the
bills. |
|
486 |
Chair Messerle |
Closes Informational
Meeting, Opens Pubic Hearing on HB 2036-A, HB 2037-A, HB 2051-A. Declares possible
conflict of interest. |
Tape 63, B |
||
HB 2036-A, HB 2037-A, HB 2051-A, PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
029 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about the changes, of
the agricultural products to include horticulture products and if this is
going to bring nurseryman under the agricultural producer lien. |
|
039 |
Wiley |
Responds that he believes
it gives them a choice of the two different types of liens to file. |
|
040 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks about the proposal to
eliminate Christmas tree dealer from the statute. Views this as being
broadened so those Christmas tree producers would be able to file a lien
against anyone who buys a Christmas tree from them. |
|
044 |
Wiley |
Agrees, and expands on
response. |
|
046 |
Beyer |
States that they made
certain that it did not apply to final consumers of the tree, and only wanted
to lien those who were buying the trees for the purpose of reselling. Asks if
this is an expansion of that statute. |
|
050 |
Wiley |
Agrees, and clarifies. |
|
056 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks for clarification
regarding the Nurserymen’s lien being attached to the final consumer against their real estate and not to the
product you are selling. |
|
062 |
Wiley |
Agrees and clarifies. |
|
067 |
Sen. Beyer |
Asks if the Nurseryman’s
lien is not changed then person still has a choice to attach it to real
estate if he chooses. |
|
068 |
Wiley |
That is correct. |
|
070 |
Sen. Deckert |
Asks if there are any
unintended consequences in the future. |
|
073 |
Wiley |
Responds that does not see
any negative consequences. |
|
101 |
Martinez |
Adds comments to Mr. Wiley
response. |
|
113 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks Mr. Martinez how the
banks are protecting their collateral and should we be looking at bonding for
processors. |
|
129 |
Martinez |
Responds to the effects to
the growers and the producers. |
|
151 |
Wiley |
Adds comments to Mr.
Martinez’ response. |
|
158 |
Sen. Fisher |
Asks what the percentage of the problems with the
bankruptcies is to management vs. mismanagement. |
|
177 |
Martinez |
Refers to the AGRI-FROZEN
bankruptcy. |
|
194 |
Wiley |
Makes additional comments
to Mr. Martinez’ response. |
|
216 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks if any processors
were present at the meetings with Rep. Kropf. |
|
220 |
Wiley |
Yes, they were well
represented. |
|
240 |
Chair Messerle |
States that he thought
there would be more interest in testifying, especially if they are discussing
other areas of bonding and capital requirements. |
|
251 |
Wiley |
Agrees. Notes that there
are some concerns of clients obtaining funding. |
|
262 |
Martinez |
Makes additional comments. |
|
274 |
Dave Nelson |
Executive Secretary of
Oregon Seed Council. Speaks in support of all three bills. Considering the
grower’s indemnity fund to insure against something like the bankruptcies of
the past. |
|
448 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks how the producer
judges if his wholesaler is reputable. |
|
465 |
Nelson |
Responds that he doesn’t
think there is an objective way to do that, because most of the seed
companies are privately held. |
|
504 |
Chair Messerle |
Makes additional comments
regarding the need to protect the producers. |
015Tape 64, B |
||
|
020 |
Jim Cramer |
Acting Administrator for
the Commodity Inspection Division for the Oregon Department of Agriculture.
Speaks in favor of the bills. Submits written testimony. (EXHIBIT E). |
|
029 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks if the department has
been involved in the amendments to HB 2036. |
|
031 |
Cramer |
States that the department
has been involved in the review and comments to the bills. |
|
034 |
Chair Messerle |
Will not do any action of
bills today. Will wait until the amendments come back, so they can be dealt
with at the same time. |
|
042 |
Sen. Beyer |
Urges caution because of
sections of the law in 2051 and the changes in the others may cause the need
to change it back. |
|
048 |
Chair Messerle` |
States that he hopes LC is
keeping a close watch, and that they are depending on folks who have been
working on the committee to double-check that for them also. |
|
056 |
John McCully |
Representing the Ag
Cooperative Council. Comments on the Agricultural Produce Lien. Discusses
issues in the A-engrossed part of bill. Makes clarification in several areas
of bill. Speaks in favor of the bills. |
|
102 |
Chair Messerle |
Asks how cooperative
members are protected. |
|
107 |
McCully |
Responds that they have to
be protected by their involvement in the co-op. |
|
121 |
Chair Messerle |
States his concern
regarding the local co-ops. |
|
132 |
McCully |
Responds that the growers
have some control over the large companies. |
|
139 |
Chair Messerle |
Makes comments regarding
his involvement with co-ops in the past. States that he is pleased with the
movement of these bills, but sees that there is more work to be done. Closes
Public Hearing on HB 2051, HB 2037, and HB 2036. Adjourns meeting at 9:43 a.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Cheryl Young, Jennifer Solomon,
Committee Assistant Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2051, HB 2037, HB 2036, written testimony, Jean Wilkinson, 1p.
B
– HB 2051, HB 2037, HB 2036, written testimony, Brian Glaser, 1p.
C
– HB 2051, written testimony, Walt Gowell, 3pp.
D
– HB 2051, written testimony, Tim Martinez, 3pp.
E
– HB 2051, HB 2037, HB 2036, written testimony, Jim Cramer, 1p.