HOUSE SPECIAL SESSION COMMITTEE ON TAXATION
February 27, 2002 Hearing Room HR A
5:45 p.m. Tapes 1 - 4
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bruce Starr, Chair
Rep. Mark Hass
Rep. Tim Knopp * See vote explanations (Exhibit N)
Rep. Jerry Krummel * See vote explanations (Exhibit L)
Rep. Jan Lee
Rep. Tootie Smith * See vote explanations (Exhibit M)
Rep. Diane Rosenbaum
Rep. Vicki Walker
Rep. Jackie Winters * See vote explanations (Exhibit O)
STAFF PRESENT: Paul Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Richard Yates, Economist, Legislative Revenue Office
Ed Waters, Economist, Legislative Revenue Office
Greg Chaimov, Legislative Counsel
Cara Filsinger, Administrative Support
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Adoption of committee rules
Introduction of committee bills
Public Hearing and Work Session – HB 4024
Public Hearing and Work Session – HB 4039
Public Hearing and Work Session – HB 4040
These minutes are in compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the tapes.
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 1, A |
||
005 |
Chair Starr |
Opens the meeting at 6:29 p.m. Opens a work session for the purpose of adopting committee rules. |
WORK SESSION TO ADOPT COMMITTEE RULES |
||
009 |
Rep. Winters |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT the proposed Committee Rules (EXHIBIT A). |
010 |
|
VOTE: 7-0 |
|
Chair Starr |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
WORK SESSION TO INTROUDCE COMMITTEE MEASURES |
||
011 |
Chair Starr |
Explains process for introducing measures. |
013 |
Paul Warner |
Legislative Revenue Officer. |
020 |
Warner |
Explains LC 44 (EXHIBIT B) relating to a two year delay in the implementation of Measure 88. |
028 |
Warner |
Explains LC 48 (EXHIBIT C) relating to an increase in the cigarette tax. |
033 |
Warner |
Explains LC 49 (EXHIBIT D) relating to an increase in the privilege tax on beer and wine. Says all measures require a 3/5 vote. |
048 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks about beer tax exceptions for small producers. |
054 |
Warner |
Answers there is an exception for producers of less than 200,000 gallons. |
060 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks how many companies are affected by the tax increases. Asks if Widmer Brewery would be affected. |
065 |
Warner |
Responds he does not know. |
066 |
Dick Yates |
Legislative Revenue Office. Answers that the measure would exempt all Oregon producers of malt beverages. |
070 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks which wines will have the increase of $1.05. |
072 |
Warner |
Answers most wines are taxed at 67 cents and dessert wines at 77 cents. Says the increase of $1.05 is for both. |
077 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks about volume limitations for wineries. |
081 |
Yates |
Responds that existing law exempts US producers with a domestic production volume of less than 100,000 gallons from tax on the first 50,000 gallons. Comments on tax credit measure that passed in 2001 session. |
099 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks how many Oregon wineries would be affected by the $1.05 increase. |
100 |
Yates |
Replies he does not know, but says there is a person from Oregon Liquor Control Commission available to answer questions. |
102 |
Chair Starr |
MOTION: Moves LC's 44, 48, 49 BE INTRODUCED as committee bills. |
|
|
VOTE: 7-0 |
105 |
Chair Starr |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
099 |
Chair Starr |
Recesses the committee at 6:35 p.m. |
|
|
NOTE: The Speaker appointed Representatives Krummel and Lee to the committee during the recess. |
100 |
Chair Starr |
Reconvenes committee at 7:20 p.m. |
120 |
Chair Starr |
Opens public hearing on HB 4024, HB 4039, and HB 4040 |
PUBLIC HEARINGS – HB 4024, HB 4039, HB 4040 |
||
123 |
Ed Waters |
Legislative Revenue Office. Reviews the revenue impact statement for HB 4024 (EXHIBIT E). Says the effective date is 91 days after sine die. |
140 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks about the revenue impact in 2003-05 biennium. |
143 |
Waters |
Responds that the measure affects revenue in the two tax years in the current biennium. |
148 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks clarification about when the measure would be in effect. |
150 |
Waters |
Answers the measure would be in effect for tax years January 1 – December 31, 2002 and January 1 – December 31, 2003. |
153 |
Chair Starr |
Points out revenue statement is available to the committee. |
157 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks what income level is required to take advantage of the increased deduction. |
150 |
Waters |
Responds that need at least $3,000 of federal tax liability. |
168 |
Rep. Krummel |
Inquires what the poverty level is for a family of four. |
169 |
Waters |
Responds he will get back to the committee with the answer. |
181 |
Chair Starr |
Discusses process for public hearings. |
192 |
Rep. Hass |
Expresses disappointment in late hour for the public hearings. Comments on possible technical errors in the bills. |
203 |
Chair Starr |
Comments on public testimony received in December and January. |
215 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Comments on process by which the committee was appointed. |
250 |
Dick Yates |
Provides revenue impact statements for HB 4039 and HB 4040(EXHIBITS F and G). Discusses reductions in distribution to counties. |
311 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks about the transfers to counties versus the General Fund. |
321 |
Yates |
Responds the tax from the existing rate would continue the current distribution through the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) (56% to General Fund, 10% to counties, and 34% to the cities). Says that for the new revenue, OLCC will have to keep track of the additional tax collected, and that money will go directly to the General Fund. |
336 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks whether OLCC would need to add staff to account for increased tax collections. |
342 |
Yates |
Responds he does not think they would. |
346 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Clarifies that no money would go to mental health, cities, or counties. |
321 |
Yates |
Responds they get the same distribution as under current law, except that due to the tax increases in the measure, consumption will be reduced and the total revenue will decrease slightly. |
357 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks about reduced consumption. |
361 |
Yates |
Responds yes. |
363 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks about section 3 in HB 4039. Asks if it was the intent to eliminate the tax on the smaller microbreweries. |
371 |
Yates |
Says that is how the measure reads. |
372 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks if smaller producers would benefit because the tax is removed. |
374 |
Yates |
Answers yes. |
384 |
Chair Starr |
Says the draft was intended to be that way. |
386 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks if the revenue impact statement includes removal of the tax on small producers. |
389 |
Yates |
Answers yes. |
390 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks if there are figures available reflecting revenue impact if the tax on small producers was not removed. |
400 |
Rep. Hass |
Comments on the issue of fairness. |
415 |
Yates |
Reviews revenue impact statement for HB 4040 (EXHIBIT G). Comments on consumption decline. |
463 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks about reduction in consumption. |
474 |
Yates |
Responds that the tax rate is fixed per pack. Says there is typically a decline in consumption due to tax increases. |
480 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks if campaign to reduce tobacco consumption is included in the figures. |
490 |
Yates |
Responds no. |
500 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks what effect tax evasion will have on beer and wine or cigarette tax. |
TAPE 2, A |
||
030 |
Yates |
Responds the beer and wine tax is relatively low. Says he is not aware of problems with smuggling relating to the beer and wine tax. Speculates that this measure would not increase illegal activity. Says relating to cigarette taxes, the Western states are relatively high. Comments on efforts to reduce illegal activity. |
058 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if it is illegal to purchase wine, beer, or cigarettes over the Internet. |
061 |
Yates |
Says no, but that buyers are liable for the tax. |
065 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks about cost for enforcement. |
070 |
Yates |
Responds that was addressed during 2001 session. Says that the Attorney General (AG) and Department of Revenue are scheduled to begin the process of enforcement. |
085 |
Rep. Winters |
Ask about the tax per pack for Idaho. |
089 |
Warner |
Responds it is 28 cents. |
096 |
Chair Starr |
Says the bills before the committee are drafted the same as the Governor’s proposals. |
100 |
Rep. Haas |
Says there may be some disagreement about whether the measures are drafted that way. |
107 |
Rep. Randy Leonard |
District 48. Comments on his past legislative experience. Discusses status of the budget in Oregon. |
160 |
Rep. Leonard |
Relates his disappointment in the process. |
200 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Comments on Rep. Leonard’s testimony. Discusses public hearing process. |
223 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if the Governor should reconsider his vetoes of the budget bills. |
230 |
Rep. Leonard |
Clarifies his position. Relays personal experience with firefighters union. |
308 |
Rep. T. Smith |
Asks if Rep. Leonard supports tax increases to balance budget. |
311 |
Rep. Leonard |
Responds that he supports a balanced process. |
317 |
Rep. T. Smith |
Comments on the tax increases proposed by the measures. |
332 |
Rep. Leonard |
Responds to Rep. Smith’s statements. |
367 |
Rep. Ben Westlund |
District 53. Comments on the negotiations of the “Group of 5” . Outlines the revenue proposals that were discussed by the group. Comments that Sunday liquor sales was the only long-term revenue proposal that had consensus. |
445 |
Rep. Westlund |
Discusses the Education Endowment Fund proposal. |
TAPE 1, B |
||
011 |
Rep. Westlund |
Says that it is necessary to determine whether the legislature will approve increased taxes before the budget process can continue. |
033 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks about sending tax proposals for a vote instead of as part of a whole package. |
045 |
Rep. Westlund |
Comments that during a special session, it is necessary to know the revenue first. |
070 |
Chair Starr |
Says that if any of the measures pass the House floor, there would be a bi-partisan group making determinations on how to allocate the revenue. |
075 |
Rep. Westlund |
Replies that a special session is different. |
092 |
Chair Starr |
Says that Legislative Counsel reports there are no drafting mistakes in the measure. |
096 |
Rep. Hass |
Comments on the drafting process for the measures. |
103 |
Paul Romain |
Oregon Beer and Wine Distributors Association. Discusses HB 4039. Explains privilege taxes on beer and wine. Says that the tax should be on the end transaction, not the wholesalers. Points out the tax increase in HB 4039 is very large. Discusses effect of tax increase on consumers. |
120 |
Romain |
Provides examples of other states’ taxes. Comments on the effect of HB 4039 on microbreweries. |
210 |
Romain |
Says the measure is not constitutional. Comments the measure will be challenged in court. |
230 |
John Powell |
Miller Brewing Company. Comments on HB 4039 and excise taxes. Relates personal experience relating to excise taxes. |
258 |
Powell |
Discuses the difference between average and median taxes. Comments that beer is also taxed federally. Relates the proposed tax increase in HB 4039 compared to other state’s rates. |
302 |
Powell |
Comments on the regressive nature of excise tax on beer. |
348 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks if Oregon’s tax on beer and wine is fair. |
355 |
Romain |
Says the tax is too high. Comments that consumers pay more than others, for example costs such as the bottle bill and wages. |
400 |
Powell |
Comments on tax fairness issues as compared to other states. Relates examples of other kinds of taxes. |
428 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks about microbreweries and the production threshold contained in the measure. |
441 |
Powell |
Defers question to Mr. Romain. |
438 |
Romain |
Answers the largest microbrewery, Widmer Brothers, produces about 127,000 barrels. The next largest, Deschutes Brewing Company, produces about 103,000 barrels. Says the exemption level in the bill was increased in later versions of the measure. |
TAPE 2, B |
||
002 |
Romain |
Comments that the brewers are growing fast. Outlines increased distribution for various breweries. Says exemptions are a bad policy. |
010 |
Chair Starr |
Says Legislative Counsel will explain constitutionality of the measure. |
020 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks for a percentage of people that earn under $30,000. |
021 |
Powell |
Says he does not know. |
030 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks what percent of consumers earn less than $30,000 per year. |
035 |
Powell |
Responds that it varies across the state. |
040 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks what effect a price increase will have on consumption. |
050 |
Powell |
Comments that beer consumption has remained about the same over time. Says there would be some reduction, but he does not know how much. |
060 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks about how other types of alcohol products (e.g., coolers, Zima) are taxed. |
068 |
Powell |
Responds that he does not know how the other kinds of products are taxed. |
074 |
Romain |
Discusses “malt-ernatives”. Says they are taxed the same as beer. |
097 |
Ken Strobeck |
Oregon Winegrowers Association. Says the bulk of the product sold in Oregon comes from out of state, so consumers will end up paying for the cost of HB 4039. Comments on small family farm wineries. |
110 |
Strobeck |
Says only ten wineries in Oregon produce above 100,000 gallons. Says one half of the larger wineries will go out of business if HB 4039 passes. Outlines other taxes imposed on wineries. |
137 |
Nancy Baker Kroft |
Comments on difficulties to get the public to testify. Says local wineries should be exempted from taxes. Says she represents teachers and schools and is concerned about the future of education. Comments on cutting services without increasing taxes. Says wine and beer are not a necessity, so the taxes on them cannot be considered regressive because they are optional. |
188 |
Dan Kohler |
Keizer small business owner. Discusses the nature of his business. Comments on detrimental effect on his business if taxes were increased. |
259 |
Rex Daines |
Salem. Comments on alcohol and cigarette taxes. Says as a bankruptcy lawyer, his business will increase if taxes are increased. |
295 |
Chris Mickelson |
Keizer. Asks that taxes not be increased. |
311 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Provides example of the Alaska state budget. Asks about Oregon government services and what services they would cut. |
345 |
Mickelson |
Comments on past increases in the budget. Emphasizes the more money taken from the “public’s pocket”, the less money they have to spend. Urges the committee move forward with the “Group of 5” proposal. |
393 |
Kohler |
Reiterates that more cuts should be made than increasing taxes. |
410 |
Laura Aviani |
Candidate for House District 7. Urges prioritizing cuts in food, shelter, and safety first. Says anything less is unacceptable. |
451 |
Aviani |
Says that only making cuts, without considering revenue, creates more problems in the future. Asks legislators to contact the federal government to urge cuts not be made. |
TAPE 3, A |
||
040 |
Rep. Jeff Merkley |
District 47. Asks for a different process to get bills to get these issues to the floor. |
070 |
Greg Chaimov |
Legislative Counsel. Comments on constitutionality of HB 4039. Says as long as there are neutral criteria it would be acceptable. |
114 |
Steve Dixon |
OSPIRG. Says his organization is neutral on HB 4040. Says (EXHIBIT H)was prepared before HB 4040 was printed. Comments on tobacco tax increases as a tool for tobacco use reductions. |
159 |
Dixon |
Comments on health care costs due to tobacco use. Says that tobacco is a luxury purchase. |
180 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks what he means by “luxury” purchase. |
187 |
Dixon |
Replies that it is not necessary for a day-to-day living. |
188 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks for clarification. |
189 |
Dixon |
Says people may need a haircut to look presentable. Says tobacco is a luxury. |
198 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks if a latte or soda qualifies as a luxury. |
200 |
Dixon |
Says he would not qualify them as a luxury. Says tobacco is an addictive substance. |
206 |
Rep. Winters |
Comments that caffeine is also addictive. |
216 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks about tobacco education programs and whether Mr. Dixon would support future tax increases. |
220 |
Dixon |
Responds he may support a future tax increase. |
223 |
Rep. Krummel |
Clarifies that the revenue source will decrease. |
228 |
Dixon |
Responds his interest in reduction in tobacco use. |
230 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks about Oregon Health Plan (OHP) data cited in testimony. |
233 |
Dixon |
Says he can get the source of the data. |
238 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if OHP clients should pay for their health care services by increasing taxes on tobacco products. |
243 |
Dixon |
Says all people who smoke will pay the tax. |
251 |
Rep. Krummel |
Repeats the question. |
253 |
Dixon |
Responds that in a way it would require the OHP clients to pay for part of the cost of their services. |
266 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks why smokers should pay to solve the budget problem. |
267 |
Dixon |
Replies that it is a privilege tax. Says if people do not want to pay the tax, they should not smoke. |
276 |
Rep. Lee |
Asks about the $350 million in medical expenses cited in his testimony. |
280 |
Dixon |
Says he will review his handout and get back to the committee. |
290 |
Phyllis Rand |
Governor’s Commission on Senior Services. Says the commission has not reviewed the measures at hand, but is in favor of increased beer, wine, and cigarette taxes to offset budget cuts, and also supports delaying Measure 88 implementation. |
310 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks if the commission would like more time to review the measures. |
313 |
Rand |
Responds that would be nice, but understands that it might not happen. |
320 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks if Ms. Rand could review them with the commission tomorrow. |
321 |
Rand |
Answers yes. |
329 |
Bob Castagna |
Oregon Catholic Conference. Presents (EXHIBIT I). Comments on status of the economy and post-September 11 issues. Says things will probably get worse. Says government is not like a business. Comments on role of government in providing social services. |
407 |
Castagna |
Reviews page two of (EXHIBIT I) citing budget figures. Says churches and charities cannot replace government services. |
TAPE 4, A |
||
010 |
Castagna |
Says most affected by budget cuts are children. Says the safety net should be supported. Says the Catholic Conference opposed Measure 88. |
057 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks how Mr. Castagna would define wealth. |
060 |
Castagna |
Says it is a question of resources. |
064 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks for a dollar figure. |
066 |
Castagna |
Says it depends on the situation. |
075 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks for further clarification. Questions how many taxes are enough. |
087 |
Castagna |
Says they are looking for equity. Comments on saving lives. |
100 |
Rep. Lee |
Comments on chart in (EXHIBIT I). |
102 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks whether counties should have responsibility to provide services. |
112 |
Rand |
Replies they should provide senior services. |
121 |
Russ Walker |
Oregon Citizens for a Sound Economy. Describes the purpose of his organization. Says budget issues are not solved by increasing taxes. |
140 |
Walker |
Discusses other state’s efforts to address revenue issues. Says the tax proposals are regressive. |
172 |
Walker |
Comments on testimony provided earlier in the evening. |
190 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Discusses letters she has received from her constituents. Says many letters ask for tax increases. Asks if $900 million should be cut from the state budget. |
202 |
Walker |
Says his organization has suggested an across the board cut. Comments on tax policy. |
244 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Comments her constituents would want to testify in public. |
252 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks if there are other indicators of the economic downturn, prior to September 11. |
254 |
Walker |
Responds there were signs as early as November 2000. Says September 11 exacerbated the problem. |
264 |
Rep. Winters |
Asks about Oregon conditions. |
267 |
Walker |
Replies that economists rank Oregon’s fiscal discipline low. Says we rank well in some areas. |
286 |
Joe Schweinhart |
Associated Oregon Industries. Comments on HB 4024. Says Measure 88 is a middle class tax cut and necessary for economic stimulus. Says that HB 4024 would harm the economy. |
318 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if the witnesses can define “wealth”. |
333 |
Schweinhart |
Answers that every person has a level where they feel comfortable. Says he cannot give a number. |
341 |
Chair Starr |
Closes the public hearings on HB 4024, HB 4039, and HB 4040. |
347 |
Chair Starr |
Recesses committee until 10:00 p.m. |
353 |
Chair Starr |
Calls the committee to order at 10:04 p.m. |
356 |
Chair Starr |
Opens a work session on HB 4024 |
WORK SESSION – HB 4024 |
||
360 |
Rep. Hass |
Asks for more time to review the issues. |
375 |
Chair Starr |
Responds that the process will be moved along. Says it is necessary to know what revenues are on the table. |
441 |
Chair Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 4024 to the floor WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION as to passage. |
TAPE 3, B |
||
003 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Says the measures need more work. Comments that there needs to be more public input. Says she is concerned about public perception of the process. |
050 |
Rep. Knopp |
Says he will provide courtesy votes to move the process forward. |
072 |
Rep. V. Walker |
Asks about tax pledge. |
081 |
Rep. Knopp |
Responds to question. |
086 |
Chair Starr |
VOTE: 5-4 AYE: 5 – Knopp, Krummel, Smith T, Winters, Starr NAY: 4 - Hass, Lee, Rosenbaum, Walker V |
088 |
Chair Starr |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
|
NOTE: Four members submitted vote explanation letters (EXHIBITS L, M, N, and O). |
094 |
Chair Starr |
Closes work session on HB 4024 and opens a work session on HB 4039. |
WORK SESSION – HB 4039 |
||
100 |
Chair Starr |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 4039-1 amendments dated 2/27/02 (EXHIBIT J). |
|
|
VOTE: 9-0 |
101 |
Chair Starr |
Hearing no objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
105 |
Chair Starr |
Comments on new revenue statement that reflects the –1 amendments(EXHBIT K). |
119 |
Warner |
Explains the revised revenue statement. |
125 |
Yates |
Explains the change is the reduction for mental health services. |
146 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks what the HB 4039–1 amendments do. |
150 |
Yates |
Explains the effect of the amendments. |
163 |
Rep. Knopp |
Clarifies his vote. |
166 |
Chair Starr |
States the nature of certain votes on the committee. |
172 |
Rep. Krummel |
Comments on shared revenue for cities and counties. |
185 |
Chair Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 4039 to the floor AS AMENDED WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION as to passage. |
|
|
VOTE: 5-4 AYE: 5 - Knopp, Krummel, Smith T, Winters, Starr NAY: 4 - Hass, Lee, Rosenbaum, Walker V |
189 |
Chair Starr |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
|
NOTE: Four members submitted vote explanation letters (EXHIBITS L, M, N, and O). |
193 |
Chair Starr |
Closes the work session on HB 4039 and opens a work session on HB 4040. |
WORK SESSION - HB 4040 |
||
196 |
Chair Starr |
MOTION: Moves HB 4040 to the full committee without RECOMMENDATION to passage. |
198 |
Rep. Krummel |
Reiterates comments regarding county revenues. |
|
|
VOTE: 5-4 AYE: 5 - Knopp, Krummel, Smith T, Winters, Starr NAY: 4 - Hass, Lee, Rosenbaum, Walker V |
203 |
Chair Starr |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
|
NOTE: Four members submitted vote explanation letters (EXHIBITS L, M, N, and O). |
208 |
Chair Starr |
Comments on the process. |
213 |
Chair Starr |
Closes work session on HB 4040 and adjourns the committee at 10:30 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Cara Filsinger, Kim Taylor James,
Administrative Support Revenue Office Manager
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
A – Proposed committee rules, Staff, 1 p
B – LC 44, Staff, 14 pp
C – LC 48, Staff, 5 pp
D – LC 49, Staff, 6 pp
E – HB 4024, Revenue Statement, Staff, 1 p
F – HB 4039, Revenue Statement, Staff, 1 p
G – HB 4040, Revenue Statement, Staff, 1 p
H – HB 4040, Written Testimony, Steve Dixon, 1 p
I – HB 4024, 4039, and 4040, Written Testimony, Bob Castagna, 5 pp
J – HB 4039-1 Proposed Amendments, Staff, 1 p
K – HB 4039-1 Revenue Statement, Staff, 1 p
L – HB 4024, HB 4039, HB 4040, Vote Explanation, Rep. Jerry Krummel, 3 pp
M - HB 4024, HB 4039, HB 4040, Vote Explanation, Rep. Tootie Smith, 1 p
N - HB 4024, HB 4039, HB 4040, Vote Explanation, Rep. Tim Knopp, 1 p
O - HB 4024, HB 4039, HB 4040, Vote Explanation, Rep. Jackie Winters, 1 p