SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON BUDGET
June 21, 2002 Hearing Room E
10:00 AM Tapes
7 - 8
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Steve Harper, Chair
Sen. Margaret Carter
Sen. Peter Courtney
Sen. Avel Gordly
Sen. Charles Starr
MEMBER EXCUSED: Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Ken Messerle
STAFF PRESENT: Paul
Warner, Legislative Revenue Officer
Patricia Nielsen, Administrative Support
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 5091A – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 7, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Harper |
Calls the meeting to order
at 10:25 a.m. Opens work session on
HB 5021A. |
HB 5021A - WORK SESSION |
||
|
010 |
Paul Warner |
Legislative Revenue Officer, Legislative Revenue Office (LRO). Describes the overview of revenue changes during the past few
months and provides status report.
Refers to Gap Calculation handout (EXHIBIT
A) and discusses specific figures. |
|
110 |
Warner |
Continues and refers to EXHIBIT A. Discusses tobacco securitization. |
|
150 |
Warner |
Continues and refers to EXHIBIT A. Discusses tax increases. |
|
240 |
Warner |
Concludes. |
|
245 |
Chair Harper |
Comments these are
approaches to discuss. |
|
250 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks about delay of light
rail. |
|
255 |
Warner |
Explains it is a refund of
bond due, and there are reserves kept which are freed by the bond being paid
off. |
|
266 |
Sen. Gordly |
Asks whether the funds are
captured from west side light rail, and what will happen to the interstate
light rail project. |
|
275 |
Warner |
Responds and explains the
funds were reserved for specific project. |
|
280 |
Sen. Gordly |
Asks if it is possible for
the funds to be claimed for the interstate light rail project. |
|
295 |
Warner |
Responds he will confirm
with Treasury. |
|
298 |
Sen. Yih |
Asks whether disconnect
from bonus depreciation is retroactive or prospective. |
|
305 |
Warner |
Responds it would reach
back to Sept 10, 2001 and negate the bonus depreciation for the 2003-05
biennium. |
|
315 |
Sen. Yih |
Inquires if the $124
million is for two years. |
|
320 |
Warner |
Confirms it is for the
2001-03 biennium period. |
|
325 |
Warner |
Continues on reverse page
of EXHIBIT A, and reviews the House
proposal. Begins discussion with
Solutions section, with delay of Measure 88 tax reduction. Continues. |
|
425 |
Warner |
Continues discussing House
proposal budget reductions. |
TAPE 8, A |
||
|
010 |
Warner |
Continues discussing House
proposal budget reductions. Explains
911 balance. Discusses state school
fund payment. Concludes there is an
$879 million balance to the House proposed solution. |
|
055 |
Sen. Courtney |
Inquires whether the House
plan allows for September 2002 forecast. |
|
058 |
Warner |
Responds the $28 million
general funding ending balance would be applied to decrease in September
forecast, but anything beyond that would require legislative action. |
|
060 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks if the House cut K-12
education. |
|
065 |
Warner |
Describes two reductions
of $112 million and $200 million, and offset. |
|
070 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks if Proposition 13 was
connected to reduction. |
|
075 |
Warner |
Explains it is a change in
payment pattern. House actions put schools
back where they were at the end of 2nd special session. |
|
085 |
Sen. Courtney |
Disagrees and asks about
September ballot measure. |
|
090 |
Warner |
Responds and continues the
House also proposed a backup bonding program of $180 million revenue against
master settlement. Explains the bonds
would be sold in spring to have payments to schools by May 2002. |
|
|
|
Discussion about direction
of the new stability fund. |
|
140 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks if common school fund
money is dedicated to K-12. |
|
145 |
Warner |
Explains and discusses
proposals. |
|
155 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks when earnings will be
defined. |
|
158 |
Harper |
Comments this budget
element is uncertain. |
|
160 |
Warner |
Advises the Senate Revenue
Committee has beginning of a legislative concept provided by Division of
State Lands (DSL), but no clear legal guidelines. |
|
165 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks how firm the tobacco
settlement dollar projections are. |
|
170 |
Warner |
Explains revenue from Master
Settlement Agreement. |
|
190 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks about payments to
Oregon. |
|
195 |
Warner |
Describes payment
schedule. |
|
200 |
Sen. Carter |
Inquires whether the
receipts have matched projections. |
|
205 |
Warner |
Responds they have been
very close. Explains inflation
adjustment. |
|
220 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks if these dollars will
go down. |
|
225 |
Warner |
Responds. |
|
230 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks about PERS savings. |
|
235 |
Warner |
Responds it is not a
dollar amount but was part of the original proposal. |
|
250 |
Sen. Yih |
Inquires whether a task
force is studying the issue. |
|
255 |
Chair Harper |
Advises it won’t impact
this special session budget. |
|
265 |
Sen. Yih |
Asks if there is a chance
of savings later if mortality tables changed. |
|
270 |
Chair Harper |
Responds it is not yet
determined. Opens the meeting for
comment from the floor. |
|
300 |
Chair Harper |
Advises the committee may
meet tomorrow afternoon. Adjourns
meeting at 11:15 a.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patricia Nielsen, Marjorie Taylor,
Committee Assistant Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 5091A, Gap calculation and House proposal, P. Warner, 2 pp
B
– HB 5091A, budget report and measure summary, P. Warner, 29 pp