SENATE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON BUDGET
June 24, 2002 Hearing Room E
4:00 P.M. Tapes
9 - 11
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Steve Harper, Chair
Sen. Roger Beyer
Sen. Margaret Carter
Sen. Peter Courtney
Sen. Avel Gordly
Sen. Ken Messerle
Sen. Charles Starr
GUEST MEMBERS: Sen.
Joan Dukes
Sen. Bill Morrisette
Sen. Mae Yih
Sen. Frank Shields
STAFF PRESENT: Teresa
McHugh, Department of Administrative Services (DAS)
Patricia Nielsen,
Administrative Support
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 5091-A Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 9, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Harper |
Opens meeting at 4:05
p.m. Recesses the committee for 15
minutes. |
|
010 |
Chair Harper |
Reconvenes the committee
at 4:24 p.m. Opens public hearing on
HB 5091A, the omnibus disappropriations bill. |
|
HB 5091A – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
|
Chair Harper |
Gives preliminary comments
about Senate proposal which balances budget without raising taxes using four
principles: ·
Protect K-12 from further reductions ·
Minimize impact to priority programs by reducing, delaying or
eliminating new/non-essential programs ·
Maintain adequate cash reserves ·
Consistent and fair |
|
060 |
Sen. Gordly |
Comments on lack of public
notice for the meeting. |
|
070 |
Sen. Beyer |
Comments and explains
principles further. Refers to page 2
of budget document (EXHIBIT A). Continues and gives examples. Discusses specific recommendations. Notes differences between House plan and
this proposal. |
|
200 |
Chair Harper |
Continues to discuss
details of proposal: ·
Impact on K-12 ·
Human services treated same as House plan ·
Public safety and corrections ·
Community colleges ·
Across-the-board cuts average 2.5% ·
Add some other funds, such as lottery funds |
|
215 |
Sen. Beyer |
Details differences
between House and Senate proposals. |
|
225 |
Chair Harper |
Explains need to make
proposed reductions. |
|
235 |
Sen. Yih |
Refers to written
testimony (EXHIBIT D). Expresses constituent opinions which favor
no new taxes and balancing budget without referring to voters. Recommends freezing budget at 6-30-02
levels, saving $1.6 billion. Suggests
delay of new programs. |
|
295 |
Chair Harper |
Responds. |
|
305 |
Sen. Gordly |
Asks about
across-the-board cuts to state agencies. |
|
310 |
Chair Harper |
Explains this allows
agencies flexibility to decide what cuts to make. |
|
325 |
Sen. Gordly |
Gives specific example of
$5 million cut to judicial branch, and asks if there is a need to repeal any
statutes to deal with unintended consequences. |
|
340 |
Chair Harper |
Explains it will be up to each
agency to bring up changes needed. |
|
355 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks about judicial
budget, and judges which have now been elected. Expresses need for justice to be as equal as possible. |
|
370 |
Chair Harper |
Explains the delays. |
|
|
|
Discussion about what cuts
were made. |
|
410 |
Sen. Gordly |
Asks for DAS examiner to
appear. |
|
TAPE 10, A |
||
|
005 |
Sen. Dukes |
Inquires whether agencies will
truly make across-the-board cuts instead of reducing program areas disproportionately. |
|
010 |
Chair Harper |
Answers that is the intent
but there is no way to force them. |
|
015 |
Sen. Dukes |
Expresses concern over
smaller agencies which do not receive much general fund money. Explains example of Department of Fish and
Wildlife (ODFW), which receives only about 10% general funds. Asks if agency must cut only from those
general fund programs. |
|
030 |
Sen. Morrisette |
Inquires about impact of
loss of federal dollars. |
|
035 |
Chair Harper |
Explains. |
|
053 |
Sen. Dukes |
Discusses example of the
Columbia River Estuary program. |
|
056 |
Chair Harper |
Responds. |
|
059 |
Sen. Gordly |
Discusses loss of federal
funds due to cuts in mental health programs. |
|
|
Chair Harper |
Comments on the federal
match. |
|
068 |
Norm Fox |
Testifies in favor of the
proposal. Refers to submitted material
(EXHIBIT E). Discusses proposed budget cuts. |
|
115 |
Paul Snider |
Association of Oregon Counties (AOC). Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
F). Discusses community
corrections funding. |
|
200 |
Jacqueline Zimmer Jones |
Human Services Coalition of Oregon (HSCO). Questions short-term fixes in budget proposal. Comments on “unspecified” cuts. Discusses specific recommendations: · Phase-in of Ballot Measure
88 · Adjust income tax · Cigarette, beer and wine taxes · Disconnect from federal
economic stimulus package |
|
267 |
Sen. Gordly |
Asks whether these cuts fall
disproportionately on the poor. |
|
277 |
Zimmer Jones |
Responds human services is
a large portion of the general fund, which means human services is bound to
take larger cuts. |
|
290 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks whether other states
facing economic turndown are cutting human resources programs. |
|
306 |
Zimmer Jones |
Explains Oregon saves
money by doing more things in the community. Continues many states are putting money into programs like
Oregon’s. |
|
325 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks about cuts to Medicaid-eligible
community programs for seniors. |
|
340 |
Zimmer Jones |
Discusses. |
|
350 |
Teresa McHugh |
Department of
Administrative Services (DAS). |
|
353 |
Sen. Gordly |
Asks how state agencies will
absorb the across-the-board cuts. |
|
355 |
McHugh |
Explains DAS process: · Work with the agencies to
identify statutory programs and appropriation programs · Have each agency submit
their suggested reductions that fall within legal guidelines · Present recommendations to
the Governor Refers to written material
(EXHIBIT G). |
|
TAPE 9, B |
||
|
020 |
Sen. Carter |
Discusses examples of cuts
to Pre-K, mental health planning services, safety net clinics and home care. Asks how to make sure the core of the
program is kept intact and can do its statutory mission. |
|
030 |
McHugh |
Explains DAS first contacts
agencies to make sure they do not spend un-allotted funds. Notes that at a certain point the agency
will tell DAS whether a program could withstand cuts and still maintain its
mission. |
|
054 |
Sen. Dukes |
Asks about
disproportionate cuts due to federal and state mandates. |
|
063 |
McHugh |
Responds it is likely the Governor
would follow statutory authority, and any program that is statutorily
mandated would not be eliminated. Advises the submitted document is an earlier draft. |
|
080 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks about judicial hiring
delay, after the voters have decided. |
|
090 |
McHugh |
Explains the Governor decides
whether he has the legal authority to make the cuts, then takes the impact of
the cuts into consideration. |
|
104 |
Sen. Shields |
Inquires whether agency
directors have already considered what their cuts would be. |
|
110 |
McHugh |
Responds directors would
want to look at the cuts and update their plans with additional information developed
in the last few months. |
|
123 |
Chair Harper |
Recommends if a 4.2%
decrease is needed, the smart way is to let the agencies do it. |
|
140 |
Scott Gallant |
Oregon Medical Association (OMA). Discusses cigarette, beer, and wine tax increases supported by
the OMA. Expresses concern about additional
cuts to human services, particularly the Oregon Health Plan (OHP). |
|
218 |
Gordon Fultz |
AOC. Testifies and explains concern about
cumulative effect of cuts to human
services made during the three special sessions. Recommends finding a way to stabilize the funding of these
services in the future. Discusses direct
services which have sustained cuts, including human services, regional and
rural investments, and the community solutions and development office. |
|
299 |
Chair Harper |
Advises mental health
planning funds may still be there. |
|
305 |
Fultz |
Explains counties are now
planning for the upcoming fire season. |
|
319 |
Gina Fuhrman |
Association of Community Mental Heath Programs. Reminds members of the time and effort that
went into mental health planning. Discusses shortfall in mental health system and consequences of
further cuts. Explains there is
currently an unfunded mandate and some counties already took money from other
programs for planning. |
|
370 |
Chair Harper |
Recommends making funding
request to the Emergency Board. |
|
375 |
Sen. Gordly |
Advises she will resist any
efforts to roll back or eliminate the legislation which was passed. Discusses failure to make an investment in
mental health, and potential lawsuits around the state waiting to happen
which will cost even more. |
|
416 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks about increased costs
in some areas resulting from cuts to other areas. |
|
TAPE 10, B |
||
|
020 |
Fultz |
Suggests if programs are
not funded, there will be increased costs reflected later. |
|
027 |
Grattan Kerans |
Oregon University System (OUS).
Describes
a budget note which directed OUS to return to the Emergency Board prior to
the State Board of Higher Education increasing tuition. Advises a letter has been submitted to the
Emergency Board to give notice of the plan to increase tuition (Exhibit I). |
|
060 |
Sen. Carter |
Asks what happens with the
engineering programs. |
|
065 |
Kerans |
Discusses cumulative cuts of
$61 million to OUS, which would be apportioned among engineering and other
programs. Advises tuition increases
would not cover cuts, and doing all cuts in one year would exacerbate the
effect. |
|
091 |
Sen. Carter |
Inquires how cuts and
tuition increases will affect Oregon’s nursing shortage. |
|
095 |
Kerans |
Discusses teacher
shortage, engineer shortage, nurse shortage, while at the same time
scholarship money and grant funds are reduced. |
|
117 |
Sen. Yih |
Asks about increasing
tuition for out-of-state students to make up for reductions. |
|
137 |
Kerans |
Explains tuition increases
are virtually guaranteed, but the board will decide once they see the
magnitude of the cuts. |
|
152 |
Sen. Dukes |
Inquires about impact on
enrollment if tuition is increased. |
|
155 |
Kerans |
Elaborates and advises
that lower income students would likely be impacted first. |
|
187 |
Mike Marsh |
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Discusses reductions applied to train service.
Describes work and investments to
build ridership market, which would be lost after cuts. Advises the City of Eugene has similar
concerns. |
|
200 |
Jason Heuser |
City of Eugene. Testifies in support of
continued train funding: · Losing the second train
weakens the link between communities · The timing is unfortunate,
only months away from the revitalization of downtown Eugene train station |
|
225 |
Sen. Gordly |
Asks about loss of
employment. |
|
230 |
Marsh |
Responds probably less
than twenty. |
|
250 |
Doug Barber |
Willamette Dental Group. Discusses
application of proposed cut to adult dental services under the OHP. Describes package of services based on escalating
co-pays, but this proposal would take the package and apply to poorest of the
poor who cannot afford those co-pays. |
|
295 |
Jim Bunn |
Northwest Dental Services. Elaborates on effect of
cuts on adult dental services.
Advises there is a possible $2.6 million cost. Submits written testimony (EXHIBITS J, K). |
|
330 |
Sen. Shields |
Asks about loss of $2.6
million in savings if the federal waiver is denied. |
|
335 |
Bunn |
Describes how Health
Services Commission and dental providers identified savings with a 50% cut of
non-categorical services. Notes that was
submitted with the federal wavier application so if the waiver is approved
those savings can be realized. Concludes those savings have already been counted, but the
waiver has not yet been approved. |
|
400 |
Barber |
Returns on behalf of Oregon Association of Relief Nurseries.
Discusses the 10% cut proposed for
relief nurseries and disagrees with the suggestion that the workload has
dropped. |
|
TAPE 11, A |
||
|
010 |
Linda Ludwig |
League of Oregon Cities. Recommends that Economic Development is a priority in addition
to schools and human resources, because it brings businesses and jobs to
Oregon. Advises this is what the
community solutions office does, and there is a need to keep the tools we already
have to stimulate the economy. |
|
034 |
Bob Castagna |
Oregon Catholic Conference. Testifies
in opposition to several Department of Human Services proposed reductions: · Reduction of $20,000
federal food stamp program outreach, risking a $2 million loss of federal
match · Employment related day
care cut, which takes effect in one week · Not adding staff for case
load increases, because if unemployed can’t qualify for TANF due to
insufficient number of caseworkers to process them, that in effect denies
them the service · Proposed salary reductions |
|
128 |
Lee Hazelwood |
Senior advocate. Testifies in favor of Oregon
Project Independence (OPI) and in opposition to funding cuts. Advises if the agency makes the cuts, this
program will be badly hurt. Notes
cuts to other senior mental health programs. Discusses funding for senior mental health projects. |
|
170 |
Chair Harper |
Asks if OPI program may be
cut by the agency. |
|
175 |
Hazelwood |
Affirms. |
|
177 |
Chair Harper |
Reiterates it is the
legislative intent for OPI to take only its 3-4% cut. |
|
180 |
Tom Holt |
Oregon State Pharmacists Association. Expresses concern about agency discretion for making cuts, which
would endanger the Medicaid Program.
Describes details of co-pay structure and difficulty of establishing a
co-pay in the Medicaid program. |
|
280 |
Tom Holt |
Continues and concludes. |
|
320 |
Chair Harper |
Adjourns meeting at 6:35
p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patricia Nielsen, Marjorie Taylor,
Committee Assistant Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Proposed Selective Program Reductions, staff, 6 pp
B
– Agency and Program Prorated Reductions, staff, 6 pp
C
– Senate Proposal, staff, 1 p
D
– HB 5091A, written testimony, Sen. Yih, 1 p
E
– HB 5091A, written testimony, N. Fox, 2 pp
F
– HB 5091A, written testimony, P. Snider, 7 pp
G
– HB 5091A, written testimony, T. McHugh, 16 pp
H
– HB 5091A, written testimony, Sen. Carter, 1 p
I
– HB 5091A, written testimony, G. Kerans, 1 p
J
– HB 5091A, written testimony, J. Bunn, 1 p
K
– HB 5091A, written testimony, J. Bunn, 1 p