SENATE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON
GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
June 17, 2002 Hearing Room B
6:00 p.m. Tapes 5 - 6
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Bev Clarno, Chair
Sen. Jason Atkinson
Sen. Mae Yih
STAFF PRESENT: Marjorie
Taylor, Administrator
Patsy Wood, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 1026 Public Hearing and Work
Session
SB 1025 Public Hearing
SB 1026 Work Session to Reconsider
Vote
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 5, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Clarno |
Calls the meeting to order
at 6:07 p.m. and opens a public hearing on SB 1026. |
SB 1026 PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
006 |
Admin. Marjorie Taylor |
Introduces SB 1026 which
increases unemployment insurance benefits to eligible individuals by $13 per
week and reduces unemployment insurance tax for first quarter of 2003. |
|
012 |
Sen. Yih |
Asks how taxes can be
lowered when benefits are increased. |
|
020 |
Joe Gilliam |
Oregon Grocery Industry
Association. Testifies in support of
SB 1026. Explains how additional federal
money lets them increase the benefits while decreasing the tax rate thus
extending the economic stimulus package presented in HB 4021 (1st
Special Session 2002). |
|
052 |
J.L. Wilson |
National Federation of
Independent Business. Testifies in
support of SB 1026 echoing the sentiments of Mr. Gilliam. |
|
059 |
Sen. Atkinson |
For the record, asks
whether the benefit is equally fair to employers and employees. |
|
063 |
Gilliam |
Responds that the $13 a
week is equal to $14.14 million, and the .16% tax reduction is worth $15.68
million, so they are very close. |
|
076 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Asks if there is also an
extension in the number of weeks. |
|
080 |
Gilliam |
Explains that the extension
is adding a full quarter. |
|
087 |
Chair Clarno |
Closes the public hearing
and opens work session on SB 1026. |
SB 1026 WORK SESSION |
||
|
090 |
Sen. Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves SB 1026 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 3-0 |
|
093 |
Chair Clarno |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN.
ATKINSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
095 |
Chair Clarno |
Closes the work session on
SB 1026 and opens a public hearing on SB 1025. |
SB 1025 PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
104 |
Chair Clarno |
Recesses the committee. |
|
105 |
Chair Clarno |
Reconvenes the committee. |
|
107 |
Admin. M. Taylor |
Introduces SB 1025 which
requires the Department of Education to adopt and administer norm-referenced
academic achievement testing in Oregon public schools, and makes
implementation by school district of Certificate of Initial Mastery (CIM),
Certificate of Advanced Mastery (CAM) and state assessment system optional. |
|
117 |
Stan Bunn |
Superintendent of Public
Instruction. Testifies in opposition
to SB 1025 saying Oregon’s 10-year old system of standards and assessment
should not be changed. Feels that
allowing schools to opt out of the CIM/CAM requirement would send a message
that the state is not serious about high standards in education. Adds that with a new assessment system,
clarity would be lost in identifying students with special needs. Wonders what measurement the state will
have to ensure that students are performing at a quality level if they do
away with CIM/CAM. |
|
148 |
Bunn |
Discusses some of the
complications in abandoning the CIM/CAM assessment system, including the risk
of losing $500,000,000 in federal money, possible litigation at a high cost,
and jeopardizing the ability to receive federal, competitive grants. Describes problems that would occur with
the legislatively mandated “report card” in Oregon. |
|
192 |
Bunn |
Describes the problems if
Oregon moves from CIM/CAM to a national test. Urges the committee to not make the Department of Education
abandon a system that has been in place for 10 years. |
|
226 |
Sen. Atkinson |
Expresses frustration
experienced by rural Oregon regarding the cost of the program and the
training of staff. Says that students
question the value of the CIM/CAM when moving on to college and wonder if other
states have this program. Mentions
that the legislation is proposing that the CIM/CAM system become “optional.” |
|
246 |
Bunn |
Responds that “optional”,
to him, means no standard. Describes
the value of the CIM/CAM: a higher number of third-grade students reading at a
standard level, and benefits when going on to college such as scholarships
and early or automatic entry. Says that
the cost to school districts and the Department of Education will be substantially
higher (based on the federal government’s rigorous standards) if we abandon
CIM/CAM and move to alternatives. |
|
299 |
Sen. Yih |
Asks about the cost of
norm-referenced academic achievement testing for every grade in Oregon. |
|
304 |
Bunn |
Responds that the federal
government is going to have rigorous standards for third grade through tenth
grade testing and Oregon wants to use a testing system and standards
currently in the approval process to save money. |
|
320 |
Bill Auty |
Associate Superintendent
for Assessment. Says that Oregon
would have to implement a norm-referenced national test in 7 different
subject areas. Discusses the
increased cost of testing which is between $3 and $12 per student, per
subject, and there are 40,000 students per grade. |
|
347 |
Sen. Yih |
Asks what grades are
tested in Oregon. |
|
351 |
Auty |
Replies that testing is now
done in grades 3, 5, 8 & 10. |
|
353 |
Sen. Yih |
Asks if this bill calls
for testing of every grade. |
|
354 |
Auty |
Responds it will be grades
1 through12. |
|
355 |
Sen. Yih |
Asks if these tests can be
administered by teachers in their classroom rather than through outside
contracting. |
|
360 |
Auty |
Replies that these tests are
constructed by publishers and they recoup their costs through their testing
so they would be unlikely to give teachers the tests to score internally. |
|
370 |
Bunn |
Discusses TESSA – a
computerized program that gives test results in 5 minutes. Says it is unclear if a national test would
be able to synchronize with TESSA which could significantly lengthen the time
to get back test results. |
|
395 |
Sen. Verne Duncan |
Senate District 20. Testifies in opposition to SB 1025 saying
it is hard to think about spending money on a new program when the state is
trying to find ways to save money.
Discusses the problem many teachers have with the amount of paperwork
involved, but says using the TESSA program will give teachers instant
information. Comments that the legislature
is part of the problem by cutting back on the funds for the computer
system. |
|
TAPE 6, A |
||
|
005 |
Sen. Duncan |
Says you have to look at a
trend through the years for evaluation purposes. Emphasizes that we would be sending a terrible message to the
schools in this state if we asked educators to start over with a new system. Discusses this time as an era of
accountability. Urges the committee
to not throw out a system that has the potential of being a great educational
tool. |
|
050 |
Sen. Charles Starr |
Senate District 13. Testifies in support of SB 1025 saying he
has heard from teachers that CIM/CAM are a failure, and heard from school
board members that this is a burden that has not been funded. Says our expectations are not high enough
so we don’t compare well in the world.
Gifted students tell him CIM is a waste of time. Discusses the cost of the new program
saying it shouldn’t cost more. Feels CIM/CAM
will eventually be eliminated, if it is not done so today. Says England tried this system for 20
years and they said it did not work.
Urges the committee to pass SB 1025 to the floor do pass. |
|
126 |
Sen. Randy Miller |
Senate District 19. Testifies in support of SB 1025, saying it
is very difficult to admit failure, but feels the CIM/CAM has been a
monumental failure. Notes that there
is no value to colleges of the CIM or CAM.
Has heard that CIM/CAM deprives teachers of an opportunity to teach. Notes that this legislation makes the
CIM/CAM optional. Urges the committee
to pass the bill to the floor do pass saying it will save money, save time in
the classroom and help save education. |
|
218 |
Sen. Gary George |
Senate District 12. Testifies in support of SB 1025. Comments about a town hall meeting where
teachers and staff asked him to “get bureaucracy off their back” by making
the CIM and CAM optional. Describes
how the CIM/CAM files are physically taking up a large amount of space. Notes the amount of money this process has
used up. Says making CIM/CAM optional
would leave those schools successfully using the program intact, while giving
all school districts the option to choose.
Says this is a chance to reform the reform. |
|
323 |
Chair Clarno |
Asks if he has children in
the school system. |
|
324 |
Sen. George |
Replies that he has five
children that have graduated, but says that 19 members of his family are in
the education profession. Shares some
of the discussions he has had with family members in California who feel
bogged down in the classroom by this same type of testing. |
|
348 |
Chair Clarno |
Closes the public hearing
on SB 1025 and opens a work session to reconsider SB 1026. |
|
SB 1026 WORK SESSION |
||
|
356 |
Sen. Atkinson |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which SB
1026 was sent to the floor DO PASS. |
|
|
|
VOTE: 3-0 |
|
360 |
Chair Clarno |
Hearing no objection,
declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
365 |
Chair Clarno |
Closes the work session on
SB 1026 and adjourns the meeting at 7:02 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patsy Wood Marjorie Taylor,
Committee Assistant Administrator