SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUDGET SOLUTIONS
September 15, 2002 Hearing Room 357
Time: 10:00 a.m. Tapes 5 - 6
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Lenn Hannon, Chair
Sen. Ken Messerle, Vice-Chair
Sen. Peter Courtney
Sen. Joan Dukes
Sen. Steve Harper
Senate President Gene Derfler
STAFF PRESENT: Jennifer
Simmons, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Introduction of Committee Measures
HB 4072 Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 4073 Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 5100 Public Hearing and Work
Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 5, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Hannon |
Calls the meeting to order
at 10:15 a.m. Opens a work session
for the purpose of introducing committee measures. |
INTRODUCTION OF COMMITTEE MEASURES |
||
|
006 |
Adrienne Sexton |
Legislative Fiscal
Office. Provides an explanation of LC
35 (EXHIBIT A), which sets the
procedure for a special election related to the temporary income tax
surcharge measure, HB 4072. |
|
028 |
Chair Hannon |
MOTION: Moves LC 35 BE INTRODUCED as a committee
bill. |
|
030 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
031 |
Chair Hannon |
Opens a work session on HB
4072 |
HB 4072 WORK SESSION
|
||
|
042 |
Paul Warner |
Legislative Revenue Officer.
Submits the -9 amendments (EXHIBIT
B), and informational materials (EXHIBITS
C, D, E) related to HB 4072. |
|
090 |
Warner |
Provides a
section-by-section overview of the -9 amendments. |
|
150 |
Chair Hannon |
Asks whether there is a
fiscal impact to the measure. |
|
154 |
Warner |
Answers that there is a $5
million fiscal impact for the 2001-03 biennium resulting from the increase to
the filing threshold. Indicates that
the measure phases out Oregon’s inheritance tax by 2007. |
|
174 |
Sen. Dukes |
States that the only way
to increase revenue is if the federal threshold were lower than the state
threshold. |
|
181 |
Warner |
Explains the
administrative issues involved, specifically that filers must file both state
and federal tax returns. Provides an
explanation to the credit provisions within the measure. |
|
199 |
Sen. Dukes |
Requests clarification on
the credit. |
|
202 |
Warner |
Elaborates that the
federal government has allowed states to use a “pickup tax” to use the
maximum credit, which is why Oregon law sets inheritance tax liability equal
to the maximum allowable credit. |
|
210 |
Sen. Dukes |
Compares the credit to
that for the income tax. |
|
212 |
Warner |
Clarifies that it is not
exactly similar to the deductions allowed for income taxes. Recalls that Oregon’s inheritance tax was
phased out in 1981. |
|
224 |
Sen. Harper |
Solicits Mr. Warner’s
opinion as to whether the measure is a good idea. |
|
226 |
Warner |
Says that one of the
Department of Revenue’s primary concerns is how it would collect the
retroactive taxes owed. |
|
237 |
Sen. Harper |
Asks how the law may be
clarified in order to avoid the $5 million issue for the 2003-05 biennium. |
|
244 |
Warner |
Notes that the net revenue
impact of the –A9 amendments is about $310 million increase this biennium and
$395 million in 2003-05. Acknowledges
that there is a long-term issue related to the elimination of the credit,
which would require the state to develop a stand-alone state inheritance tax. |
|
264 |
Sen. Harper |
Concludes it may be worth
the $5 million to clarify the system for citizens, administrators and
legislators. |
|
272 |
Warner |
States that there could be
confusion related to connections to the federal issue, because Oregon
administers its inheritance tax differently than most other states. |
|
294 |
Sen. Dukes |
Comments that many people
have expressed confusion about why they needed to file state taxes even if
they didn’t need to file federal taxes, particularly those managing estates
for non-relatives. Says those people
are often forced to pay out of the estate itself. Asserts that there is a need for consistency. |
|
313 |
Chair Hannon |
References the
informational materials. |
|
324 |
Sen. Dukes |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 4072-A9 amendments dated
9/14/02. |
|
330 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the work session
and opens a pubic hearing on HB 4072. |
PUBLIC HEARING HB 4072 |
||
|
335 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the public hearing
and reopens the work session on HB 4072. |
|
|
|
|
WORK SESSION HB 4072 |
||
|
350 |
Sen. Harper |
MOTION: Moves HB 4072 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
356 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. HARPER
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the work session on
HB 4072 and opens a public hearing on
HB 4073-A. |
HB 4073-A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
370 |
Richard Yates |
Legislative Revenue
Office. Provides an explanation of the measure and the –A11 amendments (EXHIBIT F). Says the measure would bond a portion of
the revenues from the Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) tobacco lawsuit |
TAPE 6, A |
||
|
026 |
Sen. Harper |
Asks how the bonds will be
called. |
|
032 |
Kate Richardson |
Oregon State Treasury. Replies that the bonds would be issued for
a set amount of time. Indicates that
the measure should provide some guidance as to the length of time. |
|
040 |
Sen. Harper |
Asks whether there would
be penalties for early call. |
|
043 |
Richardson |
Replies that she does not
know whether such penalties would apply. |
|
045 |
Yates |
Submits a model payment
structure (EXHIBITS G, H). Reiterates that it is still unknown how
the corporation would structure the debt, but that the exhibit provides a
possible example. Indicates that such
a structure can garner a 3.72 percent interest rate |
|
104 |
Sen. Harper |
Wonders why the
corporation would not dissolve following the repayment of the bonds. |
|
106 |
Yates |
Describes the process by
which the corporation would be dissolved.
Suggests the legislature may wish to retain its ability to issue
additional bonds should the economic downturn continue. |
|
146 |
Richardson |
Adds that both models
maintain enough in reserve to pay for general obligation bonds. |
|
150 |
Sen. Courtney |
Recalls that the House
version of the measure authorized $400 million in bonding, while this version
authorizes $150 million. |
|
157 |
Yates |
Clarifies that the
original measure stipulated that the maturity of the bonds was limited to 14
years. |
|
163 |
Richardson |
Explains that there is a
“turbo-payment” option to pay the bonds off sooner, while the maximum allowed
would be 14 years. |
|
171 |
Sen. Courtney |
Asks what would be the
latest the bonds could be paid off. |
|
178 |
Chair Hannon |
Clarifies that the maximum
time is 14 years, but that it could be paid off sooner. |
|
185 |
Sen. Courtney |
Concludes that the state
is effectively purchasing $240 million later in exchange for $150 million
right now. |
|
192 |
Yates |
Corrects Sen. Courtney in
that the total bond issue will be $204 million, while the payment will be
$220 million, with the interest paid in front. Adds that the payment will go up the longer it takes to pay off
the bonds. |
|
206 |
Sen. Dukes |
Presumes that the other
data in the materials includes the extended payment schedule options. |
|
211 |
Yates |
Disagrees with Sen.
Courtney’s assessment in that there is risk associated with the payment
stream, which would jeopardize the ability to pay off the bonds in time, even
if it takes 50 years to do so. |
|
222 |
Sen. Dukes |
Agrees with Mr. Yates’
assessment, adding that the MSA payments have been smaller than originally
estimated due to lower than anticipated sales. |
|
239 |
Richardson |
Mentions that the numbers
were run with the risks of reduced revenue streams included. |
|
253 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the public hearing
and opens a work session on HB 4073-A. |
HB 4073-A WORK SESSION |
||
|
259 |
Sen. Courtney |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 4073-A11 amendments
dated 9/14/02. |
|
263 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
Sen. Courtney |
MOTION: Moves HB 4073 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
287 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN.
COURTNEY will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the work session on
HB 4073 and opens a work session on
HB 4074 |
HB 4074-B WORK SESSION |
||
|
292 |
Rick Olson |
Legislative Fiscal
Office. Presents the committee with
copies of the –B10 (EXHIBIT I) and –B7 (EXHIBIT J) amendments. Explains the provisions of the amendments. |
|
315 |
Sen. Messerle |
Requests clarification
whether the fund is different than the one discussed in a previous work
group. |
|
320 |
Olson |
Explains that $500,000 is
to be set aside in the Cultural Trust, of which $250,000 will be distributed
to Morrow County through the Emergency Fund. |
|
330 |
Chair Hannon |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 4074-B7 amendments dated
9/13/02. |
|
336 |
|
VOTE: 4-1 AYE: 4 - Courtney, Dukes, Messerle,
Hannon NAY: 1 - Harper |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
The motion
Carries. |
|
|
|
|
|
339 |
Chair Hannon |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 4074-B10 amendments dated
9/14/02. |
|
342 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
345 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the work session
and opens a public hearing on HB 4074-B. |
|
HB 4074-B PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
346 |
Ruby Haughton |
Legislative and Public Affairs
Director, Care Oregon. Testifies
regarding the issue of distribution of safety net money. |
|
367 |
Chair Hannon |
Indicates that Ms.
Haughton’s concerns were addressed in the amendments. Closes the public hearing and reopens the
work session on HB 4074-B. |
|
HB 4074-B WORK SESSION |
||
|
376 |
Chair Hannon |
MOTION: Moves HB 4074-B to the floor with a DO
PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
379 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN. HANNON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
|
|
|
|
389 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the work session on
HB 4074-B and opens a work session on
HB 5100-A. |
HB 5100-A WORK SESSION |
||
TAPE 5, B |
||
|
021 |
Ken Rocco |
Legislative Fiscal Officer.
Provides the committee with copies of
the –A10 amendments (EXHIBIT K) and a brief description
of how they alter HB 5100. Outlines
the cuts presented in the measure. |
|
063 |
Sen. Dukes |
Asks whether the $310
million in across-the-board cuts are delineated anywhere. |
|
065 |
Rocco |
Responds that those cuts
are outlined in section 2 of the measure. |
|
070 |
Sen. Messerle |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 5100-A10 amendments
dated 9/14/02. |
|
073 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
074 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the work session
and opens a public hearing on HB 5100-A. |
|
|
||
|
HB 5100-A PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
075 |
Jeff Gilmour |
Oregon Health and Sciences
University (OHSU). Testifies regarding the effect that the proposed cuts will
have on OHSU. Emphasizes the
importance of nurses. |
|
096 |
Grattan Kerans |
Oregon University System
(OUS). Testifies regarding the effect
that the proposed cuts would have on higher education in Oregon. Indicates that the cuts amount to 50
percent of the budgets for spring term, threatening the ability of schools to
remain in operation. |
|
177 |
Chair Hannon |
Emphasizes that while
there are concerns about the effects of the measure the primary goal now is
to get the measure passed. |
|
182 |
Sen. Dukes |
Asks if tuition is
expected to increase for winter quarter 2003. |
|
184 |
Kerans |
Replies that the
Chancellor has asked school presidents to submit cut plans and to provide
tuition surcharge proposals in the event that those cuts are too
extreme. Warns against the potential
for lost tuition and the downward spiral that could result. |
|
207 |
Sen. Dukes |
Remarks that if tuition is
raised certain schools in other states will be cheaper for Oregonians to
attend than in-state schools. |
|
211 |
Kerans |
Refrains from estimating
the budget effect but says that lost tuition could have been as high as $12
million. Declares that there is a
great deal of frustration with the situation. |
|
224 |
Chair Hannon |
States that he shares Mr.
Kerans’ frustration. |
|
227 |
Sen. Harper |
States for the record that
the cuts are not being taken lightly or willingly, but are instead a response
to the economic situation of all Oregonians. |
|
238 |
Chair Hannon |
Closes the public hearing
and reopens the work session on HB 5100-A. |
|
HB 5100-A WORK SESSION |
||
|
243 |
Chair Hannon |
MOTION: Moves HB 5100-A to the floor with a DO
PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
245 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN.
MESSERLE will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
246 |
Chair Hannon |
Declares the meeting to be
in recess subject to the call of the chair. |
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------RECESS------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
Chair Hannon |
Opens an informational
meeting on selected budget cuts. |
|
INFORMATIONAL MEETING |
||
|
248 |
Sen. Mae Yih |
Submits a list of targeted
budget cut proposals (EXHIBIT L). Says the programs are lower-priority and
should be reduced or eliminated in order to prevent cuts to high-priority
programs or borrowing against future revenues. |
|
300 |
Sen. Yih |
Continues outlining
proposed budget reductions. |
|
370 |
Sen. Yih |
Continues outlining
proposed budget reductions.
Emphasizes that the priority should be to use the funding gained from
targeted reductions to shore up priority services, specifically law
enforcement. |
|
430 |
Sen. Yih |
Continues providing
recommendations regarding targeted budget cuts. |
|
467 |
Chair Hannon |
Thanks Sen. Yih for her
suggestions and says some should be explored going into next legislative
session. Recesses the committee
subject to the call of the chair. |
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------RECESS------------------------------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
|
|
|
TAPE 6, B |
||
|
043 |
Chair Hannon |
Reconvenes the
meeting. Reopens the work session on
HB 4072. |
|
HB 4072 WORK SESSION |
||
|
047 |
Chair Hannon |
Provides an overview of
the proposed –B10 amendments to HB 4072. |
|
071 |
Sen. Courtney |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 4072-B10 amendments
dated 9/15/02. |
|
074 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
080 |
Sen. Courtney |
MOTION: Moves HB 4072 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
082 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 |
|
|
Chair Hannon |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. SEN.
COURTNEY will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
|
|
|
|
086 |
Chair Hannon |
Declares the meeting to be
in recess subject to the call of the chair. |
|
|
(Meeting is adjourned by
implied consent.) |
|
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patrick Brennan, Marjorie Taylor,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– LC 35, staff, 7 pp.
B
– HB 4072, -9 amendments, staff, 9 pp.
C
– HB 4072, informational materials, staff, 1 p.
D
– HB 4072, revenue impact statement, staff, 1 p.
E
– HB 4072, informational materials, staff, 1 p.
F
– HB 4073, -A11 amendments, staff, 1 p.
G
– HB 4073, informational materials, staff, 2 pp.
H
– HB 4073, informational materials, staff, 1 p.
I
– HB 4074, -B10 amendments, staff 2 pp.
J
– HB 4074, -B7 amendments, staff, 1 p.
K
– HB 5100, -A10 amendments, staff, 26 pp.
L
– HB 5100, informational materials, Sen. Mae Yih, 3 pp.