HOUSE SPECIAL SESSION COMMITTEE ON BUDGET RESTORATION
5th Special Session
September 4, 2002 Hearing Room 343
1:00 p.m. Tapes 4 - 9
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Ben Westlund, Chair
Rep. Richard Devlin
Rep. Cedric Hayden
Rep. Betsy Johnson
Rep. Susan Morgan
STAFF PRESENT: Monica
Brown, Legislative Fiscal Office
Susan Jordan, Legislative Fiscal
Office
Annetta Mullins, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Public
Hearing
Possible
Budget Reductions
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 4 Side A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Westlund |
Calls meeting to order at
1:15 p.m. for the purpose of hearing suggestions for possible budget
reductions. |
|
|
|
Invites everyone to
testify on how reductions have impacted budgets and what additional
reductions would do to specific programs. |
|
023 |
Chair Westlund |
Introduces Monica Brown,
new staff in Legislative Fiscal Office. |
|
030 |
Rep. Johnson |
Comments that she
understands that DAS has given instructions to agencies to prepare highly
detailed analyses of what the budget cuts would do to their programs. Asks if this committee will have the
opportunity to hear that information. |
|
038 |
Chair |
Responds that if the
agencies would like to comment on the reductions as requested by the
Executive Branch, he will hear that testimony. Adds that the committee also wants to hear what additional
budget reductions would mean to the agencies, departments or commissions. |
|
043 |
Kingsley Click |
State Court Administrator. Comments on impacts to the Judicial branch
that have been the result of the past four special sessions. Overall it has been an 8.9 percent
decrease. About $35 million in cuts
to the Judicial Department, about $11.5 million for operations, $1.2 million
to the jury and interpreter program, $22.3 million for indigent defense. |
|
060 |
Click |
Explains that public
service has been lost with those reductions, courts have cut hours and 10
percent of workforce. The courts have
a priority listing of types of cases they try to handle, mainly on public
safety and children. Further cuts,
while not part of the Governor’s across-the-board cuts for the Executive
Branch, they did prepare for Legislative Fiscal Office a likely scenario if the
Judicial Branch were to take similar cuts.
The Judicial Branch is funded 95 by percent General Funds and they do
not have back-fill sources. With an
across-the-board cut of $482 million, it would be about 4.7 percent cut for
the Judicial Branch and would have an impact of about 20 percent in eight
months. |
|
102 |
Click |
Explains that the cut of $10.5
millionfor Operations is roughly 350 staff, and combined with the 150 being
held open, that is one-third of the court’s work force statewide. Court locations are set by statute. Also the duties of the courts are set by
statute and the Constitution. Some clients
may not get due process. As a result
of the across-the-board cuts, cases have been prioritized and focus on public
safety. Under this scenario of the
cut in work force there would be 9-10 weeks of closure to account for loss of
personnel dollars—approximately 350 people.
That would be achieved either through layoffs, furloughs, or other
combinations. While filings might
happen, nothing would happen with small claims, non-person misdemeanors,
landlord-tenant violations, traffic, fish and wildlife and other citations,
and probate. |
|
142 |
Click |
Explains they calculate
there would be about $20 million in lost revenues. |
|
|
Click |
Bottom line is support for
the public would not be there. People
would not have civil access and criminal cases would not be processed in the
same way. Attorneys are having trouble
getting restraining orders and there have been delays in the juvenile justice
courts. Courts have responded saying
they thought they could hold on for six or seven months but they say they
cannot maintain in the long term. |
|
172 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks if there has been any
thought of shutting down certain levels of functions that citizens have come
to rely on. |
|
|
Click |
Responds yes and explains. |
|
203 |
Rep. Hayden |
Comments he does not
understand the 20 percent reduction in the remaining eight months of the
biennium if the $482 million were to be implemented. Asks if they would have a 4.7 percent cut from
the biennial budget, and if it is pressed into one-third of the time, whether
the impact would be three times the 4.7. |
|
200 |
Chair |
Explains how the
differences appear in each agency depending on the agency budget. |
|
218 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks if Click will share
the least injurious actions if they have to make further reductions. |
|
250 |
Nancy Miller |
Director of Court Program
and Services, Office of State Court Administrator. Comments that anything that could have been done has already
been done; they are not at a point of less injurious any more. |
|
|
Rep. Hayden |
Asks that they compare less
injurious to releasing prisoners.
Asks if there is something else. |
|
|
Miller |
Responds they are looking
at the small claims, landlord tenant cases.
Those impact the business community. |
|
262 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks witnesses to talk
about roll up costs being greater the later we are in the biennium. Asks if they have information to show how
much of what they are looking at is attributable to higher payroll costs. |
|
295 |
Click |
The information is not on
the level of cuts they have taken but she can get the information from Budget
and Management; personnel costs are 97 to 98 percent of their budget. |
|
310 |
Rep. Morgan |
Requests that they provide
information on the personnel costs. |
|
|
Click |
States that the only
amount that has been added since the Legislatively Approved Budget (LAB) is
the distribution of the salary funds and benefits funds from last
session. The Judicial Branch received
$8 million. Adds that they are still
at the cut level with that $8 million added in. |
|
330 |
Click |
Explains that in the
remaining months, only $700,000 is attributed to staff salary changes. Adds that the $10.5 million in the last
eight months would represent a 19.7 percent cut to operations. Many things in their budget are non-reducible. Judicial salaries cannot be reduced during
the term. Only thing left is people
and reduction of salaries. |
|
357 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks if a greater share of
what they pay to other agencies is lumped into the last of the budget cycle. |
|
|
Click |
Responds, no and explains. |
|
375 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks how many people have
been pink-slipped. |
|
|
Click |
Responds that 50 out of the
150 have been pink-slipped, and they started freezing positions last
March. |
|
391 |
Miller |
States she would like to
comment on the potential of further reductions impacting the Juvenile Court
processes. States that Oregon was recently found to be not in compliance in
processing cases—they flunked the audit on the permanency hearings. Explains why DHS looses federal funds. Oregon is now under the Program
Improvement Plan that is imposed by the federal government, and if we do not
meet the requirements of the program, DHS can be assessed penalties. |
|
|
Rep. Devlin |
Asks whether they see
people beginning to understand which cases would not be heard when they
talked about guidelines for priority cases. |
|
441 |
Click |
Responds affirmatively. Explains that local courts try to design
what will work best for their communities.
Believes there needs to be statewide response so that the people who
use the courts know. |
TAPE 5, A |
||
|
025 |
Joe Linden |
Oregon Criminal Defense Lawyers
Association. Comments that in the
first three special sessions $22 million or 14 percent of the budget was
cut. That means that the system runs
out of money next April if it continues to operate as it is operating
today. Suggests a way to change the
system would be to stop prosecuting certain types of cases to reduce the
demand on the fund. Adds that
additional cuts would only accelerate the date the crisis occurs. The system will need money in January or
soon after. |
|
047 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks if they can they
defer some of the cases for 60 days in April. |
|
|
Linden |
Responds that any case
that carries a possibility of incarceration must be provided with defense
counsel at the time the defendant is brought before the court. You can try to find a way to not prosecute
individuals and that is a local decision.
District attorneys are elected to prosecute people who have broken the
law. If Oregon wants to have a tough
criminal justice system, we must have an adequately funded defense
system. That includes law
enforcement, prosecution, court, correctional, and juvenile justice
funding. When one piece such as indigent
defense is under funded it brings the other pieces to a halt. |
|
078 |
Ozzie Rose |
Confederation of Oregon
School Administrators. States that what
will happen will be different in all the school communities because there are
different situations because of 150 years of decisions they have made. The most commonly talked about response
among the superintendents is they don’t know what to do now because of the
uncertainty. Thinks that there will
probably be shorter school years, which is the most reasonable response. Thinks what happens will depend on each school
district and the situation. The worst
case scenario will be closing schools in mid-April. The districts say they will run until they are out of money,
which is a subjective term. Questions
what “out of money” means to different districts. Comments on alternative scenarios and decisions that each
district must make. |
|
139 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks Rose to talk about
the economy in the small towns. |
|
|
Rose |
Responds that in most of
the communities the school district is the number one to four largest
employer. States they had a study
done by EcoNorthwest that says for every job in the schools, something like
1.8 jobs are available in the community.
In four to eight counties, the school districts represent 14 percent
or more of the payroll in the county. |
|
181 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that four or five
districts have elected to open the school year a week later. Asks why a district would start the school
year a week late. |
|
|
Rose |
Responds that those
communities are making decisions based on lack of certainty. |
|
204 |
Rep. Devlin |
Comments there are always
disagreements about the amount of cuts.
States that one district in his area, when they thought the cuts would
be about $2.1 or $2.2 to the district, was cutting $5million from their
budget. Asks if it is fair to say
that the $5.2 million that was talked about last July was not adequate to
hold those districts harmless. |
|
231 |
Rose |
Responds that districts must
plan for the increased costs, health insurance and energy costs, PERS. They have to try to build reserves. Each district handles their reserves
differently. The $5.2 million was not
allowing for a large increase. |
|
248 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks if teachers are paid
on a nine- or 12-month basis. |
|
|
Rose |
Explains how the teachers
are paid, and how that benefits the districts. |
|
262 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks if they would like to
go back to local control property tax system. |
|
267 |
Rose |
Responds he doesn’t want
to go back totally to a property tax system where there were huge inequities
between districts. Believes there
needs to be a couple more dollars of property tax available to school
districts. States that the local
elections created a discussion between the total communities about their
schools. We don’t have that
discussion any more. |
|
289 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks if the equalization formula
was a benefit or curse. |
|
|
Rose |
Responds that we now have
a much fairer system to all the kids in the state. |
|
310 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks Rose what he thinks
about summer school, year-round school starting in July to help those who
could not get done by April. |
|
317 |
Rose |
Responds that he said
schools would start shutting down in April if they choose that route. Adds that some schools may go all year if
they can make it. States that the new
budget does not seem to be a lot larger than the current one and doesn’t know
how to divide the funding for the years.
States that if a district looses 15 to 30 days this spring, efforts
will be made to make sure the kids pass the tests. |
|
319 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks if they would ever run
out of money if they start summer school July 1. |
|
|
Rose |
Responds he thinks they
would run out the next spring. It depends
on what the legislature does between January and June 2003. |
|
357 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks what kinds of
discussions COSA is having about solutions or changes in the way things are
designed because the “money follows the student” doesn’t work very well. |
|
370 |
Rose |
Responds that enrollments
in 160 of 190 districts are declining.
It is very difficult for very small and declining districts. Explains that declining enrollment in the
larger districts eats up the percentages for the small districts. |
|
423 |
Rose |
States that 18 bills were
introduced to adjust the formula.
Each benefited the person who introduced the bill at the expense of
other districts. |
|
440 |
Rose |
States that the declining
issue won’t be solved until there is more funding. State he is not recommending this, but the state could reduce
the number of school districts but that has social implications. |
TAPE 4, B |
||
|
020 |
Rep. Morgan |
Districts cover small
geographical areas and they split positions, and have division of things so
they can better use their resources.
Asks if the money can be split up. |
|
032 |
Rose |
States there is no problem
with districts sharing the money; there is no prohibition against it. |
|
|
Rep. Morgan |
Comments on efforts of
districts in her legislative district to share funds. |
|
079 |
Rose |
Responds that Oregon has never
addressed equity on the infrastructure side, only on the operations
side. |
|
114 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments he never thought about the consequences of not having the local elections and the conversations between the schools, the concepts, principles and values of public education in a community. |
|
149 |
Kathryn Weit |
Oregon Developmental
Disabilities Coalition. States that
the proposed cuts include the elimination of 101 group homes. That means over 400 individuals with
developmental disabilities, mental retardation, will be kicked out of their
homes. |
|
173 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks how many staff are in
each home. |
|
|
Weit |
Responds it depends on the
extent of the individuals’ disabilities in the homes. |
|
|
Rep. Morgan |
Asks if there are three
staff persons for each person. |
|
|
Weit |
Explains staffing levels. |
|
217 |
Weit |
Adds that also the support
services would be cut. |
|
229 |
Weit |
States they are also
looking at the elimination of the family support services that are provided
in the home to allow the family to keep the member in the home so the family
can sleep. |
|
241 |
Weit |
States they are also
looking at the elimination of psychiatric services, in-home support for
people with physical disabilities, and services for those receiving general
care needs. |
|
250 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks Weit to provide information
on the big picture of total care and the percentage of cuts on the lowest
needs for services. |
|
|
Weit |
Responds that she can provide
the data. |
|
|
|
NOTE: The information
requested by Rep. Morgan and submitted by Ms. Weit is hereby made a part of
these minutes (EXHIBIT G). |
|
285 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks if these people came
from Fairview. |
|
|
Weit |
Explains that all the
individuals from Fairview are now living in small group homes. For the most part, they fall into the
categories of more significant needs and would not likely be the individuals
cut. These are the one who came out
many years ago. They are also the
individuals whose needs are increasing because of aging. |
|
305 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks what levels they are
talking about, whether it is range 15-17 under Medicaid. |
|
|
Weit |
Defers the questions to
the Department of Human Services staff. |
|
322 |
Rep. Devlin |
Asks if it would be fair
to say that if this many facilities are closed, recreating the facilities
might be a lot more difficult than replacing the dollars in the future. |
|
|
Weit |
Responds that the cuts
would not be cost effective. People
may end up in more expensive facilities.
Many of the homes are older homes in smaller communities. Many of the people would go through the system
of civil commitment and more expensive options. |
|
370 |
Kate Dickson |
Deputy Superintendent,
Oregon Department of Education (ODE).
States that budget reductions of $482 million has an implication of
$12.8 million for ODE. Much of the resources
are grant-in-aid to school districts. The ODE overall budget is approximately $270 million. Of that $270 million, about $235 million
goes directly to school districts for grant-in-aid. Explains concern for grant-in-aid budget. $82 million goes directly to serve early
childhood special education children.
They also have regional programs that are to serve the special
education population. Children from
multiple school districts are served by the regional programs because they
have high-cost and low-incidence special needs. Currently about $32 million is spent on the program and they
would be looking at about a six percent reduction. States those costs will have to be picked up by the school
districts because these students are on IEPs and the services must be
provided. |
|
426 |
Dickson |
Explains they will also
take cuts in their hospital programs, long term care and treatment programs,
and the Oregon Pre-K Program. |
TAPE 5, B |
||
|
001 |
Doug Wilson |
Assistant Director for
Finance and Policy Analysis, Department of Human Services. Presents reduction projections for the
Department of Human Services (EXHIBIT
A). Explains they prepared this
document last week in response to the Governor’s request for $12.8 million of
cuts to the Department of Human Services under his reductions. States they were instructed to make
proportional reductions based on the appropriations for each line in their
budget. |
|
032 |
Bobby Mink |
Director, Department of
Human Services (DHS). Comments that
DHS serves more than 800,000 Oregonians or one-fourth of the Oregon
population every year. The department
serves the most needy and vulnerable people in the state. Ten percent of the 800,000 individuals
will receive six or more services. In
some of the eastern and southern Oregon counties DHS serves 40 percent of the
populations. |
|
|
Mink |
States that last session
the DHS budget was $8.5 billion total funds, about $2.5 billion General
Funds. Eighty percent of that is direct
payout into the communities to doctors, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted
living facilities, foster parents, county mental and public health programs,
developmental disabilities in the counties, the AAAs. In addition to the 80 percent that is paid
out, another 16 percent pays for the field staff and institutional staff in
the branch offices, the Oregon State Hospital, and the hospitals at Portland
and Pendleton. Less than four percent
of the budget is associated with administration in Salem. |
|
|
Mink |
Comments on effects on
local economies. |
|
092 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks how the cuts were
arrived at. |
|
|
Mink |
Explains that because of
the Governor’s constitutional and legal limitations, the cuts are
across-the-board. Explains how staff
and interest groups worked together. |
|
116 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks at what point in the
circle of advisers the local governments get to comment on it. |
|
|
Mink |
States that DHS has a local
government advisory committee and the department has shared with them the
budget building process and how they would reduce the budget. The advisory committee includes county
commissioners, AOC, and different human services representatives. Also, seniors, the disabled, health
services and family groups have a part in it. |
|
168 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks for an estimation of
social services if the paradigm could be changed in southern and eastern
Oregon. |
|
|
Mink |
Responds he believes the
clue is in the services they provide.
There is a lack of jobs. Because
the population is so sparse the state cannot afford to have the same services
there as in the Valley. Practitioners
do not have enough work in those areas.
|
|
228 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks if they have data on
how case loads have changed. |
|
|
Mink |
Responds that the
department does not have data except for the last few years. |
|
248 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks how they would
suggest making cuts if the parameters of cuts were lifted. |
|
|
Mink |
States they would take a look
at programs that are more regional in nature, and ask if they can afford to
do it in only one region. The problem
is the programs are all needed. It
is too difficult a question to answer. |
|
270 |
Mink |
Explains there are more
advocates suing state government for services across the nation and they are
winning because there is a right to some of these services. Believes they would have looked at the
places where they have to look.
Twenty-five percent of the budget is in the health plan and they would
focus there. Twenty-five percent of
the budget is in senior services and they would look at those. Sixteen percent is in mental health
services and they would focus there.
The committee just heard testimony about the developmentally disabled
population. Adds there was recently a
$40 million settlement around developmental disabilities and inadequate
services for that population. Cutting those services would be very, very
hard. |
|
300 |
Wilson |
Comments that DHS is being
sued because the population cannot get the services. Because of the nature of the settlements,
these cuts will challenge them to stay out of court, most likely around child
welfare, developmentally disabilities, and welfare. Most programs are tied to the federal government; 40:60 percent
match. States that it will be
difficult to meet the Maintenance of Effort (MOE) agreement. They have not done the analysis yet
because they have not seen what the other agencies are doing. |
|
346 |
Wilson |
States that DHS depends on
local governments for delivery of services in the DD systems, a large part of
the mental health system, AAAs for senior and disabled long-term care system,
and public health. They cannot avoid
raising havoc with those systems with these types of cuts. |
|
|
Rep. Johnson |
Comments her county
commissioner and incoming chair of AOC just came in and she wants to make sure
he knows she is advocating on behalf of local governments. |
|
|
Wilson |
Explains that cuts in the
mental health system is causing a backlog of people in jail because the
system is not getting to them. |
|
378 |
Wilson |
Reviews budget reduction (EXHIBIT A). |
TAPE 6A |
||
|
021 |
Wilson |
Continues presentation of
budget reductions (EXHIBIT A). |
|
034 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks where Oregon is on
the waiver request. |
|
|
Wilson |
Responds he will provide
an update on the process. |
|
074 |
Wilson |
Continues explanation of
cuts. Two thirds of OHP participants
are categorical and were previously served through Medicaid and Medicare
programs. Others are 100 percent or
less of the poverty level. |
|
096 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks what happens to the
people if 60 lines in the list are eliminated.. |
|
|
Wilson |
Responds that if
eligibility were cut to a certain group, they would start hitting safety net
clinics and hospitals and other programs to get the care they cannot live
without. |
|
118 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks what the difference
is in benefits between the OHP and fee-for-service Medicaid. |
|
121 |
Wilson |
States that managed care
was around before the OHP and there is still a sizeable fee-for-service
program under the OHP. Under
capitation OHP does pay an eight percent administration fee to the plans. |
|
138 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks if it is less
expensive to have capitation in the health plan or the fee-for-service
Medicaid. |
|
|
Wilson |
Responds that he believes
the OHP is more preventive in nature than the old fee-for-service. |
|
163 |
Wilson |
Reviews cuts for seniors
and nursing homes, spousal pay, restructuring of special needs program, OPI
would be eliminated for the rest of the biennium (EXHIBIT A, pages 3-5). |
|
195 |
Rep. Hayden |
Comments he now
understands that with federal funds, the cost of the care to Oregon is
one-half. |
|
222 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks what the status is of
the waiver for independent living. |
|
|
Wilson |
Responds that he believes
some people are operating under the waiver but will provide additional
information. |
|
217 |
Wilson |
Continues review of
reductions (EXHIBIT A, page 6). |
|
283 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks where the list is of
the undefined DHS cuts as a result of the $6.5 budget reductions in Special
Session 3. |
|
254 |
Wilson |
Responds that it will be
reported to the next E-Board meeting. |
|
264 |
Wilson |
Continues review of cuts (EXHIBIT A, pages 6-7). |
|
306 |
Rep. Johnson |
Comments that trying to
calculate the community costs in trying to move people in the mental health
system is probably incalculable. Asks
if there are facilities that receive those patients for the Portland psychiatric
unit. |
|
315 |
Wilson |
Responds that they assume
under this cut they would put the people into the existing facility, but they
are very constrained at the State Hospital.
States that before the State Hospital in Salem can be expanded, significant
funds will have to be put into new structure or remodeling; they are close to
the capacity now. |
|
343 |
Mink |
Comments that if services are
cut to the 800,000 people DHS serves, most of them will not go anywhere. They will be in the communities somewhere
and it will be a tremendous burden on the county sheriffs, municipal police
departments, and Oregon State Police trying to figure out what to do with
people who are not taking their medications. |
|
361 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks what items in the DHS
budget are prophylactic and try to stop the number from increasing. |
|
370 |
Mink |
Responds that preventative
programs that used to be DHS have long since been cut and there aren’t many
of those. States that they have tried
to put back the Oregon Children’s Plan and the tobacco program. |
|
392 |
Wilson |
Adds that many of the
preventative dollars are in the budget but they have not been able to invest
them. States that many programs are interrelated. Alcohol and substance abuse is a key
prevention/intervention issue because many of the program services stem back
to substance abuse. |
|
420 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks if there are
statistical scientific bases for the impact, and who determines them, and why
was there not this impact before the programs existed. States he assumes the reason is drug
abuse. |
|
434 |
Wilson |
States there were people
not receiving services, or were receiving services from hospitals and
charitable providers. Believes there have
been some major societal changes, i.e. families took care of their family
members. |
|
|
Rep. Hayden |
Comments there are more
homeless people and more crime since we have the programs. |
TAPE 7, B |
||
|
025 |
Rep. Devlin |
Comments that a large
percentage of those served by DHS are children. States that without health care and nutritional assistance,
there could be more significant problems than we have right now. |
|
037 |
Wilson |
Continues review of
reductions (EXHIBIT A, pages 8-10). |
|
087 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks if DHS can determine
if there are private sector providers who can pick up some of the services
that are listed in these cuts, and how the department can monitor compliance
at the local level. |
|
135 |
Chair Westlund |
Suggests the solution
would be additional money. |
|
141 |
Wilson |
States that in the area of
alcohol and substance area, they would reduce the residential bed capacity
from 608 to 511. Adds that A & D
services are also part of the OHP, the outpatient dollars for Medicaid
clients are part of the OHP and some of those would have already been cut as
part of the OMAP cuts. |
|
149 |
Wilson |
Reviews cuts on vocational
rehabilitation (EXHIBIT A, page 13). |
|
156 |
Mink |
Explains that with the cut
of $75,000 General Funds they will lose almost $1.4 million additional
dollars because of the 4:1 match. |
|
172 |
Wilson |
Reviews administrative
support systems cuts (EXHIBIT A, page
14). |
|
199 |
Mink |
Explains impact of cuts of
administrative support systems in DHS. |
|
213 |
Committee |
Wilson and Mink continue discussion
on reductions of administrative services in DHS. |
|
244 |
Karen Brazeau |
Director, Oregon Youth
Authority (OYA). Introduces Karen
Olsen, Manager of OYA Business Services.
Submits information on budget cuts to OYA, explains services, and
reviews budget cuts (EXHIBIT B). |
|
307 |
Brazeau |
Continues presentation (EXHIBIT B, page 5). |
|
331 |
Brazeau |
Reviews budget cut
information (EXHIBIT B, pages 6 - 8). |
|
358 |
Rep. Johnson |
Comments that the worst
offenders are in the close custody beds.
Asks if those facilities were offered up for closure prior to other
facilities being offered, or did the budget cuts wipe out OYA. |
|
367 |
Brazeau |
Explains that the cuts
that were offered up were offered in a balanced way. Explains how the system works when the
youth are moved into the field and usually placed in out-of-home placement. |
|
392 |
Brazeau |
Explains impact of cuts
shown on page 7 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
431 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks why they have
selected the rural programs to be cut. |
|
439 |
Brazeau |
Explains that it is blow
to rural communities. The Warrenton facility
employs 83 and puts a payroll of $245,000 a month into the community. The reason for the selection is at MacLaren
the cost per day can be significantly cheaper than the Warrenton
facility. Adds that Hillcrest is the
only facility where they house young women. |
TAPE 6B |
||
|
036 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks to see the cost
benefit analysis used to make the decisions on the cuts. |
|
056 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks to see the moth-ball
costs also. |
|
060 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that it is not
the director’s responsibility to look at the economic impact on the
community. |
|
071 |
Rep. Johnson |
Responds that we should
try to figure out how to do restorations instead of closing facilities. |
|
073 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks for more detail about
what is involved in closing each facility and detail on what each line item
is worth so the committee can look at it in terms of total dollars. |
|
082 |
Brazeau |
Responds they can provide
the details. |
|
083 |
Brazeau |
Explains impacts shown on
page 8 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
100 |
Brazeau |
Continues explanation of
cuts shown on page 8 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
119 |
Brazeau |
Explains effect of cuts
for the biennium (EXHIBIT B, page 9). |
|
136 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks if the assumption is that
the beds are full all the time. |
|
|
Brazeau |
Responds that the beds are
full all the time. |
|
151 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks what happens to the
kids—what is the recidivism. |
|
|
Brazeau |
Responds that the agency
is getting better at being able to track them. OYA is tracking them one year out and looking for the reason
for their return. The return rate is about
30 percent. States she will send
members their report that was just completed. |
|
184 |
Rep. Devlin |
Asks how the cutbacks
would impact county juvenile facilities. |
|
|
Brazeau |
Responds that the youths
cannot stay in county facilities because the law prevents long-term stays in
detention. Judges can commit the
youth to the state. |
|
219 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks if the recidivism
rates are falling nationally. |
|
|
Brazeau |
Responds she does not know. It is difficult to compare because people
measure it in different ways. The
return rate for new crimes is in the mid-teens. They do know the highest rate is within the first six months or
first year. |
|
235 |
Lee Hazelwood |
Senior Advocate. Speaks in support of retaining funding for
Oregon Project Independence (OPI):
|
|
382 |
Lieutenant Ron Rucker |
Oregon State Police. Explains that the $8.8 million eliminates
185 positions in the department, 131 sworn officers and 54 professional
positions. During the series of
special session, the department has lost 41 sworn officers and 30-32
professionals. There would also be
five positions lost in Fish and Wildlife, 26 in criminal, some in the
forensic laboratory, and 41 in Human Resources. |
|
416 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks that they provide
details to LFO so the information can be distributed. |
|
433 |
Rucker |
Explains that layoffs in
the department will occur by seniority.
Explains services that will not be provided. Adds that they will also have to redeploy a good number of
employees to balance things geographically.
This will reduce the number to one-half the number of people in the
Patrol Division in 1980. Believes
this $8.8 million represents the dismantling of the State Police. |
TAPE 7, B |
||
|
051 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks if they have talked
to the counties about the impact this will have. |
|
060 |
Rucker |
Responds they are meeting
frequently with the OACP, the Sheriff’s Association, the Governor’s Public
Safety Policy and Planning Council, and are putting together a law
enforcement leadership forum.
Comments on the murder case in Klamath Falls and the impact the State
Police had in solving the case. |
|
089 |
Rep. Johnson |
Asks what OSP’s mothball
costs would be including the BPSST expansion. |
|
115 |
Rucker |
Responds that the
department has a lot invested in training and a lot of agencies in and
outside Oregon would like to hire the troopers if they are laid off. States the department needs the trained
people desperately so the State Police can accomplish its mission. Will provide a dollar figure on what they
think it costs to train and deploy a person. |
|
122 |
Gordon Fultz |
Association of Oregon
Counties (AOC). Introduces Paul
Snider and AOC Vice President, Tony Hyde.
Explains that $750 million of the state General Fund per biennium goes
to counties. Seventy percent of that goes
to public safety and human services.
The counties, for the most part, must tell people the services are not
available if the cuts occur. The counties are also concerned about the
impacts of the various systems on each other. Submits handout prepared by Jane O’Keefe on effect of funding
cuts (EXHIBIT C). |
|
167 |
Fultz |
Comments on effects of cuts
to human services program at the county level, including the federal matches
that the counties lose:
|
|
233 |
Paul Snider |
AOC. Comments on effects of cuts to law
enforcement in the early 80s. The
State Police had to cover patrol for the county sheriffs’ office. The State Police had a different funding
source than today. States there are
agreements with the State Police, sheriffs, and city police about who has
responsibility. The sheriffs do not
have the capacity to pick up the slack if the State Police are cut. |
|
|
|
Comments that in the third
special session, the counties talked about the population forecast cuts in
community corrections. The
explanation that came to the legislature from the Community Corrections
Funding Committee has to do with the interrelationship. One of the reasons why that forecast was
going down was because several counties’, especially Multnomah and Marion,
budget cuts were reducing the capacity of their county jails. Including those two counties the jail bed
capacity went down 500 beds as of July 1, 2002. Sheriff’s have reduced the
length of stays on sanctioned offenders and that drove down the numbers in
community corrections. There was no
workload reduction in community corrections; the workload is as least as high
as it was before but the capacity to deal with the offender population is
shrinking at the local level. Under
the Department of Corrections’ cuts for institutions, the department has said
it will have to close institutions and move a significant number of the
population into parole and probation without providing the funding to
community corrections to handle the workload. Adds that Karen Brazeau, OYA, said the same thing. States that the options
the counties would have to deal with the problem would be very
restricted. |
|
322 |
Snider |
Comments on relationship
of cuts on human services and public safety programs. |
|
367 |
Tony Hyde |
AOC. Comments on cuts to the State Police and
the impact on the county:
|
|
418 |
Rep. Morgan |
Comments that the root
cause of the problem Oregon is in is the economy. Asks what the legislature can do to facilitate an economic
recovery. |
|
436 |
Hyde |
Responds that their handout
includes significant jobs (EXHIBIT C). The unemployment rate is 7.9 percent in
Columbia County; cutting jobs only adds to the problem. |
TAPE 8, A |
||
|
027 |
Rep. Morgan |
Comments on need to
reenergize the private sector.
Cautions people who think government can sustain the economy. |
|
054 |
Hyde |
Comments that he focuses
most on economic development in his job and agrees with Rep. Morgan. Also thinks this is the time when human
services and law enforcement and public safety are most needed. |
|
060 |
Westlund |
Asks what the legislature can
do to improve the economic conditions.
|
|
072 |
Hyde |
Responds that out
migration in Columbia County is their biggest problem because they not only
lose their economic base, they also lose the social infrastructure. States that the most valuable tools they
have are the economic development tools that are coming out of the Office of
Economic and Community Development (OECD).
|
|
084 |
Rep. Morgan |
Comments on bureaucracies
around state agencies that add costs and time to a permitting process. Asks what Hyde thinks the impact of
cutting back on regulations would be. |
|
098 |
Hyde |
Comments on process
relating to a request for development of wetlands and ball parks in Columbia
County and indecisions that may take two years and $20,000 to solve. |
|
142 |
Rep. Morgan |
Comments she believes
Community Solutions Team is an excellent way of doing things but it is
indicative of the problems one faces bureaucratically. |
|
165 |
Fultz |
Advises members that AOC
has provided the numbers of people served in the programs and the potential
losses of personnel (EXHIBIT C). |
|
172 |
Ellen Lowe |
Columbia Willamette United
Way. Comments on expectations that
these local organizations will pick up the slack in the budget reductions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
Rick Crager |
Chief Financial Officer, Oregon
Housing and Community Services.
Presents explanation of cuts thus far and impact of proposed cuts (EXHIBIT D). Explains that top row of figures is specific to the
across-the-board cuts, and the bottom row is more specific to the next
biennium at 10 and 30 percent levels. |
|
379 |
Crager |
Continues presentation (EXHIBIT D). |
|
434 |
Crager |
States the agency has
lost, in General Fund reductions, 100 percent of the Housing Development
Guarantee account, 52 percent of the Emergency Housing account, and the
remainder of the programs translates into 5.24 percent. |
|
441 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks if the Home Ownership
Assistance program provides loans or grants. |
|
|
Crager |
Responds they are grants
that go out to the community action programs across Oregon. |
|
447 |
Rep. Morgan |
Asks if the agency tracks
the success rate of how many people are able to sustain homeownership. |
|
|
Crager |
States they have put a tracking
mechanism in place but cannot give any historical data. |
|
470 |
Rep. Morgan |
States she is interested
in the Homeownership Assistance program. |
|
|
Crager |
Responds that the program
provides shelter care, emergency shelter assistance. States they are moving to a model where
they can do more transitional housing.
|
|
507 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks what the 45.5 percent
General Fund reduction means in dollars. |
|
510 |
Crager |
Responds it would be a
5.14 percent reduction. |
TAPE 9A |
||
|
053 |
Craig Campbell |
Chair, State Commission on
Children and Families. Submits report
and explains budget reductions for the commission (EXHIBIT E). States that
the total cuts represent $2.848 million.
With the $4.175 million reduced in previous special session, the total
reductions total $7.014 million (12.1%) in the commission’s overall General
Fund budget. |
|
086 |
Donna Middleton |
Director, State Commission
for Children and Families. Comments
that one program, Court Appointed Special Advocates, was not mentioned by
Campbell. The program would have a two percent cut but any money that
comes out of the programs is significant.
States the programs do raise some money but most of their funds come
from other state systems as well as the commission and some of those state
systems are talking about reductions. |
|
100 |
Campbell |
Explains that the
commission has three primary responsibilities: coordinating comprehensive
planning among the state and local partners around services to children and
families, and to ensure there is a system of services that is designed for
early childhood prevention. The
services that are being cut are directly related to those services. The services are being provided to
families before they get into trouble with SCF. The third responsibility is to make sure they provide whatever
information they have to the legislators as policy makers. States they have just completed a full set
of comprehensive planning processes in the 36 counties and can provide the
executive summaries of each, which identify what the communities believe their
service priorities are. |
|
125 |
Middleton |
Emphasizes that these are
the resources before things happen.
Hopes the committee weighs prevention. Adds that the counties also get
other donations for these programs. |
|
154 |
Bret West |
Assistant Commissioner for
Community Colleges. Submits testimony
he presented to the Governor (EXHIBIT
F). States that 97 percent of the
General Fund money their office receives goes out to the community colleges
through the funding formula. About
one and one-half percent is left behind for administration. Currently nine FTE are funded through
General Funds. With a $19.7 million
cut to the Community College Support Fund they believe that at least 14,000
people will not be able to attend a community college and it is quite likely
the number could be 40,000. Explains
that the choices on how the cuts will be administered locally will be made by
the local boards. With the $14
million cut in the second special session the community colleges had to raise
tuition by about 12 percent. Explains that the
community colleges also have to make choices about the high cost programs,
the professional technical programs.
Those will be decisions they have to make if the $19 million cut goes
through. |
|
217 |
Andrea Henderson |
Executive Director, Oregon
Community College Association. Comments
on effects on services that community colleges provide. Reviews Blue Mountain
Community College’s Impact on Reductions in State Funding (EXHIBIT F, page 3). |
|
256 |
Rep. Hayden |
Asks what level of federal
funding is available in grants and loans for the truly needy students. |
|
|
West |
Responds that he does not
know the exact answer, but generally financial aid is only available to
full-time students. It is the
part-time students who get cut out and most community college students are
part-time students. States they will
do research and report back. |
|
306 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks how many classes fall
into personal enrichment. |
|
|
West |
Responds it would be about
eight percent; most are computer courses, usually one-day courses. Also in that group is the English as a
second language program, defensive driving courses for seniors, and other
safety and health courses like CPR, etc. |
|
324 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks how many of those
courses would be listed in the catalog of the 17 institutions and would last
the duration of the term. |
|
331 |
West |
States that most of the
courses that would be in the catalog would also include hobby and recreation
courses, which by law are excluded from using state funds to support. Most of the courses listed in the schedule
as self-improvement type courses are not full term courses. |
|
350 |
Chair Westlund |
Thanks everyone for
participating in the meeting. |
|
357 |
Chair Westlund |
Adjourns meeting at 5:35
p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Annetta Mullins Marjorie Taylor,
Administrative Support Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT SUMMARY
A – Possible Budget Reductions, Doug
Wilson, 14 pp
B – Possible Budget Reductions, Karen
Brazeau, 10 pp
C – Possible Budget Reductions, Gordon
Fultz, 4 pp
D – Possible Budget Reductions, Rick
Crager, 1 p
E – Possible Budget Reductions, Craig
Campbell, 2 pp
F – Possible Budget Reductions, Bret West,
4 pp
G – Possible Budget Reductions, Kathryn
Weit, 1 p