HOUSE
SPECIAL SESSION COMMITTEE ON
ECONOMIC
GROWTH AND JOB DEVELOPMENT
September 6, 2002 Hearing
Room 357
2:00 pm Tapes 7 – 8
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jeff Kropf, Chair
Rep. Alan Brown
Rep. Elaine Hopson
Rep. Al King
Rep. Kathy Lowe
MEMBER EXCUSED:
Rep. Greg Smith
Rep. Tim Knopp
STAFF PRESENT: Ray
Kelly, Administrator
Nancy Massee, Administrative Support
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD:
Informational Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
TAPE 7, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Kropf |
Opens meeting at 2:16
p.m. |
|
014 |
Rep. Tom Butler |
House District 60.
Ontario, Oregon. Worked with group on ways to attract businesses to Oregon.
The ideas of attracting venture capital, biotechnology and research firms to
Oregon were discussed. Presents concept
Small Communities Incentive Program (SCIP).
|
|
085 |
Rep. Butler |
Continues explaining how
experts in particular areas would get an income tax exemption for up to ten
consecutive years in return for locating a business in Oregon. The groups referred to are to be proven
venture capitalists with at least $100 million capital to invest in
technology or bioscience. |
|
150 |
Rep. King |
Asks if income tax
exempted is earned income only. |
|
165 |
Rep. Butler |
Responds income tax
exclusion would be exclusive to the partner.
Yes, only Oregon earned income would be exempt. |
|
214 |
Rep. Hopson |
Asks if income earned with
the state of Oregon whether earned with the venture capital or other, would
be exempt? |
|
221 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains how the exemption
would be allowed. |
|
255 |
Rep. Butler |
Continues describing Legislative
Counsel’s explanations regarding tax exemptions. Describes individuals who would qualify. The group would be
quite small in number consisting of researchers, Ph.D.’s and M.D.’s. |
|
365 |
Rep. Butler |
After venture capitalists,
the second group to attract would be qualified bio-scientists and companies
not already in Oregon. Describes requirements for these people. Continues explaining how high tech
industries have operated in Oregon trading employees. |
TAPE 8,A |
||
|
043 |
Rep. Butler |
Summarizes how this tax
exemption would benefit Oregon. |
|
053 |
Rep. Hopson |
Asks about the three groups
of venture capitalists, individual Ph.Ds, M.D., and what else? Are the qualifiers for the economically
distressed areas already in place? |
|
061 |
Rep. Butler |
Responds the qualified bio-science
individuals and then the qualified high tech individuals. High tech is
already here. We are trying to
attract the bio-science field. |
|
073 |
Rep. Butler |
Describes some qualifiers.
Counties that presently qualify are Sherman, Gilliam, Wheeler, and Lake.
Describes some port districts. |
|
113 |
Rep. King |
Comments on bringing
biotech industries to Oregon. Stresses
importance of getting this business and the fact that it is a highly
competitive field. |
|
141 |
Rep. Butler |
Continues describing
qualified bio-science industry possibilities. Suggests there is great
opportunity to change Oregon’s goals in attracting business. |
|
207 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks for clarification on
the groups that would be approached. |
|
390 |
Rep. Butler |
Clarifies. |
TAPE 7,B |
||
|
007 |
Rep. Butler |
Describes needs of access
to funds, access to personnel, and access to natural resources. |
|
020 |
Rep. King |
Discusses venture
capitalists in California. Oregon only
recently has attracted venture capitalists.
Oregon could be a northwest partner to New York venture capitalists, as an example. If Oregon got four
or five venture capitalists Oregon would realize financial power. |
|
055 |
Chair Kropf |
Does this program pay for
itself? Where does this fall
economically? |
|
067 |
Rep. Butler |
Responds Oregon Economic
and Community Development Department (OECDD) is already trying to attract new
staff. The business community is trying to attract these companies and
individuals. Explains how revenue would be gained. Cost for a biennium for the program would not be over
$200,000. It would be revenue and
expense neutral and no fiscal. OECDD
would need authority to expend the money for the applications. A hundred new businesses in this category
would bring billions to Oregon’s economy. |
|
087 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks if Oregon can attract
these people, should Oregon accept some short term lower revenues to create
longer term, stable, economic diversity. |
|
105 |
Rep. Butler |
Answers he does not
believe this program will reduce revenues in any way. These new businesses would be investing in
property and offices in Oregon. |
|
140 |
Chair Kropf |
Supports this concept to
attract venture capitalists and highly trained people to Oregon’s business
community. |
|
144 |
Rep. Butler |
Refers to Legislative
Counsel and OECDD witnesses to testify. |
|
149 |
Dexter Johnson |
Legislative Counsel. Says this is a complicated bill that could
not be drafted until possibly Monday. |
|
152 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks what complications
there could be in drafting the bill. |
|
168 |
Johnson` |
Responds by discussing
constitutional requirements of taxation. If a personal limitation is in the
bill there could be problems. Discusses other drafting issues to meet
requirements. |
|
197 |
Rep. Butler |
Introduces Ron Fox from
OECDD. |
|
210 |
Ron Fox |
OECDD. Supports this concept and offers
help. The concept is worth further
discussion. |
|
266 |
Rep. Butler |
Thanks participants. |
|
280 |
Chair |
Asks Rep. Butler and Dexter
Johnson to move forward on the draft.
Adjourns meeting at 3:33 p.m. |
Submitted by, Reviewed by,
Nancy Massee Ray Kelly
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator