CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON HB 4073B
Fifth Special Session of 71st Legislative
Assembly
September 17, 2002 Hearing Room 50
9:55 PM Tape 1
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Ben Westlund, Chair
Rep. Betsy Johnson
Rep. Susan Morgan
Rep. Lane Shetterly
Sen. Bev Clarno
STAFF PRESENT: Richard
Yates, Legislative Revenue Office
Patsy Wood, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 4073B Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 1, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Westlund |
Calls the conference
committee to order at 9:57 p.m. and opens a work session on HB 4073B. |
|
HB 4073B WORK SESSION |
||
|
010 |
Richard Yates |
Legislative Revenue
Office. Explains HB 4073B sells a
portion of the payment stream that comes from the Master Settlement Agreement
(MSA) to a separate corporation which in turn will issue bonds with the net proceeds
of those bonds going into the state school fund. States that the House-passed version of this bill directs $400
million be issued with a maturity not to exceed 14 years; the Senate version
directs $150 million be issued with maturity not to exceed 8 years. Submits the B13 amendments which delete
$150 million in the Senate version and increase that to $200 million (EXHIBIT A). |
|
029 |
Rep. Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 4073B-13 amendments
dated 09/15/02. |
|
036 |
Kate Richardson |
State Treasurer’s Office. States that she would prefer to testify
after the committee has decided upon a final amount and length of time. |
|
042 |
Rep. Bates |
Discusses the compromises
that have occurred this special session and stresses the importance of the
$50 million being restored in the bill. |
|
069 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Contends the $50 million
is more of a bicameral issue than an R & D (Republican and Democrat)
issue. Says that even though he made
the motion as a courtesy to the Chair, he is inclined to defer to the Senate at
this time, and revisit the issue of additional school funding in
January. |
|
088 |
Chair Westlund |
Appreciates the courtesy
motion, but says that $200 million is more appropriate at this time. |
|
100 |
Sen. Deckert |
Indicates that after
polling the floor of the Senate, there seems to be majority support from both
floors to pass this legislation with the additional $50 million and sine die. |
|
114 |
Sen. Clarno |
Notes her objections to this
motion. |
|
127 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Amends his previous
comments and says he will support the motion. |
|
132 |
Chair
Westlund |
VOTE: Notes that with Sen. Beyer and Sen. Clarno voting “no”,
and a majority needed from both houses, the motion to adopt the B13
amendments fails. |
|
141 |
Rep. Shetterly |
MOTION: Moves HB 4073B to the
floor with the recommendation that the House CONCUR in Senate amendments
dated 9/15/02 and REPASS the Measure. |
|
148 |
Rep. Morgan |
Regrets $50 million not
being restored to K-12, but says there will be options in January for the
Legislature. Regretfully supports the
motion. |
|
161 |
Rep. Bates |
Notes his objection to the motion without the $50
million for K-12. |
|
166 |
Rep. Shetterly |
States his desire to
revisit additional school funding next session, but says he will be a
courtesy “yes” vote to get this out of committee. |
|
180 |
Chair Westlund |
Understands concerns but
notes how much this $50 million has been previously debated. |
|
187 |
|
VOTE: 5-3 AYE: 5 - Rep. Morgan, Rep. Shetterly,
Sen. Beyer, Sen. Clarno, Chair Westlund NAY: 3 - Rep. Bates, Rep. Johnson,
Sen. Deckert |
|
191 |
Chair
Westlund |
The motion
Carries. REP.
WESTLUND will lead discussion on the HOUSE floor. |
|
199 |
Kate Richardson |
State Treasurer’s
Office. Asks for guidance from the
committee on how to structure the payoff. |
|
209 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks about the difference
in percentage of available MSA stream over a “short” or “long” payment
period. |
|
213 |
Richardson |
Notes that the interest
cost difference is under 4% for both. |
|
221 |
Yates |
Points out that the State
Treasurer has latitude in which to structure this deal and submits figures
with a four-year payoff (EXHIBITS B
& C). |
|
247 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Talks about
obligating the largest share of the stream to keep the total cost of funds as
low as possible. |
|
261 |
Rep. Morgan |
Wants to explore the
timeline for issuance; wonders if there is time to revisit this when they
return for the next regular session. |
|
269 |
Richardson |
Notes that the first
issuance would be March or April so the next legislature could revisit this
statute. Says that the State
Treasurer’s office would need a 30-day lead time to restructure the deal. |
|
277 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks if these bonds could
be looked at for revision if it is necessary to look at additional school
funding if another deficit occurs in the December forecast. |
|
282 |
Richardson |
Replies affirmatively. |
|
284 |
Rep. Bates |
Wonders how long it would
take to start this bonding process over if the $150 million failed tonight. |
|
291 |
Richardson |
Says it would take 90 days
because it would be a new project. |
|
296 |
Chair Westlund |
Points out that waiting
until January to start this process would be about the same time for issuance
as this bonding proposal tonight. |
|
303 |
Richardson |
Asks for clarification
that this proposal should be structured in the shortest timeframe as
possible. |
|
306 |
Chair Westlund |
Says that he does not want
to utilize all the Master Settlement Agreement dollars. |
|
314 |
Richardson |
Responds that the
Treasurer’s office is just looking for direction from committee. |
|
318 |
Chair Westlund |
Notes the importance of
leaving some flexibility for next session. |
|
332 |
Richardson |
Replies that the committee
would be achieving their purpose by giving the State Treasurer direction as
if nothing changes, but they would also retain the flexibility to revisit the
issue if circumstances do change. |
|
337 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Talks about coming back in
January and revisiting the issue for more money, but for the $150 million in
question tonight, use the shortest duration. |
|
350 |
Rep. Morgan |
Suggests going ahead with
the proposal tonight, but wants to protect their options if another special
session is called before the next regular session in January. |
|
362 |
Chair Westlund |
Acknowledges that there is
some flexibility with this bonding issue.
Adjourns the conference committee at 10:17 p.m. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patsy Wood, Marjorie Taylor,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 4073B, B13 amendments dated 9/15/02, submitted by staff, 1 pg.
B
– Model Bonding of MSA Payment Stream with proceeds at $150 million, dated
9/17/02, submitted by staff, 1 pg.
C
– Model Bonding of MSA Payment Stream with proceeds at $200 million, dated
9/17/02, submitted by staff, 1 pg.