SENATE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON
PERS STABILIZATION
September 06, 2002 Hearing Room H-170
2:30 p.m. Tapes
4 - 5
MEMBERS PRESENT: Sen. Roger Beyer, Chair
Sen. Ryan Deckert
Sen. Charles Starr
STAFF PRESENT: Cara
Filsinger, Committee Administrator
Patricia Nielsen, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: SB 1028 – Public hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 4, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Beyer |
Calls the meeting to order
at 2:45 p.m. Opens public hearing on
SB 1028. |
|
SB 1028 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
010 |
Chair Beyer |
Comments on SB 1028-A2
amendments dated 9-6-02 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
015 |
David Heynderickx |
Legislative Counsel. Presents overview of SB 1028-A2 amendments
dated 9-6-02. Describes the amendment
as a new plan for new hires, a third Tier.
Advises it is based on the House plan considered in 2002 3rd
special session. |
|
090 |
Sen. Deckert |
Clarifies the Tier 1
employees would receive eight percent, and earnings over eight percent would
be paid toward the deficit and into reserves. |
|
095 |
Heynderickx |
Affirms and cautions the Tier
1 membership is shrinking, so the effect will be diminishing. Continues describing details of
amendments. |
|
175 |
Michelle Deister |
League of Oregon Cities
(LOC). Testifies in favor of the bill
with some clarifications. Suggests
changes: ·
Explicit language that successor system applies to those who have not
established membership by 2004 ·
Expedited Supreme Court review should be applied to entire bill |
|
210 |
Marge Kafoury |
Director of Government Relations,
City of Portland. Agrees with changes
suggested. |
|
220 |
Steve Manton |
Pension Systems Manager, City
of Portland. Suggests on page 2, of
the SB 1028-A2 amendments, section 4, lines 20-22, changing five to ten
years, to allow the fund to recover more fully. |
|
245 |
Sen. Deckert
|
Asks if witnesses are members
of Speaker’s or Governor’s task force. |
|
250 |
Deister
|
Responds. |
|
255 |
Sen. Deckert
|
Asks whether this bill
should be passed even though two task forces are currently working on the
issue. |
|
260 |
Deister
|
Responds the efforts are
not mutually exclusive. |
|
265 |
Libby Henry |
Eugene Water and Electric
Board (EWEB). Testifies in support. Submits written testimony. (EXHIBIT B). |
|
270 |
Pat West |
Oregon State Fire Fighters
Council and PERS Coalition. Discusses
specific sections including the eight percent earnings limit. Opposes the extension from five to ten
years. Continues and discusses closed
system and phasing out of Tier 1.
Advises fixed account has earned over ten percent on average. |
|
375 |
Brian DeLashmutt |
Oregon Nurses Association,
Oregon Council of Police Associations, Association of Oregon Corrections
Employees, Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers, Public
Employees Retirement System (PERS) Coalition. Testifies and raises concerns over bill. Suggests not ending the system without a
replacement system. Discusses
unfunded liability and how Tier 2 provisions have dealt with many of the
stated problems of Tier 1. Suggests
the movement is premature. |
|
TAPE 5, A |
||
|
005 |
Maria Keltner |
Association of Oregon
Counties (AOC). Testifies in support
and raises issues: ·
Supports creating a successor system for new members ·
Supports cap on crediting earnings to Tier 1 regular accounts ·
Agrees with request for expedited review ·
Requests assistance for local governments to deal with unfunded
liability |
|
040 |
Joe Schweinhart |
Associated Oregon
Industries (AOI). Testifies in favor
of bill and recommends that PERS reform be part of any overall budget
solution. |
|
060 |
Sen. Deckert
|
Asks whether it is
appropriate to deal with the issue during a special session when all the
parties are not present. |
|
070 |
Schweinhart
|
Responds this is a start,
and more bills will be presented during session. |
|
080 |
Steve Delaney |
PERS legislative
liaison. Raises concerns: ·
Changing five-year to ten-year call requires analysis by actuary ·
Recommends not deleting lines 24-28, on page 2 of the SB 1028-A2
amendments, because it is a helpful directive from legislature to PERS Board,
and a safety valve to assure neither a deficit nor an excess in the gain-loss
reserve ·
Points out there are other directives regarding reserves, which must
be obeyed by PERS, along with a requirement that earnings be paid to deficit
account |
|
130 |
Chair Beyer
|
Clarifies whether funding
for gain-loss reserve is from employee money or both employer and employee
money. |
|
135 |
Delaney
|
Affirms it is a combination
of employer and employee earnings. |
|
140 |
Chair Beyer
|
Asks whether a clause can be
added to reinstate the old system, if the Supreme Court overturns. |
|
150 |
Heynderickx
|
Recommends against that
action. Continues and discusses
language about funding reserve accounts. |
|
180 |
Chair Beyer
|
Discusses funding source
for unfunded liability for local government.
Asks staff to consider. Asks
how long the actuary would take to review the five-year versus ten-year call. |
|
195 |
Delaney
|
Responds he should have
the information within 24 hours. |
|
200 |
Chair Beyer
|
Comments the bill needs
language allowing use of contingency reserves. |
|
205 |
Heynderickx
|
Agrees there should be clarifying
language. |
|
210 |
Chair Beyer
|
Closes public hearing on
SB 1028. Recesses committee at 3:30
p.m. |
|
|
|
The committee did not
re-convene, and was adjourned by the adjournment of the Senate at the end of
the session day. |
Submitted By, Reviewed By,
Patricia Nielsen, Cara Filsinger,
Committee Assistant Committee Administrator
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– SB 1028-A2 amendments dated 9-6-02, staff, 11 pp
B
– SB 1028, written testimony, L. Henry, 1 p