HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 23, 2003 Hearing Room D
1:00 PM Tapes
7 - 8
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jeff Kropf, Chair
Rep. George Gilman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Elizabeth Terry Beyer
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Donna Nelson
Rep. Patti Smith
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Kelley Wirth, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Ray
Kelly, Committee Administrator
David Peffley, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD:
HB 2200 – Public
Hearing and Work Session
HB
2195 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 7, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Kropf |
Calls meeting to order at 1:11 PM and opens a public
hearing on HB 2200. |
|
HB 2200
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
028 |
Charlie Stone |
Assistant State Forester Protection Division. Submits (EXHIBIT A) and provides testimony in support of HB 2200, as it
would reform liability for fire fighters. |
|
071 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks if there have been previous problems which are related
to this legislation. |
|
073 |
Stone |
States that this is more an issue of prevention and
protection. |
|
087 |
Chair Kropf |
Recaps that this legislation would bring wildland
fire fighters and private non-profit protection agencies under the umbrella
of the tort liability act. |
|
092 |
Stone |
Confirms that it would. |
|
097 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks what statute this falls under. |
|
099 |
Stone |
Responds that tort claims liability is ORS number 30.270. |
|
100 |
Rep. Smith |
Asks whether we presently have protection for fire
fighters. |
|
101 |
Stone |
Replies that they are, but that it doesn’t extend to
the association fire fighters. |
|
108 |
Chair Kropf |
Recaps that willful neglect or disobedience would
not exempt the fire fighting associations from liability. |
|
113 |
Stone |
Affirms that Chair Kropf is correct. |
|
121 |
Ray Wilkinson |
Oregon Forest Industries Council (OFIC). Testifies in support of HB 2200, which would eliminate
unnecessary obstacles to fire fighting. |
|
155 |
Chair Kropf |
Comments that this bill would not impact the federal
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Asks whether the Oregon ESA would be impacted. |
|
174 |
Wilkinson |
Replies that he doesn’t believe that this would be a
problem, but the issue hasn’t been discussed. |
|
196 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2200, and opens a work
session on HB 2200. |
|
HB 2200
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
198 |
Rep. Smith |
MOTION: Moves HB
2200 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
241 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair
Kropf |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. REP.
NELSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
246 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the work session on HB 2200 and opens a public
hearing on HB 2195. |
|
HB 2195
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
272 |
Ray Kelly |
Summarizes HB 2195. |
|
283 |
Clark Seely |
Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF). Testifies and submits (EXHIBIT B) in support of HB 2195 as it provides revenue for ODF
and the Oregon State University (OSU) College of Forestry forest research lab. |
|
372 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks the witness to walk us through the financial
formula. |
|
374 |
Seely |
Responds as to how ODF arrives at their financial
figures. |
|
404 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks what the ending balance was for the past
biennium. |
|
406 |
Seely |
States that they had $400,000 in harvest tax revenue
which was carried forward to the present biennium. |
|
TAPE 8, A |
||
|
114 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if this money is used entirely by ODF. |
|
120 |
Seely |
Responds that it is used by ODF and OSU |
|
126 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if the difference during this biennium will be greater
or lesser. |
|
131 |
Seely |
Offers that economists estimate a slight increase in
harvest volume. States expectations
for the upcoming biennium. |
|
166 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks if ODF anticipates the projections to stay the
same even if the federal government implements the Clinton management plan. |
|
171 |
Seely |
Refers to (EXHIBIT
B) in explaining that the projections have taken the federal government’s
action into account. |
|
192 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if there’s any hope that we’ll effectively deal
with old growth timber. |
|
200 |
Seely |
Replies that the old growth issues generally fall
under federal jurisdiction. Also addresses
bureaucratic difficulties in the system. |
|
230 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks for confirmation regarding the $400,000 figure. |
|
234 |
Seely |
Replies that the figure is from the previous
biennium. Reiterates that ODF expects
that number to stay fairly static. |
|
244 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks if ODF has a specific target while budgeting
and how they arrive at their goals. |
|
247 |
Seely |
Responds to Rep. Hunt’s budgetary concerns. |
|
265 |
Rep. Hunt |
Asks if the value has fluctuated over the years or
remained static. |
|
269 |
Seely |
Responds that it has not fluctuated greatly. |
|
279 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks what the volume of timber was that we lost in
the fires last year. |
|
289 |
Seely |
Responds that he really doesn’t really know, but
will respond back to the committee with some broad figures. |
|
295 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks how much money we lost in the last biennium
regarding to the amount of timber lost.
|
|
324 |
Seely |
States that he will find those figures, although they
will be fairly rough. |
|
333 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks what kind of budgetary increase we will need to
effectively fight fires for the upcoming biennium. |
|
342 |
Seely |
States belief that we’re at a level of protection
less than they have had in past years with present reductions and will ask
for a general fund increase of perhaps $2,000,000. |
|
372 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks again what the total required will be. |
|
374 |
Seely |
Replies that they will be asking for $16,000,000 for
the fire protection program. |
|
384 |
Chair Kropf |
States that the extensive loses in recent fires is a
good argument for keeping the level of funding high. |
|
TAPE 7, B |
||
|
008 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if we have any uncollectables from land owners. |
|
010 |
Seely |
States that the forest patrol assessments are
collected along with their property taxes. |
|
023 |
Ray Wilkinson |
Testifies in support of HB 2195-a perennial bill
which comes up every biennium. |
|
059 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if this figure is high relative to the past. |
|
062 |
Wilkinson |
Responds that it is a little high, but that it’s
been high in the past. Gives recent
overview. |
|
071 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the public hearing and adjourns meeting. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A – HB 2200, written testimony, Charlie Stone, 2 pp.
B – HB 2195, written testimony, Clark Seely, 4 pp.