HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 28, 2003 Hearing Room D
1:00 PM Tapes
9 - 11
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jeff Kropf, Chair
Rep. George Gilman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Kelley Wirth, Vice-Chair
Rep. Elizabeth Terry Beyer
Rep. Donna Nelson
Rep. Patti Smith
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Dave Hunt
STAFF PRESENT: Ray
Kelly, Committee Administrator
David Peffley, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: HB
2179 - Work Session
HB 2195 - Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2205 - Public Hearing
HB 2241 - Public Hearing
HB 2256 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 9, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Kropf |
Calls the meeting to order and opens a work session
on HB 2179. |
|
HB 2179
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
016 |
Ray Kelly |
Committee Administrator. Explains the amendment to HB 2179 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
023 |
Chair Kropf |
Offers that the proposed amendment was acceptable to
Dean Hal Salwasser, Director of Oregon’s Forest Research Laboratory. |
|
031 |
Rep.
Nelson |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB
2179-1 amendments dated 1/27/03. |
|
033 |
|
VOTE: 5-0 EXCUSED: 2 - Hunt, Wirth*(see Tape 11A, #048) |
|
045 |
Chair
Kropf |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
064 |
Chair
Kropf |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. REP.
NELSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
050 |
Rep. Nelson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2179 to the floor
with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on
Ways and Means by prior reference. |
|
058 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Hunt |
|
064 |
Chair
Kropf |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. REP.
NELSON will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
075 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the work session on HB 2179 and opens a public
hearing on HB 2195. |
|
HB 2195
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
079 |
Ray Kelly |
Summarizes HB 2195. |
|
088 |
Stephen Hobbs |
Forest Research Laboratory (FRL), Oregon State University
(OSU). Submits (EXHIBIT B) and testifies in support of HB 2195 in order to fund
ongoing research. |
|
127 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if the FRL works in conjunction with Oregon
industries. |
|
133 |
Hobbs |
Responds that the FRL works very closely with Oregon
industries. |
|
150 |
Rep. Nelson |
States that she hopes that dollars will be kept for
future development of Oregon industry. |
|
157 |
Hobbs |
Affirms that the FRL aims to develop Oregon’s
economy, industries, and communities. |
|
167 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks for additional information from Clark Seely. |
|
175 |
Clark Seely |
Responds that they have assigned the requested task gathering
the requested data and hope to receive the findings very soon. |
|
183 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2195 and opens a
work session on HB 2195. |
|
HB 2195
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
189 |
Rep. Beyer |
MOTION: Moves HB 2195 to the floor with a DO PASS Recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on
Revenue by prior reference. |
|
200 |
Chair
Kropf |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. REP. BEYER
will lead discussion on the floor. |
|
206 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the work session on HB 2195 and opens a public
hearing on HB 2205. |
|
HB 2205
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
225 |
Gary Lynch |
Oregon Department on Geology and Mining Industries (DOGAMI). Submits (EXHIBIT C) and testifies in support of HB 2205 as it will reduce
overall costs. |
|
276 |
Rep. Smith |
Asks if the survey must be conducted annually. |
|
281 |
Lynch |
Responds that it would be done at the time of
application, and that this bill is really about accurate boundaries. |
|
299 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks who validates the boundaries. |
|
304 |
Lynch |
Responds that in the best case scenario, it would be
done by a professional surveyor and that mapping is taken seriously. |
|
323 |
Rep Nelson |
Inquires about the surveying process. |
|
328 |
Lynch |
Summarizes the steps in the process. |
|
340 |
Rep. Gilman |
States concern that this process could create
duplication. |
|
350 |
Lynch |
Clarifies the land use question and gives the
reasons that duplication should not occur. |
|
374 |
Rep. Smith |
Asks for clarification on the wording “other acceptable
methods” |
|
378 |
Lynch |
Affirms that we need an amendment to change that
language. |
|
398 |
Rep. Smith |
Asks who would decide what is acceptable. |
|
402 |
Lynch |
States that the department would set the standards. |
|
410 |
Rep. Smith |
Asks whether a property owner would be able to hire
someone to flag the line themselves. |
|
413 |
Lynch |
States that the property owner would probably be
able to do so. |
|
TAPE 10, A |
||
|
010 |
Rep Beyer |
Asks if the bill would be changing the permit
process. |
|
014 |
Lynch |
Confirms that it would not change. Reiterates that the survey would just make
the system more efficient. |
|
020 |
Chair Kropf |
Questions the viability of reducing costs. |
|
032 |
Lynch |
Responds that prevention is cheaper than enforcement
and that’s where the savings will come. |
|
060 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks how many people will be effected by this. |
|
066 |
Lynch |
States that he doesn’t know, but will find the
answer. States that it is a
significant number however. |
|
072 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks how much it’s going to cost to comply with the
surveys. |
|
074 |
Lynch |
Reiterates that if DOGAMI has the authority given by
this bill, the costs will be minimal.
|
|
081 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks about fees for this process. |
|
084 |
Lynch |
Doesn’t see any fee as part of the program. |
|
091 |
Chair Kropf |
Expresses concern about costs down the road. |
|
108 |
Chair Kropf |
States appreciation for the goals of this legislation
and states a desire to explore it |
|
114 |
Stephen Kafoury |
Testifies in support of HB 2205, but introduces a
proposed amendment - (EXHIBIT D). |
|
144 |
George Cathy |
Chairman of the Legislative Committee of the Professional
Land Survey of Oregon. Testifies in support of HB 2205 and reaffirms Gary
Lynch’s testimony that the surveys are necessary, but also points out that
the surveying must be under the direct supervision of a licensed surveyor. |
|
200 |
Ed Graham |
Executive Secretary for the Oregon State Board of
Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying (OSBELLS). Addresses the accountability of those
performing the services. |
|
240 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if everyone goes through the process whether
they own the land or not. |
|
250 |
Kafoury |
Explains the surveying process and the reasons for
it. |
|
256 |
Rep. Nelson |
Expresses concern about people doing what they want
with their own land. |
|
260 |
Cathy |
Addresses Rep. Nelson’s concern while providing an example
of how the process works. |
|
288 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks for clarification on the purpose for the
surveying process. |
|
298 |
Cathy |
Responds by explaining the boundary marking process. |
|
318 |
Rep. Smith |
Asks for the cost and time requirements to the
landowner. |
|
322 |
Cathy |
Replies that these requirements vary with geology
and the situation with regard to cost.
|
|
TAPE 9, B |
||
|
002 |
Rep. Smith |
Continues that he doesn’t see this process costing
the land owner any additional time. |
|
012 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks for clarification on Mr. Cathy’s assertion that
mapping without certification is a violation of statute. |
|
015 |
Cathy |
Confirms that assertion. |
|
017 |
Rich Angstrom |
President of the Oregon Concrete Aggregate Producers
Association (OCAPA). Clarifies the
intent and process for this bill. |
|
060 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks whether this bill is necessary and whether the
problem is big enough to warrant it. |
|
082 |
Cathy |
States his belief that this is an important issue. |
|
087 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks whether DOGAMI guarantees their surveys. |
|
091 |
Kafoury |
States that they are responsible for a very high
standard of work. |
|
100 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if they need a lot of liability insurance. |
|
104 |
Chair Kropf |
Responds that it’s not a requirement, but that it’s a
good idea. |
|
110 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks what percentage of applicants file surveys. |
|
114 |
Lynch |
Responds that he doesn’t have that figure. Reiterates the importance of the accuracy
of the maps. |
|
139 |
Ray Kelly |
Reads two statutes, 672.020 and 672.005 for
clarification. |
|
197 |
Kafoury |
Points out the differences and similarities in
laws. Believes that the proposed
amendment makes the law more clear. |
|
234 |
Chair Kropf |
States his understanding of the bill that both a map
and a survey are required. Asks if a
prior survey is acceptable. |
|
247 |
Lynch |
Affirms that previous surveys are regularly
accepted. |
|
267 |
Rep. Nelson |
Agrees with Mr. Kafoury that the committee is
splitting hairs unnecessarily. |
|
282 |
Lynch |
States that the costs could be costly to some in
Eastern Oregon and that this bill aims at fixing this problem. |
|
302 |
Dr. Beaulieu |
DOGAMI.
Offers that if you remove the ten acre provision, the problem would be
solved. |
|
312 |
Angstrom |
States that he would support that amendment. |
|
318 |
Chair Kropf |
Requests that the three organizations work out the
language and come back with something agreeable to all. Closes the public hearing on HB 2205 and opens
a hearing on HB 2241. |
|
HB 2241
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
355 |
Kelly |
Summarizes the bill |
|
368 |
Marcia Keith |
Oregon Veterinary Medical Association (OVMA). States that OMVA has no reservations about
shifting from under the jurisdiction of the Department of Human Services
(DHS). |
|
381 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks why the veterinarians are part of DHS and not
the Department of Agriculture. |
|
385 |
Keith |
States that she is not sure herself. |
|
390 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks where she thinks they should be. |
|
396 |
Keith |
Points out that she understands they would want to
staff their own board. |
|
400 |
Rep. Nelson |
Speculates on reasons that they might have
originally fallen under the jurisdiction of DHS. |
|
408 |
Keith |
States that she doesn’t have the historical depth to
answer that question. |
|
422 |
Kelly |
Gives the historical rationale for original
placement in DHS. |
|
TAPE 10, B |
||
|
009 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on Kelly’s analysis. |
|
015 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2241 and opens a hearing
on HB 2256 |
|
HB 2256
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
021 |
Kelly |
Summarizes HB 2256. |
|
034 |
Dr. Beaulieu |
Testifies in support of HB 2256 as one which will
save a lot of money. |
|
052 |
Lynch |
Gives historical background in support of HB 2256
which will help to produce necessary regulation. Introduces his testimony (EXHIBIT
E). |
|
106 |
Rep. Gilman |
Explains the issue of salmon spawning by the banks
of the Rogue River |
|
120 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks what DOGAMI bases the fee increases upon. |
|
128 |
Lynch |
Explains the three phases to the fee increase and how DOGAMI arrived at
these figures. |
|
168 |
Rep. Nelson |
States her opinion on the penalization of
Oregonians. |
|
172 |
Lynch |
Responds that a healthy mining industry requires
effective regulation. |
|
178 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if Lynch has a list of individuals who support
this bill. |
|
181 |
Lynch |
Speaks to the fee increase and the endorsement of
OCAPA. |
|
194 |
Angstrom |
Testifies how they work together with DOGAMI and
that regulatory agencies are absolutely necessary. |
|
246 |
Lynch |
Confirms Mr. Angstrom’s figures on mines not in use. |
|
257 |
Angstrom |
Reasserts that mining is not a healthy industry
right now, but offers hope that they do have a positive outlook for future. |
|
273 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks how many of the 880 mines belong to OCAPA. |
|
278 |
Angstrom |
States that he doesn’t know due to inconsistencies
within the industry. |
|
290 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks how many FTE were authorized in 1997. |
|
294 |
Dr. Beaulieu |
Responds that they have maintained the staffing
levels, but now offer declining services, and have vacancies. |
|
308 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks how much money this bill would generate. |
|
325 |
Dr. Beaulieu |
Responds that they would raise $120,000. |
|
352 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks for confirmation on the breakdown of the
$120,000. |
|
382 |
Lynch |
Responds that a major amendment costs about as much
as a permit fee. |
|
399 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks for clarification on who determines the fee. |
|
406 |
Lynch |
Responds that the fee was not part of the original
plan. |
|
407 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks if OCAPA is in favor of the fee. |
|
414 |
Angstrom |
States that all the major aggregate producers that
he knows of definitely support the fee. |
|
TAPE 11, A |
||
|
002 |
Angstrom |
Concludes testimony on the fee increase. |
|
018 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks what the effect will be if the fee increase is
not approved |
|
023 |
Dr. Beaulieu |
Responds that the services which DOGAMI provides will be greatly compromised. |
|
044 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2256 and reopens a work session on HB 2179 and HB 2195. |
|
HB 2179 AND HB 2195 - WORK SESSION |
||
|
048 |
Rep.
Gilman |
MOTION: Requests unanimous consent that the rules be suspended in order to allow Rep. Wirth* to be recorded
as voting AYE on the motion to send HB 2179 to the
floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
050 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Hunt |
|
053 |
Chair Kropf |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
060 |
Rep.
Gilman |
MOTION: Requests unanimous consent that the rules be suspended in order to allow Rep. Wirth* to be recorded
as voting AYE on the motion to send HB 2195 to the
floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation. |
|
062 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 EXCUSED: 1
- Hunt |
|
063 |
Chair
Kropf |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
066 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the work session on HB 2179 and HB 2195 and
adjourns the meeting. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A – HB 2179, -1 amendment, staff, 1 p.
B – HB 2195, written testimony, Stephen
Hobbs, 1 p.
C – HB 2205, written testimony, Gary Lynch, 1
p.
D – HB 2205, proposed amendment, Stephen
Kafoury, 1 p.
E – HB 2256, written testimony, Gary Lynch, 2
pp.