HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 27, 2003 Hearing Room D
1:00 PM Tapes 50 – 51
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jeff Kropf, Chair
Rep. George Gilman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Kelley Wirth, Vice-Chair
Rep. Terry Beyer
Rep. Dave Hunt
Rep. Donna Nelson
Rep. Patti Smith
STAFF PRESENT: Ray
Kelly, Committee Administrator
David Peffley, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3308 – Public Hearing
HB 2416 – Public Hearing
HB 3123 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 3132 – Public Hearing
HB 2344 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 50, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Kropf |
Calls the meeting to order at 1:39 and opens a
public hearing on HB
3308. Announces that HB 3308 will be
amended. |
|
HB 3308
- PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
020 |
Ray Kelly |
Committee Administrator. Summarizes HB 3308.
Announces -1 amendment (EXHIBIT
A). |
|
031 |
Senator Atkinson |
Speaks to his bill and against Section 7. Informs
the committee on the success of the Crater Lake license plate. |
|
055 |
Chair Kropf |
Talks about the expectations of this bill. |
|
068 |
Hilary Abraham |
The Nature Conservancy. Submits (EXHIBIT B)
and testifies regarding HB 3308.
Requests that this bill be sent to a work group and to help with the
legal counsel. |
|
135 |
Rep. Gilman |
Addresses Section 7 of the bill and states that it
is not a good source for money. |
|
141 |
Abraham |
Agrees with Rep. Gilman. |
|
146 |
Steve West |
Klamath County Commissioner. Testifies against Section 7 and hopes that
a different proposal would come forth as to how to fund the noxious weed
problem. |
|
200 |
Tim Butler |
Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA). Affirms Abraham’s overview of the noxious
weed task force. Affirms ODA’s
ongoing efforts to support the noxious weed plan. |
|
239 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks how much money we need to fix the problem. |
|
241 |
Butler |
Replies that we need about $8 million. |
|
251 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks if this is a problem which will eventually
abate. |
|
260 |
Butler |
States that it can improve, but that we need a
stable base of funding. Notes that
cost prevention programs can keep the problems in check. |
|
275 |
Chair Kropf |
Recommends a task force and suggests Butler come
back with a power-point presentation during the next hearing on this bill. |
|
288 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks Butler to show proof of the 33-1 ratio. |
|
297 |
Butler |
States that he’d be happy to. |
|
301 |
Keith Leavitt |
Port of Portland.
States appreciation for the funding mechanisms of this bill and
recommends looking for something competitive. Wishes to work on an amendment
to this bill. |
|
335 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks if there are noxious weeds which come via the
port. |
|
338 |
Leavitt |
States that is a safe assumption. |
|
340 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks for a clarification on the surcharge. |
|
345 |
Leavitt |
Defines the surcharge. |
|
368 |
Rep. Nelson |
Rephrases her question. |
|
371 |
Leavitt |
States the bill draft needs to be cleaned up. |
|
390 |
Rep. Nelson |
Responds to not unloading from any other vehicle at
another port. |
|
391 |
Chair Kropf |
Notes trying to decrease the influx of weeds coming
into port. |
|
393 |
Chris Jarmer |
Oregon Forest Industries Council (OFIC). Reaffirms
how invasive noxious weeds can be, such as scotch broom. |
|
411 |
Mark Simmons |
Oregon Association of Nurserymen. Supports the notion that this is a serious
problem, but does not support HB 3308 as written. |
|
452 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes a public hearing on HB 3308 and opens a
public hearing on HB 2416. |
|
TAPE 51, A |
||
|
HB 2416
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
020 |
David Schmierbach |
State Police Forensics Division. Submits (EXHIBIT C) and testifies against what he considers a very
incomplete definition of science. |
|
048 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks about the issue of expert opinion. |
|
053 |
Schmierbach |
Notes the discussion was to seek our legal counsel
and determine whether counsel was giving the same information. |
|
056 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks where the term discovery comes from. |
|
058 |
Schmierbach |
Responds out of a college text in division
headquarters. |
|
063 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks what kind of book. |
|
065 |
Schmierback |
Answers a general science text. |
|
067 |
Rep. Beyer |
Asks if the bill or the -1 amendments are being
addressed. |
|
068 |
Chair Kropf |
Announces the -1 amendment (EXHIBIT D), and states that counsel is not in favor of the
amendments in the present state.
Closes public hearing on HB 2416 and opens a public hearing on HB
3123. |
|
HB 3123 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
085 |
Ray Kelly |
Summarizes HB 3123. |
|
100 |
Katie Fast |
Supports (EXHIBIT
E) and testifies in favor of HB 3123.
States the benefits of this legislation. |
|
129 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks why this legislation was originally passed. |
|
133 |
Fast |
Answers that animal welfare groups put pressure on
USDA to move to a less sensitive area. |
|
142 |
Rodger Huffman |
Administrator, Animal Health and Identification
Division, Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA). Notes the place on the cattle where they are being branded is
not the greatest but an acceptable one. |
|
177 |
Chair Kropf |
Close the public hearing on HB 3123 and opens a work
session on HB 3123. |
|
HB 3123
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
178 |
Rep. Smith
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3123 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
179 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Kropf |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. SMITH will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
179 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the work session on HB 3123 and opens a
public hearing on HB 3132. |
|
HB 3132
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
RECESSES |
||
|
182 |
Chair Kropf |
Reopens the committee meeting. |
|
185 |
Rep. Zauner |
Submits (EXHIBIT
F) and (EXHIBIT G) and
testifies that the trumpeter swan is a predatory game bird. |
|
228 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks if the swans are predatory and whether that
allows Oregon Department of Forestry and Wildlife (ODFW) to manage them
differently. |
|
231 |
Rep. Zauner |
Answers that it will allow the farmer to protect his
land. |
|
238 |
Chair Kropf |
Notes that there has never been a tundra swan hunt. |
|
241 |
Rep. Zauner |
Answers that is correct. |
|
255 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks Rep. Zauner about his understanding of Federal
Laws in relationship to the swans. |
|
259 |
Rep. Zauner |
Notes there is an overlay where some things can not
be done. |
|
265 |
Chair Kropf |
Declares a conflict of interest. |
|
290 |
Ron Anglin |
Submits (EXHIBIT
H) and testifies as a neutral party regarding the federal regulations
regarding this legislation. Talks
about the classification and designation of trumpeter swans. |
|
345 |
Eric Rickerson |
Testifies as a neutral party submitting written
testimony (EXHIBIT I) and offers
background information on the biology relevant to the case of the trumpeter
swan. |
|
389 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks about the effect of reclassification. |
|
400 |
Rickerson |
Responds to the effect. |
|
TAPE 50, B |
||
|
002 |
Chair Kropf |
Clarifies that the status allows for damage take. |
|
006 |
Rickerson |
Answers that is correct. |
|
008 |
Chair Kropf |
States that the federal government could decide that
this is not as big a problem as with geese and that it would not merit
allowing take. |
|
014 |
Rickerson |
Answers that would be their option. |
|
024 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if there are any economic damage provisions to
deal with predators. |
|
031 |
Anglin |
Asks for clarification. |
|
033 |
Rep. Nelson |
Restates. |
|
037 |
Anglin |
Speaks to the broad authority of ODFW. |
|
044 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks for the time estimate for the process. |
|
048 |
Rickerson |
Answers that the time frame could be between
eighteen to thirty-six months. |
|
055 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks how much of a problem it would be if the state
passed a distinction between bird and game until the study was completed. |
|
063 |
Rickerson |
States that confusion could ensue. |
|
082 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if there is any common practical sense. |
|
100 |
Anglin |
States that Oregon Department of Forestry and
Wildlife has authority |
|
105 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if we’ve ever done a study and then declared an
emergency in this state. |
|
121 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks what the process was in getting an
environmental impact on the geese causing depredation issues in the valley and
how long it took. |
|
130 |
Rickerson |
Answers that it took a great deal of effort in the
Willamette Valley. |
|
136 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on the State of Oregon in relation to
international standards. |
|
140 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3132 and asks for
opinions on this concept. |
|
151 |
Rep. Nelson |
States the need to move forward. |
|
154 |
Chair Kropf |
States the need for Oregon to petition the federal
government for an Environmental Impact Study (EIS). |
|
166 |
Rep. Beyer |
Responds negatively to the practice of shooting
swans. |
|
170 |
Rep. Wirth |
States concern for passing a state law. |
|
176 |
Rep. Nelson |
Notes to move the bill forward and asks about rabid
swans. |
|
182 |
Chair Kropf |
Reopens the public hearing on HB 3132. |
|
HB 3132
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
190 |
Rickerson |
States the need to work with the ODFW. |
|
196 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks if the goose predation issue is that which is
covered in the Migratory Bird Act. |
|
200 |
Rickerson |
Answers in the affirmative. |
|
225 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks if there was an improper message sent in the
past. |
|
230 |
Rickerson |
Answers that he doesn’t think that there was, and
replies that ODFW had a good system in place working with the landowners and
OFB. |
|
244 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks what the effect would be if we don’t
reclassify. |
|
251 |
Rickerson |
States that the Rep. Zauner would be included in any
discussions on how it is being addressed. |
|
260 |
Rep. Zauner |
States that he’s he is willing to work with
ODFW. Also notes that hunting scares
geese away. |
|
289 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the public hearing on HB 3132. |
|
292 |
Rep. Gilman |
Notes that he’s not sure this bill will solve the
problem. |
|
299 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes a public hearing on HB 3132 and opens a
public hearing on HB 2344. |
|
HB 2344
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
312 |
Chair Kropf |
Addresses the -1 amendment (EXHIBIT J). |
|
369 |
Bill Kluting |
Western Counsel of Industrial Workers. Speaks in favor of HB 2344. Addresses the fire problem and saving
mills from closing. |
|
450 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if it is customary to save the salvage. |
|
TAPE 51, B |
||
|
003 |
Kluting |
Replies that in trying to maintain the forests, we
could end up in the court process. |
|
014 |
Kluting |
Addresses the economic condition of the state. |
|
021 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if this issue started with the spotted owl. |
|
|
Kluting |
Replies that it started there. |
|
027 |
Chair Kropf |
Asks to look over the amendments and adjust them
further. |
|
032 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks about fiscal impact of the amendment. |
|
040 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks why this isn’t practical. |
|
044 |
Chair Kropf |
Discusses the task force. |
|
058 |
Chair Kropf |
Closes the public hearing on HB 2344 and adjourns
the committee meeting at 3:10. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3308, -1 amendments, staff, 1 p.
B
– HB 3308, written testimony, Hilary Abraham, 2 pp.
C
– HB 2416, written testimony, David Schmierbach, 1 p.
D
– HB 2416, -1 amendments, staff, 1 p.
E
– HB 3123, written testimony, Katie Fast, 1 p.
F
– HB 3132, written material, Rep. Zauner, 3 pp.
G
– HB 3132, written testimony, Rep. Zauner, 1 p.
H
– HB 3132, written testimony, Ron Anglin, 3 pp.
I
– HB 3132, written testimony, Eric Rickerson, 2 pp.
J
– HB 2344, -1 amendments, staff, 2 pp.