HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
AUDIT & HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET REFORM
April 10, 2003 Hearing Room 50
3:15 PM Tapes 92
- 93
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Ben Westlund, Chair
Rep. Steve March, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Jeff Merkley
Rep. Alan Bates
MEMBERS EXCUSED: Rep. Randy Miller
Rep. Susan Morgan, Vice-Chair
GUEST MEMBERS: Rep.
Laurie Monnes Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Rick
Berkobien, Committee Administrator
Kelly Fuller, Committee Assistant
ISSUES HEARD: Invited
Testimony
Informational Meeting
Pharmacy Benefit Management: RegenceRx
David Clark, The Regence Group
Patty Church, The Regence Group
Pharmacy Benefit Administration and Multi-State
Purchasing Pool
Scott Allocco, First Health Services Corporation
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 92, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Westlund |
Calls the meeting to order, introduces David Clark
and Patty Church our guests here for invited testimony and opens the
informational meeting. |
|
INFORMATIONAL
MEETING |
||
|
015 |
David Clark |
Introduces himself and presents his testimony (EXHIBIT A) and begins presentation. |
|
132 |
Rep. March |
Asks what kind of weight do you give un published
studies, like the one you are referring to. |
|
138 |
Clark |
Elaborates how un published studies benefit them and
continues presentation. |
|
164 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that he assumes the pharmaceutical
companies welcome that. |
|
169 |
Clark |
Comments that yes they welcome that to an extent,
elaborates, and continues. |
|
278 |
Chair Westlund |
What percent do those usually run. |
|
280 |
Clark |
Responds that it is up to twenty five percent of the
total dollars available from the manufacturer. |
|
282 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks if that discount is from savings and rebates
etc. |
|
285 |
Clark |
Responds yes and continues. |
|
292 |
Rep. Merkley |
Asks is the reason that Regence can contract
directly with their manufactures because of your size. |
|
198 |
Clark |
Responds that there is two major factors that drive
discounts from pharmaceutical manufactures and elaborates. |
|
308 |
Rep. Merkley |
Comments that this is why bulk purchasing is a
feasible strategy for the State of Oregon. |
|
310 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that they don’t have access to the Medicaid
drugs that we do and asks how many lives they represent. |
|
315 |
Clark |
They cover 3 million lives. |
|
326 |
Rep. Bates |
Asks what it their usual discounts or rebates
compared to AWP. |
|
328 |
Clark |
Makes comments about reimbursement to pharmacies. |
|
336 |
Rep. Bates |
Asks do you run any Medicaid programs. |
|
342 |
Clark |
Current no, they do not run any Medicaid programs
and makes additional comments. |
|
358 |
Rep. Bates |
In order to get the brand name discount do you have
to hit a certain market share or certain number of prescriptions or do you
have a formulary or preferred drug list you use. |
|
367 |
Clark |
Yes, they do have a preferred drug list and
elaborates. |
|
376 |
Rep. Bates |
Those on SSI, other than Prozac which is generic
would the physician look at a choice of drugs there or a single drug that was
preferred first. |
|
382 |
Clark |
Comment that he thinks he is referring to SSRI’s
which are Select Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and elaborates. |
|
TAPE 93, A |
||
|
001 |
Rep. Bates |
On the brand names on those anti-depressants how do
you make the selection of one to the other of which ones are on the
formularies and the ones that are off. |
|
005 |
Clark |
Comments that this is one of the challenges
currently and elaborates. |
|
015 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Would like at the slide on key strategies (EXHIBIT A) on restrain costs and
promote quality and asks who is paying for this. |
|
024 |
Clark |
Clarifies by re-asking her question as who pays for
doing all of this review and comments that the reviews are funded by the
Regence group and elaborates. |
|
030 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks and is this a significant piece of your budget
or a small percentage. |
|
037 |
Clark |
Comment that the largest percentage of the budget is
doing customer service work, elaborates and continues presentation. |
|
070 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks how that compared to the rest of the
population. |
|
074 |
Clark |
Comments that it is about the same or a little bit
lower. |
|
076 |
Chair Westlund |
So these trend grew at lower than the commercial
population. |
|
080 |
Clark |
Comments at that time yes, and comments what they
would like to see with the new Oregon Health Plan recommendations. |
|
087 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks how they manage their own pharmacy network. |
|
089 |
Clark |
Explains how they manage their own pharmacy network. |
|
095 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks if they have utilization throughout the entire
state. |
|
097 |
Clark |
Responds that they have about ninety five percent of
the pharmacies. |
|
100 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments and asks them to keep doing what they
are doing. |
|
116 |
Clark |
Makes closing comments and states what they believe
in. |
|
123 |
Rep. March |
Asks when the states lists have come out, how did
ours look. |
|
128 |
Clark |
Responds that as far as preferred medications and
preferred drugs, there are a lot of similarities and elaborates. |
|
144 |
Chair Westlund |
Thanks the witness for their testimony and
introduces Scott Allocco from First Health Services Corporation. |
|
168 |
Scott Allocco |
Introduces himself, presents his testimony and
begins his presentation. |
|
263 |
Rep. Bates |
On the rebate that you get on the Medicaid fee for
service, is it not true that sixty percent of that goes back to the Federal
Government and forty percent comes to the State. |
|
267 |
Allocco |
Responds yes, that is correct and elaborates. |
|
272 |
Rep. Bates |
Comment that with the fee for service the real
discount to the State if only eight percent. |
|
275 |
Allocco |
Responds that you need to compare apples to apples
and elaborates. |
|
286 |
Chair Westlund |
That is why we were asking if this was a gross
number so sixty percent of this fee for service has to go back to the Federal
Government. |
|
290 |
Allocco |
Responds yes, that is correct. |
|
294 |
Rep. Bates |
Comments that is point is the real discount to the
state in not the twenty four percent it is the forty percent. |
|
296 |
Allocco |
Responds and elaborates. |
|
305 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that sixty percent you have to pay back to
the Federal Government. |
|
308 |
Allocco |
Comment that that is correct and the net difference
is fourteen percent of which for every hundred million dollars forty percent
of that is State and sixty percent is Federal. |
|
321 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments to help clarify the discussion and
comments that we are just looking at net numbers. |
|
328 |
Allocco |
Elaborates to help the members understand the
process with the key issues. |
|
345 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that the important thing here is the net to
the State and not net rebates, we care about adding populations, providing
more services and adding benefits and elaborates. |
|
354 |
Allocco |
Appreciates the difference and the importance in the
members having to come up with the state money to fund these programs and
elaborates. |
|
373 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that he is talking about these larger
numbers of rebates and supplemental rebates and that is accurate, but for our
purposes it distorts reality, because we are not getting those kind of
rebates nor are we entitled to them and elaborates. |
|
390 |
Allocco |
Comments that one of the issues that he wanted to
address today was one of the bullet points in the Oregon Health Plan
recommendations about auditing First Health Services and elaborates. |
|
TAPE 92, B |
||
|
104 |
Rep. Bates |
Asks what percent of the market in Michigan and Ohio
is generic drugs. |
|
115 |
Allocco |
Responds that the last page of his handout will give
an explanation of generic drugs. (EXHIBIT
B) |
|
125 |
Rep. Bates |
Asks in the generic market with the supplemental
savings are the costs of the brand names getting pretty close to the generic
cost or is there still a significant difference. |
|
130 |
Allocco |
Comments about one issue that has been debated is
when a brand name drug goes to generic and answers in more detail. |
|
140 |
Rep. Bates |
Using an example of Clariton, you said it is common
that twenty percent of the drug cost is being deposited right back in as a
rebate to the state of Oregon, asks if Oregon is going to have to split that
with the Federal Government. |
|
146 |
Allocco |
Responds yes, that is correct and elaborates. |
|
149 |
Rep. Bates |
Asks, so the twenty percent that goes back to the
State has to be split with the Federal Government. |
|
151 |
Allocco |
Explains the process. |
|
158 |
Rep. Bates |
The process of getting the list of what the state
bought, you send them the invoice and then they cut the check based off of
that, it seems that this is a place for an audit it is a very complex
situation. |
|
169 |
Allocco |
Responds that the Federal OIG is investigating the
manufactures prices that the rebates are based on and elaborates. |
|
218 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that he feels Pharmacy Benefit Managers are
doing a great job and as far as the auditing we are talking about, good
prudence would say, we audit people that handle that kind of money and
elaborates. |
|
221 |
Allocco |
Again, lets talk about how we can do that. |
|
241 |
Rep. Bates |
Comments that he is basically saying he can given
the tools you believe you can recover for us the supplemental rebates. |
|
252 |
Allocco |
Respond yes, if the legislature were to give OMAP
the authority. Give his general
recommendation of what pooling that each state individually can do before
looking at multi-state pooling. |
|
320 |
Chair Westlund |
Disagrees with his comment about giving the state
the tools and makes comments about how he feels. |
|
362 |
Rep. Bates |
Share the same concern, but is still intrigued and
asks have you approach in any of your market, where you have these tools a
generic market that seventy five or eighty percent, have you ever reached
that level anywhere as an agency working for the entire state. |
|
371 |
Allocco |
Responds and elaborates. |
|
386 |
Rep. Bates |
Reiterates what he just heard him was that even if
we gave you the tools the Federal Government is not going to allow you to
have the kind of formulary and MCO would and that’s a tool that is pretty
important if you want to get that generic level up. |
|
393 |
Allocco |
Responds by saying he feel the state is planning on
implementing an enhanced process to require physician to provide
justification when wanting to supply a generic name drug instead of a brand
name and elaborates. |
|
TAPE 93, B |
||
|
009 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks what level of generic usage have you guys
achieved. |
|
015 |
Clark |
Comments that they are almost at just under fifty
percent for generic utilization and asks Rep. Bates for clarification on his
question because it would make a difference in his answer. |
|
019 |
Rep. Bates |
Comment that he will go back and find out if his
figures are correct. |
|
023 |
Chair Westlund |
Comment that, that floats between sixty and one is
actually up to eighty. |
|
026 |
Allocco |
Respond yes, there is actually a difference and
elaborates with detail. |
|
033 |
Rep. Bates |
In reality, my question would be have you been able
to achieve that, do you have any place you have the tools to do that and if
you do have you ever achieved anything above fifty percent. |
|
036 |
Allocco |
Talks about what was just said by Regence and
elaborates his comments on the issue. |
|
041 |
Rep. Bates |
All he cares about is which drugs are being
dispensed as generic verses brand names and as I understand it is fifty one
percent in Michigan. |
|
044 |
Allocco |
Comments that the Medicaid fee for services programs
because they have stronger mandatory generic substitution laws generally have
slightly higher generic drug utilization than non-Medicaid programs. |
|
051 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks Tom Holt, Oregon Pharmaceutical Association
from the audience if this is substitution or total utilization. |
|
054 |
Tom Holt |
Responds from the audience. |
|
060 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments and asks if they both are talking about total
psychotropic and seven eleven drugs and comments that that was Tom Holt from
the audience and he indicated that some of the carve out drugs Cancer, AIDS
and seven eleven drugs would bring the total utilization down. |
|
062 |
Berkobien |
Could you explain how the State of Michigan does
with their Mental Health drugs. |
|
065 |
Allocco |
Comments that the Mental Health drugs seem to be the
most costly and gives more detail about what the State of Michigan is doing. |
|
103 |
Berkobien |
Asks about different litigation around drug programs
happening in the states and asks if Michigan and Florida were involved in
those. |
|
108 |
Allocco |
Responds to the different litigations in the
country. |
|
177 |
Chair Westlund |
Thanks the witnesses for the testimony and calls the
meeting to a close and adjourns 4:57 PM |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Informational, prepared testimony, David Clark, 5 pp
B
– Informational, prepared testimony, Scott Allocco, 21 pp