HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
AUDIT & HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET REFORM
April 21, 2003 Hearing Room 50
3:15 PM Tapes 96
- 97
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Ben Westlund, Chair
Rep. Steve March, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Kruse
Rep. Jeff Merkley
Rep. Alan Bates
MEMBERS EXCUSED: Rep. Randy Miller
Rep. Susan Morgan, Vice-Chair
GUEST MEMBERS: Rep.
Monnes Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Rick
Berkobien, Committee Administrator
Kelly Fuller, Committee Assistant
ISSUES HEARD: Work
Session
Possible Introduction of Committee
Bill
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
|
TAPE 96, A |
|||
|
003 |
Chair Westlund |
Calls meeting to order and opens the work session.. |
|
|
WORK
SESSION |
|||
|
003 |
Rep. March |
Moves LC Draft 3547 be introduced as a committee
bill. |
|
|
008 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks if there is any discussion and goes over the
changes that may occur on the draft they have in hand.
Extends a thank you to all that have participated to
get us this far and states that this is still a work in progress. |
|
|
048 |
Rep. Kruse |
Would also like to mention Holly Robinson. |
|
|
050 |
Rep. March
|
MOTION: Moves LC 3547 BE INTRODUCED as a committee
bill. |
|
|
|
|
VOTE:
5-0 EXCUSED: 2 - Morgan, Miller |
|
|
|
Chair |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
055 |
Chair Westlund |
Also extends a thank you to the staff for their work
and participation. |
|
|
******* |
************** |
RECESS************************************************* |
|
|
067 |
Chair Westlund |
Calls Holly Robinson up for her testimony on the LC
Draft 3547. |
|
|
085 |
Holly Robinson |
Introduces herself from Legislative Council and
begins the description of the LC Draft 3547. (EXHIBIT A) |
|
|
105 |
Chair Westlund |
Would like to add that the bigger overarching policy
discussion here is to get as many people as possible into Managed Care. |
|
|
113 |
Robinson |
Agrees that that is the overarching policy in
sections 1 & 2. |
|
|
105 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks is our fully capitated health plan CareOregon. |
|
|
109 |
Rep. Kruse |
Answers that there is fourteen of them. |
|
|
114 |
Robinson |
Continues presentation on Sections 4 &5 of the
Draft. |
|
|
139 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks if there is a smaller number of those in
Section 5 than in Section 14. |
|
|
143 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that those are really two different issues,
but at some level they are achieving the same thing and elaborates. |
|
|
151 |
Robinson |
Continues presentation in Section 6. |
|
|
158 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks if the Section 5 organization is not a fully
capitated health plan. |
|
|
160 |
Robinson |
Responds that, that is correct. |
|
|
162 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Asks for clarification on Section five. |
|
|
166 |
Chair Westlund |
Responds and gives clarification about how it works. |
|
|
168 |
Rep. Anderson |
Asks are there more than one that serve more than
2000. |
|
|
170 |
Chair Westlund |
Responds no. |
|
|
172 |
Robinson |
Continues presentation. |
|
|
195 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that the sections she is discussing will
most likely have an extensive rewrite. |
|
|
203 |
Robinson |
Continues presentation. |
|
|
213 |
Rep. Anderson |
Asks if Section 8, Sub Section 3 is saying that
different areas within the State will be receiving different capitation
rates. |
|
|
218 |
Robinson |
Explains what Department of Human Services is doing
with the five major regions. |
|
|
230 |
Rep. Kruse |
Gives a follow up for an example. |
|
|
240 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that there are a lot of bells and whistles
that have to come off of this bill or a companion to this bill, there still
are a lot of issues to be determined. |
|
|
250 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks how Secretary of State got into this in naming
an actuary instead of DAS. |
|
|
256 |
Chair Westlund |
Explains how this process worked. |
|
|
275 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Trying to grasps what we have now and how this is
different, and asks the reason our plans would want to form contracts with
OMAP, is because an incentive for them would be because we don’t have
hospital costs. |
|
|
313 |
Chair Westlund |
Explains that no, they already have contracts and
this is very difficult and elaborates. |
|
|
325 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that Chair Westlund is describing right now
is not reflected in this bill and will be part of the re-writes. |
|
|
351 |
Robinson |
Finishes her discussion of Section 9. |
|
|
354 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that currently transportation costs are not
included and in particular number 3 in prescription drugs accepting the
anti-psychotic drugs and whether they are included or not. |
|
|
362 |
Robinson |
Continues on Section 10. |
|
|
375 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that it is fair to say that at least long
term, section 10 could go away if we can figure out a methodology of what I
had described before, with projecting a costing and a cost differential that
we can establish. |
|
|
381 |
Robinson |
Continues on through section eleven. |
|
|
396 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments this is how we go about getting
pharmaceuticals at the lowest cost. |
|
|
TAPE 97, A |
|||
|
007 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that this section may also be up for
revision. |
|
|
015 |
Robinson |
Continues presentation. |
|
|
028 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that section seventeen may also need to be
written. |
|
|
032 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks how these three organizations fit into this and
what is the relevance of the three of them in the Medicaid reform. |
|
|
038 |
Robinson |
Explains how these three different organization fit
into this LC draft. |
|
|
055 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Does not see anything of substance in here except
the fully capitated health plan and asks is there somewhere in here where
there is some responsibility given to pre-paid Managed Care health services
organizations and is there some where in here where there is some
responsibility except to collect contributions for physician care
organizations. |
|
|
065 |
Robinson |
Gives explanation of the part of the Oregon Revised
Statutes that talks about this. |
|
|
081 |
Rep. Greenlick |
It looks like in section 2 we have everyone in a fully
capitated health care system or in fee for service managed by a fully
capitated health care system. |
|
|
090 |
Robinson |
Comments that the majority of the actors that are
primarily effected at this point it is true that it would be fully capitated
health plans and hospitals to some degree and elaborates. |
|
|
111 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Comments that then page 1 line 22 – 24 that provides
everything in that larger bucket. |
|
|
115 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that a lot of this revolves around capacity
and elaborates. |
|
|
123 |
Rep. Kruse |
Comments that there are some outlying here, redefining
access and moving in the direction we are wanting to go. |
|
|
125 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments right now a person is eligible for Medicaid
dollars for services rendered without being in a health plan, is this what we
have now. |
|
|
134 |
Robinson |
Responds yes and give a more detailed explanation. |
|
|
144 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
So a person that shows up at the hospital door and
is eligible for Medicaid or is not, this shows Managed Care does not pay for
anything for hospitals at this point, because they don’t meet the criteria or
a Managed Care plan won’t take them. |
|
|
158 |
Robinson |
Comments that this LC Draft does not address that
issue and elaborates. |
|
|
161 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that this is a delivery system model, we
can do what we have all been talking about in here for so long, with the
Federal minimums, if there is to be additional populations, that is a revenue
question. |
|
|
186 |
Rep. Anderson |
Not sure which categories fully capitated health
plan or pre paid managed health care an IPA would fit into, or would it fit
into both. |
|
|
190 |
Robinson |
Comments it depends on the contact they have with
the state and elaborates. |
|
|
208 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks if there is any more questions for Holly
Robinson and reiterates that this is the frame work and is a work in progress. |
|
|
217 |
Rep. March |
Comments that this is the delivery system design
that would allow us to cover the categorical Medicaid population with what we
have been allotted to spend at this time. |
|
|
235 |
Chair Westlund |
Wants to make a real distinction that this is a
deliver system model and while in its efficiencies it allows us to buy some
benefits that we think are minimal benefits and does have revenue
implications in that this is a more efficient delivery model and he would
encourage everyone to think of this as a delivery system model and not a
revenue producing vehicle although it does produce cost savings. |
|
|
265 |
Rep. Merkley |
Comments wouldn’t this frame work that has been
written provide a framework for anyone else that we make eligible. |
|
|
267 |
Chair Westlund |
Responds absolutely and explains in more detail. |
|
|
275 |
Chair Westlund |
Make announcements and calls meeting to a close and
adjourns 4:46 pm. |
|
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– LC Draft 3547, staff, 11 pp