HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
AUDIT & HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET REFORM
April 24, 2003 Hearing Room 50
3:15 PM Tapes 101
- 102
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Ben Westlund, Chair
Rep. Steve March, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Merkley
Rep. Alan Bates
MEMBERS EXCUSED: Rep. Randy Miller
Rep. Susan Morgan, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Kruse
GUEST MEMBERS: Rep.
Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Monnes Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Rick
Berkobien, Committee Administrator
Kelly Fuller, Committee Assistant
MEASURES/ISSUES HEARD: HB 3624 - Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
|
TAPE 101,
A |
|||
|
003 |
Vice Chair March |
Calls the meeting to order and opens the public
testimony. |
|
|
HB 3624
- PUBLIC HEARING |
|||
|
008 |
Berkobien |
Gives information about the materials presented at
the dais. (EXHIBIT A) |
|
|
019 |
Jim Russell |
Mid Valley Behavioral Care Network begins testimony. |
|
|
025 |
Bob Beckett |
Executive Director of Jefferson Behavioral Health,
representing Josephine, Coos Curry, Douglas, Jackson and Klamath Counties. |
|
|
030 |
Jim Russell |
Begins testimony by asking about the Mental Health
Organizations not specifically being addressed at this point and continues. |
|
|
048 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments as soon as we get this through the pipe
line and on its merry way we will be working on the Mental Health Issues. |
|
|
061 |
Beckett |
Thanks the committee for all of their efforts on
this issue and in the stakeholders group. |
|
|
075 |
Lynne Marie Crider |
Board Member of the Oregon Health Action Campaign
begins testimony. |
|
|
088 |
Mary Lou Hennrich |
Board member for the Oregon Health Action Campaign. |
|
|
095 |
Crider |
Would like to discuss section one, which requires
applicants to enroll in fully capitated health plans where available in the
geographical area and elaborates. |
|
|
130 |
Chair Westlund |
Asks if she feels there should be some exceptions to
the process. |
|
|
136 |
Crider |
Responds yes and elaborates. |
|
|
140 |
Chair Westlund |
Agrees and comments we should strengthen these things
up and elaborates. |
|
|
150 |
Crider |
Agrees with the statements and give a more detail
explanation of her comments. |
|
|
155 |
Rep. Merkley |
Comments on testimony from last week regarding
special needs and asks are you comfortable with those exemptions. |
|
|
161 |
Hennrich |
Comments that it is difficult to come up with a one
size fits all program for the whole state and elaborates. |
|
|
200 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments about how they can help us through
the rest of this process. |
|
|
205 |
Crider |
Their last comments are in regards to the sections
that endeavor to establish systems for setting reimbursement rates for
providers, and we do feel that adequate reimbursement rates are necessary to
ensure access for enrollees. They are
concerned that in the Co-Chair budget, this would dies-enroll 150,000 people
from the plan and we need to beware of the risks. |
|
|
228 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments that this is a delivery system for
the largest amount of people we can buy back. |
|
|
237 |
Crider |
Makes additional comments to the advocacy of
services and it looks like the bill addresses fully capitated rates for
hospitals but not primary care providers. |
|
|
248 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments that, that is a fair comment and may
be something we need to look at. |
|
|
250 |
Crider |
Comments that it just seems like that the access to
primary care providers is what is most lacking. |
|
|
258 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments about PPO’s fit into this bill. |
|
|
261 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks if she has specific comments on page |
|
|
267 |
Crider |
Was actually referring to the lack of anything that
addresses reimbursement rates for physicians that are in fee for service. |
|
|
271 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments what we are trying to get to with this
section. We could possibly go through
a major rewrite on this section after working with all of you. |
|
|
285 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Comments that her point is talking about fee for
service hospitals and not fee for service physicians. |
|
|
288 |
Crider |
Was not aware that section eight states that it will
encompass all providers. |
|
|
291 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments about what section ten is trying to
state. |
|
|
318 |
Rev. Carolyn Palmer |
Special Concerned Ministries, Public Policy Director
extends a thank you for all of the committee’s hard work on this issue. Begins her testimony around the concerns
that she has. Concerned about the fee for service clients, would
like to see a pretty strong clause the states that the pay is coming from
Medicare and elaborates. |
|
|
TAPE 102,
A |
|||
|
030 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments about the story she related about a
single mother of a child with Acute Asthma. |
|
|
040 |
Palmer |
Continues presentation regarding people on fee for
service. |
|
|
049 |
Rep. March |
We have discussed this prior, about the language their
needs to be exception language for those special case needs folks. Would like to talk about the first point
that she made. |
|
|
065 |
Palmer |
Asks what they mean by standard population. |
|
|
069 |
Rep. March |
Gives a definition about the standard population. |
|
|
084 |
Rep. Merkley |
Comments that he read this as an underlying
structure on which both an OHP Standard categorical could be place and an
expanded population could be placed because there is no common that divides
those, asks if he is mis reading this. |
|
|
090 |
Rep. March |
Comments that we have not touch on all the technical
pieces yet. |
|
|
095 |
Rep. Merkley |
Comments what this bill does not address and asks if
it will all be addressed elsewhere. |
|
|
101 |
Palmer |
Makes comments about the monthly fee for
prescriptions for some folks. |
|
|
128 |
Rep. March |
Comments that, that is the expanded population that
he would like to cover. |
|
|
140 |
Palmer |
Continues presentation. |
|
|
184 |
Chair Westlund |
Thanks Carolyn for coming to testify and states that
it is a real important part of the legislative process. |
|
|
209 |
Palmer |
Makes a few additional comments about people she is
in contact with and shares some feelings from her heart. |
|
|
225 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Comments about the intent under line nine section
two page two of HB 3624. |
|
|
235 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes additional comments. |
|
|
242 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Agrees and continues comments on the language in the
HB. |
|
|
247 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments it depends on what exceptions we make and
on premiums and co-pays. |
|
|
262 |
Laura Woodruff |
Introduces herself and begins her testimony. |
|
|
345 |
Mike Volpe |
States his concern about this bill. Has a concern about the Co-Chairs budget
and what it will not be covering. |
|
|
398 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comments about the Co-Chairs budget and what
will be covered and what will not. |
|
|
TAPE 101,
B |
|||
|
015 |
Volpe |
Makes additional comments and discusses the long
term care system in Oregon. |
|
|
037 |
Chair Westlund |
Makes comment about the Managed Care program to put
his mind at ease. |
|
|
051 |
Volpe |
Asks if that person then assigned to a physician or
does the person get to choose the physician. |
|
|
053 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that the patient has the choice. We understand that this will not make everyone
happy and elaborates. |
|
|
060 |
Volpe |
Comments that they are just thinning the soup. |
|
|
070 |
Chair Westlund |
Disagrees and comments that he feels that the
individual can still receive some of the best medical care on the face of the
planet. |
|
|
078 |
Volpe |
Disagrees with the chair and makes comments about
his situation. |
|
|
080 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that maybe the middle ground is that your
physician would find her way into the Managed Care System. |
|
|
085 |
Volpe |
Comments that then he will have to have each doctor
take a look at the system and then decide to be a part of it or not. |
|
|
095 |
Chair Westlund |
Comments that the bottom line is that we need to
encourage more physicians to get involved in Managed Care. |
|
|
105 |
Rep. Bates |
Makes comments about the wavered populations it goes
directly with what the chair was talking about and comments that if we can’t
find enough in the delivery system we have and those wavered populations that
will not be covered any more, and that is where we will have our real
loss. The categorical’s, those that
we have to cover, we have barely have enough money to cover their
pharmaceuticals and durable medical goods, alcohol and drug dependency and
mental health issues, we have found enough to pay for that, but we need more
revenue to go beyond that. Asks if he
is on Medicare. |
|
|
129 |
Volpe |
Comments that he is on Medicaid and Medicare. |
|
|
130 |
Rep. Bates |
He would expect then that your physicians are
dealing with have also refused to take Medicare as well as Medicaid and that
they are using the Medicaid as a supplemental to that. |
|
|
130 |
Volpe |
Comments that that is correct. |
|
|
131 |
Rep. Bates |
Comments that we need to encourage those physicians
to work with us and to get them into Managed Care so that people like you can
continue your relationship with your current physicians, I personally feel
that they will step up to that if we structure Managed Care in a proper way,
and we are working on changing that structure and comments on the real issue
that we face right now. I would guess
the most important thing you are getting out of Medicaid right now is
medications because Medicare does not have that benefit for you. |
|
|
142 |
Volpe |
That is correct and comments that Medicaid picks up
the percentage that Medicare does not. |
|
|
145 |
Rep. Bates |
Comments that we understand that and we do not want
you to lose that and the work this committee has done is to prevent this from
happening. |
|
|
149 |
Volpe |
Asks that we allow as many physicians as possible
into the process as you can. |
|
|
140 |
Rep. Merkley |
Comments that one of the points being made is that
health care is not like shopping for other things, and we need to wrestle
with when we provide exceptions for people who have long standing
relationships with medical providers.
Gives more elaboration about solving the problems. |
|
|
173 |
Volpe |
Would be very happy to come back and work with them
on this process. |
|
|
179 |
Tina Kitchin |
Medical Director for Seniors and People with
Disabilities. Not here to testify on
this bill but would like to make one small correction. People who are on the DHS waivers are
categorically eligible and are not at risk of losing their OHP services. |
|
|
194 |
Palmer |
Asks if they have some doctors that they can
approach about this fee for service and asks that they make this a part of
their decision process. |
|
|
235 |
Jacqueline Zimmer-Jones |
Makes comments for clarification about those
categorically eligible not being at risk. |
|
|
288 |
Chair Westlund |
Calls meeting to a close and adjourns 4:58 pm |
|
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3624, DHS New Release, staff, 2 pp
B
– HB 3624, Provisions and Background, staff, 2 pp