HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
BUSINESS, LABOR AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS
March 03, 2003 Hearing Room E
8:30 A.M. Tapes 44
- 45
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Betsy Close, Chair
Rep. Derrick Kitts, Vice-Chair
Rep. Diane Rosenbaum, Vice-Chair
Rep. Mary Gallegos
Rep. Bill Garrard
Rep. Jeff Merkley
Rep. Mike Schaufler
STAFF PRESENT: Megan
Palau, Committee Administrator
Mike Reiley, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Informational Meeting – High Tech
Site Selection
HB 2682 – Public Hearing
HB 2737 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
Introduction of Committee Measures LC 1150, 1152,
1976, 3072, 3443, 3155, 3277, 3279, 3280, & 3278 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 44, A |
||
|
003 |
Chair Close |
Calls meeting to order at 8:37 a.m. Opens
informational meeting. |
|
INFORMATIONAL
MEETING – HIGH TECH SITE SELECTION |
||
|
014 |
Keith Thomson |
Former Vice-President and Site Manager, Intel.
Explains Intel expansion into Oregon. |
|
212 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks what can be done to improve tax structure in
Oregon to attract businesses. |
|
221 |
Thomson |
Explains ideas for potential tax structure
improvements. |
|
239 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks for primary reason why Intel located in Oregon. |
|
246 |
Thomson |
Explains reasons Intel moved to Oregon. |
|
269 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks what Oregon can do to attract businesses such
as Intel. |
|
287 |
Thomson |
Explains ideas steps Oregon can take to attract
businesses. |
|
318 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks about investment and return on business
development. |
|
326 |
Thomson |
Explains that in time of his last involvement with
Intel, return on investment was 10:1. |
|
332 |
Rep. Garrard |
Asks if lack of airline service would eliminate rural
areas of Oregon from consideration for business development. |
|
354 |
Thomson |
Explains benefits of airline service and impact on
business development. |
|
400 |
Chair Close |
Asks about potential sites for business development
in Oregon. |
|
410 |
Thomson |
Explains need for infrastructure and other benefits
for business development. |
|
TAPE 45, A |
||
|
020 |
Rep. Gallegos |
States support for efforts to attract companies such
as Intel to Oregon. |
|
025 |
Chair Close |
Asks about legislation regarding “shovel ready
land.” |
|
028 |
Thomson |
Explains how to prepare for business development. |
|
042 |
Rep. Merkley |
Asks about tax incentives. |
|
053 |
Jonathon Williams |
Intel. Explains his knowledge and involvement. |
|
061 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks about education system and its effect on
corporate expansion into Oregon. |
|
068 |
Thomson |
Explains impacts of education system on corporate
expansion. |
|
111 |
Chair Close |
Closes informational meeting. Opens public hearing
on HB 2682. |
|
HB 2682
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
113 |
Megan Palau |
Committee Administrator. Summarizes HB 2682. |
|
123 |
John McCulley |
Oregon Association of Mortgage Brokers. Submits and
summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2682 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
234 |
Chair Close |
Asks about making language more specific to achieve
objectives. |
|
240 |
McCulley |
Responds that it could be done. |
|
254 |
Chair Close |
Expresses concern about access to records. |
|
258 |
Rep. Garrard |
Asks if criminal background check would already be
done on loan originators. |
|
261 |
McCulley |
Explains provisions regarding loan originators and
background checks. |
|
274 |
Rep. Merkley |
Asks about standards for background checks. |
|
277 |
McCulley |
Answers that standards would be set by rulemaking
process. |
|
286 |
Rep. Merkley |
Asks if authority would be contained in provisions. |
|
289 |
McCulley |
Answers yes. |
|
291 |
Rep. Merkley |
Asks if language is specific enough to achieve
desired intent. |
|
293 |
McCulley |
Answers yes. |
|
303 |
John Powell |
State Farm Insurance. Explains forthcoming amendment
addressing “full time.” |
|
330 |
Chair Close |
Asks for clarification of 60-day timeframe. |
|
333 |
Powell |
Offers clarification of 60-day timeframe. |
|
347 |
Andrea Meyer |
Legislative Director, American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) of Oregon. Expresses concern about background checks. |
|
363 |
Rep. Garrard |
Asks about seriousness of problem. |
|
368 |
Meyer |
Answers that she is not familiar with specific problem. |
|
376 |
Chair Close |
Closes public hearing on HB 2682. Opens public
hearing on HB 2737. |
|
HB 2737
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
383 |
Megan Palau |
Committee Administrator. Summarizes HB 2737. |
|
400 |
Rep. Mark Hass |
House District 27. Submits and summarizes prepared testimony
in support of HB 2737 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
425 |
Dan Lulich |
Chief Technology Officer, Rulespace, Inc. Submits
and summarizes prepared testimony in support of HB 2737 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
TAPE 44, B |
||
|
026 |
Chair Close |
Asks how spam process works. |
|
030 |
Lulich |
Explains variations of spam. |
|
055 |
Dr. Dana Smith |
Submits and summarizes prepared testimony in support
of HB 2737 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
106 |
Chair Close |
Asks about specifics of Dr. Smith’s identity theft. |
|
108 |
Smith |
Explains her situation. |
|
110 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks about effectiveness of Washington spam law. |
|
116 |
Rep. Hass |
Explains effectiveness of Washington spam law. |
|
130 |
Rep. Garrard |
Commends Rep. Hass and Chair Close for bringing HB
2737. |
|
136 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Asks how emails such as Nigerian money-laundering
messages could be stopped. |
|
144 |
Lulich |
Explains complexities of law in addressing
international cases. |
|
163 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Asks about effectiveness of legislation. |
|
168 |
Lulich |
Explains that law would be effective, but issue is
difficult to address. |
|
185 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Asks about reciprocal legislation in other states. |
|
186 |
Rep. Hass |
Explains potential for HB 2737. |
|
198 |
Rep. Schaufler |
Asks if Dr. Smith’s practice has been negatively
impacted due to problem. |
|
200 |
Dr. Smith |
Answers no, but notes that it could be problem for others. |
|
207 |
Jim Craven |
Oregon Council, American Electronics Association. Testifies
in support of concept of HB 2737. Expresses reservations about specifics of
legislation. |
|
283 |
Chair Close |
Asks for clarification of similar Senate
legislation. |
|
286 |
Craven |
Clarifies that SB 261 and SB 121 are similar
concepts. |
|
290 |
Chair Close |
Asks about similar laws in other states. |
|
294 |
Craven |
Explains similar laws in other states. |
|
302 |
Jim Gardner |
Microsoft Corporation. Testifies in support of
concept. States that bill does not go far enough. Explains desire for ADV
subject line in emails and liability shield. |
|
365 |
Chair Close |
Concurs with Mr. Gardner that amendments addressing
ADV subject line may be warranted. |
|
375 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks if other states use Unlawful Trade Practices
Act as enforcement for regulation. |
|
380 |
Gardner |
Answers that some do, but he cannot speak for all. |
|
399 |
Cheryl Pelligrini |
Assistant Attorney General, Financial Fraud and
Consumer Protection Department, Oregon Department of Justice. Explains that legislation
puts “finer point” on current law. |
|
TAPE 45, B |
||
|
019 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Asks what consumers can do for protection. |
|
023 |
Pelligrini |
Explains recourse for consumers impacted by email
fraud. |
|
047 |
Chair Close |
Asks why ADV subject line would be unconstitutional. |
|
053 |
Pelligrini |
Answers that Oregon Constitution does not
differentiate between commercial and non-commercial use. |
|
065 |
Chair Close |
Asks if magazine ads designed to appear as articles
would also be unconstitutional. |
|
068 |
Pelligrini |
Answers that she is unsure how law addresses
magazine advertisements. |
|
078 |
Chair Close |
Argues that provisions in bill do not limit free
speech, but give consumers protection against abuse. |
|
080 |
Pelligrini |
Explains that legislation similar to “no call”
legislation. |
|
092 |
Rep. Merkley |
Notes constitutional issues related to spam and
legislation to address it. |
|
109 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks about language related to Washington law. |
|
111 |
Pelligrini |
Explains differences between Oregon’s bills and
Washington law. |
|
114 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks about specificity of language in bill. |
|
120 |
Pelligrini |
Explains that work group is addressing issue. |
|
130 |
Chair Close |
Closes public hearing on HB 2737. Opens work session
for introduction of committee measures. |
|
INTRODUCTION
OF COMMITTEE MEASURES – WORK SESSION |
||
|
135 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves LC's: 1150, 1152, 1976, 3072, 3443, 3155, 3277, 3279, 3280, & 3278
BE INTRODUCED as committee bills (EXHIBIT E). |
|
145 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Notes that introducing committee measures does
necessarily indicate support for bills. |
|
148 |
Chair Close |
Concurs and states that committee bill introduction
is done as courtesy to bill sponsors. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Close |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
153 |
Chair Close |
Closes work session. Adjourns meeting at 10:12 a.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2682, written testimony and information, John McCulley, 8 pp
B
– HB 2737, written testimony, Rep. Mark Hass, 1 p
C
– HB 2737, written testimony, Dan Lulich, 1 p
D
– HB 2737, written testimony, Dr. Dana
Smith, 1 p
E
– LC drafts: 1150, 1152, 1976, 3072, 3443, 3155, 3277, 3279, 3280, & 3278,
staff, 65 pp