HOUSE
COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
March 24, 2003 Hearing Room E
1:00 PM Tapes 49
- 52
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Vic Backlund, Chair
Rep. Pat Farr, Vice-Chair
Rep. Elaine Hopson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. Billy Dalto
Rep. Mary Nolan
Rep. Wayne Scott
STAFF PRESENT: Jim
Keller, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: HB
2816 – Public Hearing
HB 2843 – Public Hearing
HB 3480 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules. Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 49, A |
||
|
002 |
Chair Backlund |
Calls meeting to order at 1:04 PM. Opens public
hearing on HB 2816. Opens public hearing on HB 2843. Opens public hearing on
HB 3480. |
|
HB 2816
PUBLIC HEARING, HB 2843 PUBLIC HEARING, HB 3480 PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
016 |
Rep. Billy Dalto |
House District 21. States his support for the Talented
and Gifted (TAG) program and its students. Speaks about the students involved
in the program and the responsibility of society to provide a related
education. Testifies in favor of HB 2816, HB 2843, and HB 3480. Explains the
requirements of the bills. Notes no employee at the Oregon Department of
Education (ODE) specializes in TAG. |
|
080 |
Pat Burk |
Deputy Superintendent, ODE. Testifies on HB 2816, HB
2843, and HB 3480. Discusses the TAG program and service delivery systems. (EXHIBIT A). |
|
090 |
Laura Pehkonen |
Department of Special Education. |
|
095 |
Burk |
Explains Title II funds with regard to the bills.
Provides information on current funding of TAG and the requested budget (EXHIBIT B). Informs of the zero funding allotted by the
Governor’s budget. Concurs with Rep. Dalto on the need fro improvement of
TAG. |
|
215 |
Sen. Kate Brown |
Senate District 21. Appreciate the hearing of TAG
issues. Believes the issue is extremely important. |
|
227 |
Chair Backlund |
Appreciates her presence and support. |
|
235 |
Sen. Brown |
Comments. |
|
237 |
Pehkonen |
Informs the committee of the status of her
employment in terms of time allotted to TAG. |
|
263 |
Rep. Dalto |
Asks her to elaborate on the term ‘0.32’. |
|
265 |
Pehkonen |
Explains ‘0.32’ of her Full-time Equivalent (FTE)
job is spent on TAG. |
|
268 |
Chair Backlund |
Clarifies Ms. Pehkonen is the sole representative of
ODE for TAG. |
|
271 |
Pehkonen |
Affirms. Refers committee to TAG expenditures (EXHIBIT C). Explains her position
and the information the programs gathers. Elaborate on the per student
expenditures (EXHIBIT D). |
|
TAPE 50, A |
||
|
006 |
Burk |
Comments on the funding needed for the programs.
Believes there are overlapping ways to obtain fund for TAG beyond the ODE. Speaks
to the requirements of federal agencies regarding Title II funds. Explains
the implications of funding. Speaks to Title I and III funds. States he is
unsure of dictates on the funds. |
|
096 |
Burk |
Speaks on HB 2843. Explains there is no money in the
TAG discretionary fund. Offers that the option is to shift funds from a
different department. Notes the need for better data on the students. Remarks
on HB 3480 regarding FTE allocations and related implications. States ODE
strongly supports funding in the areas. |
|
155 |
Chair Backlund |
Asks the level of interest in TAG regarding the time
Ms. Pehkonen spends on the program. |
|
164 |
Pehkonen |
States there are many requirements on time in the
area of TAG. Explains it is not possible to be proactive with the time
allotted. |
|
175 |
Burk |
Provides five FTE may not solve the problem.
Believes the problem is more a district one in terms of local resources. |
|
199 |
Rep. Dalto |
Questions who would be responsible for working with
school districts in the amount of time Ms. Pehkonen is allowed. |
|
205 |
Burk |
Notes the issue is creating and monitoring systems
for improvement and expansion to solve the problem. Offers a partnership could
be established to train teachers in the program. |
|
237 |
Rep. Dalto |
Asks if Ms. Pehkonen can effectively manage TAG
responsibilities with the time allotted. |
|
242 |
Pehkonen |
Explains she can react to concerns, but not
effectively. Reiterates there is not time to be proactive concerning the
issue. |
|
248 |
Rep. Dalto |
Comments on the flexibility of her time being taken
by TAG. |
|
255 |
Pehkonen |
Responds there is an overlap with
‘twice-exceptional’ children. |
|
261 |
Rep. Dalto |
Comments on the need for services in the area.
Recognizes the budget situation. States the addition of an FTE is not a
waste. Submits the issue is not being effectively managed by the department.
Wishes ODE would return with some solutions. |
|
296 |
Burk |
Clarifies that more people on the problem would
help. Acknowledges Ms. Pehkonen’s position is not enough. Reiterates the
Governor’s balanced budget does not even include the program. Explains his
point was work to guide districts in instituting a greater program. Suggests
TAG be included in the program consolidation for funding. Adds the situation
can be improved. |
|
365 |
Rep. Farr |
Clarifies fund would come form the curriculum
department. |
|
370 |
Burk |
Explains ODE is attempting to consolidate the
departments within itself to better utilize fund in the matter. |
|
396 |
Rep. Farr |
Requests the number of FTE’s in Special Education. |
|
401 |
Burk |
States he is unsure. |
|
404 |
Rep. Farr |
Requests an estimate. |
|
406 |
Burk |
Estimates ten FTE. |
|
410 |
Rep. Farr |
Asks for the curriculum field numbers. |
|
412 |
Burk |
Estimates fifteen FTE. |
|
414 |
Rep. Farr |
Notes ODE is looking into the approach of departments.
|
|
TAPE 49, B |
||
|
003 |
Margaret DeLacy |
Oregon Association for Talented and Gifted (OATAG).
Testifies in favor of HB 2816, 2843, and 3480 (EXHIBITS E and F). Comments on the statements made by Mr. Burk.
Informs the committee of the importance of TAG for students and society.
Speaks on the funding of TAG. Provides statistics (EXHIBIT G). Comments on priorities set by ODE and the state. Urges
support of the bills and of the program. |
|
112 |
Rep. Farr |
Comments on his sons who are TAG students. Concurs
with DeLacy. |
|
123 |
DeLacy |
Notes the negative effects of not funding the
program. |
|
131 |
Chair Backlund |
Asks how the Advanced Placement (AP) program could
assist in the matter. |
|
135 |
DeLacy |
Notes AP classes are helpful for high achievers, not
TAG students. Provides alternatives. |
|
180 |
Deb Andrews |
Testifies in favor of HB 2816, 2843, and 3480. Explains
her son’s progression in school to
illustrate the need for TAG (EXHIBIT H). |
|
249 |
Sally Phillips |
TAG Advocate and Teacher, Salem-Keizer School
District. Testifies in favor of HB 2816, 2843, and 3480. Describes the
situation of TAG advocates in the district and explains the program. |
|
TAPE 50, B |
||
|
004 |
Phillips |
Continues. Lists points to consider regarding the
issue. |
|
053 |
Rep. Hopson |
Comments on the testimony. Poses question on the
program. |
|
058 |
Phillips |
Outlines the program. Comments on the changes due to
lack of funding. |
|
077 |
Rep. Farr |
Asks if they use non-certificated employees in the
program |
|
079 |
Phillips |
Negates. Notes ten testers have been hired for the
district. |
|
087 |
Rep. Farr |
Clarifies hiring of advocates. |
|
090 |
Phillips |
Responds regarding how the program pays advocates. |
|
097 |
Rep. Farr |
Asks if the program uses volunteers. |
|
100 |
Phillips |
Negates. Comments on assessments. |
|
107 |
Rep. Farr |
Notes the availability of qualified parents to
assist. |
|
112 |
Phillips |
Responds concerning parent advocacy and assistance. |
|
116 |
Rep. Farr |
Points out services offered by universities. |
|
120 |
Phillips |
Concurs the universities offer summer programs. |
|
134 |
DeLacy |
Makes request of the Chair. |
|
140 |
Jackie Buisman |
Educator of the gifted. Testifies on TAG and in
favor of HB 2816, 2843, 3480 (EXHIBIT I).
Comments on the work of Ms. Pehkonen. Offers a curriculum project as a
probable solution. Notes a letter from Susan Castillo, Superintendent of
Public Instruction. |
|
285 |
Jim Dufala |
Parent. Testifies in favor of TAG and HB 2816, 2843,
3480 (EXHIBIT J). Offers a TAG
model could be created to allow for responsible curriculum. Notes charter schools
are a means to create a curriculum. |
|
389 |
Rep. Dalto |
Requests the process to have his son tested for
ability. |
|
394 |
Dufala |
Explains another superintendent who has his son
tested. |
|
410 |
Rep. Nolan |
Speaks on solutions. |
|
418 |
Dufala |
Sees it as a regional solution. Believes there are
enough students to constitute a class. |
|
426 |
Rep. Dalto |
Comments on his own experience in school with regard
to |
|
TAPE 51, A |
||
|
003 |
Rep. Dalto |
Continues regarding magnet schools as a solid model
for education. |
|
012 |
Tanner Mathison |
Student, Riley Creek School. Testifies in favor of
TAG and HB 2816, 2843, 3480 (EXHIBIT
K). Describes his own experiences and hardship due to ability. Comments
on special education matters with regard to allocation of funds. Notes his
family will be leaving the state to pursue a high school education. |
|
113 |
Edith Gillis |
Parent. Describes the situation of her son who was
home schooled and later public schooled. Discusses his experiences later on.
Notes the family is unable to afford advanced placement tests. Lists the
programs the family is unable to afford. Gives accounts of her other two
children, her husband, and her siblings. Testifies in favor of HB 2816, 2843,
and 3480. Offers taxation as a means for funding the programs. |
|
350 |
Kimberly Robinson |
TAG Student. Testifies in favor of HB 2816, 2843,
and 3480 (EXHIBIT L). |
|
384 |
Darlene Robinson |
TAG Parent. Testifies in favor of HB 2816, 2843, and
3480 (EXHIBIT M). Believes TAG
children are a silent minority. |
|
TAPE 52, A |
||
|
003 |
D. Robinson |
Continues and explains the need to support TAG
children. Provides accounts her children’s experiences. Notes the TAG mandate
has made it possible to educate children properly. |
|
063 |
Sue McGrory |
Teacher and Parent, Linn County. Provides her
difficulties in children to meet the CIM while educating those who exceed
standards. Voices concern for HB 2843 with regard to data. Testifies in favor
of HB 2816 and 3480. Offers that students should be held accountable. Notes
TSPC requires teachers to be able to differentiate curriculum. |
|
150 |
Chair Backlund |
Comments. |
|
155 |
Rep. Dalto |
Thanks Oregon TAG for its presence. |
|
157 |
Chair Backlund |
Closes public hearings on HB 2816, 2843, 3480.
Adjourns the meeting at 3:33 PM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– TAG, Pat Burk, 1 p
B
– TAG, Pat Burk, 4 p
C
– TAG, Laura Pehkonen, 1 p
D
– TAG, Laura Pehkonen, 1 p
E
– HB 2816, 2843, 3480, Margaret DeLacy, 5 p
F
– TAG, Margaret DeLacy, 20 p
G – TAG, Margaret DeLacy, 25 p
H
– HB 2816, 2843, 3480, Deb Andrews, 11 p
I
– HB 2816, 2843, 3480, Jackie Buisman, 2 p
J
– HB 2816, 2843, 3480, Jim Dufala, 3 p
K
– HB 2816, 2843, 3480, Tanner Mathison, 5 p
L
– TAG, Kimberly Robinson, 2 p
M
– HB 2816, 2843, 3480, Darlene Robinson, 2 p