HOUSE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION
March 31, 2003 Hearing Room E
1:00 PM Tapes 55
- 56
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Vic Backlund, Chair
Rep. Elaine Hopson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. Billy Dalto
Rep. Mary Nolan
Rep. Wayne Scott
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Pat Farr, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Jim
Keller, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: HB
3104 – Public Hearing
HB 3557 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 55, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Backlund |
Calls meeting to order at 1:43 PM. Welcomes
colleagues and audience. Opens public hearing on HB 3104. |
|
HB 3104
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
009 |
Jim Keller |
Committee Administrator. Reads Staff Measure Summary
(SMS) on HB 3104. |
|
008 |
Rep. Max Williams |
House District 35. Testifies in favor of HB 3104.
States he sponsored the bill at the request of the school board in his
district. Note the bill would change the mandatory requirement of
transportation for schools. Believes the issue is a mandate worthy of
conversation. Discusses the differing situations among districts. |
|
040 |
Rep. Hopson |
Understands the need for discussion in the area.
Asks that if the option was left to school districts, how children who have
parents unable to transport would cope. |
|
050 |
Rep. Williams |
Thinks management could entail a fee for the
transportation component of participation in activities. Notes some districts
are suspending regional activity trips as a result of budget cuts. Believes
the best decision is made by school boards. |
|
065 |
Rep. Hopson |
Asks if he is aware of the bill in the senate that
increases the rate of reimbursement in some rural districts. |
|
071 |
Rep. Williams |
Explains he is unfamiliar with the details of the
bill |
|
074 |
Rep. Hopson |
Discusses the districts spending on transportation.
Believes the bill came out of Senator Deckert’s committee. |
|
079 |
Rep. Williams |
Believes the issues underscores the need for
discussion of educational funding matters to districts. Reiterates local
districts should assess their own transportation needs given the current
budget situation. Notes transportation is one of the more expensive educational
mandates. |
|
111 |
Rep. Nolan |
Asks if Rep. Williams is aware of any other state
services where transportation is provided. |
|
115 |
Rep. Williams |
Responds of public partnerships in his district
where services are provided for seniors when they qualify for subsidized
programs. Lists the American Red Cross as involved in the issue. |
|
136 |
Rep. Nolan |
Comments. |
|
138 |
Chair Backlund |
Clarifies the issue was brought forth by his
district school board. Asks how he would assess the issue in statewide. |
|
145 |
Rep. Williams |
Explains he has not had great response on the
matter. Explains his hopes of engendering the committee’s awareness into the
matter. |
|
163 |
Rep. Hopson |
Clarifies Rep. Williams sees this as something that
should be on the agenda when long term budget issues are discussed |
|
166 |
Rep. Williams |
Concurs that is a fitful way to describe the
approach to it and other transportation issues. |
|
188 |
Ed Edwards |
Oregon School Employees Association (OSEA).
Testifies in opposition of HB 3104 (EXHIBIT
A). Discusses the issues of transportation. States OSEA supports current
laws. Believes the issue is also a matter of safety. Believes the bill could
make it difficult for all children to access education. |
|
242 |
John Marshall |
Oregon School Boards Association (OSBA). Notes the
time he spent last week listening to the testimony in the Ways and Means
Subcommittee on Education. Seems to him that all educational matters should
be eligible for discussion. Believes that when decisions fall to education
program cuts, transportation issues should be included as they are a mandate.
Urges the committee to seriously consider HB 3104. Notes the bill allows
districts to make their own considerations. |
|
294 |
Rep. Avakian |
Asks what his estimate of the effect on
transportation. |
|
299 |
Marshall |
Doubts that transportation would be eliminated.
Offers that decisions on ‘walk-zones’ may be adjusted. Notes the allowance |
|
305 |
Rep. Avakian |
Believes the safety of children is an important
consideration. |
|
310 |
Marshall |
Negates. Provides there will continue to be safety requirements.
|
|
315 |
Rep. Avakian |
Clarifies the issues of safety is one of students
transporting themselves to school. |
|
325 |
Marshall |
Argues those issues should be more appropriately
discussed at a local school level. |
|
335 |
Rep. Hopson |
Disputes that rich and poor suburbs exist within the
same school district and voices concern that needs may be overlooked. |
|
342 |
Marshall |
Suggests there is a mix of students within
districts. Reiterates belief that school districts should be in charge of the
matter. |
|
361 |
Rep. Hopson |
Requests if
Mr. Marshall is aware of other state using public transportation in metro
areas. |
|
374 |
Marshall |
Notes bus passes are provided to some students in
Portland and Eugene. |
|
382 |
Rep. Dalto |
Comments on his own experiences with transportation as
a student in New York City. |
|
390 |
Chair Backlund |
Closes public hearing on HB 3104. Opens public
hearing on HB 3557. |
|
HB 3557
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
TAPE 56, A |
||
|
008 |
Jim Green |
Oregon S. Testifies in favor of HB 3557 (EXHIBIT B). Notes he introduced the
bill at the request of his members. Discusses the requirement of charter
schools to be non-profit organizations. Speaks on tax considerations of
charter schools and 501(C)(3) status. Comments on the difficulty in finding
board members for the non-profit boards. Explains the changes to the bill.
States he has spoken to much of the education committee, and that he knows of
no objection. |
|
045 |
Rep. Avakian |
Clarifies the premise of the bill in terms of
contraction of charter schools. |
|
051 |
Green |
Explains it is essentially what is in the
alternative school program currently |
|
060 |
Rep. Avakian |
Clarifies it is a different process. Asks what other
purpose the new law allow would
serve. |
|
070 |
Green |
Affirms. Responds |
|
078 |
Rep. Avakian |
Clarifies. |
|
080 |
Green |
Responds listing the reasons behind the bill. |
|
096 |
Rep. Avakian |
Notes the legislature has passed laws governing
schools that do not include charter. Remarks further. |
|
105 |
Green |
Responds. |
|
114 |
Rep. Avakian |
Does not believe the current charter school law
creates public charter schools. Speaks to the allowances made to the schools.
|
|
127 |
Green |
Negates. Offers the bill does not prohibit creation
of charter schools. |
|
129 |
Rep. Nolan |
Questions the reason to charter an entire district
is to achieve federal money. Comments on the purpose of the funds. Asks if Mr.
Green can admit that the districts would not return for a ‘bailout’ to
achieve state funds. |
|
140 |
Green |
Responds he cannot affirm as all school funding is
questionable in the foreseeable future. |
|
160 |
Rep. Nolan |
Requests the number of students in Paisley. |
|
170 |
Green |
Estimates around 110 including international
students. Explains the real figure may be around 65-80. |
|
180 |
Rep. Nolan |
Discusses the budget figures per student. Requests
the ability of Paisley to come up with the funds when federal funds stop. |
|
185 |
Green |
Believes the Paisley School District fully
understands the implication of the charter and notes the work on funding. |
|
193 |
Rep. Nolan |
Voices concern in the statewide system being
‘piecemealed’. |
|
200 |
Green |
Explains the solution will not be ‘piecemealed out’.
Comments further on Paisley. |
|
214 |
Chair Backlund |
Asserts that he anticipated moving the bill to work
session. Believes concerns have been raised and in view of them there will
not be a work session. Closes public hearing on HB 3557. Adjourns meeting at
2:23 PM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3104, Ed Edwards, 1 p
B
– HB 3557, Jim Green, 2 p