HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
ENVIRONMENT AND LAND USE
May 15, 2003 Hearing Room E
9:00 AM Tapes
77 - 78
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Bill Garrard, Chair
Rep. Dennis Richardson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Cliff Zauner, Vice-Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman
Rep. Dan Doyle
Rep. Mitch Greenlick
Rep. Diane Rosenbaum
STAFF PRESENT: Ray
Kelly, Committee Administrator
David Peffley, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: HB
3637 - Work Session
HB 2614 – Work Session
HB 2899 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 77, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Garrard |
Calls the meeting to order at 9:06 and opens the
work session on HB 3637. |
|
HB 3637
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
019 |
Ray Kelly |
Committee Administrator. Summarizes HB 3637.
Defines the term cullet for
the committee. |
|
025 |
Paul Romain |
Oregon Beer and Wine Distributors Association. Addresses the bottle bill and the theories
behind it. Asserts that there is no market for recycled glass and testifies
in favor of HB 3637. |
|
080 |
Phil Hatch |
Owner, Hanes Distributing and Central Oregon
Recycling. Speaks to the problem in
Eastern Oregon in disposing of recycled glass. |
|
102 |
John Fletcher |
President, Container Recovery, Portland. Addresses problems with glass recycling
and expresses concern for the future of the glass recycling industry. |
|
131 |
Romain |
Speaks to the imperfection of the bill, and adds
that he would like to work the bill further on the Senate side. |
|
158 |
Fletcher |
Clarifies transportations costs per ton. |
|
162 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks about the issue of separating glass at the home
site and asks if there are special problems involved. |
|
173 |
Fletcher |
Replies that his plant separates crushed glass and
that it is not cheap. |
|
182 |
Romain |
Talks to the problem of machines being unable to
distinguish between different-colored glass leading to contamination. |
|
197 |
Rep. Richardson |
Asks the basis for this problem and whether DEQ contributed
to the problem. |
|
204 |
Romain |
States that DEQ is not part of this problem and that they merely enforce
the laws passed by the legislature.
Points out that this bill is asking to broaden DEQ’s mandate. |
|
241 |
Bob Danko |
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Testifies in opposition to HB 3637. Acknowledges that there are problems with
markets, but that this bill will undermine the public’s trust in the
recycling program. |
|
321 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks if there’s a way to amend this bill to make it
agreeable to DEQ. |
|
326 |
Danko |
Replies that there is not and that the bill is
unnecessary. |
|
332 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Acknowledges that there is a problem with the
recycling program. Asks Danko what he
believes the solution to the problem is. |
|
345 |
Danko |
Also acknowledges that there is a problem. Posits that the California fiberglass
market is an option as are other programs, although notes that those options
may not be as profitable. |
|
372 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks DEQ’s position about mixing fill materials in a
construction project. |
|
377 |
Danko |
States that roadbeds and pipe fittings are
acceptable uses for cullet, but filling in holes is not. |
|
398 |
Rep. Zauner |
Notes that there is some disagreement from the
proponents of the bill. |
|
411 |
Doug Myers |
Association of Oregon Recyclers (AOR). Speaks to the value of recycling and the
spillover effect if we do away with the recycling program. |
|
|
|
|
|
TAPE 78, A |
||
|
006 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks Myers if he sees a solution to problems at the
end of the line. |
|
016 |
Myers |
Expresses uncertainty. Submits that recycling is a conservative value which needs to
be preserved. |
|
024 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Offers an anecdote illustrating an example of taking
pride in recycling. |
|
033 |
Rep. Zauner |
States that if the public is not informed, they
won’t be outraged. |
|
037 |
Myers |
Notes that the media would certainly get the word
out. |
|
046 |
Chair Garrard |
Notes that many counties are closing recycling
facilities and cites the costs in shipping glass. |
|
057 |
Danko |
Speaks to shipping glass out of state and
regulations surrounding the practice. |
|
062 |
Rep. Ackerman |
Asks if this bill represents a market-based
solution. |
|
066 |
Danko |
Acknowledges that markets do need to be considered,
but reaffirms the overriding concern for public perception. |
|
092 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Clarifies his understanding that the bill would not
allow direct disposal into a dumpster.
Reaffirms the notion that recycling is a conservative value. |
|
131 |
Danko |
States that there is not time for such a major
policy change. |
|
141 |
Rep. Richardson |
Posits that if DEQ had been responsible, then the
legislature might not have been called upon to pass this legislation. Asserts that that this bill does not serve
the principle of conservation at any cost, but it does serve the principle of
conservation for the best interests of the people. |
|
186 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Points out that even the testimony of the proponents
of this legislation have stated that DEQ is not responsible for the present
problem. |
|
202 |
Rep. Richardson |
Notes the alleged problems with administrative
rules. |
|
210 |
Kristan Mitchell |
Oregon Refuse and Recycling Association (ORRA). Responds to the prior testimony. Speaks to the genesis of the curbside
recycling program. Addresses
technological improvements to recycling and notes that there are some other
options which could be considered. |
|
311 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Addresses the issue of market determination. |
|
319 |
Mitchell |
Downplays the significance of market determination
with regard to recycling. |
|
339 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Asks whether ORRA supports or opposes HB 3637. |
|
344 |
Mitchell |
States neutrality to the bill and offers to
participate by helping to work the bill in the Senate if necessary. |
|
352 |
Romain |
Reiterates that the bill is not a perfect solution,
but asserts that action must be taken before the problem becomes too onerous to
be dealt with effectively. |
|
400 |
Fletcher |
Cites the current market prices for varieties of
glass. Reasserts that glass will not contaminate landfills, that it will
dissolve back into sand. |
|
441 |
Romain |
Cites the loss of breweries as a key reason for the
lack of need for glass, thus exacerbating the problem. |
|
458 |
Chair Garrard |
Closes the invited testimony HB 3637. |
|
The following prepared testimony was submitted for
the record without public testimony for HB 3637. |
||
|
|
Matt Blevins |
Summarizes (EXHIBIT
B). |
|
TAPE 77, B |
||
|
003 |
Rep.
Richardson |
MOTION: Moves HB 3637 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
010 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Remarks that she will vote nay on HB 3637 as to
uphold the will of her constituents. |
|
013 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Expresses concern over the legislation, but will
vote to move it out of committee.
States that he has not decided how he will vote on the floor. |
|
026 |
Rep. Doyle |
Understands the market forces at work against this
bill, but expresses concern over the legislation and will vote nay. |
|
040 |
Rep. Ackerman |
Speaks to the merits of HB 3637 and the practicality
given the current market situation.
Notes that he will vote aye on the bill. |
|
047 |
|
VOTE:
5-2 AYE: 5 - Ackerman, Greenlick, Richardson, Zauner,
Garrard NAY: 2 - Doyle, Rosenbaum |
|
051 |
Chair Garrard |
The motion CARRIES. REP. RICHARDSON will lead discussion
on the floor. |
|
055 |
Chair Garrard |
Closes the work session on HB 3637 and opens a work
session on HB 2614. |
|
HB 2614
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
060 |
Rep. Zauner |
References Tuesdays hearing on HB 2614 and addresses
the accommodations made by other committee members. |
|
080 |
Chair Garrard |
Empathizes with Rep. Zauner regarding HB 3211. |
|
090 |
Rep. Ackerman |
Asks whether the rules could be suspended to hear HB
3211. |
|
101 |
Chair Garrard |
Discusses the one-hour notice in relation to HB
3211. |
|
131 |
Rep. Zauner |
Cites prior testimony in favor of HB 2614. |
|
133 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
References a consulting report and asks if Rep.
Zauner agrees with the findings. |
|
140 |
Rep. Zauner |
States that he has no opinion on the report. |
|
144 |
Chair Garrard |
Closes the work session on HB 2614 and opens a work
session on HB 2899. |
|
HB 2899
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
150 |
Ray Kelly |
Committee Administrator. Notes that the -3 amendments were adopted on Tuesday, May 13. |
|
163 |
Rep.
Zauner |
MOTION: Moves HB
2899 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation and BE
REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior reference. |
|
169 |
|
VOTE:
6-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Doyle |
|
173 |
Chair Garrard |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
175 |
Chair Garrard |
Closes the work session on HB 2899 and reopens a
work session on HB 2614. |
|
HB 2614
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
179 |
Rep. Zauner |
Notes the -5 amendments (EXHIBIT A). |
|
181 |
Rep.
Zauner |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2614-5 amendments dated
4/15/03. |
|
186 |
|
VOTE:
5-2 AYE: 5 - Ackerman, Doyle, Richardson, Zauner, Garrard NAY: 2 - Greenlick, Rosenbaum |
|
190 |
Chair Garrard |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
192 |
Rep.
Zauner |
MOTION: Moves HB
2614 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
202 |
|
VOTE:
5-2 AYE: 5 - Ackerman, Doyle, Richardson, Zauner, Garrard NAY: 2 - Greenlick, Rosenbaum |
|
207 |
Chair Garrard |
The motion CARRIES. REP. ZAUNER will lead the discussion
on the floor. |
|
211 |
Chair Garrard |
Closes the work session on HB 2614. |
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
Rep.
Ackerman |
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of setting a work session for Friday, May 16 in order to have a work session
on HB 3211. |
|
244 |
Rep. Zauner |
Offers support for Rep. Ackerman’s motion. |
|
253 |
Rep. Greenlick |
Conjectures as to why HB 3211 might have been sent
back to committee. |
|
265 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Asks for clarification on Rep. Ackerman’s motion. |
|
267 |
Rep. Ackerman |
Clarifies his motion to suspend the rules to hear HB
3211. |
|
270 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
States that she will be unable to support the
motion. Expresses concern that such
an action would have the effect of subverting the democratic process. |
|
276 |
Ray Kelly |
Committee Administrator. Clarifies the rules regarding the motion on the table and
explains how the bill would move through committee. |
|
311 |
Rep. Rosenbaum |
Suggest scheduling another meeting to consider HB
3211. |
|
355 |
|
VOTE:
3-3 AYE: 3 - Ackerman, Zauner, Garrard NAY: 3 - Greenlick, Richardson, Rosenbaum EXCUSED: 1 - Doyle |
|
361 |
Chair Garrard |
The motion FAILS. |
|
372 |
Chair Garrard |
Adjourns the meeting at 10:32 A.M. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2615, -5 amendments, staff, 1 p.
The
following exhibit is listed out of order in the body of the tape log.
B
– HB 3637, written testimony, Matt Blevins, 1 p.