HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
January 21, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 AM Tapes
2 - 4
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jerry Krummel, Chair
Rep. Donna Nelson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Floyd Prozanski, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. Derrick Kitts
Rep. John Mabrey
Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick
Brennan, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: -HB 2052 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
-HB 2132 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
-HB 2140 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
-HB 2170 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
-HB 2175 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
-Informational meeting
Association of
Oregon Counties (AOC) and the League of Oregon
Cities (LOC).
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 2, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Krummel |
Calls meeting to order at 8:37 AM. Informs that House
Bill (HB) 2167 will not be heard. Opens public hearing on HB 2052. |
|
HB 2052
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
021 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads Staff Measure Summary (SMS) for HB 2052. |
|
028 |
Keith Kutler |
Oregon Department of Justice (DOJ). Testifies in
support of HB 2052. Provides history of the bill. Invites questions. |
|
045 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks how many federal military installations there
are in Oregon. |
|
046 |
Kutler |
Responds he is unsure. Lists Umatilla as a
possibility. |
|
048 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if Kingston or Portland airbases would count in
addition to Umatilla. |
|
050 |
Kutler |
Thinks that they would. |
|
051 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if there is a possibility of the federal
government adding installations in Oregon. |
|
053 |
Kutler |
States he has no idea. |
|
054 |
Chair Krummel |
Wonders about potential of adding one on the coast
since we were attacked there in World War II. |
|
058 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments in favor of HB 2052. |
|
066 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 2052. Opens work session
on HB 2052. |
|
HB 2052
WORK SESSION |
||
|
068 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2052 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation. |
|
073 |
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair
Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. AVAKIAN will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
092 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2052. Opens public hearing
on HB 2132. |
|
HB 2132
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
094 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 2132. |
|
099 |
Inga Deckert |
Office of the Treasury. Explains HB 2132. Details
cost of bill indicating no fiscal impact. Invites questions. |
|
128 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if Ms. Deckert approves of the amendments. |
|
135 |
Deckert |
Responds she is in favor of amendments. |
|
138 |
Chair Krummel |
Questions if the amendments will create a fiscal
impact. |
|
139 |
Patrick Brennan |
Negates. |
|
141 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Poses a concern about language of the measure. |
|
145 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies language. Closes public hearing and opens
work session on HB 2132. |
|
HB 2132
WORK SESSION |
||
|
155 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2132-1 amendments for HB 2132-1
dated 1/20/2003. 2132. |
|
158 |
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair
Krummel |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
165 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2132 to the floor
with a DO PASS AS
AMENDED recommendation. |
|
168 |
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair
Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. KITTS will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
179 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2132. Opens public hearing
on HB 2140. |
|
HB 2140
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
186 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS. |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Asks question concerning the action of the
amendment. |
|
199 |
Brennan |
Explains the amendment. |
|
211 |
Roy Turnbaugh |
Office of the Secretary of State. Submits written
testimony (EXHIBIT A). Testifies
in support of HB 2140. Explains bill further. |
|
232 |
Chair Krummel |
Thanks the witness. Closes public hearing on HB
2140. Opens public hearing on HB
2170. |
|
HB 2170
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
260 |
Jack Kenny |
Deputy Director of Housing and Community Services.
Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT B).
Testifies in support of HB 2170. |
|
283 |
Rep. Nelson |
Voices concern as to why ombudsman program is not
functioning according to the way it was established. |
|
295 |
Kenny |
Responds that historically the program was meant to
provide neutral assistance and support. Adds that if it were indeed an
ombudsman the neutrality would be taken away. |
|
321 |
Rep. Nelson |
Inquires as to why the word “ombudsman” is kept, as it
is a misnomer. |
|
329 |
Kenny |
Explains that HB 2170 no longer maintains the word
“ombudsman” but changes program to “manufactured dwelling park community
relations office”. |
|
336 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if the entire district requires that change. |
|
341 |
Kenny |
Affirms. |
|
350 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on the need for the word “ombudsman”.
Reiterates necessity for the terms and lists reasons. Questions necessity
according to her understanding of the position. |
|
371 |
Kenny |
Acknowledges that although Rep. Nelson is raising
valid points, they are not relevant to his particular agency or addressed in
this bill. States that he does not desire to sidestep her issue. Suggests
that a different bill would be needed to align name change with function. |
|
409 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Inquires if the department believes the current
listing is a misnomer that misleads the public as to what the agency does. |
|
420 |
Kenny |
Answers he is correct. |
|
425 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments on the clarification. Closes public hearing
and opens work session on HB 2170 |
|
445 |
Rep. Nelson |
States her desire to be positive, but recommends
that the committee postpone its decision until full consideration is given to
the affects of this bill on ombudsmen. Restates her concern as to who may
fill this position. |
|
471 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Responds to Rep. Nelson. Raises question concerning
the referral of HB 2170 to Ways and Means as there appears to be no
reflection of fiscal impact. |
|
TAPE 3,A |
||
|
005 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Continues discussion of HB 2170. |
|
061 |
Chair Krummel |
Remarks that he has been asked to remove the
subsequent referral to Ways and Means. |
|
064 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments on the misleading nature of the term.
Agrees with Rep. Nelson that it is a misnomer. |
|
075 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if the committee would consider amending the
bill. Asks if Jack Kenny will return and further complete testimony. |
|
082 |
Chair Krummel |
Invites Jack Kenny to return and testify. |
|
090 |
Jack Kenny |
Responds to Rep. Nelson that an amendment would
change the character of this particular program. Believes changes are a
larger policy discussion. |
|
109 |
Rep. Avakian |
Inquires as to what distinguishes the office from an
ombudsman. |
|
113 |
Kenny |
Explains that an ombudsman is an advocate for people
who have been violated of state law and the states they would be. Believes
they would lose neutral ground in the relationship and that this would take
away the element of trust they enjoy. |
|
131 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asserts that if ombudsman existed within the
department it would change the department. Assumes that if they did so they
would need advocates and that would require additional funds. |
|
150 |
Kenny |
Affirms statement. |
|
152 |
Rep. Nelson |
Conveys this issue is of great importance to her
constituents. Asks who the ombudsman will
be when this bill takes effect. Asks when the bill takes effect. |
|
155 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator states it will take effect
January 1, 2004 |
|
156 |
Rep. Nelson |
Hopes he will establish a bill so that these people
have an ombudsman. |
|
166 |
Kenny |
Remarks he would be happy to develop new bill if it
interests the committee. |
|
168 |
Chair Krummel |
Provides history of program. Explains agreement as
to how program would function. Believes the program functions well. |
|
197 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks Mr. Kenny if funds could be located for an
ombudsman. Provides that an ombudsman offers legal aide to those who cannot
afford an attorney. |
|
219 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing and opens work session on HB
2170. |
|
HB 2170
WORK SESSION |
||
|
221 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2170 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation
and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and
Means BE RESCINDED. recommendation
and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. |
|
223 |
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Kitts |
|
|
Chair
Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. MABREY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
240 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2170. Opens work session
on HB 2140. |
|
HB 2140
WORK SESSION |
||
|
260 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2140 to the
floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
Recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the
committee on Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. . |
|
275 |
|
VOTE: 6-0 EXCUSED: 1 - Kitts |
|
|
Chair
Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. WIRTH will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
295 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2140. Opens public hearing
on HB 2175. |
|
HB 2175
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
314 |
Col. Mike Caldwell |
Deputy Director, Oregon Military Department (OMD).
Testifies in support of HB 2175. Provides written testimony (EXHIBIT C). |
|
355 |
Rep. Wirth |
Questions the language regarding the armory. |
|
365 |
Caldwell |
Responds the language is clarify the definition of
the armory as some things that fall in the current category are not actually
armories. |
|
390 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if changing this definition could render the armory
unusable in its current form. |
|
403 |
Caldwell |
States he does not foresee that at all. |
|
418 |
Rep. Kitts |
Thanks Col. Caldwell. Asks for rough estimate as to how many facilities to which this
currently applies. |
|
427 |
Caldwell |
Replies thirty-eight armories, three major training
areas, two air bases and two camps. States they are a large agency with
regard to real estate. |
|
TAPE 2, B |
||
|
005 |
Caldwell |
Continues to answer question. |
|
039 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Inquires if the measure would change any provision
of the property itself. |
|
043 |
Caldwell |
States that the bill would change nothing about the
property. |
|
046 |
Rep. Nelson |
Thanks Col. Caldwell for security and freedom. Asks
if he could provide information as to the total owned property of the guard. |
|
055 |
Caldwell |
Responds that he would be happy to provide that
information. |
|
059 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if facilities are shared between military
branches. |
|
064 |
Caldwell |
Affirms. |
|
066 |
Rep. Nelson |
Wonders if facilities could be used for educational
programs. |
|
070 |
Caldwell |
Provides that the Youth Challenge Program in Bend is
an example of that. |
|
089 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if Col. Caldwell would consider assisting to
draft a bill that would expand the use of facilities for drop outs. |
|
094 |
Caldwell |
States that he is more than willing to take on that
challenge. Adds that the problem is not the facilities themselves, but the
money necessary to run those facilities. |
|
111 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing and opens work session on HB
2175. |
|
HB 2175
WORK SESSION |
||
|
113 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB
2175 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT
REFERRAL to the
committee on Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. recommendation
and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. |
|
115 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. REP. NELSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
125 |
Chair Krummel |
States this is the extent of the bills. |
|
135 |
Rep.
Nelson |
MOTION: Requests unanimous consent that the rules be
SUSPENDED to allow REP. NELSON to BE RECORDED as
voting AYE on HB 2052. |
|
140 |
|
VOTE: 7-0 |
|
|
Chair
Krummel |
Hearing no
objection, declares the motion CARRIED. |
|
159 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2052. Opens informational meeting on local
government issues. |
|
INFORMATIONAL
MEETING ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT ISSUES |
||
|
163 |
Ken Strobeck |
Executive Director, League of Oregon Cities (LOC).
Gives statistics and information on various Oregon cities. States purpose of
LOC. Overviews written testimony. |
|
271 |
Mayor Helen Berg |
Mayor of Corvallis. States the impact of economic
downfall has been severe. Adds that unless the money to provide the services
is available, they cannot perform their jobs. Stresses that fiscal
“challenges” are in the area of operating funds, not in the area of
capital. Invites questions. |
|
371 |
Rep. Wirth |
Inquires as to the expectations of the Mayor for
this session and of her idea of the impact of last session. |
|
388 |
Berg |
Answers request. |
|
TAPE 3,B |
||
|
006 |
Berg |
Continues testimony. Provides that franchise fees
are the second largest source of income in Corvallis. |
|
017 |
Strobeck |
Comments on the negative affect of the inability of
cities to charge fees on local government. |
|
031 |
Rep. Nelson |
Inquires as to the burden of the Public Employee Retirement
System (PERS) on cities. |
|
035 |
Strobeck |
Responds it is exceptionally large. States PERS is
crippling cities and has caused layoffs in order for cities to pay the
benefits. |
|
044 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if statistics of this are available. |
|
050 |
Strobeck |
Responds that each member will receive a legislative
directory with information on each city. |
|
054 |
Rep. Nelson |
Wonders if there could be surveys that would show
the types of economic development
cities desire. |
|
067 |
Strobeck |
Answers that he would be happy to follow up on that
issue. Adds that infrastructure needs to be adequate as well. |
|
075 |
Rep. Nelson |
Points out that Mayor Berg should auction abandoned
belongings of Oregon State University (OSU) students. |
|
084 |
Mayor Berg |
Responds she had not considered that. Explains that
non-profit agencies do take advantage of recycling said belongings. |
|
092 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Points out the valuable nature of LOC. States they
perform a function that is less costly than if it were the state’s
responsibility. Submits that the legislature has created a burden. Expresses
desire to preclude predation of local funding. |
|
122 |
Chair Krummel |
Refers to (EXHIBIT
D). Asks what cities view as essential government services. |
|
139 |
Strobeck |
Explains they see them as whatever local residents
ask them to provide. |
|
145 |
Berg |
Thanks the chair for asking that question. Lists the
police departments, fire departments, libraries, and parks as essential.
Indicates that for every possible fee they can charge, they do in order to
relieve the property tax burdens on communities. Turns to Rep Mabrey’s
earlier comments . |
|
165 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments on the difference is essential services at
the state and local levels. |
|
178 |
Tony Hyde |
Columbia County Commissioner, President of
Associated Oregon Counties (AOC). Provides statistics on Oregon Counties.
Details life in six Oregon counties. |
|
286 |
Hyde |
Refers to packet (EXHIBIT E). Points out that government serves the same cities.
Details shared state-county services. Explains he has included those the AOC
felt were most important. Indicates the desire of the AOC to work with the
legislature. |
|
338 |
Bob Cantine |
AOC. Provides overview of revenue in Oregon counties
and its expenditure. States that services and revenue are interwoven. |
|
TAPE 4,A |
||
|
005 |
Cantine |
Continues presentation. |
|
026 |
Tony Hyde |
Understands the economic reality in Oregon
currently. Expresses they have endured painful cuts as well. Invites
questions. |
|
063 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if they can address action counties are taking
on SB 1145 and related funding. |
|
070 |
Hyde |
Commits to get back to them on that issue. |
|
077 |
Rep. Nelson |
Thanks everyone. Tells of her goal to eliminate
unfunded mandates. Expresses desire to hear from them if they encounter
these. Adds she wishes to know what counties can do to be self-sufficient.
Reiterates she would like to know what kinds of economic development counties
are ripe for. |
|
105 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments on Rep. Nelson’s statement. |
|
123 |
Rep. Nelson |
Expresses concern with regard to state action on
issues of mental health and security. |
|
137 |
Hyde |
Remarks with regard to Rep. Nelson’s earlier
comments on the separation of county and state governments stating he finds
it ultimately impossible, and restates the AOC is not advocating that, and
reiterates that is not something counties want. States his hesitation to
respond in any other way. |
|
150 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies, asks how county services can be made
efficient without the burden of the state. |
|
159 |
Hyde |
Responds that block grants are helpful in allowing
counties flexibility as well as limiting state investment in overhead. |
|
162 |
Chair Krummel |
Inquires how much state agencies withhold in terms
of administrative costs when an agency is not involved in providing the
service the county provides. |
|
174 |
Cantine |
Answers that this varies by agency. Adds that although this is not the best
analysis, the figure is in the eight-to-ten percent range in addition to
overhead costs from the program. Provides that the Department of Corrections
(DOC) as an example of an agency with clean overhead costs. |
|
197 |
Chair Krummel |
States he shares the concerns Rep. Prozanski voiced
earlier. |
|
200 |
Cantine |
Comments that the budget they have currently says
the state will no longer fund 8,000 offenders. |
|
209 |
Chair Krummel |
States this is why he was not in favor of SB 1145 when
it came up. Requests information on state and federally qualified Medicare
and Medicaid providers and the types of services that they provide. Comments
on the expectation of counties in reimbursement. |
|
240 |
Hyde |
Reiterates that services will disappear as budget
issues worsen. |
|
256 |
Rep. Nelson |
Voices concern about the Governor’s role in
releasing the imprisoned. |
|
266 |
Chair Krummel |
Identifies that his understanding is that sentences
will have to be completed although the DOC can modify behavioral corrections
ending in early release. Comments that because there is no money to carry out
services, the counties are left responsible when prisoners are released. |
|
296 |
Rep. Nelson |
Expresses distress as to the inability of the
treasury to reserve funds. |
|
311 |
Chair Krummel |
Thanks audience and presenters. Closes informational
meeting. Adjourns at 10:47 AM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2140, prepared testimony, Roy Turnbaugh, 1 p 1
B
– HB 2170, prepared testimony, Jack Kenny, 2 pp
C
– HB 2175, prepared testimony, Colonel Mike Caldwell, 2 pp
D
– Informational, (LOC), Ken Strobeck, 47 pp
E
– Informational, (AOC), Tony Hyde, 15 pp