HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
February 20, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 AM Tapes 20
- 21
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jerry Krummel, Chair
Rep. Donna Nelson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Floyd Prozanski, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. Derrick Kitts
Rep. John Mabrey
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick
Brennan, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURE HEARD: Public
Hearing – HB 2410
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 20, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Krummel |
Calls meeting to order at 8:37 AM. Opens public
hearing on HB 2410. |
|
HB
2410 PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
008 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Reads Staff Measure Summary
(SMS). Notes -2 amendments (EXHIBIT A).
Informs of a possible fiscal impact. |
|
023 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if there is a subsequent referral. |
|
025 |
Patrick Brennan |
Negates. |
|
030 |
Ken Murphy |
Deputy Director, Oregon Emergency Management
(OEM). Testifies in support of HB
2410. Explains the main issue of the bill is liability. Adds OEM is working
with other agencies on the fiscal impact. |
|
064 |
Chair Krummel |
Refers to the Oregon Good Samaritan Law to
differentiate it from the intention of the bill. |
|
079 |
Murphy |
Responds that OEM is attempting to provide assurance
to medical providers from liability. |
|
096 |
Keith Kutler |
Department of Justice (DOJ). Explains the Oregon Good
Samaritan Law. Relates that the bill is different in that it encompasses
avenues that the Samaritan Law does not. |
|
118 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if the measure would be applicable to mass
emergencies. |
|
125 |
Kutler |
Affirms. |
|
130 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if he agrees with the -2 amendments. |
|
135 |
Kutler |
Concurs that the amendments are proper. |
|
144 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Requests how the bill would be implemented with
regard to individuals. Asks what steps individuals could take to challenge
services received. |
|
154 |
Kutler |
Responds to the latter question that the challenge
would be in the form of a lawsuit. |
|
165 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks what the current policy for emergencies in the
state is. |
|
170 |
Murphy |
Explains the current policy. |
|
180 |
Rep. Nelson |
Provides Mt. St. Helens as an example of a mass
disaster and asks if disasters are not already covered. |
|
192 |
Kutler |
Responds that disasters such as those that the bill
would address have not occurred yet. Explains the process the bill would
cover. |
|
220 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests if they are familiar with Northwest Medical
Teams. |
|
230 |
Murphy |
Replies that he is not, but uses Federal Emergency
Management Administration (FEMA) as an example. |
|
239 |
Kutler |
Explains there are providers that are covered by
different laws. Restates the bill has been created to cover all the providers
including volunteers. |
|
263 |
Chair Krummel |
Points out that the closest example of a disaster
would be the United flight crash on Burnside in Portland in 1977. |
|
285 |
Dr. Grant Higginson |
Department of Human Services (DHS). Testifies in
support of replacement language for HB 2410 (EXHIBIT A). Provides a proposed revision to the bill (EXHIBIT B) and related information (EXHIBIT C). |
|
TAPE 21, A |
||
|
003 |
Higginson |
Explains the reasoning behind the revision of the
bill. Adds DHS is working on the fiscal impact of the revision. |
|
017 |
Scott Gallant |
Oregon Medical Association (OMA). Points out the
involvement and authority of the Governor. Informs of the individuals not
currently covered and explains negligence. Suggests standards be adopted for
malpractice liability protection. Informs committee of other related bills.
Describes the reasons for modification of the bill. Suggests a workgroup be
created to modify the bill. |
|
156 |
Rep. Avakian |
Refers to section two of EXHIBIT B and poses question. |
|
162 |
Higginson |
Responds that he is unsure. Believes the language
was requested by Chair Krummel. Explains the reasoning behind the
language. |
|
173 |
Rep. Avakian |
Refers to section three and poses question. Asks about
the terms chosen. |
|
181 |
Higginson |
Explains that liability coverage needs structure and
quality-assurance. |
|
203 |
Rep. Avakian |
Refers to section four and poses question concerning
the intentions of the section. |
|
217 |
Higginson |
Concurs with the observations. Provides past
examples of situations. |
|
241 |
Rep. Avakian |
Asks what kind of rule-making process would be
anticipated. |
|
245 |
Higginson |
Responds. |
|
247 |
Rep. Avakian |
Asks if providers injured in the act are covered by
the bill. |
|
252 |
Higginson |
Responds he is unsure. |
|
255 |
Rep. Avakian |
Comments. |
|
263 |
Higginson |
Explains DHS will need to return with that
information |
|
270 |
Rep. Nelson |
Poses question concerning acceptance of providers. |
|
280 |
Higginson |
Replies that authority falls to OEM. |
|
298 |
Rep. Nelson |
Poses question concerning medical students’ involvement
as providers |
|
305 |
Higginson |
Answers how they may be included. |
|
312 |
Gallant |
Adds that medical residents may be included. |
|
316 |
Rep. Nelson |
Observes there is no acknowledgement of military and
other field. |
|
326 |
Higginson |
States pharmacists and Emergency Medical Technicians
(EMT) were originally listed. Responds concerning military providers. |
|
351 |
Chair Krummel |
Explains his reasons for requesting language changes
to the bill. |
|
377 |
Rep. Nelson |
Lists other organizations that would requires
licensing. |
|
TAPE 20, B |
||
|
005 |
Chair Krummel |
Observes the relating to clause is broad enough to
include air transport companies. Adds that may be better included in a
different bill. |
|
017 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on the intention of her request. |
|
020 |
Higginson |
Explains the intention is to include volunteers not
already covered in emergency situations. |
|
035 |
Rep. Nelson |
Responds that this was her earlier intention and
elaborates. |
|
042 |
Murphy |
Informs of the coverage that already exists. |
|
055 |
Gallant |
Adds to the comments referencing the inclusion of employees
in the Oregon Tort Claims Act. |
|
087 |
Rep. Nelson |
Provides a situation of transport companies in
California to suggest further examination into the issue. |
|
108 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments. |
|
110 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if Oklahoma City has such a program. |
|
114 |
Higginson |
Responds he believes Oregon would be the first. |
|
122 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Points out the inclusion of natural disaster relief |
|
126 |
Higginson |
Concurs. |
|
128 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments on the utilization of other providers. |
|
135 |
Higginson |
Expresses the hope that would be that providers give
services related to their specialty. |
|
148 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Appreciates his comments. |
|
152 |
Higginson |
Explains the revision would provide balance of
liability. |
|
157 |
Gallant |
Reiterates that clarification is needed to the bill.
|
|
168 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments. |
|
172 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Provides example of unlicensed providers and poses
question regarding their inclusion |
|
183 |
Gallant |
Explains those individuals could be covered by the
Oregon Good Samaritan Law. |
|
195 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks if counties or the state would assume
liability. |
|
197 |
Higginson |
Answers that the bill assumes state liability. |
|
212 |
Chris Davie |
State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) Corporation.
Responds to Rep. Avakian’s earlier inquiries regarding providers injured
while volunteering in disaster relief. |
|
227 |
Rep. Avakian |
Asks if volunteers are legally volunteers if they
are providing services for the state. |
|
238 |
Davie |
Refers to volunteers already protected when
providing service. |
|
247 |
Chair Krummel |
Inquires if there would be an effect on the premiums
Oregon pays. |
|
259 |
Davie |
Explains those who receive premiums and their
calculation. |
|
272 |
Rep. Nelson |
Inquires if state should be required to cover
providers. |
|
276 |
Davie |
Responds. |
|
292 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests that Mr. Murphy create a workgroup to deal
with the issue. Asks that they meet to discuss results. Believes there is
merit in the bill. Comments on Rep. Avakian’s earlier inquiries. |
|
358 |
Rep. Avakian |
Envisions other venues be designated as triage
centers. |
|
370 |
Rep. Nelson |
Adds that facilities such as the Capitol should also
be included in discussion. |
|
395 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 2410. Adjourns meeting
at 9:57 AM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– Proposed Amendments to HB 2410, Staff, 1 p
B
– HB 2410, Grant Higginson, 3 p
C
– HB 2410, Grant Higginson, 3 p