HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
March 06, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 AM Tapes 29
- 31
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jerry Krummel, Chair
Rep. Donna Nelson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Floyd Prozanski, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. John Mabrey
Rep. Kelley Wirth
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Derrick Kitts
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick
Brennan, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: HB 2743 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
Informational Meeting – Central
Hearing Officer Panel, Tom Ewing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 29, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Krummel |
Calls meeting to order at 8:35 AM. Opens public
hearing on HB 2743. |
|
HB 2743
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
006 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Reads Staff Measure Summary
(SMS) on HB 2743. |
|
|
Rep. Tim Knopp |
Submits written testimony in support of HB 2743
prior to the meeting (EXHIBIT A). |
|
010 |
Rep. John Mabrey |
House District 59. Testifies in favor of HB 2743 (EXHIBIT B). Provides background of
the bill with regard to the Oregon Veteran’s Home (OVH). Explains the land
provided for the home. Discusses state funding of the home. Explains how circumstances
have changed. States there is no request for funding by the bill and that if
the opportunity arises the general fund would include the OVH. Reiterates his
remarks are not critical to veterans. |
|
126 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests an estimate of funds needed for the added
wing. |
|
137 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Responds he is unsure. Estimates the hospital is
spending around a million dollars per year to operate OVH currently. |
|
155 |
Rep. Nelson |
Wonders if the veterans are ineligible for other
health care due to the OVH. |
|
162 |
Rep. Mabrey |
States he does not know. Explains that he
understands veterans of Oregon cannot take money from the Oregon Health Plan
(OHP). |
|
177 |
Chair Krummel |
Discusses a veterans’ home in Vancouver and asks if
qualifying veterans could got to the home in the Dalles. |
|
182 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Responds he is unsure. |
|
186 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies the home cannot qualify as a Medicaid
provider. |
|
214 |
Jon Mangis |
Director, Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).
Mentions the DVA is not requesting any funds. Testifies in favor of HB 2743.
Notes the funding the DVA has applied for and received for the OVH. Invites
the legislators to visit the home. Explains the intentions of the OVH. Notes
the support of the Governor for the bill although his budget includes no
money for the OVH. Describes the expectations in the operation of the OVH. |
|
TAPE 30, A |
||
|
003 |
Mangis |
Notes a nursing program associated with the OVH.
Speaks to the current needs in the health care profession. Discusses original
legislation. Offers that a fund has been created to raise money for the home
and discusses aspects of its maintenance. Notes that the federal government
is finding it more efficient for states to create veterans’ homes. Offers the
jobs and funds created by the OVH. |
|
160 |
Staryl Austin |
Chair, Veterans’ Affairs Advisory Committee. Notes
the committee unanimously approved the bill. |
|
170 |
Rep. Wirth |
Requests the number of volunteers to the OVH. |
|
174 |
Mangis |
Responds that there is a solid volunteer
organization involving citizens and veterans. |
|
196 |
Rep. Wirth |
Wonders whether the regulations involving volunteers
to the OVH deter those from contributing time. |
|
205 |
Mangis |
Responds that even he had a background check. Adds
that there is a reason for security. |
|
221 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if there are veterans’ homes in Oregon and
Idaho. |
|
225 |
Mangis |
Lists homes in Idaho and Washington. |
|
230 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks where the home is located. |
|
235 |
Mangis |
Answers Spokane. Notes California’s homes. |
|
244 |
Chair Krummel |
Explains his consideration for those near borders of
states. |
|
248 |
Mangis |
Responds to the idea. |
|
253 |
Chair Krummel |
Speaks to the timeframe of the federal VA homes.
Asks if OVH is under the same guidelines. |
|
257 |
Mangis |
Answers the home is not and explains. |
|
282 |
Chair Krummel |
Poses question regarding timeframe for contacts. |
|
284 |
Mangis |
Responds every 36 months |
|
285 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests the costs of annual operation for the OVH. |
|
300 |
Mangis |
Answers $16.2 million was requested. |
|
310 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies the figure is for the OVH. |
|
314 |
Mangis |
Affirms. |
|
320 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests the total DVA budget. |
|
325 |
Mangis |
Answers $2.5 million general fund and describes
allocations. |
|
TAPE 29, B |
||
|
003 |
Mangis |
Continues discussion of cash flow. Notes the credit
rating reduction DVA was part of. |
|
035 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments on the forms. |
|
037 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests the cost to open the other wing. |
|
040 |
Mangis |
Estimates the figure, full occupancy, would be around
$1.27 Million. |
|
057 |
Walter Crews |
Non-Commissioned Officers Association (NCOA).
Explains the situations of the officers with regard to NCOA. Testifies in
favor of HB 2743 (EXHIBIT C). Expresses
the desire to have a full facility and need for a second. |
|
103 |
Dennis Hooyman |
Veteran. Testifies in favor of HB 2743. Notes the
veterans are not requesting funding, only access to the general fund if it
becomes available. Describes his perception of veterans’ homes in other
states throughout his life. Describes the bond between veterans to illustrate
volunteering. |
|
166 |
Greg Warnock |
Oregon Veterans’ Association (OVA). Notes Oregon is
the state with the highest percentage of veterans per capita. Testifies in
favor of HB 2743 (EXHIBIT D). Offers
there is only enough money in the trust fund for the next biennium. States
the bill is one of the most important for the biennium. |
|
224 |
Crews |
Notes the list of voting member organizations
provided in EXHIBIT C. |
|
237 |
Peter Detrant, Jr. |
Veteran. Asks how many veterans are currently being
served. |
|
245 |
Chair Krummel |
Responds 109. |
|
247 |
Detrant |
Asks the budget. |
|
250 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies the budget. |
|
253 |
Detrant |
Responds with his belief in cost reduction
concerning administration. |
|
280 |
Rep. Avakian |
Comments. |
|
285 |
Detrant |
Comments on the value of a veteran. |
|
312 |
Chair Krummel |
Points out the reduction many state employees are
taking already. |
|
316 |
Detrant |
Responds that they should publicize that. |
|
325 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing and opens work session on HB
2743. |
|
HB 2743
WORK SESSION |
||
|
330 |
Brennan |
Notes that the bill has been requested to be moved
to the floor by the Speaker. |
|
335 |
Rep.
Mabrey |
MOTION: Moves HB
2743 to the floor with a DO PASS recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT
REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. |
|
347 |
Rep. Prozanski |
States he supports the bill. Comments on the
emergency clause. |
|
352 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks Rep. Mabrey is he knows. |
|
360 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Responds concerning drafting the bill and the
clause. |
|
370 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments that the clause may need to be removed. |
|
393 |
Rep. Wirth |
Supports Rep. Prozanski’s suggestion. States she
will give a courtesy vote to the bill regardless. Comments on her family’s
involvement in the military. Speaks to the budget. |
|
TAPE 30, B |
||
|
017 |
Rep. Nelson |
Expresses she supports the bill as it is, do pass,
without the removal of the emergency clause. Voices the importance of the
bill. States that current funding is a disgrace. |
|
050 |
Rep. Mabrey |
States that he respects Rep. Wirth’s opinions on the
matter. Concurs with Rep. Nelson’s opinions |
|
065 |
Rep.
Mabrey |
Withdraws
the motion. |
|
069 |
Chair Krummel |
Recognizes Rep. Mabrey’s decision. Supports the
decision. Voices concern there will be misunderstanding on the floor with the
clause. Closes work session on HB 2743. States the bill will return. |
|
085 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments on his experience with a veteran. |
|
096 |
Chair Krummel |
Opens informational meeting. |
|
INFORMATIONAL
MEETING |
||
|
102 |
Tom Ewing |
Central Hearing Officer Panel (CHOP). Explains the
purpose of the panel in terms of operations. Refers committee to information
provided in (EXHIBIT E). Discusses
professionalism of hearing officers. Speaks to the problems overcome.
Discusses the geographical disparity of the offices as a continuing issue.
Comments on efficiency. |
|
257 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests the reason for CHOP. |
|
261 |
Ewing |
Explains the panel hears all issues between
individuals and state agencies. |
|
272 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies. |
|
274 |
Chair Krummel |
Explains the past use of CHOP. |
|
278 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests how CHOP officers are selected and if CHOP
is independent of all agencies. |
|
283 |
Ewing |
Affirms the panel is independent of all agencies.
Responds he is appointed, and then hires all officers. |
|
289 |
Rep. Avakian |
Adds state action is included in the appeals heard
by the panel. |
|
297 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains the purpose of the origination of the
panel. Notes a bill that will remove the sunset clause on the agency. |
|
336 |
Rep. Nelson |
Poses a situation and requests how a representative
would be involved. |
|
342 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains the involvement of CHOP. |
|
351 |
Rep. Avakian |
Adds on funds for CHOP |
|
360 |
Ewing |
Remarks on the breakdown of CHOP funding. |
|
370 |
Chair Krummel |
Notices the Board of Athletic Trainers is on the
list. Explains how fees help to fund CHOP. |
|
380 |
Ewing |
Continues. |
|
TAPE 31, A |
||
|
002 |
Ewing |
Explains the workload requirements and full time
equivalent (FTE) employees with regard to savings and budget cuts. Speaks to water
resources and business and labor regarding FTE’s. |
|
071 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if licensees need to hire attorneys. |
|
075 |
Ewing |
Negates and explains reasons. Notes that is always
good to have counsel. |
|
089 |
Chair Krummel |
Poses question regarding commissions. |
|
091 |
Ewing |
Responds concerning decisions made. |
|
096 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies boards brought in are subject to the
panel. |
|
100 |
Ewing |
Affirms. |
|
105 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if hearing officers unfamiliar with issues can
cause a disadvantage. |
|
115 |
Ewing |
Replies regarding real estate agency plans.
Discusses other licensing agencies. |
|
137 |
Chair Krummel |
Discusses a past issue of CHOP. Asks what happens to
support people. |
|
150 |
Ewing |
Explains concerning involvement. |
|
162 |
Chair Krummel |
Understands the hearings officers decisions are not
final. |
|
170 |
Ewing |
Estimates that 98% of decisions are and explains the
other cases. |
|
183 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests how CHOP pays for investigation and
witnesses. |
|
187 |
Ewing |
Explains the board or the citizens pays for those
situations |
|
190 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks how they rule if the testimony is necessary. |
|
197 |
Ewing |
Explains CHOP does not have an advocacy role and
that it tries to be impartial. |
|
216 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes informational meeting. Adjourns the meeting
at 10:42 AM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2743, written testimony, Rep. Tim Knopp, 1 p
B
– HB 2743, written testimony, Rep. John Mabrey, 2 pp
C
– HB 2743, written testimony, Walter Crews, 3 pp
D
– HB 2743, written testimony, Greg Warnock, 2 pp
E
– Informational, CHOP, Tom Ewing, 4 pp