HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
March 20, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 AM Tapes 37 - 39
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jerry Krummel, Chair
Rep. Donna Nelson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Floyd Prozanski, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. Derrick Kitts
Rep. John Mabrey
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick
Brennan, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURES: HB 2739 – Public Hearing
HB 2974 – Public Hearing
HB 3101 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in compliance
with Senate and House Rules. Only
text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the
tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 37, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Krummel |
Calls meeting to order at 8:43 AM. Opens public
hearing on HB 2739. |
|
HB 2739
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
008 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Reads Staff Measure Summary
(SMS) on HB 2739. |
|
015 |
Rep. George Gilman |
House District 55. Testifies in favor of HB 2739.
Provides the committee with a map of state owned land in the Crook County
area (EXHIBITS A and B). States
the land will not include the state park. |
|
035 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks how many acres are represented by the land
available in EXHIBIT A. |
|
040 |
Rep. Gilman |
Notes the only land he has researched is in and
around Prineville. Encourages other legislators to consider land in their own
districts. |
|
047 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks how many of the parcels are spoken for. |
|
050 |
Rep. Gilman |
Explains the Division of State Lands (DSL) conducts
the inventory and answers the properties are available. |
|
057 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Asks who determines whether the land is good for
public use. |
|
062 |
Rep. Gilman |
Answers DSL and other agencies do. |
|
072 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies as to who should make the decision on land
sale and lease. |
|
076 |
Rep. Gilman |
Answers the agencies should decide whether property
should be made available. |
|
087 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies that a complete list of all property owned
by the state is available. |
|
093 |
Rep. Gilman |
Explains he is working with DSL currently to find surplus
land. |
|
097 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies there is not a lists of available land
readily available. |
|
101 |
Rep. Gilman |
Responds that he is unsure. |
|
105 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Requests if Rep. Gilman could suggest a mechanism
the legislature could give agencies to use for property sales. |
|
114 |
Rep. Gilman |
Believes the state should sell land when it no
longer sees a use for it and not because of the market at the time. |
|
127 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments with regard to process of offering land to
state agencies before the public sector. Asks if this should be addressed by
the bill. |
|
138 |
Rep. Gilman |
Welcomes the committee to make changes it sees fit. Believes
there should be a way to expedite the process. |
|
150 |
Jeanette Holman |
Assistant Director, DSL. Comments on state trust lands.
|
|
187 |
Rep. Kitts |
Concurs with the sentiment of his colleagues on the
lands owned by the state. Believes sale of state land no longer needed should
not be contingent on market value. Refers to EXHIBIT A and poses question. |
|
195 |
Holman |
Responds that she is unsure how long the state has
owned land. |
|
200 |
Rep. Kitts |
Clarifies. |
|
205 |
Holman |
Explains further. |
|
210 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if each agency has to be asked about available
land. |
|
221 |
Holman |
Explains that DSL has records of land available and
also has a mapping system for state owned lands. |
|
247 |
Chair Krummel |
Poses question regarding the purpose of common
school lands. |
|
263 |
Holman |
States she is unsure. |
|
271 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if a member of DAS is present. |
|
274 |
John Wales |
Manager of Property Sales, DAS. |
|
280 |
Rep. Nelson |
Expresses concern there is not a list of state lands
available. Asks if one exists. |
|
285 |
Wales |
Responds DAS does have a list of all state agency
lands. Speaks to the process of offering state lands. Notes he is unsure if
the list is current. |
|
302 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies there is a list of all property owned and
leased. |
|
304 |
Wales |
Affirms. |
|
305 |
Rep. Nelson |
Restates earlier question. |
|
321 |
Wales |
Explains DAS has a list of all property state owns.
Notes it does not keep track of current market value of the property. |
|
341 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if the purchase value is known |
|
343 |
Wales |
Affirms. |
|
347 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments on the process already implemented
concerning the jurisdiction of property. |
|
365 |
Wales |
Explains every agency determines what property it
needs and then informs DAS. Continues explanation of the process of
acquisition. |
|
387 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if there is a procedure involving state lands
involving the general public for recreational purposes. |
|
TAPE 38, A |
||
|
005 |
Wales |
Answers there are properties available depending on
the agency. |
|
012 |
Rep. Kitts |
Clarifies the process of availability. |
|
015 |
Wales |
Explains the process. |
|
021 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks if the property is then exchanged because the
state owns all the land. Poses situation. |
|
031 |
Wales |
Believes the example is a fair assessment. |
|
035 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Speaks to the lands available. Comments on land
management. Asks if there is the opportunity for public citizens to place
offers on property. |
|
061 |
Wales |
Explains there is no formal process although the opportunity
exists. |
|
071 |
Rep. Nelson |
Wonders if all renters are current. |
|
075 |
Wales |
Clarifies the land DAS charges to agencies. |
|
080 |
Rep. Nelson |
Notes the price on square footage. |
|
090 |
Wales |
Speaks to the rate per square footage charged by
other agencies in Oregon. |
|
096 |
Rep. Avakian |
Requests Mr. Wales to comment on the word change set
out by the bill. |
|
101 |
Wales |
Explains there is no fiscal impact to DAS in making
the change. Speaks to the disposition program DAS has. Explains DAS does not
control agency decisions regarding property. Comments the bill would remove
discretion regarding land. Notes there may be some properties that cost more
to dispose of than to keep. |
|
140 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests that Mr. Wales work with Rep. Gilman and
Committee Staff to expedite process and to ensure agencies fare well. |
|
155 |
Wales |
Affirms. |
|
160 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 2739. Opens public
hearing on HB 2974. |
|
HB 2974
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
165 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 2974. |
|
170 |
Rep Prozanski |
House District 8. Testifies in favor of HB 2974. Explains
the bill. Notes there are mixed opinions on the measure. |
|
195 |
Wayne Schulz |
Lane County. Testifies in favor of HB 2974
representing Oregon veterans (EXHIBIT
C). Speaks on identity theft. |
|
235 |
Rep. Nelson |
Voices concern that certain individuals may need to
access the records. |
|
242 |
Schulz |
Clarifies. |
|
247 |
Rep. Nelson |
Explains further. |
|
252 |
Schulz |
Notes the process that occurs when veterans become
deceased. |
|
264 |
Rep. Nelson |
Assumes that all veterans do not have a personal
representative. |
|
276 |
Schulz |
Voices concern that the information is currently available
to everyone and would like to see more measures taken to protect that. |
|
284 |
John Mangis |
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). Explains the
problems with identity theft. |
|
TAPE 37, B |
||
|
010 |
Charles Stern |
Yamhill County Clerk. Identifies the materials he
has provided (EXHIBITS D, E, and F). Speaks to the issue of identity theft of
veterans. Explains he is unsure of how to deal with the problem. Summarizes
the issues of concern the counties share. |
|
081 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if an amendment was created and the bill
passed, what would occur. |
|
087 |
Stern |
Explains there will be a price to removing the
information. |
|
092 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if a certain form can be obtained. |
|
097 |
Stern |
Notes it is a public document. Lists marriage
records and liens as information also available as public record. |
|
105 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on lists being sold. Asks if the information
is sold. |
|
114 |
Stern |
Answers in some cases the information is sold and
explains. |
|
130 |
Tom Gallagher |
(ONPA). Testifies against HB 2974. Notes the
importance of keeping certain information available due to public security
issues. Admonishes that the general
purpose of public record be considered. |
|
171 |
Rep. Nelson |
Notes that veterans are in need of protection as
targets of terrorists. |
|
185 |
Gallagher |
Responds targets are innumerable. |
|
|
Diane Cilenti |
Submits written testimony on HB 2974 (EXHIBIT G). |
|
193 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 2974. Opens public hearing
on HB 3101. |
|
HB 3101
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
198 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3101. |
|
211 |
Suzanne Brownlow |
Testifies in favor of HB 3103 (EXHIBIT H). Describes situations of pornography abuse and
availability. Speaks to pornography blocking filters to protect children.
Believes tax dollars should not be spent on institutions that provide access
to pornography. |
|
300 |
Rep. Avakian |
Poses question regarding wording of the bill. |
|
305 |
Brownlow |
Wants the term ‘offensive’ to be changed to
‘material that has been deemed harmful to children’. Explains courts have
already used the term. |
|
315 |
Rep. Avakian |
Asks who determines which material is ‘deemed
harmful’. |
|
320 |
Brownlow |
Refers him to the information provided in EXHIBIT H. |
|
330 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if Rep. Avakian’s questions were satisfied. |
|
331 |
Rep. Avakian |
Answers no. |
|
335 |
Brownlow |
Believes the public library is not a place where
children should have to be protected from illegal pornography. Comments on
the amount of material available. |
|
348 |
Chair Krummel |
Remarks. |
|
352 |
Brownlow |
Discusses the restriction of information available
to children. Speaks to a library’s policy of signatures required to use a
computer. Describes her own situation.
|
|
TAPE 38, B |
||
|
003 |
Robert Ekstrom |
Constitution Party of Oregon. Testifies in favor of
HB 3101 (EXHIBIT I). Relates the
American military’s current situation to illustrate the attempt to protect
children from pornography. Lists
arguments against the bill. Notes the reason to propone the measure being the
protection of the minds of children. |
|
062 |
Rep. Betsy Close |
House District 15. Testifies in favor of HB 3101 (EXHIBIT J). Describes situations of
her own encounters with pornography at public libraries. Believes public
computers should not be available for the material. |
|
099 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if Rep. Close has spoken with Legislative
Counsel (LC) about constitutionality of the bill. |
|
104 |
Rep. Close |
Responds she has not received a letter from LC
indicating a potential problem. |
|
108 |
Rep. Nelson |
Concurs with the opinions of Rep. Close and the
proponents of the bill. Asks if the libraries could be accountable for the
delinquency of individuals. |
|
115 |
Rep. Close |
Responds the issue is contentious and believes it
will spur discussion and debate. |
|
128 |
Rep. Kitts |
Poses situation regarding the development of photographs
and pornography. |
|
151 |
Rep. Close |
Responds that those situations involve private
businesses and because the issue is of public places and obscenity. |
|
162 |
Rep. Kitts |
Notes the public library carrying problem books. Expands
on matters of protection. |
|
174 |
Rep. Close |
Responds regarding filtration and boycotts due to
lack of protection. |
|
185 |
Rep. Kitts |
Responds he supports the bill. |
|
188 |
Norma Rich |
Concerned Women of America (CWA) of Oregon.
Testifies in favor of HB 3101 (EXHIBIT
K). Notes she is not anti-library as a former employee. Lists the reasons
for the need of the legislation. Provides statistics on sexual predation. Points
out libraries have been sued under Title VII for the issues. Offers fourteen
states have taken action on the issue. |
|
230 |
Marie Hyde |
American Mothers of Oregon. |
|
235 |
Chair Krummel |
Notes that Mrs. Hyde has received the title ‘Mother
of the Year’. |
|
240 |
M. Hyde |
Testifies in favor of HB 3101 (EXHIBIT L). Notes pornography can be related to cigarette and
alcohol programs to target the youth. Notes the presence of pornography
figures on the American Library Association (ALA). Notes the ALA also
receives funds from the pornography industry. |
|
352 |
Paul Hyde |
Father, Grandfather. Testifies in favor of HB 3101.
Explains how his family filters the internet. Speaks to freedom of expression
versus protection issues. |
|
TAPE 39, A |
||
|
003 |
P. Hyde |
Equates porn with termites. |
|
010 |
Lou Beres |
Executive Director, Christian Coalition of Oregon.
Testifies in favor of HB 3101 (EXHIBIT
M). Speaks to the importance of protecting the citizens of Oregon with
wholesome public policy. Believes the Oregon legislature has the duty to
protect children from pornography in libraries. |
|
080 |
Nan Heim |
Oregon Library Association (OLA). Testifies in opposition
to HB 3101. Notes the fiscal impact at around one half million dollars. Submits
decision should be made at the local level. |
|
118 |
Andrea Meyer |
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Testifies in
opposition of HB 3101. Believes the bill has constitutional issues. Provides
statistics on those accessing the internet at libraries. Informs of a Supreme
Court decisions on internet issues. Offers that filtering software does not
always work. Provides statistics on the amount and content of internet material.
Lists examples of content that has been kept from the public due to error by
internet filtering software. |
|
215 |
Chair Krummel |
Notes the committee fully understands the issue. |
|
220 |
Meyer |
Believes the filtering system is problematic. Notes
Oregon voter rejection of ballot measures related to limiting freedom of
expression. Explains the ACLU believes the bill is unconstitutional. |
|
256 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments on local control issues. Accounts for his
own accidental encounters with pornography on the internet. Asks about the
constitutionality of overrides on the issue. |
|
290 |
Meyer |
Responds with the scrutiny that exists already by
the courts. |
|
311 |
Heim |
Comments the funding of libraries by local tax
payers. Notes patrons most capable of uninstalling the software are children. |
|
332 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments. |
|
335 |
Rep. Kitts |
Refers to Article I, Section 8 of HB 3101 and asks
about sectioning libraries as an acceptable compromise. |
|
352 |
Meyer |
Responds that the one-hour photo versus internet
library porn issue is different. Explains the filtering is so broad and
undefined that it will sweep in material that should not be filtered in any
case. |
|
376 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks if there are any districts that would support
pornography in their libraries. |
|
380 |
Heim |
Negates. |
|
382 |
Meyer |
Believes the proposal is much broader than child
pornography. |
|
386 |
Rep. Kitts |
Notes the motive behind the issue is a good one for
children. |
|
396 |
Rep. Nelson |
Speaks to local control issues and the right of
children to be protected. |
|
400 |
Heim |
Offers libraries in Rep. Nelson’s district that have
instituted filtering. |
|
412 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments. |
|
438 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3101. Adjourns meeting
at 10:55 AM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2739, Rep. George Gilman, 1 p
B
– HB 2739, Rep. George Gilman, 2 p
C
– HB 2974, Wayne Schultz, 1 p
D
– HB 2974, Charles Stern, 1 p
E
– HB 2974, Charles Stern, 12 p
F
– HB 2974, Charles Stern, 5 p
G
– HB 2974, Diane Cilenti, 1 p
H
– HB 3101, Suzanne Brownlow, 52 p
I
– HB 3101, Robert Ekstrom, 1 p
J
– HB 3101, Rep. Betsy Close, 1 p
K
– HB 3101, Norma Rich, 30 p
L
– HB 3101, Marie Hyde, 10 p
M
– HB 3101, Lou Beres, 3 p