HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
March 25, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 AM Tapes 40
- 42
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jerry Krummel, Chair
Rep. Donna Nelson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Floyd Prozanski, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. Derrick Kitts
Rep. John Mabrey
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick
Brennan, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: HB
3072 – Public Hearing
HB 3073 – Public Hearing
HB 3194 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 3212 – Public Hearing
HB 3062 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2131 – Work Session
HB 2417 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact words. For complete contents, please refer to the
tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 40, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Krummel |
Calls meeting to order at 8:38 AM. Opens public
hearing on HB 3072. |
|
HB 3072
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
009 |
Rep. Tom Butler |
House District 60. Testifies in favor of HB 3072.
Explains the issue. |
|
021 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if there is great noncompliance that would
require the bill. |
|
023 |
Rep. Butler |
Responds and explains tax return issues. |
|
033 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if anyone has requested an audit. |
|
035 |
Rep. Butler |
Notes that agencies cannot currently share
information with the Department of Revenue and the bill would require the
needed authorization. |
|
043 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies. |
|
045 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains the constitutional right of the Secretary
of State to do the audits. |
|
051 |
Chair Krummel |
Provides an example of tax law compliance with
regard to licensing |
|
059 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if there is a financial burden. |
|
061 |
Rep. Butler |
Informs the measure may actually assist the budget. |
|
065 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies the procedure and intent of the
noncompliance. |
|
071 |
Rep .Butler |
Explains the sharing of information regarding
licenses and tax returns among agencies. |
|
0832 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Requests examples of license boards that require tax
return filing. |
|
087 |
Rep. Butler |
Responds there is currently no requirement that people
demonstrate filing a state tax return. Voices concern for those who are
licensed but are not filing. |
|
107 |
D.E. Bridges |
Oregon Forest Products Transportation Association (OFPTA).
Testifies on HB 3072. Presents a problem with the wording of the bill. Notes
the bill may have a negative affect on truck driving. |
|
125 |
Bob Russell |
President, Oregon Trucking Association (OTA).
Testifies on HB 3072. Voices concern with the cost to the Oregon Department
of Transportation (ODOT). |
|
148 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Concurs on costs to drivers. Asks about the
potential financial burden of testing. |
|
160 |
Russell |
Explains the review process could be where cost
lies. |
|
168 |
Chair Krummel |
Notes the word ‘may’ in HB 3072 and that it would not
require ODOT to provide proof. |
|
178 |
Russell |
Concurs. State his concerns for the bill. |
|
180 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if he has shared his concern with the sponsor
of the bill. |
|
184 |
Russell |
Explains he has not yet. |
|
190 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3072. Opens public
hearing on HB 3073. |
|
HB 3073
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
198 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Reads Staff Measure Summary
(SMS) on HB 3073. |
|
204 |
Jason Williams |
Executive Director. Taxpayers Association of Oregon.
|
|
205 |
Rep. Tom Butler |
House District 60. Comments. Testifies in favor of
HB 3073. Explains the intent of the bill. |
|
244 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks why the bill is not effective immediately. |
|
250 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains there will be programming time needed. |
|
254 |
Rep. Kitts |
Comments on the budget crisis of the current
biennium. Asks if it would be in best interest to have the information
currently. |
|
260 |
Rep. Butler |
Responds regarding the time required. |
|
269 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks who is opposed to the bill. Asks if the intent is
to make the information more available. |
|
275 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains the need to locate individuals in the
system. |
|
295 |
Rep. Kitts |
Requests who is opposed to the bill. |
|
297 |
Rep. Butler |
States he is unsure. |
|
306 |
Rep. Kitts |
State he supports the bill. |
|
314 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments. |
|
317 |
Chair Krummel |
Interjects. |
|
319 |
Rep. Nelson |
Poses question relating to zero-based budgeting. |
|
326 |
Rep. Butler |
Comments on the attempt of Ways and Means to remove
funding of inefficient labor costs. |
|
340 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies. |
|
345 |
Rep. Butler |
Answers that even with an emergency clause, their
action may not be complete. |
|
350 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments on Department of Administrative Services
(DAS) involvement. Concurs with Rep. Butler about the lack of need for an emergency
clause. |
|
360 |
Rep. Butler |
Comments on the scope of the bill. |
|
370 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Notes that ten percent of the state population is
funded by government. Poses question regarding employees and contracts. |
|
382 |
Rep. Butler |
Notes that state employees can be up to 50,000 a
year. Comments on compensation of employees. |
|
TAPE 41, A |
||
|
002 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies based on the bill what information
regarding employment. Requests the intent of the bill |
|
007 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains the intent. |
|
012 |
Rep. Kitts |
Notes he does not have the same faith in state
agencies as Rep. Butler does. Requests if it is possible for the Governor to
freeze new hires by agencies. Believes it would be appropriate to know the
information the bill would provide now. |
|
030 |
Rep. Butler |
Answers there is a freeze currently although it is
rather fluid. Clarifies. |
|
036 |
Rep. Kitts |
Restates his question regarding the Governor. |
|
043 |
Rep. Butler |
Speak to position currently frozen and the
accomplishments of those positions with regard to the movement of employees
among agencies. |
|
062 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Believes the goal of the bill is admirable.
Questions the value of the work needed to perform the actions the bill would
require. |
|
077 |
Rep. Butler |
Notes that an audit process is basically necessary
in the ferreting out of unneeded jobs and that one is currently underway in
Ways and Means. |
|
094 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Restates earlier question regarding the validation
of state employment positions without knowledge of the jobs and persons
involved. |
|
109 |
Rep. Butler |
Responds that the right to have the information supersedes
the ideals. |
|
119 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests his recollection of the lack of information
of overhead of agencies. Asks if the bill would help in situations like that. |
|
127 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains the information to be provided by the bill.
|
|
137 |
Chair Krummel |
Informs of the state employee phone list. Asks if
the list could be utilized. |
|
147 |
Rep. Butler |
Remarks it could be used because a database already
exists. Notes additions to be made to the database. |
|
154 |
Chair Krummel |
Points out the similarity of the bill to one past. |
|
161 |
Rep. Butler |
Concurs it is similar. Believes the information is
needed. |
|
166 |
Chair Krummel |
Inquires about the good in the legislature
exercising micromanagement. |
|
170 |
Rep. Butler |
Believes micromanagement is a necessary exercise of
the legislature. |
|
192 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks about the inclusion of consultants in the bill. |
|
198 |
Rep. Butler |
Explains issue consultants. Welcomes the opportunity
to gather more information on issues such as these. |
|
218 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies it could include consultants. |
|
223 |
Chair Krummel |
Points out the consultation funds are earned by the
private sector. |
|
229 |
Williams |
Testifies in favor of HB 3073 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
257 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Poses question. |
|
264 |
Williams |
Comments on the Ways and Means process. Explains the
OTA is interested in the availability of information. |
|
280 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Believes the existence of a list does not
necessarily connote improvement. Offers an audit would be helpful. Asks if
OTA would be interested in micromanagement. |
|
290 |
Williams |
Responds concerning OTA work on the matter. |
|
295 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Restates his question. |
|
304 |
Williams |
Responds that he would like to see more audits. |
|
310 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if OTA would support the legislature becoming
full-time then. |
|
314 |
Williams |
Replies the legislature could experiment with the
option. |
|
317 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains the requirements overseeing the
implications represented by the measure would necessitate a more full-time
approach by the legislature. |
|
323 |
Williams |
Concurs. |
|
326 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains the intent of his questions. |
|
334 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments on his own experiences as a county judge. Notes
the nebulous nature of determining necessary employment. Wonders how the list
is not redundant. |
|
377 |
Williams |
Responds that the annual report can be a starting
point. Believes clarity on the issue is necessary and that it would be easy
to produce the list. |
|
TAPE 40, B |
||
|
008 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests if there are questions for Ms. *. |
|
015 |
Nancy * |
DAS. |
|
017 |
Rep. Nelson |
Speaks to issues of performance measurement
accountability in terms of the budget. |
|
025 |
* |
Clarifies and explains. |
|
030 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3073. Opens public
hearing on HB 3194. |
|
HB 3194
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
034 |
Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3194. |
|
039 |
Rep. Lane Shetterly |
House District 23. Testifies in favor of HB 3194. Informs
the committee of the situation of the Dallas Cemetery Board Members
requesting the bill. |
|
072 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if there is a list of members without districts. |
|
075 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Explains he does not have it and explains that
cemeteries have their own local government districts. |
|
087 |
Chelsey Nichol |
Special Districts Association. Testifies in favor of
HB 3194 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
112 |
Violet Starks |
Dallas Cemetery Maintenance District. Clarifies she
is an employee of the district and not a board member. Supports HB 3194. |
|
122 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 3194 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
124 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Kitts, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. SHETTERLY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
130 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3194. Opens public hearing
HB 3212. |
|
HB 3212
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
132 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3212. |
|
138 |
Colonel Mike Caldwell |
Oregon Military Department (OMD). Testifies in
opposition to HB 3212. Cites reasons for opposition of the bill in its
current form. Recommends an amendment to the ninety day limit. Explains the
issue the created the bill. |
|
200 |
Shelli Honeywell |
DAS. Offers she is present to answer questions. |
|
203 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests the difference between state and federal
active duty status. |
|
209 |
Caldwell |
Explains the current deployments have been under
federal law. Notes the bill concerns state duty. Adds the President of the
United States can call on all state active duty troops. |
|
240 |
Chair Krummel |
Poses question regarding time limits on troops. |
|
245 |
Caldwell |
Notes that service of over thirty days is uncommon.
Explains the provisions of statutes and emergencies. |
|
271 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Explains he is not aware of the conflict of the
bill. Explains his desire to protect the jobs of troops, not to limit them. |
|
287 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if the bill could include the retirees if
amended. |
|
296 |
Caldwell |
Explains the hesitancy to re-file the bill regarding
the retiree issue. Offers given the chance to work with the sponsors, they
would work to include former members. |
|
326 |
Chair Krummel |
Poses question regarding the extension of Public
Employees Retirement System (PERS) benefits. |
|
340 |
Honeywell |
States DAS would be willing to find that information
out. Comments on reemployment rights of soldiers upon return from service. |
|
352 |
Mary Botkin |
Association of Federal, State, County and Municipal
Employees (AFSCME), Local 79. States AFSCME shares the concerns of Col.
Caldwell. Comments on PERS. |
|
TAPE 41, B |
||
|
006 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3212. Asks Col. Caldwell
to work with the sponsors of the bill. Requests future clarification on PERS
issues. Opens public hearing on HB 3062. |
|
HB 3062
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
020 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3062. |
|
024 |
Nan Heim |
Oregon Library Association. Testifies in favor of HB
3062 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
058 |
Jim |
Director, Oregon State Library. Testifies in favor
of HB 3062 regarding the ‘Ready to Read’ grant program (EXHIBIT D). |
|
073 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing and opens work session on HB
3062. |
|
HB 3062
WORK SESSION |
||
|
077 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if HB 3062 has a subsequent referral. |
|
078 |
Chair Krummel |
Answers no. |
|
080 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 3062 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
083 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. WIRTH will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
093 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3062. Opens public hearing
on HB 2131. |
|
HB 2131
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
095 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 2131. Indicates changes made to the
bill. Explains the -2 Amendments (EXHIBIT
E). Notes the representatives in the audience. |
|
110 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if interested parties have signed off on the
measure. |
|
113 |
Brennan |
Affirms. Mentions there is no fiscal or revenue
impact. |
|
117 |
Rep. Nelson |
Requests testimony from the Municipal Debt Advisory
Commission (MDAC). |
|
121 |
Lady* |
MDAC. Notes the member of the commission is not
present. |
|
126 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks for the intent of the bill regarding cities. |
|
136 |
Lady* |
Responds there is no opposition regarding the
cities. |
|
145 |
Chair Krummel |
Identifies the League of Oregon Cities (LOC)
supports the bill as amended. |
|
148 |
Lady* |
Agrees. |
|
153 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2131-2 amendments dated
02/18/03. |
|
155 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
158 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves HB 2131 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
164 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments on the importance of the bill. |
|
168 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. KITTS will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
175 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2131. Opens work session
on HB 2417. |
|
HB 2417
WORK SESSION |
||
|
177 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 2417. Informs of -1 amendment (EXHIBIT F). |
|
186 |
Rep. Betsy Close |
House District 15. Explains how the amendment has
narrowed the bill to cover day passes for public visitors who testify.
Acknowledges there is no fiscal analysis yet. Voices belief the cost is not large.
|
|
209 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Inquires why a fiscal analysis has not yet been
received. |
|
214 |
Brennan |
Explains Committee Services is extrapolating the
data to provide Legislative Fiscal with the information needed. Notes a subsequent
referral could be added later. |
|
220 |
Chair Krummel |
Adds the Senate could also send the measure to Ways
and Means. Informs the committee of his work with Rep. Close on the matter. |
|
244 |
Rep. Close |
Notes parking spots currently exist. |
|
247 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2417-1 amendments dated
03/19/03. |
|
252 |
Rep. Prozanski |
States he is not ready to move on the bill until a fiscal
analysis is received. |
|
256 |
Rep. Avakian |
Concurs with Rep. Prozanski. Asks for the City of Salem’s
position on the matter. |
|
260 |
Brennan |
Believes the city is comfortable with the bill as
amended. |
|
264 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Presents the State of Oregon will incur the costs. Comments. |
|
268 |
Brennan |
Notes the costs will be to Legislative
Administration (LA). |
|
272 |
Rep. Kitts |
Clarifies it is a loss of revenue. |
|
276 |
Chair Krummel |
Answers the revenue is neutral to the City of Salem
and cost is to the State. |
|
283 |
Rep. Kitts |
Clarifies the State incurs the cost, and there will
be no exemption of costs. |
|
288 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains that unless it is a ‘takings’ and the City
of Salem no longer charge for the spots, cost will be incurred. Questions the
need for the bill when those who travel to the Capitol pay to operate
personal vehicles. |
|
295 |
Rep Kitts |
Comments. |
|
305 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Questions that parking pass costs are a burden as he
does not believe they are. |
|
314 |
Brennan |
Adds Mr. Bennett from City of Salem explained LA
obtains the passes from the city. Notes the possibility of a bulk discount
agreement. |
|
331 |
Rep. Kitts |
States he would like to see a compromise reached
between the city and the state. Supports the -1 amendment still. |
|
344 |
Chair Krummel |
Concurs with Rep. Prozanski’s reservations. Voices
belief that any barrier that exists between the public and the Capitol should
be removed. Supports the -1 amendment. |
|
357 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Provides alternatives in existence that would not
cost the state. |
|
365 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments on the information included to citizens
wishing to testify. |
|
370 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asserts he provides that information for his constituency. |
|
377 |
|
VOTE:
5-1-1 AYE: 5 - Avakian, Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Krummel NAY: 1 - Prozanski EXCUSED: 1 – Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
386 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2417 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
392 |
Rep. Mabrey |
States he was unaware there were parking passes available.
Believes public that testifiers will pay at the meters because they are
uninformed. Believe impact will not be great. |
|
TAPE 42, A |
||
|
013 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments on the potential overuse or misuse of the
passes. Believes there are other outlets for access to the Capitol. Explains
he is uncomfortable moving the bill due to the lack of cost analysis. |
|
026 |
Rep Avakian |
Informs he will be voting with Rep. Prozanski. |
|
028 |
Rep. Kitts |
States his concerns for the abuse of the parking
passes. Supports the bill despite this. |
|
033 |
|
VOTE:
4-2-1 AYE: 4 - Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Krummel NAY: 2 - Avakian, Prozanski EXCUSED: 1 – Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. CLOSE will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
037 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2417. Adjourns the meeting
at 10:28 AM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 3073, Jason Williams, 1 p
B
– HB 3194, Chelsey Nichol, 1 p
C
– HB 3062, Nan Heim, 1 p
D
– HB 3062, Jim Scheppke, 1 p
E
– HB 2131-2, Staff, 4 p
F
– HB 2417-1, Staff, 2 p