HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
April 10, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 AM Tapes 55
- 58
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jerry Krummel, Chair
Rep. Floyd Prozanski, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. Derrick Kitts
Rep. John Mabrey
Rep. Kelley Wirth
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Donna Nelson, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick
Brennan, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: HB
3268 – Public Hearing
HJR 19 – Public Hearing
HJR 32 – Public Hearing
HB 3109 – Public Hearing
HB 3110 – Public Hearing
HJR 34 – Public Hearing
HB 3600 – Public Hearing
HB 3380 – Public Hearing
HB 2278 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 3319 – Public Hearing
HB 3496 – Public Hearing
HB 2961 – Public Hearing
HB 2857 – Public Hearing
HB 3612 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 55, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Krummel |
Calls meeting to order at 8:40 AM. Opens public
hearing on HB 3268. |
|
HB 3268
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
012 |
Rep. Jeff Kropf |
House District 17. Testifies in favor of HB 3268.
Explains the bill. |
|
049 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies the state own more than two airplanes. |
|
051 |
Rep. Kropf |
Affirms and informs the committee of the aircraft
Oregon State Police (OSP) utilizes.
Believes road troopers have been displaced because OSP is
undercharging for air time. |
|
085 |
Rep. Kitts |
Clarifies what constitutes a King Air. |
|
090 |
Rep. Kropf |
Explains a king air is a turbo prop aircraft, and is
not a Lear jet. |
|
095 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks whether the rental access is open to the public
or just state agencies. |
|
100 |
Rep. Kropf |
Replies it is only available to certain state
agencies. Notes the legislature cannot hire the aircraft. |
|
110 |
Rep. Kitts |
Clarifies the legislature is not allowed to or that
it cannot afford the cost. |
|
115 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds both are true. Explains his policy would require
full payment of funds within thirty day so the agencies can be reimbursed
properly. |
|
122 |
Chair Krummel |
Recesses public hearing on HB 3268. Opens public
hearing on HJR 19. |
|
HJR 19
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
125 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HJR 19. Opens public
hearing on HJR 32. |
|
HJR 32
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
130 |
Ken Strobeck |
League of Oregon Cities (LOC). Testifies in favor of HJR 32 (EXHIBIT A). Explains the bill. |
|
195 |
Joanne Sutherland |
City Manager, Redmond. Explains charter municipality
of cities. Speaks on local government authority. Urges passage of HJR 32. |
|
235 |
John McArdle |
Mayor, Independence. Testifies in favor of HJR 32. |
|
281 |
Helen Berg |
Mayor, Corvallis; Treasurer, LOC. Testifies in favor
of HJR 32. |
|
314 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Remarks on the resolution. |
|
326 |
Berg |
Concurs and notes that a two-thirds majority vote is
needed. |
|
337 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Voices concern with the threshold of two-thirds and offers
if three-fifths could be considered. |
|
354 |
Strobeck |
Responds that the issue is one of preemption and that
the number would be an acceptable. |
|
389 |
Rep. Joanne Verger |
House District 9. Testifies in favor of HJR 32.Notes
that in this session she has seen more preemption than in ten years of
government service. Informs the committee of her beliefs on the issue. |
|
TAPE 56, A |
||
|
005 |
Sen. Bill Morrisette |
District 6. Testifies in favor of HJR 32. Voices
concern that the legislature is removing monies from local government by
taking away the ability of local governments ability to make funds. |
|
019 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks how the bill promotes government partnership. |
|
023 |
Rep. Morrisette |
Responds that the bill provides a partnership. |
|
040 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HJR 32. Opens public
hearing on HB 3109, HB 3110, and HJR 34. Requests the mayors in the room to stand
up and acknowledges them. |
|
HB
3109, HB 3110, AND HJR 34 – PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
050 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3109, HB 3110, and HJR 34. Notes -1
amendments to HB 3109 and -1 amendments to HB 3110 (EXHIBITS B and C). |
|
063 |
Chair Krummel |
Remarks on testimony. |
|
066 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Notes he introduced the measures at the request of
Deschutes County. Adds that he supports all three. Speaks on qualifications
for the elected positions. Stresses that the bills are permissive and allows
for the local electorate to make final decisions. |
|
095 |
Chair Krummel |
Remarks. |
|
100 |
Dennis Luke |
Deschutes County Commissioner. Testifies in favor of
HB 3109 and HJR 34 (EXHIBIT D). Testifies
in favor of HB 3110 (EXHIBIT E). |
|
140 |
Marty Wynne |
Deschutes County Treasurer. Testifies in favor of HB
3109 and HJR 34 (EXHIBIT F). |
|
180 |
Scot Langton |
Deschutes County Assessor. Testifies in favor of HB 3110.
Speaks on the role of county assessors. Lists reasons he supports the bill. |
|
221 |
Luke |
Mentions technical requirements of the surveyor’s
office. |
|
224 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Clarifies both of the positions are non partisan. |
|
227 |
Luke |
Affirms. |
|
229 |
Shari Anderson |
Treasurer, Clackamas County. Testifies against HB
3109 and HJR 41. Notes neighboring counties also oppose the bill. Informs the
committee of the recent vote of county treasurers on the issue. Lists her
personal reasons she opposes the bill as it is redundant. Reminds the
committee of the definition of a county treasurer with regard to the
constitution. |
|
305 |
Rep. Avakian |
Asks Ms. Anderson to speak to the importance of
maintaining the elected position. |
|
307 |
Anderson |
Explains her experience has been a positive one.
Informs the committee of the duties of her position. Speaks on a home rule
situation. Believes making the office of treasurer an appointed one does not
adhere to the constitution. |
|
362 |
Ernestine Killgore |
Treasurer, Wallowa County. Testifies in opposition
to HB 3109, 3110, and HJR 41. Believes making the position and appointed one
will leave the decision to the commissioners. Explains that as an elected
official there is more liberty to disagree with other members. |
|
TAPE 55, B |
||
|
008 |
Michael Long |
Treasurer, Klamath County. Testifies in opposition
to HB 3109 and HJR 41. Notes treasurers in his area also oppose the measure. |
|
023 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks if the assessor and commissioner position are
paid the same. |
|
026 |
Anderson |
Explains the positions are going through the
compensation board process. Notes that under the current law, the position of
treasurer undergoes the process. |
|
042 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks if salary is negotiated. |
|
045 |
Anderson |
Responds that as they are elected offices, the
salary is set through the compensation board, while appointed offices can
negotiate their salary. |
|
050 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks if the position is full time. |
|
053 |
Anderson |
Affirms. |
|
054 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Supports the bill because of his own county. Asks if
the local electorate should be allowed to make a determination of whether to
make the positions appointive rather than elective. |
|
074 |
Anderson |
Responds. Believes the home rule charter should be
followed. |
|
100 |
Tim Lutz |
Tillamook County Assessor. Testifies in opposition
of HB 3110 (EXHIBIT G). Speaks on
home rule structure of government. States he does not believe the bill is
needed. |
|
148 |
Ray Erwin |
Clackamas County assessor. Testifies in opposition
of HB 3110. Speaks on county assessors. |
|
161 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearings on HB 3109, HB 3110, and HJR
41. Opens public hearing on HB 3600. |
|
HB 3600
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
172 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3600. Notes the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT H). |
|
182 |
Rep. Linda Flores |
House District 51. Introduces HB 3600. |
|
190 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks how the bill differs from other fee bills. |
|
192 |
Rep. Flores |
Explains the bill clarifies the original intent of
existing statute. |
|
194 |
Rep. Greg Smith |
House District 57. Speaks on his legislative
assistant Ron Herbison and his efforts on the bill. |
|
240 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if there will be unintended consequences the
amendment the bill regarding political or advocacy groups. |
|
251 |
Rep. G. Smith |
Defers to sponsor. |
|
253 |
Rep. Flores |
Believes testimony will address the issue. |
|
256 |
Rep. G. Smith |
Thinks that every student is able to testify on the
issues involving them. Questions that public dollars should be used to pay
for these representatives. |
|
264 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if the bill would remove students from the
democratic process. |
|
270 |
Rep. G. Smith |
Asks if Rep. Prozanski’s impression. |
|
275 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Restates question, preempt membership fees . Understands
the fee processes are within the university. Requests if Rep. G. Smith opposes
the processes. |
|
289 |
Rep. G. Smith |
Reiterates his premise. Believes it is a policy
choice for the committee. |
|
294 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Refers the committee to the opinions of university
presidents on the matter (EXHIBIT I). |
|
304 |
Rep. G. Smith |
States he has not taken a position on HB 3600. |
|
314 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Refers to another letter and requests if Rep. G.
Smith has spoken with the party. |
|
317 |
Rep. G. Smith |
Negates. Reiterates his premise. |
|
339 |
Rep. Wirth |
Ensures the bill is that of his legislative
assistant and not from a number of students. |
|
351 |
Rep. G. Smith |
Explains he is supporting Mr. Herbison in his
efforts. Points out that fees required could be used for other purposes such
as books and tuition. |
|
356 |
Rep. Avakian |
Refers to letters submitted (EXHIBIT I). Wonders if they should be considered. |
|
360 |
Rep. G. Smith |
Thinks it is important for university presidents and
deans to make their positions known. |
|
380 |
Rep. Flores |
Encourages the committee listen to the testimony of
Mr. Herbison. |
|
390 |
Chair Krummel |
Points out the letters are directed at the original
bill and not the bill as amended. |
|
403 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Points out that the bill itself should be considered
with or without the amendments. |
|
|
Various students |
Submit written testimony in form of petitions
against HB 3600 (EXHIBIT J). |
|
413 |
Ron Herbison |
Legislative Assistant to Rep. Greg Smith. Notes the
issue was brought forth by a group to Rep. Flores. Speaks on the issue of a
bill becoming a law. Speaks on the
language of the bill. Explains the intent of the bill. Testifies in favor of
HB 3600. |
|
TAPE 56, B |
||
|
075 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests Mr. Herbison summarize his points. |
|
082 |
Herbison |
Asserts it is important to understand the intent of
the fees. |
|
086 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Differs from Mr. Herbison’s opinion. |
|
096 |
Herbison |
Challenges. Differentiates the types of fees. |
|
125 |
Rep. Kitts |
Requests Mr. Herbison to define advocacy groups. |
|
129 |
Herbison |
Notes the bill would not affect athletics. |
|
133 |
Rep. Kitts |
Requests examples of advocacy groups the bill would
directly affect. |
|
136 |
Herbison |
Lists groups the bill would affect. |
|
139 |
Rep. Kitts |
Voices concern for those groups. |
|
141 |
Herbison |
Explains the groups must be viewpoint neutral. |
|
151 |
Chair Krummel |
Voices frustration. |
|
154 |
Herbison |
Concludes regarding the interpretation of the
student fees. Believes HB 3600 is a housekeeping bill. |
|
168 |
Lee Lasche |
Oregon College Republicans (OCR). Testifies in favor
of HB 3600. Comments on the off-campus nature of the fees in question. |
|
194 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if OCR receives funds that the bill would
affect. |
|
197 |
Lasche |
Negates and explains the on-campus Republican
chapters do. |
|
201 |
Chair Krummel |
Inquires that Mr. Lasche believes OCR chapters
should not receive fees. |
|
203 |
Lasche |
Believes fees are acceptable as long as they fund
viewpoint neutral programs. |
|
215 |
Rep. Wirth |
Notices that there is no exact list of the groups to
be de-funded. |
|
218 |
Herbison |
Offers organizations that will not receive fees. |
|
220 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if there is a list of groups the bill would
affect. |
|
221 |
Herbison |
Responds there is a list. |
|
222 |
Rep. Wirth |
Requests the list of the groups HB 3600 would
affect. Provides she has never been lobbied by a student organization. |
|
228 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Speaks on the de-funding process already in
existence. Questions whether a vehicle for accountability exists through
student governments. |
|
240 |
Herbison |
Responds there is no accountability listed by
statute. Believes it is a misstatement that students have complete control
over the funds. Recalls past cases regarding fees and authorization. |
|
262 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Questions the opinions that Mr. Herbison has
presented. Inquires about the allocation process being viewpoint neutral. |
|
270 |
Herbison |
Responds regarding the process of allocation and the
organization. Reiterates the process must be viewpoint neutral. |
|
286 |
Dr. Richard Jarvis |
Chancellor, Oregon University System (OUS).
Testifies in opposition to HB 3600 on behalf of all Oregon university
presidents. Believes the consideration of the removal of fees would send a
‘chilling message’ to all schools. |
|
326 |
Grattan Kerans |
OUS. Testifies in opposition to HB 3600. Believes
students have the right and responsibility to account and distribute funds as
they see fit. Speaks on the Board. Believes there is a constitutional problem
with the bill. |
|
358 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if there are groups that have caused more of an
‘uproar’ than others. |
|
361 |
Kerans |
Believes institutions of higher learning should
allow groups of all kinds to voice opinions. Thinks the bill would be a
silencing to groups. Believes the amendment to the measure is ‘an invitation’
to litigation. Suggests that the committee refrain from that. |
|
TAPE 57, A |
||
|
015 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Provides an example of city taxes citizens pay to
illustrate the issue. |
|
020 |
Kerans |
Responds it is an analogous situation. |
|
035 |
Gregg Magnus |
Student Body President, Western Oregon University
(WOU). Testifies in opposition to HB 3600 (EXHIBIT K). Notes it is the expectation of students to have
their voices heard. Adds the fees they pay are for this. Believes the language is sweeping and the
bill may have unintended results. |
|
084 |
Jason Thelen |
Associated Student Body Vice President, Southern
Oregon University (SOU). Testifies in opposition of HB 3600 (EXHIBIT M). Offers that he is a
College Republican (CR) and disagrees with the opinion that CR’s propone the
measure. Believes the student fee process is a necessary and valid one. |
|
132 |
Naomi Hynes |
College Republicans, Southern Oregon University
(SOU). Testifies in opposition to HB 3600. Points out that much of the
lobbying is done on at a campus level. |
|
160 |
Rep. Wirth |
Regrets the bill has taken away attention from the
fight for higher education funding. Asks if there is anyone in support of the
bill besides the two who testified in favor of it. |
|
170 |
Magnus |
Responds he has heard of no other support. |
|
175 |
Christian Matheis |
Student. Testifies in opposition of HB 3600 (EXHIBIT N). |
|
210 |
Andy Saltz |
Oregon Student Association (OSA). Testifies in
opposition of HB 3600. Introduces board members of the OSA. |
|
226 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks that even with the -1 amendments OSA would
still be opposed to the bill. |
|
230 |
Saltz |
Affirms. |
|
240 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Remarks. |
|
245 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3600. Opens public
hearing on HB 3380. |
|
HB 3380
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
246 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3380. Opens public
hearing on HB 2278. |
|
HB 2278
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
260 |
Dave Heynderickx |
Deputy, Legislative Counsel (LC). Explains the bill.
|
|
280 |
Rep. Lane Shetterly |
House District 23. Testifies in favor of HB 2278.
Notes there are amendments (EXHIBIT O). |
|
358 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments. |
|
367 |
Dave Kenagy |
Executive Director, Oregon Law Commission (OLC). Provides
information on HB 2278 (EXHIBIT P). Introduces
his colleagues. |
|
392 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks about the side orders. |
|
395 |
Heynderickx |
Responds regarding a section by section analysis. |
|
398 |
Wendy Johnson |
OLC. States they support the -3 amendments. |
|
405 |
Robin Freeman |
Oregon People’s Utility Commission. Testifies in
favor of HB 2278 (EXHIBIT Q). Supports
the -3 amendments. |
|
409 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing and opens work session on HB
2278. |
|
HB 2278
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
411 |
Rep.
Mabrey |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2278-3 amendments dated 3/26/03. |
|
414 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Kitts, Nelson |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
417 |
Rep. Mabrey |
MOTION:
Moves HB 2278 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
420 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Kitts, Nelson |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. SHETTERLY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
428 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2278. Opens public hearing
on HB 3319. |
|
HB 3319
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
450 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3319. Notes the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT R). |
|
460 |
Mardale Dunsworth |
Oregon Department of Education (ODE). Testifies on
HB 3319. (EXHIBIT S). Notes there
will be a fiscal impact to ODE if the bill passes. Requests an amendment to
define ‘art’ and to include all fine arts.
|
|
488 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies she is with ODE and requests the position
of ODE on the bill. |
|
491 |
Dunsworth |
Affirms and responds ODE is neutral on the bill. |
|
TAPE 58, A |
||
|
003 |
Randy Hildebrand |
Chief of Staff, Senate Republican Office. Testifies
in favor of 3319. |
|
040 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Responds to one of Mr. Hildebrand’s statements
regarding education funding and art. |
|
050 |
Hildebrand |
Negates and disagrees. |
|
055 |
Rep. Prozanski |
States that is not his impression of the issue. |
|
058 |
Hildebrand |
Argues it is a choice between artists and school
teachers. |
|
067 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Responds he respectfully disagrees. |
|
070 |
Nicole Brugato |
Legislative Assistant to Rep. Cliff Zauner, House
District 22. Testifies in favor of HB 3319 (EXHIBIT T). |
|
090 |
Christine d’arcy |
Executive Director, Oregon Arts Commission.
Testifies in opposition to HB 3319. |
|
105 |
Linda Worral-Poole |
Marion County Artist. Testifies against HB 3319. |
|
167 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3319. Excuses members
and explains the bills to follow will have tap hearings. |
|
184 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Remarks on meeting. |
|
187 |
Chair Krummel |
Opens public hearing on HB 3496. |
|
HB 3496
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
189 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3496. Opens public
hearing on HB 2961. |
|
HB 2961
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
191 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 2961. Opens public
hearing on HB 2857. |
|
HB 2857
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
193 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 2857. Opens public
hearing on HB 3612. |
|
HB 3612
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
195 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes public hearing on HB 3612. Adjourns meeting
at 11:14 AM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HJR 32, Ken Strobeck, 2 pp
B
– HB 3109-1, Staff, 2 pp
C
– HB 3110-1, Staff, 2 pp
D
– HB 3109 and HJR 34, Dennis Luke, 2 pp
E
– HB 3110, Dennis Luke, 2 pp
F
– HB 3109, Marty Wynne, 1 p
G
– HB 3110, Tim Lutz, 2 pp
H
– HB 3600-1, Staff, 1 p
I
– HB 3600, Various, 14 pp
J
– HB 3600, Various, * pp
K
– HB 3600, Gregg Magnus, 3 pp
L
– HB 3600, Jason Thelen, 2 pp
M
– HB 3600, Any Saultz, 2 pp
N
– HB 3600, Christian Matheis, 3 pp
O
– HB 2278-3, Staff, 2 pp
P
– HB 2278, Dave Kenagy, 8 pp
Q
– HB 2278, Robin Freeman, 1 p
R
– HB 3319-1, Staff, 1 p
S
– HB 3319, Mardale Dunsworth, 4 pp
T
– HB 3319, Rep. Cliff Zauner, 2 pp