HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
April 15, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 AM Tapes 59 - 63
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jerry Krummel, Chair
Rep. Donna Nelson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Floyd Prozanski, Vice-Chair
Rep. Brad Avakian
Rep. Derrick Kitts
Rep. John Mabrey
Rep. Kelley Wirth
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick
Brennan, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: HB
2148 – Work Session
HB 2246 – Work Session
HB 2410 – Work Session
HB 2961 – Work Session
HB 3023 – Work Session
HB 3060 – Work Session
HB 3072 – Work Session
HB 3073 – Work Session
HB 3206 – Work Session
HB 3212 – Work Session
HB 3272 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 59, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Krummel |
Calls meeting to order at 8:46 AM. Opens a work
session on HB 2148. |
|
HB 2148
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
010 |
Chair Krummel |
Notes -2 amendments (EXHIBIT A). Explains that the -2 amendments are a rewrite of the
bill. Overviews the requirements of the sections. |
|
059 |
Cindy Becker |
Department of Administrative Services (DAS). |
|
061 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Ensures that DAS upholds the -2 amendments and
Governor has directed DAS to work with Chair Krummel on HB 2148. |
|
070 |
Becker |
Responds DAS has been working with Chair Krummel
within its understanding of what the Governor would like. |
|
074 |
Chair
Krummel |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2148-2 amendments dated 4/14/03. |
|
076 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Nelson, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
080 |
Rep. Prozanski |
MOTION:
Moves HB 2148 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
083 |
Chair Krummel |
Discusses the bill. |
|
097 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Nelson, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. CHAIR KRUMMEL will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
100 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2148. Opens a work session
on HB 2246. |
|
HB 2246
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
103 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Reads Staff Measure Summary
(SMS) on HB 2246. Notes -1 amendments (EXHIBIT
B). |
|
109 |
Susan Wilson |
Association of Oregon Housing Authorities (AOHA).
Testifies in favor of HB 2246 with the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT C). Informs the committee of the agency and list the
benefits of the bill. |
|
160 |
Chair Krummel |
Reminds the committee the bill came from the Oregon
Department of Housing. |
|
165 |
Rep.
Avakian |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2246-1 amendments dated 4/2/03. |
|
169 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments on the intellectual property definitions in
statute being over one hundred. |
|
176 |
Rep. Kitts |
Comments. |
|
181 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Nelson, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
Rep.
Avakian |
MOTION: Moves HB 2246 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on
Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. |
|
197 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Nelson, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. AVAKIAN will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
201 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2246. Opens work session
on HB 2410. |
|
HB 2410
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
203 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads Staff Measure Summary (SMS) on HB 2410. Notes
-5 amendments (EXHIBIT D). |
|
213 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies the proposed revisions are in the
amendments |
|
215 |
Dr. Grant Higginson |
States Public Health Officer, Department of Human
Services (DHS). Reviews changes made by the -5 amendments. Overviews the bill
by sections. |
|
295 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Understands that when a center is identified, there
will be provincialing plans. |
|
305 |
Dr. Higginson |
Explains that in the case of a hospital, they would
overview the current plan. Adds that in the case of areas that would be
created, and that emergency management plans and provincialing plans should
be created. Begins explanation of section six. Notes that centers must adhere
to the plan to receive funds. Informs the committee of the workgroup that
crafted the amendments. States there are still concerns on the measure, and
that further amendments are necessary before the bill can move forward.
Requests additional time to work on the amendments. |
|
393 |
Bruce Bishop |
Oregon Association of Hospitals and Health Systems.
Supports Dr. Higginson’s intentions for the bill. Pinpoints the two specific
issues the agency wishes to fix regarding language used. Notes HB 2251 (2003)
is a related bill. |
|
TAPE 60, A |
||
|
011 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies the reasons for the concerns. |
|
013 |
Bishop |
Concurs and adds it is meant to fix a conflict.
Informs the committee of the second issues with the measure regarding
authority. Supports the concept of the bill. |
|
039 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies his concerns with the language. |
|
042 |
Bishop |
Responds it may be redundant and that it is not
clear. |
|
045 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Requests the related bill. |
|
047 |
Bishop |
Answers HB 2251. |
|
049 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Understands the intent of the bill. Asks if the
Governor could use his authority in emergencies such as those described in
the bill. |
|
055 |
Dr. Higginson |
Adds on the health care facilities and authority. |
|
065 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if a rewrite of the bill is necessary. |
|
070 |
Dr. Higginson |
Responds that it depends on the number of changes. |
|
073 |
Scott Gallant |
Oregon Medical Association (OMA). Testifies that OMA
supports intent and concept of the bill. Informs the committee that the
Governor has constitutional authority over facilities in the state of
emergency. Explains the limitations of the bill. Speaks about the Tort Claims
Act. |
|
120 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if Mr. Bishop would be comfortable with the -5
amendments if the amendments are drafted by the required date. |
|
125 |
Bishop |
Replies he would be more comfortable with the
suggested amendments. |
|
130 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2410. Opens work session
on HB 2961. |
|
HB 2961
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
135 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Reads Staff Measure Summary
(SMS) on HB 2961. |
|
145 |
Burton Weast |
Special Districts Association of Oregon (SDAO). Presents
testimony in support of HB 2961(EXHIBIT
E). Adds that it is an anomaly that affects few people. Speaks on work
done on the issue of sanitary service to parcels outside of the |
|
196 |
Rep. Wirth |
Sees the potential for the bill to allow for
undersized infrastructure. |
|
200 |
Weast |
Responds her concerns are already an issue under
current law. |
|
204 |
Rep. Wirth |
Speaks on the issue of the urban growth boundary
(UGB) being underestimated and potentially causing problems. |
|
224 |
Weast |
Responds. |
|
231 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Requests how many properties could be impacted
statewide by the bill. |
|
235 |
Weast |
Estimates around sixteen of forty sanitary districts
have members who could be affected. Explains that with the exception of Bear
Creek Valley, the number is not large. |
|
250 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks how many lots have the capability to be
subdivided. |
|
255 |
Weast |
Responds concerning a survey. |
|
267 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if there is a local level process. |
|
271 |
Weast |
Explains the exceptions process regarding boundaries
and speaks on the difficulty of it. |
|
300 |
Shirley Kalkhoven |
Nehalem Bay. Testifies in favor of HB 2961 (EXHIBIT F). |
|
343 |
Chuck Root |
Manager, Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Authority. |
|
350 |
Walter Wassum |
Bear Creek. Testifies in favor of HB 2961. Shares
his experiences in sanitary service. |
|
370 |
Root |
Refers to the letter provided by those who propone
the measure (EXHIBIT G). |
|
TAPE 59, B |
||
|
010 |
Root |
Continues. Lists the benefits of providing sanitary
service to land outside of the UGB. |
|
050 |
Chair Krummel |
Differentiates the bill’s intent from the UGB. |
|
056 |
Wassum |
Speaks on the negative affects of those who do not
have a sanitary system. |
|
063 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks about business expansion in the UGB. |
|
068 |
Root |
Responds regarding business. |
|
078 |
Rep. Wirth |
Believes there is an allowance for health hazard
annexation already existing. |
|
084 |
Root |
Explains there are instances where it is difficult
and expensive to obtain sewer. |
|
090 |
Rep. Wirth |
Speaks on the extension of services outside the UGB.
|
|
100 |
Chair Krummel |
Believes the bill is narrow in focus, and that the
expansion discussed is not allowed by the bill. |
|
116 |
Rep. Wirth |
Voices concern with Mr. West’s earlier statements |
|
122 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments. |
|
124 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Requests a breakdown on the number of properties
affected. |
|
133 |
Root |
Estimates a dozen a year in the Bear Creek Valley. |
|
149 |
Weast |
Relates the usage of water to emphasize the bill
affects sewer service. Believes the bill is extremely narrow. |
|
178 |
Rep. Wirth |
Clarifies an issue of the road system. |
|
182 |
Weast |
Responds with instances of that. |
|
185 |
Rep. Wirth |
Explains she is talking about city standards. |
|
192 |
Weast |
Reiterates the bill does nothing to affect services
already existing, and that it only allows extension of sewer services. |
|
199 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2961. Opens work session
on HB 3060. |
|
HB 3060
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
205 |
Chair Krummel |
Recesses work session on HB 3060. Opens work session
on HB 3072. |
|
HB 3072
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
210 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads Staff Measure Summary (SMS) on HB 3072. Notes
the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT I). |
|
215 |
Chair Krummel |
Recesses work session on HB 3072. Reopens work
session on HB 3060. |
|
HB 3060
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
220 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3060. |
|
230 |
Dave Hunnicutt |
Oregonians in Action. Testifies in favor of HB 3060
and the -1 amendments (EXHIBIT H).
Recalls the history of the bill. |
|
250 |
Michelle Deister |
League of Oregon Cities (LOC). Testifies in favor of
HB 3060. |
|
274 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if the -1 amendments replace the bill. |
|
277 |
Hunnicutt |
Replies the -1 amendments are a ‘gut and stuff’ of
the original bill. |
|
284 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3060-1 amendments dated 3/13/03. |
|
287 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
Rep. Prozanski |
MOTION:
Moves HB 3060 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
295 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. NELSON will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
301 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3060. Opens work session
on HB 3072. |
|
HB 3072
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
305 |
Rep. Tom Butler |
House Districts 60. Refers to the -1 amendments and
explains the purpose behind them (EXHIBIT
I). Testifies in favor of HB 3072. Speaks on issues of income tax and
licensure. |
|
366 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Refers to lines 13-17 of the bill. Notes that Oregon
Department of Revenue (ODR) poses a confidentiality concern with the wording.
|
|
376 |
Rep. Butler |
Replies they are sensitive to that and that
information beyond that which is needed is subject to a Class C felony.
Believes the language is permissive while still protecting the
confidentiality issues. |
|
386 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if the language can be limited as it seems
broad. |
|
TAPE 60, B |
||
|
002 |
Rep. Butler |
Believes the information is protected and that no
confidential information is divulged. |
|
014 |
Rep. Avakian |
Assumes the intent of the bill is to encourage
people to pay their taxes. |
|
018 |
Rep. Butler |
Concurs. |
|
020 |
Rep. Avakian |
States he does not understand any problems with the
existing laws. |
|
025 |
Rep Butler |
Explains that the system will allow for the
departments to share the information. Reiterates the intent of the bill. |
|
038 |
Chair Krummel |
Poses question regarding HB 3073. |
|
042 |
Rep. Butler |
Affirms. |
|
044 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3072-1 amendments dated 3/31/03. |
|
047 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
050 |
Rep. Prozanski |
MOTION:
Moves HB 3072 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
054 |
Rep. Avakian |
Questions the necessity of the bill. Says there does
not seem to be a reasonable connection between a licensing body and a
separate agency which collects taxes. Does not think that a licensing body
should police the issue. States his opposition to the bill. |
|
060 |
Rep. Kitts |
States he will be supporting for the committee. |
|
074 |
Rep. Nelson |
Commends Rep. Butler for bringing up the issue. |
|
078 |
Chair Krummel |
Points out that as this bill will affect him, he
does not have a problem attesting to the licensing board he pays taxes, but
more one of divulging his social security number. Supports the bill despite
that. |
|
094 |
|
VOTE:
6-1 AYE: 6 - Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Prozanski, Wirth, Krummel NAY: 1 – Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. BUTLER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
097 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3072. Opens work session
on HB 3073. |
|
HB 3073
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
100 |
Rep. Tom Butler |
House District 60. Testifies in favor of HB 3073.
Notes there are no amendments to the bill. Understands that a fiscal impact
statement has been issued. Encourages passage to the committee on Ways and Means.
|
|
119 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if there is currently a subsequent referral to
Ways and Means. |
|
121 |
Patrick Brennan |
Negates. |
|
122 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests confirmation that Rep. Butler would like
the committee to move the bill to Ways and Means. |
|
123 |
Rep. Butler |
Affirms. Informs the fiscal is between $100-150,000
per biennium. Informs the committee that a subcommittee of Ways and Means
would consider that. |
|
136 |
Cindy Becker |
DAS. Comments on the ability of DAS to provide
information on employees. States that is should be possible to do so. |
|
157 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Comments that he supports Rep. Butler’s efforts in
this regard. Voices concern in providing something that is in no true form as
the information to be provided would be raw data. Believes the bill may add
to the bureaucracy. |
|
192 |
Rep. Nelson |
Compliments DAS for its work. Speaks on the need for
information about employees for administration purposes. Supports the bill. |
|
214 |
Rep. Wirth |
Recalls the special sessions where employees were
let go. Asks if the information is readily available. |
|
223 |
Becker |
Responds on where the information can be found and
the related process that would need to be created. |
|
232 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if the government does know what it is spending
on contracts. |
|
235 |
Becker |
Responds with regard to services. |
|
242 |
Rep. Nelson |
Remarks on the cuts made at the local level to
illustrate the need for the information |
|
258 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if there have been any estimates on cost for
agencies to comply with the request. |
|
262 |
Becker |
Responds DAS has not yet done so, and that it will
depend on the automation of the agencies. |
|
274 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Explains that he cannot support the bill until
additional information is provided. Comments on the amount of unknown
information and questions the usage of the information. Believes it will add
a bureaucracy that has no certain purpose. Echoes Rep. Mabrey’s concerns. |
|
308 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks Rep. Prozanski if he would support the
subsequent referral to Ways and Means without recommendation. |
|
311 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Negates. Explains the reasoning behind his answer.
Believes it may allow for government to target agencies. |
|
342 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3073. Opens work session
on HB 3206. |
|
HB 3206
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
360 |
Chair Krummel |
Notes -1 and -2 amendments (EXHIBITS J and K). |
|
365 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Reads Staff Measure Summary
(SMS) on HB 2148. |
|
375 |
Bob Garrison |
State Fire Marshal. Explains the request for the
amendments by the sheriffs in the -1 amendments. Explains the second half of
the -1 amendments. Requests the -2 not be considered. |
|
TAPE 61, A |
||
|
009 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3206-1 amendments dated 4/3/03. |
|
011 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
014 |
Rep. Prozanski |
MOTION:
Moves to ADOPT HB 3206-2 amendments dated 4/3/03. |
|
016 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Withdraws motion. |
|
|
|
|
|
017 |
Rep. Prozanski |
MOTION:
Moves HB 3206 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
018 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. KITTS will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
020 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3206. Reopens work session
on HB 2961. |
|
HB 2961
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
022 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies the bill does not have a subsequent
referral to Ways and Means. |
|
024 |
Patrick Brennan |
Concurs, adding that as the bill has not yet
received a fiscal impact statement. |
|
028 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if a procedural process is required in the
situation. |
|
031 |
Chair Krummel |
Affirms and adds it does not preclude moving the
bill. Offers his understanding. |
|
040 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Expresses opposition, as there are questions that have
not yet been answered. Questions the information received on the matter.
Believes the bill could encompass more than it sets out to and that potential
unintended consequences could occur. |
|
053 |
Rep.
Nelson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2961 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
057 |
Chair |
Comments. |
|
060 |
Rep. Wirth |
States she will vote in opposition. Echoes Rep.
Prozanski’s concerns. Thinks there is already a process to fix this. Believes
this is a drastic change from the current system. |
|
065 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Says he does not believe the bill changes land use
policy. Thinks the concern of expansion is not one of concern. |
|
073 |
|
VOTE:
5-2 AYE: 5 - Avakian, Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Krummel NAY: 2 - Prozanski, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. MABREY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
084 |
Chair Krummel |
Discusses the bill. Closes work session on HB 2961
and reopens work session on HB 2148. |
|
HB 2148
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
087 |
Rep.
Nelson |
MOTION: Requests unanimous consent that the rules
be SUSPENDED to allow REP. NELSON to BE RECORDED as voting AYE on the
"Moves HB 2148 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation". |
|
088 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
089 |
Chair
Krummel |
Closes
work session on HB 2148. Reopens work session on HB 2246. |
|
HB 2246 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
089 |
Rep.
Nelson |
MOTION: Requests unanimous consent that the rules
be SUSPENDED to allow REP. NELSON to BE RECORDED as voting AYE on the
"Moves HB 2246 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation and
the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and Means BE
RESCINDED". |
|
090 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
090 |
Chair
Krummel |
Closes
work session on HB 2246. Reopens work session on HB 2148. |
|
HB 2148 – WORK SESSION |
||
|
091 |
Rep. Wirth
|
MOTION: Requests unanimous consent that the rules
be SUSPENDED to allow REP. WIRTH to BE RECORDED as voting AYE on the
"Moves HB 2148 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED
recommendation". |
|
092 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
092 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2148 and reopens work
session on HB 2246. |
|
HB 2246
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
093 |
Rep. Wirth |
MOTION: Requests unanimous consent that the rules
be SUSPENDED to allow REP. WIRTH to BE RECORDED as voting AYE on the
"Moves HB 2246 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation and
the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and Means BE
RESCINDED". |
|
094 |
|
VOTE:
7-0 |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
096 |
Chair
Krummel |
Closes
work session on HB 2246. Declares the meeting to be recessed until 5:00 PM. |
|
TAPE 62, A |
||
|
002 |
Chair Krummel |
Reopens meeting at 5:11 PM. Opens work session on HB
3212. |
|
HB 3212
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Reads SMS on HB 3212. Notes
-1 amendments (EXHIBIT L). Mentions there is no fiscal or revenue
impact to the bill with the amendments. |
|
010 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Supports the bill and adds that he sponsored it. |
|
022 |
Colonel Mike Caldwell |
Deputy Director, Oregon Military Department (OMD).
Speaks on the creation of the bill. Explains the -1 amendments to HB 3212.
Explains the term ‘active duty’ was clarified. Notes homeland security was
also identified. |
|
045 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks about the federal duty time. |
|
048 |
Col. Caldwell |
Responds about a year and adds that there are
additional provisions. Continues explanation. Notes the largest change was to
returning retirees. |
|
065 |
Shelley Honeywell |
DAS. States she worked with Col. Caldwell on the changes
and explains them. |
|
070 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies the language changes. |
|
075 |
Honeywell |
Responds concerning employees and related statutes
to explain language changes. |
|
085 |
Col. Caldwell |
Adds additional changes made. |
|
095 |
Chair Krummel |
Refers the page three and clarifies the term of
leave of absence and employment. |
|
100 |
Col. Caldwell |
Concurs. |
|
104 |
Chair Krummel |
Continues and clarifies the time is seven days. |
|
114 |
Col. Caldwell |
Concurs. |
|
117 |
Rep. Nelson |
Remarks that seven days is not very long time to
return to a job after being released from active duty. |
|
120 |
Col. Caldwell |
Responds that the typical emergency is around three
weeks. Notes benefits are still maintained once jobs are left. |
|
130 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments that other groups would have a problem with
a longer than seven day period. |
|
141 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if transportation is included in the seven
days. |
|
145 |
Col. Caldwell |
Explains the seven days will only apply to Oregon. |
|
156 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if Oregonians are ever sent to neighboring
states while on active duty. |
|
161 |
Col. Caldwell |
Explains that as a member of the National Guard of
the United States, state active duty statues does not apply, and member can
be sent elsewhere. |
|
170 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Poses situation to clarify active duty. |
|
176 |
Rep. Nelson |
Adds to that. |
|
179 |
Col. Caldwell |
Concurs. |
|
186 |
Rep.
Mabrey |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3212-1 amendments dated
3/31/03. |
|
190 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-2 EXCUSED: 2 - Kitts, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
Rep. Mabrey |
MOTION:
Moves HB 3212 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
200 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-2 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Kitts, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. MABREY will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
206 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3212. Opens work session
on HB 3272. |
|
HB 3272
- WORK SESSION |
||
|
215 |
Mark Nelson |
Lane County. Refers the committee to the -5
amendments (EXHIBIT M). Explains the changes made by the amendments.
Notes the counties involved in the sections. |
|
249 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks that with technology available, why the Willamette
River is still used as a boundary and a coordinate is not chosen. |
|
254 |
Nelson |
Responds that coordinates have been established. |
|
269 |
Roger Knight |
Lane County. Concurs. Clarifies his question. |
|
276 |
Chair Krummel |
Restates. |
|
278 |
Knight |
Responds that the center of the river is a useful
point. |
|
285 |
Chair Krummel |
Restates his question with regard to the boundary. |
|
296 |
Nelson |
Explains that global positioning has been used.
Explains the amendments allow for the boundary to be further identified in
the future and the counties will be able to determine that. |
|
317 |
Rep. Kitts |
Poses a hypothetical situation. |
|
325 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Speaks on the potential for change regarding the
coordinates. Comments on the use of rivers as boundaries over time. |
|
335 |
Chair Krummel |
States his thoughts. |
|
338 |
Nelson |
Offers that all surveyors of all affected counties
have come to an agreement on this method. |
|
345 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3272-5 amendments dated 4/10/03. |
|
366 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Notes there are other amendments to be considered. |
|
371 |
Rep. Kitts |
Withdraws
motion. |
|
382 |
Chair Krummel |
Indicates that there may be amendments submitted by
Sen. Frank Morse. |
|
TAPE 63, A |
||
|
001 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks what the original legislative intent was when
the boundaries were established. |
|
005 |
Nelson |
Responds regarding the legislative intent. |
|
008 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if he knows of any other times when legislation
was passed naming counties who did not agree to the bill. |
|
013 |
Nelson |
Understands that all surveyors have agreed to the
bill. |
|
018 |
Rep. Wirth |
States she does not see the urgency on the matter. |
|
025 |
Nelson |
Explains an agreement has not been reached in over a
year although there has been much discussion. Adds that Lane County would
like to rectify this. |
|
036 |
Rep. Wirth |
Clarifies the bill represents frustration with the
process. |
|
039 |
Nelson |
Responds there has been disagreement between
parties, but the surveyors of all the counties agree and see this as the
correct approach. |
|
045 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks Mr. Nelson if he has seen the -6 amendments (EXHIBIT N). |
|
050 |
Nelson |
Points out the -6 amendments remove Benton county
from the bill. Opposes the -6 amendments. |
|
060 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Believes that Sen. Morse has attempted a -7
amendment to broach concerns about compensation on the measure. Asks if the
issue has been discussed. Voices hope to fix the issue so it does not
resurface in the future. |
|
070 |
Nelson |
Provides that Sen. Morse was comfortable in fixing
the bill on the senate side. |
|
075 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3272-5 amendments dated 4/10/03. |
|
076 |
Rep. Wirth |
Requests another question. |
|
078 |
Rep. Kitts |
Withdraws
motion. |
|
082 |
Rep. Wirth |
Understands the surveyor cannot make a decision
without a commissioner vote. |
|
085 |
Nelson |
Understands an agreement was reached. Explains that
he knows Benton County does not want to see the boundary changed for
political reasons. |
|
099 |
Rep. Avakian |
Clarifies there is a current boundary. Asks why the
bill is even necessary. |
|
104 |
Nelson |
Answers the bill delineates where property owners
are going to receive services. |
|
110 |
Rep. Avakian |
Questions the concerns over the correct county line.
|
|
113 |
Nelson |
Responds that people have concerns about county
services. |
|
118 |
Rep. Avakian |
Clarifies the line is in the river. |
|
119 |
Nelson |
Affirms. |
|
121 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Poses situation to clarify the reasoning behind the
bill. |
|
128 |
Nelson |
Concurs. |
|
135 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3272-5 amendments dated 4/10/03. |
|
138 |
Rep. Avakian |
Requests an explanation of the difference between
the -5 and -6 amendments. |
|
141 |
Brennan |
Responds with the stipulations of the -5 amendments. |
|
146 |
Chair Krummel |
Adds to staff’s response. |
|
150 |
Brennan |
Mentions that the -6 amendments remove reference to
Benton County. |
|
153 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments on the need for local government to come to
the states when they disagree. Speaks on the movement of the river over time.
Questions the types of improvements the county made to the river and
questions the compensation related to the boundary. Does not believe the bill
is complete. Questions whether it is best to move forward or to respect it
will be addressed on the floor and then maybe the Senate. |
|
199 |
Rep. Nelson |
Believes the issue is the ‘prudent and right thing
to do’. Thinks the issue is all encompassing and that there are great
discrepancies. Supports moving the bill. |
|
221 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Notes the $17,000 spent on administrative fees,
among other fees to counties involved. Questions the wisdom of moving the
bill. |
|
232 |
Rep. Kitts |
Believes the bill simplifies the problem needing to
be addressed. |
|
236 |
Rep. Wirth |
States she opposes the bill with the -5 amendments.
Does not believe all the counties agree to the bill. Suggests the counties
work the problem out amongst themselves. Believes passage would equate
usurping the legislature. |
|
252 |
Rep. Nelson |
Speaks on the issue of counties. |
|
260 |
Rep. Avakian |
Echoes Rep. Wirth’s concerns in using states power
on a local issue. States he has the impression that the issues is
irreconcilable and that then states power should therefore be utilized. |
|
275 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Supports the -5 amendments, but does not support the
bill. Offers alternative ways to address the issues, although they may not
save funds. Believes another amendment should come to address compensation. |
|
298 |
Rep. Avakian |
Thinks it is appropriate to set a boundary in such a
situation but does not believe that compensation is an area to venture into. |
|
306 |
Rep. Wirth |
Offers that Benton County representatives believe
they have not had proper say in the issue. |
|
314 |
Chair Krummel |
Supports the -5 amendments. Thinks the information
discussed by Rep. Avakian is valid, but adds that Sen. Morse may be able to
reconcile these issue. Would like to move the bill to the floor, and when it
arrives in the Senate they can also try to find a resolution. Notes a
conference committee could also be utilized. |
|
365 |
|
VOTE:
6-1 AYE: 6 - Avakian, Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Prozanski,
Krummel NAY: 1 – Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3272 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
371 |
Rep. Prozanski |
States he will vote against the measure as the bill
is premature. Believes an important point has not been addressed. |
|
385 |
Chair Krummel |
Remarks on the bill. |
|
397 |
|
VOTE:
5-2 AYE: 5 - Avakian, Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Krummel NAY: 2 - Prozanski, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. KITTS will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
403 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3272. Adjourns meeting at
6:20 PM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2148, -2 amendments, Staff, 11 pp.
B
– HB 2246, -1 amendments, Staff, 1 p
C
– HB 2246, Susan Wilson, 1 p
D
– HB 2410, -5 amendments, Staff, 4 pp.
E
– HB 2961, Burton Weast, 2 pp.
F
– HB 2961, Shirley Kalkhoven, 1 p
G
– HB 2961, Chuck Root, 9 pp.
H
– HB 3060,-1 amendments, Staff, 2 pp.
I
– HB 3072, -1 amendments, Staff, 1 p
J
– HB 3206, -1 amendments, Staff, 1 p
K
– HB 3206, -2 amendments, Staff, 1 p
L
– HB 3212, -1 amendments, Staff, 4 pp.
M
– HB 3272, -5 amendments, Staff, 8 pp.
N
– HB 3272, -6 amendments, Staff, 7 pp.