HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT
April 17, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 AM Tapes 64 - 68
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jerry Krummel, Chair
Rep. Donna Nelson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Floyd Prozanski, Vice-Chair
Rep. Derrick Kitts
Rep. John Mabrey
Rep. Kelley Wirth
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Brad Avakian
STAFF PRESENT: Patrick
Brennan, Committee Administrator
Jeana Harrington, Committee Assistant
MEASURES HEARD: HB
2410 – Work Session
HB 3219 – Work Session
HB 3609 – Work Session
HB 3380 – Work Session
HB 3114 – Work Session
HB 2739 – Work Session
HB 3573 – Work Session
HJR 19 – Work Session
HM 4 – Work Session
HM 5 – Work Session
HM 6 – Work Session
HM 8 – Work Session
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 64, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Krummel |
Calls meeting to order at 8:53 AM. Opens work
session on HB 2410. |
|
HB 2410
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
012 |
Dr. Grant Higginson |
State Public Health Officer, Department of Human
Services (DHS). Explains -6 amendments (EXHIBIT
A) by sections. Comments on designation of emergencies. States the idea
is not to ask health care facilities to do additional work. Believes the key
stake holders are now fine with the bill as amended. |
|
059 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if he has spoken with the fire districts and
the Association of Federal, State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). |
|
065 |
Dr. Higginson |
Notes he has not, as that was not the focus. |
|
068 |
Chair Krummel |
Thinks there are minor issues the organizations do
have. Asks the parties work together on the Senate side to resolve the
issues. |
|
077 |
Dr. Higginson |
States he would be happy to work with them and that
the focus was on health care providers. |
|
082 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2410-6 amendments dated
4/16/03. |
|
085 |
|
VOTE:
4-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Avakian, Nelson, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
090 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2410 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
093 |
|
VOTE:
4-0-3 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 3 - Avakian, Nelson, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. PROZANSKI will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
098 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2410. Opens work session
on HB 3609. |
|
HB 3609
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
104 |
Rep. Farr |
House District 14. Testifies in favor of HB 3609. |
|
118 |
Rep. Gallegos |
House District 29. Testifies in favor of HB 3609 (EXHIBIT B). Refers committee to
information on the issue (EXHIBIT C). |
|
187 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks Mr. Brennan if there is a fiscal statement on
the bill. |
|
190 |
Patrick Brennan |
Committee Administrator. Responds that there is not
one currently but the costs of the pilot program are estimated at around
$50,000. |
|
197 |
Rep. Kitts |
Asks the Chair if he intends to move the bill to
Ways and Means. |
|
200 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests the committee let Rep. Gallegos testify to
that issue. |
|
204 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Notes they wish to amend the bill on the Senate side
to clearly articulate Department of Human Services (DHS) work on the issue.
Believes the work may significantly reduce the cost. |
|
235 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks whether cost savings are specific to Washington
County. |
|
240 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Concurs and notes that the funding was reduced and
savings were still realized. |
|
250 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies the savings are to Medicaid and Medicare
services. |
|
260 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Answers it was a savings to taxpayers. |
|
279 |
Rep. Nelson |
Voices concern that there is discrimination among
counties with the bill. Requests the bill be amendment to include all
counties. |
|
295 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Understands Rep. Nelson’s concern. States the
largest savings would be to the three counties included as they have the most
veterans. Notes the fiscal impact would increase if all counties were
included, but adds she would be happy to include all of them. |
|
314 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if counties could be prevented from contracting
with the service provider to utilize the services. |
|
318 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Responds she is not knowledgeable in the area. |
|
322 |
Chair Krummel |
Points out there may be savings to other counties if
they took this on. |
|
327 |
Rep. Farr |
Notes there is an additional cost to the program but
that cost savings will be realized to taxpayers and to DHS. |
|
337 |
Rep. Nelson |
Believes it is difficult to distinguish which
veterans deserve the service. Reiterates her request for the bill to be all
inclusive. |
|
350 |
Rep. Farr |
Concurs. |
|
356 |
Rep Gallegos |
States they would be happy to work on it. |
|
358 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Supports the pilot program. |
|
365 |
Chair Krummel |
Notes his mother is a veteran and that they have
availed to use some of the services and receive some benefits resulting in an
overall savings to the DHS of Washington. |
|
391 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies the veteran services officers |
|
395 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Explains on the county organization. |
|
403 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Assumes some counties contract with others. Asks
Rep. Farr about the issue in terms of Lane County. |
|
415 |
Rep. Farr |
Responds. |
|
TAPE 65, A |
||
|
003 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Poses question regarding Lane County. |
|
004 |
Rep. Farr |
Wishes to get him a definitive answer on the issue. |
|
006 |
Rep. Gallegos |
Offers the situation in Eugene in facilitating the
services. |
|
016 |
Chair Krummel |
Recesses work session on 3609. Opens work session on
HB 3114. |
|
HB 3114
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
021 |
Rep. Betsy Close |
House District 15. Testifies in favor of HB 3114. |
|
030 |
Chris Negahbani |
Testifies in favor of HB 3114 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
060 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks Rep. Close about the -3 amendments (EXHIBIT E) regarding patriotic
organizations. |
|
065 |
Rep. Close |
Refers the committee to information on patriotic
organizations (EXHIBIT F). |
|
070 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Speak on patriotic organizations. |
|
080 |
Rep. Close |
States the -3 amendments are not what was intended,
and requests the committee consider the bill without them. |
|
090 |
Chair Krummel |
Responds regarding the amendments. |
|
097 |
Rep. Close |
Notes the -3 amendments were much broader than
anticipated. |
|
100 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies the use of US code. |
|
107 |
Rep. Close |
Concurs. |
|
112 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if the bill without amendments would retain the
intent. |
|
116 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Voices concerns with constitutionally of the bill.
Thinks that with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act there may also be a
conflict. |
|
143 |
Cindy Hunt |
Legislative Counsel Office (LC). |
|
148 |
Chair Krummel |
Explains the concern with the changes in -3
amendments. |
|
166 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Voices concern with lines 8-10 of as they may have
constitutional problems and with lines 4 and 5 of the -3 amendments
additionally. |
|
176 |
Hunt |
Responds with regard to federal law including NCLB
provisions. Notes that if a school district goes against the laws, it risks
losing federal funding. Does not necessarily see a constitutional problem
with HB 3114. Explains the intent pf the -3 amendments. Believes
constitutional concerns may be present with regard to the Oregon
Constitution. |
|
232 |
Rep. Close |
Asks Ms. Hunt about the groups the law would apply
to. |
|
235 |
Hunt |
Answers concerning the inclusion of various youth
group and original federal law. |
|
252 |
Rep. Close |
Appears that the original bill would adhere to the
constitution |
|
273 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Wonders if the school district could then limit the
times groups meet. |
|
277 |
Hunt |
Concurs and explains school districts allowances for
groups. |
|
281 |
Rep. Nelson |
Expresses curiosity about lines 8-10 of the
amendments regarding school hours being used for youth groups. |
|
297 |
Hunt |
Answers the concern may be a different issue not
necessarily covered by federal law. Explains it is a decision for the school
districts and may be different than current school policies. |
|
323 |
Rep. Nelson |
Recommends upon possible amendments that the
reference be stricken from the bill. |
|
332 |
Hunt |
Replies it was not included in the original bill |
|
336 |
Rep. Close |
Adds it was not the intent either. |
|
340 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments. |
|
345 |
Rep. Nelson |
Wonders if the ‘anti-bully’ law would law would
entertain the issues. |
|
356 |
Hunt |
Explains it is not something necessarily addressed
by federal law and it would be a choice for school districts. |
|
371 |
Rep. Nelson |
Believes every school district was asked to adopt a
policy on that. |
|
377 |
Rep. Close |
Notes every group who break the law can be
prohibited under law. |
|
413 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Clarifies his understanding of the bill. States he
would like to see some local control on the issue. |
|
TAPE 64, B |
||
|
007 |
Rep. Close |
Explains the bill says the choice to deny access
exists. |
|
015 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies the Title 36 law was limited to high schools. |
|
020 |
Hunt |
Concurs, but notes that NCLB applies to all grades. |
|
029 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if Title 36 additionally limits groups. |
|
033 |
Hunt |
Concurs and adds that an open forum is required for
all groups to meet under Title 36. |
|
035 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies that groups not listed can be included on
the list of patriotic and national organizations. |
|
045 |
Hunt |
Answers that all youth groups can be included under
law, under Title 36 is a different issues. |
|
051 |
Rep. Close |
Requests the committee stay with the original bill. |
|
052 |
Chair Krummel |
Confirms. |
|
054 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks about Corvallis School District’s current
policy. |
|
058 |
Hunt |
Answers with her knowledge of the current policy. Believes
the district would be fine by the bill. |
|
064 |
Rep. Wirth |
Requests a synopsis of policy without the amendment.
|
|
066 |
Hunt |
Assumes the policy in Corvallis would not change. |
|
070 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks what changes school districts would need to
make. |
|
073 |
Rep. Close |
Believes there is a fee that is not being collected. |
|
083 |
Rep. Wirth |
Clarifies that under the bill, schools could not
prevent meetings of groups such as White Supremacists. |
|
089 |
Rep. Close |
Responds there is no problem as long as groups are
within the law. |
|
092 |
Rep. Kitts |
Agrees with Rep. Close that the groups are a ‘gray
area’. Asks if the bill excludes anyone from coming into the schools as long
as they are youth groups. States he does not wish to exclude groups he
disagrees with. |
|
105 |
Hunt |
Answers it is ‘all or nothing’. Says she does not
know of any school districts who have chosen the latter. |
|
114 |
Rep. Kitts |
Recites the wording as ‘to allow’. Clarifies the
bill would preempt inclusion. |
|
117 |
Hunt |
Notes the wording later in the bill would not. |
|
126 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks how the policy will be released and asks how
schools will be expected to perform this. |
|
130 |
Hunt |
Notes that if the Superintendent of Public Instruction
finds out about non-compliance, she can conduct an investigation and hearing,
and stop funds. |
|
143 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if there is anything to prevent citizens from
checking on the policy. |
|
145 |
Hunt |
States she does not see a reason. |
|
151 |
Chair Krummel |
Remarks that would always be the case. |
|
154 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks how compliance would be found. |
|
157 |
Hunt |
Responds that if a complaint comes up, schools
generally choose to comply. Notes one exception where state funds were
withheld. |
|
170 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies who would have standing. |
|
175 |
Hunt |
Believes a school board could hear complaints.
Informs she is unsure of a standing issue with the superintendent. |
|
180 |
Rep. Nelson |
Recalls legislation from last session that opened all
school facilities are open to all schools for use. |
|
190 |
Hunt |
States she is unsure of the law, but will check. |
|
197 |
Rep. Wirth |
Understands there are currently no schools in
violation. |
|
200 |
Rep. Close |
Responds that to her knowledge there are no
violations. |
|
203 |
Chair Krummel |
Recesses work session on HB 3114. Opens work session
on HB 3573. |
|
HB 3573
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
217 |
Rep. Jackie Dingfelder |
House District 45. Explains -2 amendments (EXHIBIT G). |
|
254 |
Chair Krummel |
States his understanding of the impact. |
|
254 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Ensures there will be only minor impact due to
private funding. |
|
259 |
Rocky Johnson |
Director, Community Action Team. Testifies in favor
of HB 3573 (EXHIBIT H). Requests the
subsequent referral be rescinded as private funds will be sought and the
Governor has been notified. |
|
269 |
Rep. Prozanski |
States a desire to move the bill to Ways and Means.
Confirms Mr. Johnson’s statements. |
|
271 |
Johnson |
Confirms. |
|
273 |
Rep. Kitts |
Suggests rescinding the referral may be placing the
‘cart before the horse’. |
|
282 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
States it would be difficult to raise the funds
without the bill. Adds that by expanding the partnership allowed by the bill,
funds can be achieved. |
|
301 |
Rep. Kitts |
Respectfully disagrees with raising funds after the
fact, although he supports the concept. |
|
314 |
Johnson |
Responds that he has no doubt the funds will be
raised. |
|
321 |
Rep. Nelson |
Speaks on her concerns for hunger in Oregon.
Understands that there are funds already available. |
|
341 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
Responds she would be happy to look into the fund
suggestions. |
|
361 |
Rep. Nelson |
Voices concern for the legislature having to do form
a task force when agencies should be. |
|
371 |
Adrienne Sexton |
Legislative Fiscal Office (LFO). |
|
383 |
Chair Krummel |
Informs Ms. Sexton the proponents would like to
rescind the subsequent referral and send the bill to the floor. Requests
input on this. |
|
393 |
Sexton |
States she has compared the -2 amendments to the
bill. |
|
400 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests what will happen if sufficient funds are
not raised. |
|
404 |
Sexton |
Explains the Governor would have to draw from funds
available if funds are not achieved. |
|
TAPE 65, B |
||
|
007 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies a claim cannot be placed unless Governor
gives his authority. |
|
011 |
Sexton |
Speaks on the permissive nature of the bill. Believes
it could be a policy decision on the part of the Governor. Notes additional
language applies that future appropriations could be allowed by the emergency
fund. Refers the committee to section one and notes a discrepancy as the
commission would not be a functioning budget entity. |
|
044 |
Rep. Dingfelder |
States the Governor’s Office was spoken with this
morning and they do not wish to put a burden on his budget. |
|
055 |
Chair Krummel |
Provides suggestions for the bill. |
|
059 |
Rep. Kitts |
Clarifies a vote will not occur on the floor. |
|
062 |
Chair Krummel |
Negates. |
|
064 |
Sexton |
Offers LFO assumes that the Governor’s Office could
go to the Emergency Board and that the bill therefore need not go to Ways and
Means. |
|
079 |
Rep.
Prozanski |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3573-2 amendments dated
4/14/03. |
|
082 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
085 |
Rep. Prozanski |
MOTION:
Moves HB 3573 to the floor with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation
and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and Means BE RESCINDED. |
|
090 |
Rep. Kitts |
Voices concerns that a commission will be looking at
the problem of hunger. Will vote yes in committee, but not necessarily on the
floor. |
|
099 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Understands the -2 amendments allow the commission
to generate funds in a not-for-profit sense. |
|
105 |
Rep. Kitts |
Does not feel there is sufficient evidence the funds
will be raised. Prefers the money is raised first. |
|
110 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments that for the past four years she has worked
to end hunger in the state as it is her most aggressive concern. Believes the
Oregon Hunger Task Force should be ended, and that an agricultural network
should be created. Remarks further her hope that the commission ends hunger. |
|
135 |
|
VOTE:
4-2-1 AYE: 4 - Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Prozanski NAY: 2 - Wirth, Krummel EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. DINGFELDER will lead discussion
on the floor. |
|
140 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3573. Opens work session
on HB 3380. |
|
HB 3380
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
145 |
Fred VanNatta |
Testifies on HB 3380. Refers committee to -2 and -5
amendments on the bill (EXHIBITS I &
J). Provides written testimony by Rep. Tom Butler on the measure (EXHIBIT K).. Explains the -5 amendments.
|
|
187 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if the states will be obligated in the event of
a default. |
|
193 |
VanNatta |
Does not believe the state will be obligated. Continues
testimony. Speaks on the provision of the -2 amendments. |
|
243 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies it is for all semi-independent agencies. |
|
249 |
VanNatta |
Concurs. |
|
252 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Questions the fees involved. |
|
255 |
VanNatta |
Responds that fees are self-supported. Encourages
adoption of the -2 and -5 amendments. |
|
264 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies the agencies |
|
274 |
VanNatta |
Responds that statute includes licensing boards. |
|
285 |
Rep. Nelson |
Explains her issue is that boards need to purchase
real property. |
|
292 |
VanNatta |
Less expensive to operate that way |
|
296 |
Rep. Nelson |
Explains her reasons for questioning. Understands
the boards function for their membership. Asks about board membership voting.
Thinks the first amendment could be violated. |
|
321 |
VanNatta |
Responds funded licensing boards pay fees to finance
the board which in turn rents or buys real property. |
|
341 |
Rep. Wirth |
Poses situation, asks if semi-independent boards and
commission are benefiting in borrowing money for property. |
|
359 |
VanNatta |
Does not know if it will benefit them. |
|
375 |
Rep. Wirth |
Requests what occurs if a board is abolished. |
|
381 |
VanNatta |
Answers regarding foreclosure. |
|
386 |
Rep. Wirth |
Clarifies there is no liability. |
|
388 |
VanNatta |
Affirms. |
|
389 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Refers to lines 15-19 of HB 3380 on payment for a
board. Voices concern that DAS has control and that state could be liable. |
|
TAPE 66, A |
||
|
003 |
VanNatta |
Notes there will be changes in the Senate to delete
subsection line 17. Explains the reasoning. |
|
023 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies part of -5 he would like to take out in the
Senate. |
|
027 |
VanNatta |
Answers he does not believe states will be liable
for debt. |
|
035 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Supports the bill, but wants to ensure clarification
of the state involvement by this evening. |
|
040 |
Rep. Nelson |
Thinks there is a challenge. |
|
045 |
Chair Krummel |
Informs the committee of his intentions. States LC
will be present this evening on the bill. Recesses the work session on HB
3380. |
|
053 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if the committee should vote on HB 2410. |
|
055 |
Chair Krummel |
Informs it will be voted when the committee
reconvenes. Recesses the committee at 10:52 AM. |
|
TAPE 67, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Krummel |
Reconvenes the meeting at 4:24 PM. Reopens the work
session on HB 3609. |
|
HB 3609
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
005 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3609. Notes there are no amendments.
|
|
006 |
Rep.
Mabrey |
MOTION: Moves HB 3609 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
|
017 |
Rep. Nelson |
Voices disappointment that the bill would be moved
or passed as it discriminates against veterans. Believes the bill is an
injustice and a disgrace. |
|
024 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Sympathizes with Rep. Nelson’s statements. Does not
think there is the money to implement the project statewide. |
|
040 |
Rep. Nelson |
Wonders if the bill will have a further referral to
Ways and Means. |
|
049 |
Chair Krummel |
Does not think the bill has a further referral to
Ways and Means and points out the subsequent referral could be added in the
Senate. Thinks the sponsors of the bill are attempting to validate the
program by using the three counties. Says he does not think there is anything
preventing counties from implement the programs themselves. |
|
070 |
|
VOTE:
5-1-1 AYE: 5 - Kitts, Mabrey, Prozanski, Wirth, Krummel NAY: 1 - Nelson EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. FARR & REP. GALLEGOS will
lead discussion on the floor. |
|
075 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3609. Opens work session
on HB 2739. |
|
HB 2739
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
085 |
Rep. George Gilman |
House District . Explains the two amendments to HB
2739 (EXHIBITS L & M). Believes there may be a problem with the -1
amendment but encourages it be passed to the Senate. Explains the -2 amendments
offer something altogether. |
|
111 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies the amendments to be passed. |
|
114 |
Rep. Gilman |
Concurs. |
|
117 |
Doug Tindall |
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Explains
the -2 amendment will help to build a new maintenance station. |
|
129 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if the -2 amendment will expedite the process. |
|
132 |
Tindall |
Concurs. |
|
133 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if ODOT is comfortable with the -1 amendments. |
|
134 |
Tindall |
Responds the -1 amendments have no impact on ODOT. |
|
135 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2739-1 amendments dated 4/8/03. |
|
137 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION:
Moves to ADOPT HB 2739-2 amendments dated 4/9/03. |
|
142 |
Rep. Nelson |
Recalls there was a request for a list of the state
owned land. |
|
146 |
Chair Krummel |
Concurs that was a request. |
|
154 |
Rep. Kitts |
Answers it was. |
|
158 |
Rep. Nelson |
Notes Division of State Lands (DSL) did not provide
the list. Questions why the committee is hearing from ODOT on the matter. |
|
164 |
Chair Krummel |
Thinks the -2 amendments can expedite the process
while still maintaining the relating to clause. |
|
175 |
Rep. Nelson |
Clarifies an addition to the bill under -2 amendments. |
|
180 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2739 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
204 |
Rep. Nelson |
Recalls the previous discussion on the bill and
believes there is no real way to evaluate it currently. States she is unsure
of how to proceed. |
|
217 |
Chair Krummel |
Believes the committee will rely on agency
determination of the use of the land. Thinks it creates a way for the agency
to substantiate the need to own property. |
|
231 |
Rep. Wirth |
Clarifies the bill would authorize and establish a
presumption that it is not in the public interest to maintain the property. |
|
239 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Knows that in county government properties were deeded
as open space. Expresses the belief that the bill is a mechanism to allow department
heads to determine the use and the need for the land. |
|
263 |
Rep. Nelson |
Notes another issue is of who receives the money
from the land. Voices concern that there may be many questions on the house
floor. |
|
281 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks Rep. Gilman where the money is distributed. |
|
284 |
Rep. Gilman |
Replies that it is primarily the Common School Fund.
Notes he is not an authority. |
|
292 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks who gets the funds. Recalls information
discussed in the March 20 meeting. |
|
312 |
Chair Krummel |
Explains the issue for working the bill as the deadline
is today. |
|
326 |
Rep. Nelson |
Asks if it could be referred to another committee |
|
330 |
Chair Krummel |
Offers to do either. |
|
332 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Offers a partial answer to the question |
|
342 |
Rep. Nelson |
Notes some of the property was easement. |
|
347 |
Chair Krummel |
Notes there are details to address. |
|
353 |
Rep. Wirth |
Understands the bill would do more than facilitate
property. Believes it establishes a presumption that the land is surplus. |
|
367 |
Rep. Prozanski |
States he will support the bill in committee. |
|
370 |
|
VOTE:
5-1-1 AYE: 5 - Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Prozanski, Krummel NAY: 1 - Wirth EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. GILMAN will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
381 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 2739. Opens work session
on HB 3380. |
|
HB 3380
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
395 |
Chuck Smith |
Oregon State Treasury. Addresses issue. Explains
they are fine with the amendments (EXHIBITS
I & J). |
|
415 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks if the treasury is comfortable with the -5
amendments. |
|
417 |
Smith |
Affirms and states the treasury is neutral on the
bill. |
|
TAPE 66, B |
||
|
005 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Recalls his earlier concern on control over the
property. Understands the intent of the proponents. |
|
022 |
Smith |
Notes there is a member in the audience who can
answer that. |
|
025 |
Christine Chute |
Oregon Department of Justice, Attorney General’s
Office. Responds to Rep. Prozanski’s earlier concerns. Does not see a
problem. Explains the process that would occur. |
|
048 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies the agencies will not obligate the states
to incur costs on agency purchases. |
|
054 |
Chute |
Affirms. |
|
056 |
Rep. Nelson |
Notes the agency also includes the children’s trust
fund. Believes that does not fit it with the other agencies and boards. |
|
065 |
Chute |
Believes the trust fund is the only semi-independent
agency on the list. States she has limited knowledge of the agency. |
|
073 |
Rep. Nelson |
States she has a problem with the wording. |
|
078 |
Chute |
States they are listed in statute specifically.
Lists all boards included by name. |
|
095 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on the relating to clause and thinks the
relating clause does not apply. |
|
102 |
Chute |
Refers to statute to answer her question. Adds
appraisers board to list of semi-independents. |
|
111 |
Rep. Nelson |
States that her concern is that semi-independent
boards will abuse the first amendment rights and adds there is no protection
for the use of the money. |
|
132 |
Chute |
Offers to talk to her further. |
|
135 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 3380-2 amendments dated 4/9/03. |
|
140 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION:
Moves to ADOPT HB 3380-5
amendments dated 4/16/03. |
|
143 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
Rep. Kitts |
MOTION:
Moves HB 3380 to the floor
with a DO PASS AS AMENDED recommendation. |
|
149 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 1 - Avakian |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. BUTLER will lead discussion on
the floor. |
|
155 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3380. Opens work session
on HJR 19. |
|
HJR 19
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
156 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HJR 19. Notes -1 amendments (EXHIBIT N). |
|
170 |
Rep. Jeff Kropf |
House District 17. Testifies in favor of HJR 19 (EXHIBIT O). Refers the committee to
the graph on page two of his testimony to explains the economic security
fund. Explains his reasoning for bringing the issue forward. |
|
264 |
Rep. Krummel |
Comments. |
|
269 |
Rep. Kropf |
Responds that under the constitutional concept there
could be a mechanism to comply with the hope of the voters. |
|
276 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Clarifies his approach and his intent with the bill
for monies to go to education. Interprets Rep. Kropf’s statements. |
|
299 |
Rep. Kropf |
Explains that would not be the effect of the legislation
and that his staff has worked with the Legislative Revenue Office (LRO). Relays
the information he has received from LRO regarding the kicker. Offers he is
open to suggestions on making this a more viable idea. |
|
340 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on Rep. Kropf’s concern for the taxpayers.
Thinks there are some refinements to be done in the area for state business. |
|
362 |
Rep. Kropf |
Reiterates he is more than willing to embrace ideas
for the bill. |
|
376 |
Rep. Wirth |
Asks if there is any priority base for the rainy day
fund and asks what those funds can be used for. |
|
385 |
Rep. Kropf |
Answers the stability fund would always be the first
fund accessed. |
|
TAPE 67, B |
||
|
003 |
Rep. Kropf |
Continues the education stability fund should not be
utilized first for funds |
|
007 |
Chair Krummel |
Urges work on the bill to continue. |
|
012 |
Rep Kropf |
Appreciates the consideration. |
|
016 |
Rep. Wirth |
Wonders about the fiscal impact. |
|
027 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks about the charge that once again hands of the
legislature could be tied to make laws and balance state spending. |
|
025 |
Rep. Kropf |
Offers that constitutional cap can be avoided with a
large majority vote, comments on the savings that could have been incurred
had the leg invested the money. Believes that the legislature will not have
exercised good judgment if it does not set money aside. |
|
049 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HJR 19. Opens work session on
HB 3219. |
|
HB 3219
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
052 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HB 3219. Notes the subsequent referral
to Ways and Means. |
|
061 |
Ozzie Rose |
Confederation of School Administrators (COSA). Asks
the committee to not move HB 3219. Objects to any use of state school fund
budget for new programs. |
|
093 |
John Marshall |
Oregon School Boards Association (OSBA). States he
concurs with Mr. Rose. Notes there are 28 alternative programs that are
funded by the school district in Portland. Thinks those programs are as
useful as the one located in Bend. Does not think a funding mechanism should
be used t for one. |
|
119 |
Chuck Bennett |
COSA. Concurs. |
|
125 |
Rep. Nelson |
Does not know of an alternative school in Oregon
with the success rate the Oregon Youth Challenge Program has. Asks if it
would be more prudent to place money into a successful program instead of
monies placed in the general fund. |
|
150 |
Marshall |
Does not doubt that the other programs are
successful as well. Submits that each of the other 28 programs may also be as
successful. Explains the issue is that one program schools d not be singled
out and funded at the expense of others. |
|
163 |
Rep. Nelson |
Responds that is not her point. Reiterates that
there are students that ‘do not function without discipline’. Believes
students are helped in the program and the public schools should be relieved
of the burden. Elaborates on the need for the program. |
|
195 |
Rose |
Concurs that the type of program is good for some
kids. Explains the funding process. Objects to the cut in the state school
fund budget to fund one program. |
|
213 |
Rep. Mabrey |
Asks Mr. Rose about the term ‘adjudicated’ children.
|
|
221 |
Rose |
Affirms. |
|
228 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3219 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior
reference. |
|
231 |
Chair Krummel |
Requests he withdraw his motion. |
|
237 |
Rep. Kitts |
Withdraws
motion. |
|
240 |
Ralph Groener |
AFSCME. Testifies in favor of HB 3219. Provides his
own situation. Notes the program is statewide and includes every county. |
|
292 |
Chair Krummel |
Asks Mr. Groener if he thinks it would be
appropriate because it is a statewide program. |
|
300 |
Groener |
Affirms and lists demographics. |
|
306 |
Chair Krummel |
Notes the school fund issues being the appropriateness
as it is an alternative program. |
|
320 |
Groener |
Adds that students return to the school system
successfully. Sees differences in the program as it is military based. Thinks
it should qualify for the funding |
|
343 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if programs should be funded at the same level. |
|
349 |
Groener |
Believes funding at 2.0 would be fine from his point
of view. |
|
353 |
Greg Warnock |
Oregon Veterans Association (OVA). Provides statistics
on funding for the program (EXHIBIT P).
States OVA supports the program. Offers he has a son in the program
currently to illustrate that the program is an academic one. |
|
415 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HB 3219 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior
reference. |
|
TAPE 68, A |
||
|
002 |
Chair Krummel |
States he would like to send the bill to Ways and Means
as funding needs to be discussed. |
|
011 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments on the OYA program versus other alternative
programs. States he will vote ‘yes’ in committee for the program. Believes
that funding should be at the same level. |
|
024 |
Rep. Nelson |
Comments on the program and its usefulness. Believes
the program is important. Offers personal experience. Thanks Col. Caldwell
and his colleagues. |
|
038 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Avakian, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
045 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HB 3219. Reopens work session
on HB 3114. |
|
HB 3114
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
048 |
Chair Krummel |
States there are constitutional issues with the
measure. Closes work session on HB 3114. Opens work session on HM 4. |
|
HM 4 –
WORK SESSION |
||
|
053 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HM 4. Explains the bill. |
|
064 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HM 4 be sent to the floor with a BE
ADOPTED recommendation. |
|
076 |
Rep. Prozanski |
States he will not be supporting the memorial. Comments
on the areas that funding could be better utilized. |
|
092 |
|
VOTE:
4-1-2 AYE: 4 - Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Krummel NAY: 1 - Prozanski EXCUSED: 2 - Avakian, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. KNOPP will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
096 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HM 4. Opens work session on HM
5. |
|
HM 5 –
WORK SESSION |
||
|
098 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HM 5. |
|
|
Don Schellenberg |
Oregon Farm Bureau. Submits written testimony on HM
5. |
|
105 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HM 5 be sent to the floor with a BE
ADOPTED recommendation. |
|
106 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Does not agree with the memorial. Comments on the
corporate taxation. States he would like to see tax equity. |
|
115 |
Rep. Nelson |
States anything that can be done for citizens to
keep money is good. |
|
120 |
Chair Krummel |
Comments on the estate tax. Supports the memorial. |
|
130 |
|
VOTE:
4-1-2 AYE: 4 - Kitts, Mabrey, Nelson, Krummel NAY: 1 - Prozanski EXCUSED: 2 - Avakian, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. KNOPP will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
134 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HM 5. Opens work session on
HM 6. |
|
HM 6 –
WORK SESSION |
||
|
136 |
Patrick Brennan |
Reads SMS on HM 6. |
|
141 |
Rep. Kitts
|
MOTION: Moves HM
6 be sent to the floor with a BE ADOPTED recommendation. |
|
146 |
Rep. Prozanski |
States the memorial seems to benefit everyone. |
|
151 |
Rep. Nelson |
Supports the memorial. |
|
154 |
|
VOTE:
5-0-2 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote Aye. EXCUSED: 2 - Avakian, Wirth |
|
|
Chair Krummel |
The motion CARRIES. REP. KNOPP will lead discussion on the
floor. |
|
162 |
Chair Krummel |
Closes work session on HM 6. Notes HM 8 will not be
moved at this time. |
|
166 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Provides notice of possible minority reports on HM 4
and HM 5. |
|
172 |
Brennan |
Offers protocol for the filing of minority reports. |
|
183 |
Chair Krummel |
Clarifies the rules for filing. |
|
188 |
Brennan |
Restates
rules for filing minority reports. |
|
193 |
Chair Krummel |
Adjourns meeting at 6:03 PM. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2410-6, Staff, 4 pp
B
– HB 3609, Rep. Mary Gallegos, 12 pp
C
– HB 3609, Rep. Mary Gallegos, 5 pp
D
– HB 3114, Chris Negahbani, 1 p
E
– HB 3114-3, Staff, 1 p
F
– HB 3114, Rep. Betsy Close, 3 pp
G
– HB 3573-2, Staff, 2 pp
H
– HB 3573, Rocky Johnson, 1 p
I
– HB 3380-2, Staff, 8 pp
J
– HB 3380-5, Staff, 5 pp
K
– HB 3380, Rep. Tom Butler, 1 p
L
– HB 2739-1, Staff, 1 p
M
– HB 2739-2, Staff, 2 pp
N
– HJR 19-1, Staff, 4 pp
O
– HJR 19, Rep. Jeff Kropf, 2 pp
P
– HB 3219, Greg Warnock, 1 p
Q
– HM 5, Don Schellenberg, 2 pp