HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
January 31, 2003 Hearing Room D
9:00 A.M. Tapes 11
– 13
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jeff Kruse, Chair
Rep. Carolyn Tomei, Vice-Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Laurie Monnes Anderson
Rep. Ben Westlund
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Billy Dalto, Vice-Chair
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy
Thiele-Cirka, Administrator
Mara McGraw, Assistant
MEASURE HEARD: HB 2164 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2171 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2192 – Public Hearing and Work
Session
HB 2165 – Public Hearing
HB 2244 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
||
|
Tape 11, A |
||||
|
006 |
Chair Kruse |
Calls meeting to order at 8:36 A.M. and opens a
public hearing on HB 2164. |
||
|
HB 2164
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||||
|
012 |
Sandy Thiele-Cirka |
Administrator. Summarizes bill. |
||
|
019 |
Sue Wilson |
Director, Health Licensing Agency. Provides written
testimony (EHIBIT A). Explains membership,
roles and authorities of Advisory Council on Hearting Aids. Provides
background on the measure. |
||
|
045 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Questions the current agency budget. |
||
|
049 |
Wilson |
Details budget and fees associated. |
||
|
061 |
Rep. Anderson |
Inquires on split vote of council regarding change. |
||
|
063 |
Wilson |
Responds the Council requested the bill be presented
to the Legislature. |
||
|
076 |
Fred Peters |
Consumer Member, Advisory Council on Hearting Aids.
Speaks to technical and professional aspects of council. Provides testimony
in support of HB 2164. |
||
|
104 |
Rep. Barker |
Comments on the current consumer representation on
board. |
||
|
111 |
John Brenneman |
Representing Oregon Hearing Society (OHS). Explains
span and role of OHS as group of hearing aid fitters. Notes problem solving efforts
within OHS. Notes OHS concerns with changing membership. |
||
|
158 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Questions issues brought to council. |
||
|
161 |
Brenneman |
Defers to Sue Wilson. |
||
|
172 |
Wilson |
Responds the council establishes best practice,
performs test writing and clinical examination, competency standards and
consumer reporting. |
||
|
187 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Questions process of consumer input. |
||
|
190 |
Wilson |
Explains private versus public meeting process.
Reports consumer groups attend public meetings frequently. |
||
|
198 |
Rep. Tomei |
Question split vote. |
||
|
202 |
Wilson |
Explains inability to answer question. |
||
|
206 |
Rep. Barker |
Restates need for additional consumer on board. Requests
explanation regarding opposition to change in council membership. |
||
|
218 |
Wilson |
Defines opposition as it relates to the expertise of
professionals. |
||
|
235 |
Brenneman |
Explains issues related to shifting the balance on a
council. Refers to membership of
similar boards. |
||
|
261 |
Rep. Anderson |
Inquires on council’s role as peer review and/or
technical advisory services. Questions council’s ability to handle consumer
complaints. |
||
|
266 |
Wilson |
Explains agency role as an advisory role dealing
with enforcement and compliance. Clarifies council is not a peer review
board. |
||
|
283 |
Wayne Seely |
Self Help for Hard of Hearing People of Oregon. Provides
written testimony (EHINIT B). Explains
need for stronger representation on council. |
||
|
307 |
Chair Kruse |
Questions if concern is philosophical or to address
a specific problem with current council. |
||
|
313 |
Seely |
Readdresses issue of balance brought by consumer
input versus professional input. Explains focus of users toward assistive
technology and options used alongside hearing aids. |
||
|
360 |
Chair Kruse |
Comments on consumer role on board. Clarifies
Seely’s testimony. |
||
|
364 |
Seely |
Restates
position on representation of consumers. |
||
|
379 |
Chair Kruse |
Questions scope of board. |
||
|
389 |
Wilson |
Responds the council’s focus is consumer protection
and notes the council as advisory in nature. Explains uncertainty of impact
relating to change in membership. |
||
|
419 |
Rep. Tomei |
Inquires on the membership of similar councils and existing
representation by consumers. |
||
|
425 |
Wilson |
Reports more than one consumer as atypical. |
||
|
445 |
Rep. Barker |
Notes role of advisory board as it relates to
consumer protection. |
||
|
TAPE 12, A |
||||
|
023 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes public hearing on HB 2164 and opens work
session on HB 2164. |
||
|
HB 2164
– WORK SESSION |
||||
|
027 |
Rep. Anderson |
Notes functioning of current board operations. Suggests delaying change until need is
presented. |
||
|
052 |
Rep. Barker |
Comments council structure to protect consumers
would benefit from one additional consumer member. |
||
|
067 |
Rep.
Barker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2164 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and the SUBSEQUENT REFERRAL to the committee on Ways and Means
BE RESCINDED. |
||
|
083 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Reports council advisory in nature thus one
additional consumer would not upset the existing balance. |
||
|
100 |
Chair Kruse |
Comments on the lack of evidence relating to dysfunction
of council as it stands. |
||
|
121 |
Rep. Tomei |
Concurs. |
||
|
131 |
Rep.
Barker |
Withdraws
the motion. |
||
|
126 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes work session on HB 2164 and opens public
hearing on HB 2171. |
||
|
HB 2171
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||||
|
139 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 2171. |
||
|
151 |
Chair Kruse |
Explains position on bill. |
||
|
163 |
Jack Kenny |
Deputy Director, Oregon Housing and Community
Services. Submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
C). Introduces self. |
||
|
164 |
Betty Markey |
Housing Resources Manager, Oregon Housing and
Community Services. Introduces self. |
||
|
167 |
Kenny |
Details project services and budget needs. Details benefits of Oregon Affordable
Housing Tax Credit (OAHTC) funds. Defines specifications of OAHTC and need
for type of funding. |
||
|
244 |
Rep. Anderson |
Questions interest rate requirements. |
||
|
249 |
Kenny |
Details components of rent pass-through in
pre-development loans as they relate to analysis of loan structure. |
||
|
262 |
Chair Kruse |
Comments in support of the addition of predevelopment
loans. |
||
|
275 |
Bill Van Vliet |
Executive Director, Network for Oregon Affordable Housing
(NOAH). Provides written testimony (EXHIBIT D). Provides background of
NOAH. Testifies in support of HB 2171. |
||
|
433 |
John Blatt |
Association of Oregon Community Development
Organizations. Testifies in support
of HB 2171 (EXHIBIT E). Explains
partnerships in affordable housing and the relationship between state and
private funding. |
||
|
TAPE 11, B |
||||
|
005 |
Blatt |
Continues testimony. Details current costs of
predevelopment and the savings related to development costs. |
||
|
026 |
Peter Hainley |
Executive Director, CASA of Oregon. Defines scope of projects in regard to
affordable housing for Oregon farm workers.
Reports proposed changes would help with initial risk capital and
early loan funds. Describes stimulation of healthy competition between
banks. |
||
|
050 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes public hearing on HB 2171 and opens work
session on HB 2171. |
||
|
HB 2171
– WORK SESSION |
||||
|
052 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Proclaims potential conflict of interest. Comments
in support of HB 2171. |
||
|
054 |
Rep. Monnes
Anderson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2171 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and BE REFERRED to the Committee on Revenue by prior
reference. |
||
|
072 |
Rep. Anderson |
Comments on solutions provided by bill. |
||
|
080 |
Rep. Westlund |
States support of bill. |
||
|
091 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote AYE. EXCUSED: 1 - Dalto |
||
|
|
Chair Kruse |
The motion CARRIES. |
||
|
098 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes work session on HB 2171 and opens public
hearing on HB 2192. |
||
|
HB 2192
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||||
|
100 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 2192. |
||
|
111 |
Terri Johansen |
Assistant Commissioner, Department of Community
Colleges and Work Force Development. Testifies in support of HB 2192 and
offers amendment language. |
||
|
134 |
Ron Adams |
Director, Oregon Youth Conservation Corps (OYCC). Testifies
in support of HB 2192 and submits written testimony (EXHIBIT F). Describes
scope of project and funding issues and the participants and restrictions as
they relate to the bill. |
||
|
187 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Questions OYCC status as a day or residential
program. |
||
|
190 |
Adams |
Details day and residential programs. |
||
|
201 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes public hearing on HB 2192 and opens work
session on HB 2192. |
||
|
HB 2192
– WORK SESSION |
||||
|
205 |
Rep.
Westlund |
MOTION: Moves HB 2192 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation. |
||
|
209 |
Rep. Westlund |
Comments in support of HB 2192. |
||
|
228 |
Rep. Anderson |
Comments in support of HB 2192. |
||
|
262 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote AYE. EXCUSED: 1 - Dalto |
||
|
|
Chair Kruse |
The motion CARRIES. REP. WESTLUND will lead discussion on
the floor. |
||
|
276 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes work session on HB 2192 and opens public
hearing on HB 2165. |
||
|
HB 2165
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||||
|
284 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes HB 2165. |
||
|
303 |
Kathleen Haley |
Executive Director, Oregon Board of Medical Examiners
(BME). Provides background on HB 2165
and submits written testimony (EXHIBIT
G). Explains request for bill and proposed amendments. |
||
|
348 |
Rep. Tomei |
Clarifies amendment objective. |
||
|
353 |
Haley |
Concurs amendment speaks specifically to time limits
on reporting. Explains amendment also
defines term official event. |
||
|
358 |
Rep. Tomei |
Inquires on hospital reporting requirements. |
||
|
362 |
Haley |
Explains requirements and reiterates objective to
create time limit on reporting. |
||
|
373 |
Rep. Tomei |
Inquires on lack of sanctions for not reporting. |
||
|
374 |
Haley |
Relates benefits of self reporting. |
||
|
387 |
Rep. Barker |
Questions opposition to bill. |
||
|
391 |
Haley |
Unable to answer question. |
||
|
399 |
Bruce Bishop |
Representing Oregon Association of Hospital and
Health Systems (OAHHS). Reports concerns about drafting and provisions as
basis for opposition. |
||
|
TAPE 12, B |
||||
|
001 |
Bishop |
Continues explanation and details concerns with HB
2165 as written. |
||
|
075 |
Bishop |
Continues discussion. |
||
|
129 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Inquires on BME position as it relates to OAHHS
support of the bill. |
||
|
131 |
Bishop |
Comments on OAHHS position. |
||
|
133 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Questions ability to accomplish object via rules
versus legislation. |
||
|
137 |
Bishop |
Defers to Haley. Explains limitations in creating administrative
rules. |
||
|
147 |
Steven Kafaury |
Oregon Acupuncture Association. Comments on the lack
of clarity of the bill language. Explains concern over acupuncturist’s
responsibility regarding bill. . |
||
|
167 |
Edward Johnston |
Lincoln County, Oregon. Defines proposed changes as
they relate to personal medical experiences. Relates consumer rights regarding
details in bill and the bill be referred to voters. |
||
|
245 |
Chair Kruse |
Suggests interested parties work toward acceptable amendment
language. Closes public hearing on HB 2165 and opens public hearing on HB
2244. |
||
|
HB 2244
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||||
|
256 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes bill. |
||
|
276 |
Lorraine Duncan |
Immunization Program Manager, Health Services,
Office of Family Health, DHS. Provides written testimony in support of HB
2244 (EXHIBIT H). Explains
Immunization ALERT program. |
||
|
347 |
Rep. Monnes Anderson |
Comments in support and value of program. Questions usage/access
by providers. |
||
|
364 |
Duncan |
Explains fee is related to usage for business purposes.
Explains proposed fee. |
||
|
399 |
Rep. Anderson |
Inquires on budget.
|
||
|
403 |
Duncan |
Explains budget figures. |
||
|
405 |
Rep. Anderson |
Inquires on HEDIS. |
||
|
408 |
Duncan |
Reports HEDIS is an organization which provides quality
improvement measures to providers. Submits written testimony of Sara
Brickner, Douglas County Immunization Coalition(EXHIBIT I). |
||
|
TAPE 13, A |
||||
|
007 |
Rep. Alan Bates |
House District 5, and physician. Explains scope of
immunization project and registry benefits. |
||
|
069 |
Paige Sipes-Metzler |
Chair of Oregon Immunization Alert Advisory
Committee. States organization’s support of HB 2244. |
||
|
084 |
Edward Johnston |
Relates concerns with bill regarding fees charged to
public and confidentiality of public data bases. Emphasizes provision for
protection of citizens. |
||
|
140 |
Chair Kruse |
Reports issues from previous legislative session
related to clarity of fees. Suggests clarity of language to define who will
and will be charged fees and who will qualify for voluntary fees. |
||
|
159 |
Rep. Anderson |
Offers interpretation of bill’s language. |
||
|
164 |
Chair Kruse |
Questions term authorized user and speaks to intent
of requirement. |
||
|
171 |
Rep. Westlund |
Comments on difference between terms may and shall. |
||
|
172 |
Chair Kruse |
Comments on terminology approved by legislative
counsel. Closes public hearing on HB 2244 and adjourns meeting at 10:45 A.M. |
||
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2164, written testimony, Sue Wilson, 1 p.
B
– HB 2164, written testimony, D. Wayne Seely, 1 p.
C
– HB 2171, written testimony, Jack Kenny, 3 pp.
D
– HB 2171, written testimony, Bill Van Vliet, 5 pp.
E
– HB 2171, written testimony, John Blatt, 3 pp.
F
– HB 2192, written testimony, Ron Adams, 8 pp.
G
– HB 2165, written testimony, Kathleen Haley, 2 pp.
H
– HB 2244, written testimony, Lorraine Duncan, 3 pp.
I
– HB 2244, written testimony, Sara Breckner, 4 pp.