HOUSE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
March 17, 2003 Hearing Room D
8:30 A.M. Tapes 53 – 55
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Jeff Kruse, Chair
Rep. Billy Dalto, Vice-Chair
Rep. Carolyn Tomei, Vice-Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Ben Westlund
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Laurie Monnes Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Sandy
Thiele-Cirka, Committee Administrator
Mara McGraw, Committee Assistant
MEASURES: HB 2121 – Work Session
HB 2244 – Work Session
HB 2566 – Work Session
HB 2517 – Work Session
HB 2684 – Public Hearing
HB 2519 – Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 53, A |
||
|
005 |
Chair Kruse |
Calls meeting to order at 8:39 A.M. Submits 2121-3
amendments, dated 3/13/03 (EXHIBIT A)
and opens work session on HB 2121. |
|
HB 2121
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
009 |
Rep. Dalto
|
MOTION: Moves to SUSPEND the rules for the purpose
of reconsidering vote on HB 2121. |
|
014 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
015 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
017 |
Rep.
Westlund |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which
"HB 2121 was moved to the floor WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION as to passage and
BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means by prior reference." |
|
027 |
Rep. Tomei |
Notes previous vote. Speaks to constituents opinions
that bill is unnecessary. Comments on fiscal impact. |
|
028 |
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
029 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
033 |
Rep.
Westlund |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which
"ADOPT HB 2121-2 amendments dated 02/06/03." |
|
040 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
041 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
042 |
Rep.
Westlund |
MOTION: Moves to RECONSIDER the vote by which
"ADOPT HB 2121-1 amendments dated 02/06/03." |
|
045 |
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
046 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
048 |
Rep.
Westlund |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2121-1 amendments dated
2/6/03. |
|
053 |
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
055 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
056 |
Rep.
Westlund |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2121-2 amendments dated
2/17/03. |
|
058 |
|
VOTE: 6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
059 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
060 |
Sandy Thiele-Cirka |
Administrator. Summarizes -3 amendments dated
3/13/03 (EXHIBIT A). |
|
070 |
Rep.
Westlund |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2121-3 amendments dated
3/13/03. |
|
073 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
074 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
075 |
Rep. Dalto
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2121 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means
by prior reference. |
|
081 |
|
VOTE:
4-2-1 AYE: 4 - Anderson, Dalto, Westlund, Kruse NAY: 2 - Barker, Tomei EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
086 |
Chair |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
087 |
Chair |
Closes work session on HB 2121 and opens work session
on HB 2244. |
|
HB 2244
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
089 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summaries bill and -1 amendments dated 3/10/03 (EXHIBIT B). |
|
107 |
Chair Kruse |
Explains intent to move bill. |
|
113 |
Rep. Tomei |
Inquires on fiscal impact. |
|
114 |
Chair Kruse |
Explain fee bills are referred to the Committee on Ways
and Means. |
|
123 |
Rep.
Barker |
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2244-1 amendments dated
3/10/03. |
|
124 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
125 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
126 |
Rep.
Barker |
MOTION: Moves HB 2244 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means
by prior reference. |
|
130 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote AYE. EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
135 |
Chair |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
136 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes work session on HB 2244 and opens work
session on HB 2566. |
|
HB 2566
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
138 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes bill and -2 amendments dated 3/10/03 (EXHIBIT C). |
|
157 |
Rep. Tomei
|
MOTION: Moves to ADOPT HB 2566-2 amendments dated
3/10/03. |
|
159 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
161 |
Chair Kruse |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
162 |
Rep. Tomei
|
MOTION: Moves HB 2566 to the floor with a DO PASS
AS AMENDED recommendation and BE REFERRED to the committee on Ways and Means
by prior reference. |
|
165 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote AYE. EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
166 |
Chair Kruse |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
172 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes work session on HB 2566 and opens work session
on HB 2517. |
|
HB 2517
– WORK SESSION |
||
|
174 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes bill. |
|
183 |
Chair Kruse |
Notes there are no objections from the Department of
Human Services (DHS). Comments HB 2517 codifies the current direction of DHS. |
|
180 |
Rep.
Anderson |
MOTION: Moves HB 2517 to the floor with a DO PASS
recommendation and be placed on the CONSENT CALENDAR. |
|
185 |
|
VOTE:
6-0-1 AYE: In a roll call vote, all members present vote AYE. EXCUSED: 1 - Monnes Anderson |
|
188 |
Chair |
The motion CARRIES. |
|
198 |
Chair Kruse |
Closes work session on HB 2527 and opens public
hearing on HB 2684. |
|
HB 2684
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
201 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes bill. |
|
218 |
Genoa Ingram |
Representing Oregon Academy of Audiology. Submits
written testimony in support of bill (EXHIBIT
D). Addresses issues of dual licensure. Notes provisions that act as
incentives to maintain second license. |
|
310 |
Ingram |
Continues presentation on HB 2684. Discusses
consumer protection. Comments on equity between audiologists and hearing aid
dealers. |
|
405 |
Duane Anderson |
Audiologist. Submits written testimony in support of
bill (EXHIBIT E). Offers history
of audiology legislation. Speaks to experience, continuing education and
qualifications of audiologists. Comments on organizations that sell and
service hearing aids. |
|
TAPE 54, A |
||
|
036 |
Wendy Chapman |
President, Oregon Academy of Audiology. Submits
written testimony in support of bill (EXHIBIT
F). Comments that the dispensing requirement is in line with audiologists’
training and experience. |
|
096 |
John McCulley |
Representing Oregon Speech-Language and Hearing
Association. Submits written testimony in support of bill (EXHIBIT G). Refers to requirements
and training for audiologists. Notes board and rules emphasize consumer
protection. |
|
139 |
Evan Evans |
Audiologist. Submits written testimony in support of
bill (EXHIBIT H). Concurs with
previous testimony. |
|
150 |
Rep. Anderson |
Questions the differences between the dual licensure. |
|
161 |
Evans |
Notes audiology rules and regulations are more
restrictive and adequate for consumer protection. States the dispensing license
relates to business practices. |
|
185 |
Rep. Anderson |
Questions the number of audiologists dispensing
hearing aids. |
|
189 |
Evans |
Responds he does not have data. Addresses physicians
that hire a non-licensed audiologist to dispense. |
|
206 |
Scott Austin |
Hearing Aid Specialist and member, Advisory Council
on Hearing Aids, Health Licensing Office, and Department of Human Services
(DHS). Submits written testimony in opposition to bill (EXHIBIT I). Addresses two state agencies offering duplicate
administration of licensing. Notes rise in fees as result of elimination of
second licensure. Comments on reasoning for dual licensure. States the current
system is effective. |
|
260 |
John Brenneman |
Representing the Oregon Hearing Society. Offers
testimony in opposition to bill. Speaks to consistency in oversight and
administration. |
|
269 |
McCulley |
Suggests exempting clinical and research
audiologists who do not dispense hearing aids. |
|
283 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions the impact of fee reductions and increases
for dealers. |
|
294 |
McCulley |
Notes fees are not significant enough to put dealers
out of business. Compares dual licensure to dual motorcycle licensure. Presents
information specific to dispensing hearing aids. Notes continuing education
requirements. |
|
314 |
Rep. Barker |
Inquires on educational hours required for
licensure. |
|
315 |
McCulley |
Reports nine hours. |
|
324 |
Rep. Tomei |
Inquires on dealers who are also audiologists. |
|
329 |
Sue Wilson |
Director, Health Licensing Office, DHS. Submits
background information (EXHIBIT J).
Explains figure reported on audiologists impacted by bill. |
|
343 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions the hearing aid return policy. |
|
348 |
Wilson |
Explains contract between consumer and dispenser
regarding return policy. Notes change of policy to administrative rule. |
|
376 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions if unlicensed audiologists have the same
return rights. |
|
380 |
Wilson |
Reports licensed audiologists receive return rights
and non-licensed audiologists do not receive return rights. States that
consumers are not guaranteed reimbursement from non-licensed audiologists. |
|
396 |
Rep. Tomei |
Requests clarification on consumer and dealer
protection. |
|
399 |
Wilson |
Explains audiologist would not have return rights
unless licensed. |
|
401 |
Rep. Tomei |
Inquires on licensure tracking. |
|
415 |
Wilson |
Explains lack of data regarding change in licensure
status to establish clear idea of revenue impact. |
|
440 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions the use of collected fees. |
|
441 |
Wilson |
Explains fees support the programs. |
|
453 |
Rep. Dalto |
Inquires on hearing aid return policy. |
|
461 |
Wilson |
Offers to submit figures at later date. Notes
consumer protection is priority. |
|
TAPE 53, B |
||
|
032 |
Austin |
Offers estimate that 80 percent of consumers receive
refund if dissatisfied. Explains exceptions to return policy. |
|
044 |
Rep. Dalto |
Questions how many complaints are filed regarding
refund policy. |
|
048 |
Austin |
Explains refunds are the least frequent
complaint. |
|
058 |
Rep. Barker |
Questions difference between dealers and
audiologists refund policy. |
|
060 |
Austin |
Addresses legal aspect to protections. |
|
069 |
Chair Kruse |
States intent and concerns. Closes public hearing on
HB 2684 and orders committee to stands at ease. |
|
094 |
Chair Kruse |
Reconvenes and opens public hearing on HB 2519. |
|
HB 2519
– PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
096 |
Thiele-Cirka |
Summarizes bill. |
|
102 |
Grover Simmons |
Representing Adult Care Providers of Oregon. Provides
testimony in support of bill. Discusses negotiations with stakeholder groups.
Notes four sections agreed upon to remove. Speaks to constitutional
protections. Submits proposed amendment language (EXHIBIT K). |
|
230 |
Joan England |
Adult Foster Home Provider. Relates personal
experiences regarding foster home residents and current policies. |
|
314 |
Simmons |
Inquires on suggestion to increase rate. |
|
316 |
England |
Reports the state suggested rate increase to deal
with situation. |
|
322 |
Simmons |
Notes the state can not regulate rate but can offer
suggestions. Points to multiple violations reported by England’s testimony as
proof of need for bill. |
|
352 |
Joan Gallegly |
President, Adult Care Providers of Oregon. Submits
testimony in support of bill (EXHIBIT
L). Lists provider complaints and outcomes. Speaks to provider rights. |
|
TAPE 54, B |
||
|
041 |
Rep. Barker |
Questions the frequency of resident conflicts. |
|
042 |
Gallegly |
Explains resident to resident conflict. |
|
044 |
Rep. Anderson |
Inquires on differences in authority between bill
and Senior and People with Disabilities (SPD) Department |
|
048 |
Simmons |
Note resident rights are posted. Explains provider
rights and requirements created by bill. |
|
068 |
Rep. Anderson |
Inquires on sections being proposed for removal from
the bill. |
|
072 |
Simmons |
Explains efforts to work with interested parties. |
|
079 |
Rep. Anderson |
Comments on changes to bill. |
|
090 |
Helen Liere |
Chair, Legislative Committee, Governors Commission
on Senior Services. Submits testimony in opposition to bill (EXHIBIT M). Addresses current
provider and resident rights. States legislation is not needed. |
|
147 |
Cindy Hannum |
Office of Licensing and Quality Care, SPD, DHS. Submits
testimony in opposition to bill (EXHIBIT
N). States support of provider rights. Addresses tone of bill in regard
to resident-provider relations. Speaks to Simmons amendments. |
|
265 |
Chair Kruse |
Comments on private living quarters. Notes Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in regard to bill. |
|
280 |
Rep. Tomei |
Questions what information is provided to providers. |
|
284 |
Hannum |
Explains information should be relevant to resident
care. |
|
295 |
Rep. Tomei |
Requests example. |
|
296 |
Hannum |
Reports issues that do not present danger to
provider or other residents |
|
315 |
Rep. Tomei |
Inquires on possible change to amendment. |
|
318 |
Hannum |
Agrees to amendment change. |
|
320 |
Chair Kruse |
Comments on physician requirements to report under
HIPAA. |
|
331 |
Rep. Barker |
Inquires on provider rights to evict resident. |
|
340 |
Hannum |
Explains regulations and process in regard to
involuntary move out. Notes resident’s right to contest move out and request
a hearing. |
|
372 |
Rep. Barker |
Inquires on bill and related changes to eviction. |
|
376 |
Hannum |
Explains objection to second proposed change as
referenced back to third |
|
391 |
Liere |
Explains language from resident’s point of view. |
|
400 |
Rep. Barker |
Notes language speaks to pertinent information
rather than all information. |
|
412 |
Rep. Anderson |
Addresses reasoning for posting rules and regulations.
Notes case workers can explain rules to both resident and provider. |
|
436 |
Hannum |
Addresses issues related to Medicaid and private-pay
residents. Notes lack of recourse for
vulnerable residents and power dynamic between resident and provider. |
|
TAPE 55, A |
||
|
042 |
Hannum |
Continues presentation on HB 2519. Notes provider
concern over Ombudsman activity and regulatory activity. Addresses need for
privacy when filing a complaint to protect resident. |
|
057 |
Rep. Anderson |
Comments on posting of provider rights. |
|
058 |
Hannum |
Explains issue is related to fear in filing
complaints against care givers. |
|
068 |
Rep. Anderson |
Inquires on Ombudsman and licensor access. |
|
072 |
Hannum |
Reports resident requests for anonymity when filing
complaints. |
|
079 |
Rep. Anderson |
Relates personal experience with adult foster care
system. Addresses provider rights to request resident move outs. |
|
100 |
May Dasch |
Volunteer, Alzheimer’s Association. Submits
testimony in opposition to bill (EXHIBIT
O). Identifies specific objections and addresses the need for anonymity
in reporting complaints. |
|
134 |
Jim Davis |
Representing the Alzheimer’s Association and Member,
Gray Panthers. Offers testimony in opposition to bill. Notes current provider
rights under current legislation therefore provider bill of rights is
unnecessary. |
|
165 |
David Nebel |
Citizens Coalition for Quality Long-term Care. Offers
testimony in opposition to bill. Comments on providers special treatment and
need for equitable scrutiny. Comments on lack of clarity in results of bill.
Notes potential fiscal impact to create review process. |
|
234 |
Meredith Cote |
Director, Office of Long-term Care Ombudsman. Explains
agency’s informal process of complaint resolution. Notes the need for
provider rights but questions need for bill of rights. Explains history
behind creation of resident rights. Discusses specific concerns with bill.
Explains issues of confidentiality in investigating complaints. Notes lack of
clarity in language of bill. |
|
327 |
Rep. Tomei |
Inquires on opposition. |
|
330 |
Cote |
Clarifies opposition in regard to advising provider
on reason for visit. |
|
338 |
Rep. Anderson |
Comments on need for both resident and provider
rights. |
|
343 |
Cote |
Relates complication related to specific case of
provider assault. |
|
367 |
Rep. Anderson |
Offers further comments in case of provider assault. |
|
372 |
Cote |
Comments on resolution that satisfies both provider
and resident. |
|
416 |
Chair Kruse |
Comments on issues raised during hearing. Closes public
hearing on HB 2519 and adjourns meeting at 10:53 A.M. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2121, -3 amendments, dated 3/13/03, staff, 1p.
B
– HB 2244, -1 amendments, dated 3/10/03, staff, 1 p.
C
– HB 2566, -2 amendments, dated 3/10/03, staff, 1 p.
D
- HB2684, written testimony, G. Ingram, 6 pp.
E
– HB 2684, written testimony, D. Anderson, 2 pp.
F
– HB 2684, written testimony, W. Chapman, 1 p.
G
– HB 2684, written testimony, J. McCulley, 5 pp.
H
– HB 2684, written testimony, E. Evans, 1 p.
I
– HB 2684, written testimony, S. Austin, 2 pp.
J
– HB 2684, written testimony, S. Wilson, 1 p.
K
– HB 2519, written testimony, G. Simmons, 2 pp.
L
– HB 2519, written testimony, J. Gallegly, 2 pp.
M
– HB 2519, written testimony, H. Liere, 2 pp.
N
– HB 2519, written testimony, C. Hannum, 1 p.
O
– HB 2519, written testimony, M. Dasch, 1 p.