HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
February 20, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 P.M. Tapes 50
-52
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Gordon Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Floyd Prozanski
Rep. Lane Shetterly
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Taylor, Counsel
Nancy Massee, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD:
HB 2086 Public Hearing
HB 2206 Public Hearing
Introduction of LC 1486, LC 2430, LC
2543,
LC 2893, LC 2948, and LC 2949
HB 2207 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
Tape 50, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Williams |
Opens meeting at 1:00 P.M. Opens public hearing on HB 2086. |
|
HB 2086
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
020 |
Kelly Peterson |
Pacific Northwest Regional Office of the Humane
Society of the United States submits (EXHIBIT
A). Introduces Chief Jim Harper,
Dallas Police Department who submits testimony and testifies in support of HB
2086 (EXHIBIT B); Lieutenant Randy
Covy, Oregon Animal Control Council. Explains it is legal to raise fighting cocks in Oregon, although
cockfighting is a Class A misdemeanor. |
|
083 |
Peterson |
Continues explaining HB 2086. Cock fighting also Involves the illegal
crime of gambling, and is often associated with illegal drug possession, and illegal
firearms possession. |
|
109 |
Chief Jim Hobson |
Oregon Association of Chiefs of Police. Supports HB 2086. Describes the process
needed for a search warrant. Describes the large number of enforcement
officers needed to conduct a search and seizure. Explains civil liberties are protected. |
|
150 |
Detective Jason Alexander |
Woodburn Police Department. Describes his personal experience investigating
a Woodburn site that had over 100 gamecocks. Describes the physical condition
of the birds. Shows pictures of the
birds. Describes the large amount of
money handled at these fights. |
|
230 |
Lt. Randall Covy |
Humane Society Animal Control Council. Supports HB 2086. Describes how cocks are
fitted with razor slashers and altered for fighting and the drug
paraphernalia found around the sites. Says HB 2086 follows language in the dog
fighting bill, and protects lawful
bird activities. It also allows law enforcement the tools to prosecute illegal
acts associated with cockfighting. |
|
375 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Refers to the 2001 Legislative Session and a
previous cockfighting bill. |
|
380 |
Chair Williams |
Answers that this is the same bill. |
|
385 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Refers to page 6, line 13. Compares the “dog” bill
language and asks if “fighting bird” should be defined in HB 2086. |
|
430 |
Chair Williams |
Says not changing it leaves it to the discretion of
the prosecutor. |
|
450 |
Covy |
Refers to conversation and agrees that it allows
discretion. |
|
020 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Says it does not need to be built into the law. |
|
TAPE 51, A |
||
|
040 |
Marcia Keith |
Oregon Veterinary Medical Association. Supports HB
2086 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT C).
Gary Hendel submits testimony in support of HB 2086 (EXHIBIT D). |
|
058 |
Cheryl Brittain |
Oregon Animal Welfare Alliance. Supports HB 2086 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT E). Wayne Geiger submits
testimony support of HB 2086 (EXHIBIT
F). |
|
077 |
Ed Clarkson |
Humane Society of the Willamette Valley. Describes personal experience in
discovering cockfighting’s secretive nature.
Supports HB 2086. Describes
other kinds of crimes that are related to animal cruelty. |
|
117 |
Rhonda Urben |
Salem citizen. Submits testimony and testifies in
support of HB 2086 (EXHIBIT G). Lives across the street from where 200
fighting cocks are kept. Describes
how the noise is so loud that it impinges on the tranquil life of the
community. |
|
175 |
Lloyd McClure |
Medford Citizen. Supports HB 2086 and submits testimony
(EXHIBIT H). Lives in neighborhood
where cocks are raised. Describes cruelty issues and the noise in the
neighborhood. Explains his property
is no longer saleable. Describes how animal control and law enforcement are
tied. |
|
211 |
Andrea Kozil |
Salem Citizen. Describes 2001 Legislative Session’s
failure to pass out this bill.
Supports HB 2086. Asks the
committee to follow through with this bill. |
|
230 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Supports HB 2086. Supports the animal welfare issue. |
|
260 |
Larry Mathews |
Silverton, Oregon.
Oregon Gamefowl Breeders Association.
Opposes HB 2086 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT I). Describes raising birds for breeding purposes in
other countries. Describes feather
marketing industry for fly tying. Describes how trimming of the fowls is for
“show.” Describes spur cutting for safety purposes. Describes the negative
economic impact HB 2086 would cause to the gamefowl breeders industry. |
|
342 |
Mathews |
Continues explaining the game breeders
industry. Explains how, under HB 2086,
bird breeders could be arrested for having these birds. |
|
425 |
Dr. Francine Bradley |
University of California at Davis, Poultry Science
Department. Explains that poultry producers
are concerned about HB 2086. States
the bill does not define “probable cause.”
Describes birds used for poultry exhibition and used for cockfighting.
HB 2086 definition of “cock fight” is incorrect in poultry definitions. Term of “fighting” is vague. Birds are
dubbed in the poultry industry. Removal of comb, waddles, and ear lobes is a management
practice. Shaving of feathers around
vents to improve fertility and reduce parasites. Refers to equipment noted in
bill. |
|
TAPE 50, B |
||
|
040 |
Dr. Bradley |
Continues explaining the poultry breeder’s interest in
this bill. Opposes HB 2086. |
|
059 |
Leslie Melvill |
Oregon Poultry Farmers’ Association and the Oregon Poultry
Industries Council. Serves on numerous councils and boards relating to the
poultry industry. Serves on Disease Control Force Newcastle epidemic in
California. Helped draft the Animal Welfare Amendment Act (1976). Explains federal disease control programs.
Believes that HB 2086 can destroy the poultry industry in Oregon. Suggests the Oregon Department of
Agriculture needs to look at this bill. |
|
200 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks Dr. Bradley about “probable cause.” Has there
been a better bill than this in another state? |
|
214 |
Dr. Bradley |
Answers if the purpose is to outlaw the activity,
then one should be found guilty based on engaging in that activity, not
relying on someone you think might be doing that. |
|
220 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Asks if any state has better legislation in this
country regarding cockfighting. |
|
221 |
Dr. Bradley |
Replies she has California legislation which is not
perfect, but is a little tighter. |
|
223 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Comments on the impact of HB 2086 on legitimate
breeders and growers. Asks about the bill prohibiting dog fighting. Refers to “cockfight” definition. Points out language in HB 2086 that
narrows the intent. Does not believe
this bill is the death of all game fowl breeders in the state. |
|
224 |
Dr. Bradley |
Comments how general law enforcement and the public
are more familiar with dogs than farm fowl.
Continues describing birds that are used by other cultures and their
multi-uses. |
|
317 |
Chair Williams |
States that this bill is to prohibit knowingly
participating in cockfighting. Believes cockfighting is an inappropriate and
inhumane activity. |
|
345 |
Melvill |
Discusses summary. Suggests Section 1, number 3 needs to be amended. |
|
355 |
Chair Williams |
Points out the definition. Says the “knowingly” standard has to be proven by law
enforcement. |
|
374 |
Mathews |
Asks if there is a work session scheduled. |
|
377 |
Chair Williams |
Answers, a work session has not been scheduled. |
|
376 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks Dr. Bradley if the California laws have caused
problems for the exotic bird breeding industry. |
|
384 |
Dr. Bradley |
Replies that many breeders have been harassed and
raids have been made causing breeders to retain legal counsel. |
|
399 |
Greg Addington |
Oregon Farm Bureau. Introduces Barry Bushue. Points out that the bureau does not support
cockfighting. Explains some issues with HB 2086. Feels that the bill could produce a hardship on poultry
farmers. |
|
e446 |
Barry Bushue |
President Oregon Farm Bureau. Opposes HB 2086. Does not support cockfighting. States the bill will cause problems to
farmers. |
|
TAPE 51, B |
||
|
040 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Clarifies part of HB 2086. |
|
060 |
Bushue |
Points out concerns with HB 2086. States we should use
the laws in place to control cockfighting.
Describes how farm products have to be protected. |
|
086 |
Mike Baker |
Game fowl owner. Opposes HB 2086. Describes sparring
roosters. |
|
140 |
Shane Holst |
Opposes HB 2086.
Does not believe there is the right to tell people whether they can
raise game birds. |
|
173 |
Staff |
Submits testimony from various interested parties (EXHIBITS J through O). |
|
174 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2086. Opens public hearing on HB 2206. |
|
HB 2206
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
177 |
Bill Taylor |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 2206 that creates crime of abuse of memorial to dead in
first degree. Explains the -1 amendment
(EXHIBIT S). |
|
228 |
Shannon Applegate |
Supports HB 2206 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT P). Describes how memorials are stolen and
sold on E-Bay. Describes vandalism to
pioneer headstones. |
|
296 |
Carol Surrency |
Oregon Historic Cemeteries Association. Supports HB 2206 and submits testimony
(EXHIBIT Q). Gives examples of vandalism in historic
Oregon cemeteries. |
|
387 |
Joseph Lyons |
Executive Director, Oregon Historical Cemeteries
Association. Submits testimony and testifies in support of HB 2206.(EXHIBIT R). Gives personal
experience working with historic cemeteries and describes vandalism. |
|
462 |
Rep. Krummel |
Refers to page 2.
Refers to -1 amendment and submits (EXHIBIT S). |
|
TAPE 52, A |
||
|
030 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks how the amount of damages is determined in
vandalism. |
|
050 |
Applegate |
Responds about fines and restitution. Says experts would be needed to put a
value on historic headstones. |
|
055 |
Rep. Krummel |
Comments that a fine and restitution could be whatever
the court deems. |
|
070 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Points out that all cemeteries are victims, not just
pioneer cemeteries. Supports the
concept; is concerned with the classification of the crime and the fines impugned. |
|
119 |
Chair Williams |
Recesses the public hearing on HB 2206 to introduce
LC 1486, LC 2430, LC 2543, LC 2893, LC 2948, and LC 2949 (EXHIBIT T) |
|
INTRODUCTION
OF COMMITTEE BILLS |
||
|
120 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves LC's: 1486, 2430, 2543, 2893, 2948 AND 2949 BE INTRODUCED as
committee bills. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
8-0-1 EXCUSED: 1 – Macpherson |
|
121 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
122 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Re-convenes public hearing on HB 2206. |
|
HB 2206
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
157 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Discusses the issue of fines and restitution in HB
2206. |
|
176 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Suggests adding a directive to the court, “the court shall consider . . .” |
|
180 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Refers to “historical value” to be considered. |
|
190 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Comments on damage to pioneer cemeteries in Josephine
County. |
|
205 |
Applegate |
Explains this is an ongoing survey that shows
partial statistics. |
|
216 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Closes public hearing on HB 2206. Opens public hearing on HB 2207. |
|
HB 2207
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
240 |
Jana Tindall |
Parks and Recreation Department. Explains HB 2207
that authorizes the State Parks and Recreation Department to request
Department of State Police to provide criminal offender information about
subject individuals and submits testimony (EXHIBIT U). |
|
252 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if this action is only State Parks, or is this
a general authorization for any state agency. |
|
270 |
Tindall |
Specifically for the agencies included on page 5,
sub 17. |
|
272 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Comments that they are trying to standardize. Asks if this is the best way to accomplish
the goals. Refers to page 1, line 7,
says in order to protect vulnerable Oregonians, and now this would mean
anyone. |
|
303 |
Tindall |
Explains what people would be vulnerable to
employees. |
|
315 |
Rep. Prozanski |
Suggests that the legislature may want to encompass
all state employees’ background checks. |
|
345 |
Rep. Krummel |
Comments that this was for Department of Human Services
and Employment Department employees originally to protect vulnerable people
at the State Hospital and Fairview. Asks how this would affect the use of
inmates for maintenance. |
|
355 |
Tindall |
Answers those individuals are under supervision when
they are working. |
|
388 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Closes public hearing on HB 2207 and adjourns
meeting at 3:16 P.M. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– HB 2086, written testimony and news articles, Kelly Peterson, 20 pp
B
– HB 2086, letter, Jim Harper, 1 p
C
– HB 2086, letter, Marcia Keith, 1 p
D
– HB 2086, letter, Gary Hendel, 1 p
E
- HB 2086, letter, Cheryl Brittain, 1 p
F
– HB 2086, letter, Wayne Geiger, 1 p
G
– HB 2086, letter, Rhonda Urban, 5 pp
H
– HB 2086, written testimony, Loyd McClure, 1 p
I
– HB 2086, written testimony, Larry Mathews, 4 pp
J
– HB 2086, letter, Sgt. C Durbin, Staff, 1 p
K
– HB 2086, written testimony, Art Martinak, 1 p
L
– HB 2086, letter, Sarah Bleeden, 1 p
M
– HB 2086, letter, R. Stephen Atchison, 4 pp
N
– HB 2086, letter, Eileen Stark, 1 p
O
– HB 2086, letter, R. Stephen Atchison, 1 p
P
– HB 2206, written testimony, Shannon Applegate, 2 pp
Q
– HB 2206, written testimony, Carol Surrency, 2 pp
R
– HB 2206, written testimony, Joeseph Lyons, 1 p
S
- HB 2206-1, amendments, staff, 2 pp
T
– LCs 1486, 2430, 2543, 2893, 2948, 2949
U
– HB 2207, written testimony, Jana
Tindall, 2 pp