HOUSE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
February 27, 2003 Hearing Room 357
1:00 P.M. Tapes 59 - 61
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rep. Max Williams, Chair
Rep. Robert Ackerman, Vice-Chair
Rep. Gordon
Anderson, Vice-Chair
Rep. Jeff Barker
Rep. Jerry Krummel
Rep. Greg Macpherson
Rep. Lane Shetterly
MEMBER EXCUSED: Rep. Floyd Prozanski
STAFF PRESENT: Bill
Joseph, Cousel
Nancy Massee, Committee Assistant
MEASURE/ISSUES HEARD: Introduction of LC 1568, 3172, 3018,
3019
HB 2150 Public Hearing
HB 2155 Public Hearing
HB 2156 Public Hearing
HB 2342 Public Hearing
These minutes are in
compliance with Senate and House Rules.
Only text enclosed in quotation marks reports a speaker’s exact
words. For complete contents,
please refer to the tapes.
|
TAPE/# |
Speaker |
Comments |
|
TAPE 59, A |
||
|
004 |
Chair Williams |
Opens meeting at 1:10 p.m. Explains four LC’s to be introduced as committee measures (EXHIBITS A-D). |
|
INTRODUCTION
OF MEASURES |
||
|
006 |
Chair
Williams |
MOTION: Moves LC's: 1568, 3172, 3018, 3019 BE INTRODUCED as committee bills. |
|
|
|
VOTE:
6-0-3 EXCUSED: 3 - Anderson, Prozanksi, Shetterly |
|
008 |
Chair Williams |
Hearing no objection, declares the
motion CARRIED. |
|
010 |
Chair Williams |
Opens public hearing on HB 2150. |
|
HB 2150
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
020 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel.
Explains HB 2150 that specifies small estate procedures. |
|
059 |
Richard Mills |
Department of Human Services (DHS). Gives overview of HB 2150, HB 2155, and HB
2156. Clarifies HB 2150; supports HB
2150 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT E).
States that Section 3 should be
deleted. |
|
090 |
Chair Williams |
Confirms Section 3 should be deleted. |
|
175 |
Bruce Miller |
Judicial Department. Agrees that Section 3 should be
deleted. Supports HB 2150. |
|
186 |
Geoff Bernhardt |
Portland Attorney. Oregon State Bar, Elder Law
Section. Submits testimony (EXHIBIT F)
in opposition to HB 2150. Discusses how claims can be opened. |
|
244 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks about Section 2, is that where DHS is the
affiant. |
|
269 |
Bernhardt |
Responds the court certifies the copy. The bill
allows DHS to certify their own copies. |
|
277 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if a declaration is better than an
affidavit. Asks about the two- year
limitation. |
|
290 |
Mills |
Explains that there is a two-year limitation when a
creditor can request a court hearing if their claim has not been paid. Gives
example of what could happen. |
|
343 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Ask how many cases a year does DHS file as the
affiant. |
|
361 |
Mills |
Mr. Ryder says it is close to 75. |
|
410 |
Bernhardt |
Does not object to DHS certifying their own copies. Wants
to streamline the process for families. |
|
TAPE 60, A |
||
|
029 |
Bernhardt |
Says DHS indicated they are withdrawing section
three which is agreeable to them. |
|
035 |
Chair Williams |
Asks Mr. Joseph to check with Division of State
Lands (DSL). Asks for an amendment to
withdraw section three. |
|
040 |
Kenneth Ryder |
DHS. Gives example of request for a summary review
of administration of an estate. |
|
082 |
Bernhardt |
Explains concerns about extending the two-year time
limit for creditors’ claims. |
|
094 |
Rep. Macpherson |
Asks about allowing filing of an affidavit that
would only run two years. |
|
108 |
Bernhardt |
Says it would be possible with additional drafting
and an alternative of two years after the person’s death or a shorter but
sufficient amount of time for DHS to file. |
|
112 |
Ryder |
Responds that two years from date of death or 6 to 9
months from date of filing small estate affidavit would be acceptable. |
|
120 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2150. Opens public hearing on HB 2155. |
|
HB 2155
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
134 |
Bill Joseph |
Committee Counsel. Explains HB 2155 that authorizes
Department of Human Services (DHS) to bring action under certain conditions
to recover amount of assistance paid to a public assistance recipient. |
|
145 |
Richard Mills |
DHS. Submits
testimony in support of HB 2155 (EXHIBIT
G). Explains why this bill is needed.
|
|
224 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks how counterclaims are defended by DHS. |
|
230 |
Mills |
Responds that personal injury law is not his area of
expertise. |
|
253 |
Karl Goodwin |
Assistant Attorney General, DOJ. Answers regarding
issue preclusions; this does not impair the plaintiffs’ rights. Allows DHS to bring action for the amount
of medical expenses provided. |
|
285 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Explains why he thinks the recipient might be
precluded. Raises the issue of
counterclaims. |
|
304 |
Goodwin |
Replies the other party would have to raise that
defense against the plaintiff. |
|
310 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks if it is correct that when agency gives notice
to the recipient and after six months if the recipient has not initiated
action, the agency does that without anyone’s knowledge. |
|
322 |
Goodwin |
Answers that the department must give notice. |
|
315 |
Rep. Jenson |
Asks for clarification on the previous questions.
Asks if there is a countersuit, what happens. |
|
350 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Asks about lines 10 and 11 of the bill. |
|
TAPE 59, B |
||
|
001 |
Ruth Simonis |
Attorney and Co-chair of the Elder Law Legislative Subcommittee. Opposes HB 2155. Explains why she does not
support the bill as a whole. Agrees with parts of HB 2155 and submits
testimony in opposition to HB 2155 (EXHIBIT
H). |
|
026 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Asks about the department filing liens for recovery
purposes. |
|
032 |
Simonis |
Replies the concern might gain more reimbursement by
pursuing these claims. |
|
038 |
Vice Chair Ackerman |
Closes public hearing on HB 2155. Opens public hearing on HB 2156. |
|
HB 2156
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
040 |
Richard Mills |
DHS. Explains the necessity of HB 2156 which relates
to public assistance; creating new provisions, and amending ORS 205.246, and
submits testimony in support of the bill (EXHIBIT
I). |
|
087 |
Mills |
Continues giving examples of public assistance
recipients’ eligibility. |
|
100 |
Kenneth Ryder |
Estate Administrator, DHS. Discusses the -1 amendment,
Exhibit I. Explains concern for the change
in the bill from “transfer” to “sale.” |
|
135 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Comments that most of these transactions would not
go through a title company. |
|
149 |
Mills |
Comments it would not be enforceable. |
|
163 |
Susan Ford Burns |
Attorney, Oregon State Bar, Elder Law Section.
Submits testimony in opposition to HB 2156 (EXHIBIT J). Explains areas of concern. Says this bill will create a “hit list” for distressed property
investors and loan companies. |
|
210 |
Chair Williams |
Points out that elder abuse issues are going to be
dealt with through further legislation. |
|
220 |
Burns |
Points out problems that could occur with HB
2156. Discusses weakening bargaining
power and creating the “hit list.” |
|
240 |
Geof Bernhardt |
Attorney for elders. Adds that he is aware of DHS
problems in administrating estates; concern is with the “cloud” on the
property. Submits testimony in opposition to HB 2156 (EXHIBIT K). |
|
295 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks position of DHS and title insurance. Asks about
spending down by public assistance recipients and reinstatement of
recipients. |
|
303 |
Burns |
Explains that historically the title company requests
a written release from DHS. There are
then time extensions and increased costs. |
|
330 |
Mills |
Comments there is nothing for DHS to release; this
bill requires notifying DHS. |
|
366 |
Rep. Krummel |
Asks if a public assistance recipient can be forced
to sell their property. |
|
392 |
Mills |
Answers DHS cannot force a client to sell their
property. Explains excluded resources, which means their home. Explains
accountable resources, and how eligibility could be affected. |
|
TAPE 60, B |
||
|
020 |
Rep. Krummel |
Reiterates in cases where the recipient cannot
return to his home, and the family sells the property, the bill requests
notice to DHS, is that right? |
|
022 |
Mills |
Responds, that is correct. Comments in response to a
“hit list.” Points out that senior tax deferral lists are available to anyone
at the county courthouse. |
|
045 |
Bernhardt |
Mentions protections of DHS in reporting value of
assets by persons on public assistance. |
|
047 |
Mills |
Responds about a client who is in over-resource. |
|
092 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2156. Opens public hearing on HB 2342. |
|
HB 2342
PUBLIC HEARING |
||
|
103 |
Richard Mills |
Department of Human Services (DHS). Explains HB 2342
that allows claim to be made against estate of decedent at any time after
personal representative is appointed, and submits testimony in support of HB
2342 (EXHIBIT L). Discusses possible amendments to HB
2342. |
|
154 |
Bruce Miller |
Office of the State Court Administrator. Explains concerns with HB 2342. |
|
177 |
Geoff Bernhardt |
Attorney, Elder Law Section of Oregon State Bar.
Explains how valid claims are sought in creditor claim period. Evidence, other
than one’s word, of decedent’s wishes of disposal of property is needed.
Opposes HB 2342 and submits testimony (EXHIBIT
M). |
|
239 |
Rep. Shetterly |
Discusses what documentary evidence and testimony
are sufficient. Suggests wording in the statute to include both kinds of
evidence. |
|
280 |
Mills |
Asks to discuss the proposal with DOJ counsel. |
|
290 |
Vice Chair Anderson |
Asks what documents are used to support services. |
|
312 |
Mills |
Answers the records consist of microfiche lined
items showing date and service payment, with a code number. |
|
323 |
Chair Williams |
Asks Mr. Mills if the document is easily decipherable. |
|
322 |
Mills |
Replies that the microfiche is not readily
decipherable to the average person.
DHS creates an assistant summary to help clarify the records. |
|
329 |
Mills |
Gives examples when a deceased’s estate is opened more
than two years after death. Having a two-year limit has cost the department
money already. DHS often finds out after the fact that there are assets. |
|
391 |
Bernhardt |
States DHS knows when a recipient dies. |
|
436 |
Mills |
Replies that DHS does not always know that a
recipient has died. |
|
TAPE 61, A |
||
|
007 |
Bernhardt |
Objects stretching out an additional two years beyond
the present two years. |
|
012 |
Mills |
Explains the bill removes the two-year limitation.
It doesn’t say creditors have two more years. |
|
020 |
Chair Williams |
Closes public hearing on HB 2342. Adjourns meeting at 3:00 p.m. |
EXHIBIT
SUMMARY
A
– LC 1568, staff, 42 pp
B
– LC 3172, staff, 9 pp
C
– LC 3018, staff, 3 pp
D
– LC 3019, staff, 2 pp
E
– HB 2150, written testimony, R. Mills, 3 pp
F
– HB 2150, written testimony, G. Bernhardt, 1 p
G
– HB 2155, written testimony, R. Mills, 3 pp
H
– HB 2155, written testimony, R. Simonis, 1 p
I–
HB 2156, written testimony, R. Mills, 3 pp
J
– HB 2156, written testimony, S. Burns, 1 p
K
– HB 2156, written testimony, G. Bernhardt, 1 p
L
- HB 2342, written testimony, R. Mills, 3 pp
M
– HB 2342, written testimony, G. Bernhardt, 2 pp